On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 10:30:19AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> --- Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Except they do, and without directories the
> > performance of your average filesystem is going to suck.
>
> Actually you would get a speed improvement. You hash
> the full name and get
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 10:30:19AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
--- Kyle Moffett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Except they do, and without directories the
performance of your average filesystem is going to suck.
Actually you would get a speed improvement. You hash
the full name and get the file
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:52:26PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Well, using pthreads and forking in them seems to trigger libc
> bugs (read: SIGSEGvs) here under certain conditions (happens,
> after I introduced signal handlers and using pthread_sigmask,
> I think), so hangs should be
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:52:26PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
Well, using pthreads and forking in them seems to trigger libc
bugs (read: SIGSEGvs) here under certain conditions (happens,
after I introduced signal handlers and using pthread_sigmask,
I think), so hangs should be definitely
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 02:35:56PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> So basically you are pointing out that there is now a sequencer reject in
> linux? Because this used to effect and wipe drives, but you are showing
> that Linux now does scsi commands check for execution on the /dev/sdxx?
Nope,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 01:15:46PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> Then run this and see if you live.
Well, I ran it, the disk lives. The typescript is appended below.
Interestingly, scsikiller didn't cream the partition table like I
expected. However the dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc certainly
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 12:32:08PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> The SCSI low-level format glue performed by the HOST gets destroyed
> If you write to LBA Zero.
This is simply not true. I write to SCSI disk's block 0 all of the time
and never loose data. Obviously, you can lose the partition
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 12:32:08PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
The SCSI low-level format glue performed by the HOST gets destroyed
If you write to LBA Zero.
This is simply not true. I write to SCSI disk's block 0 all of the time
and never loose data. Obviously, you can lose the partition
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 01:15:46PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
Then run this and see if you live.
Well, I ran it, the disk lives. The typescript is appended below.
Interestingly, scsikiller didn't cream the partition table like I
expected. However the dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc certainly
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 02:35:56PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
So basically you are pointing out that there is now a sequencer reject in
linux? Because this used to effect and wipe drives, but you are showing
that Linux now does scsi commands check for execution on the /dev/sdxx?
Nope, there
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:16:58AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> One of the ways this could be solved would be to impose bus ordering on the
> detection sequence.
> ...
On Solaris and Irix, there is an auxillary file in /etc that maps
the hardware path to a controller to a controller
11 matches
Mail list logo
