[PATCH] Small patches to Configure.help for Alpha (2.2.18pre series)

2000-11-07 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
Here's the Configure.help patch for Alpha against the 2.2.18pre series. Alan, if you can find time to include this one, I'd appreciate it :-) diff -ur linux-2.2.18pre19/Documentation/Configure.help linux/Documentation/Configure.help --- linux-2.2.18pre19/Documentation/Configure.help Fri

[PATCH] Small patches to Configure.help for Alpha

2000-11-07 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
Rich Payne (API) and I have made a patch for Documentation/Configure.help to add some more systems to the list of Alphas. Since the original list was compiled, some of the newer system types were added, but not all. Also, the list wasn't as inclusive as it should've been (we've been getting

[PATCH] Small patches to Configure.help for Alpha

2000-11-07 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
Rich Payne (API) and I have made a patch for Documentation/Configure.help to add some more systems to the list of Alphas. Since the original list was compiled, some of the newer system types were added, but not all. Also, the list wasn't as inclusive as it should've been (we've been getting

[PATCH] Small patches to Configure.help for Alpha (2.2.18pre series)

2000-11-07 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
Here's the Configure.help patch for Alpha against the 2.2.18pre series. Alan, if you can find time to include this one, I'd appreciate it :-) diff -ur linux-2.2.18pre19/Documentation/Configure.help linux/Documentation/Configure.help --- linux-2.2.18pre19/Documentation/Configure.help Fri

Re: Compilation failure on Alpha with test8-pre[2-6]

2000-09-08 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > Yeah on most architectures you cant do an xchg of a 16 bit quantity. > Rusty has a patch: That's what I thought as well, at least for Alpha's case. Thanks...will try both patches and let you all know how it goes... C - To unsubscribe from this

Re: Compilation failure on Alpha with test8-pre[2-6]

2000-09-08 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > Yes, I can reproduce this with gcc-2.95.2 (compiles cleanly with 2.96). > Looks like older gcc doesn't like when output operand 5 listed > also as input. Hmm. > Simple swapping operands 4 and 5 makes gcc happy. Great. I'll apply the patch and see

Compilation failure on Alpha with test8-pre[2-6]

2000-09-08 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
While attempting to compile the 2.4.0test8-pre series on Alpha, I ran into the following problem in the drivers/block/xor.c modifications: gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/src/kernel/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mno-fp-regs -ffixed-8 -mcpu=ev5 -Wa,-mev6

Compilation failure on Alpha with test8-pre[2-6]

2000-09-08 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
While attempting to compile the 2.4.0test8-pre series on Alpha, I ran into the following problem in the drivers/block/xor.c modifications: gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/src/kernel/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mno-fp-regs -ffixed-8 -mcpu=ev5 -Wa,-mev6

Re: Where is test7-pre8?

2000-08-30 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Michael Peddemors wrote: > I usually get my sources from ftp.kernel.org but pre-8 isn't up. > Where is the earliest site that the development kernels come out? Try ftp.us.kernel.org. I fetched test8-pre1 yesterday from there. C - To unsubscribe from this list: send the