Re: ZFS with Linux: An Open Plea

On Tuesday 17 April 2007 09:47:32 Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Theodore Tso wrote: > [..] > > > Well, that was totally useless answer from the ZFS developers. What > > he should have told you is to contact Sun management, since they are > > the only ones who can decide whether or n

apm platform device cleanup

In checking a "make allmodconfig" I noticed that the apm device (arch/i386/kernel/apm.c) is still using the old pm_send_all setup - I know the fix is to add suspend/resume hooks but the apm code hasn't been touched since 2002 and isn't using the new device API (it doesn't even register, AFAICT,

Re: Style Question

On Sunday 11 March 2007 16:35:50 Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Mar 11 2007 22:15, Cong WANG wrote: > > Another question is about NULL. AFAIK, in user space, using NULL is > > better than directly using 0 in C. In kernel, I know it used its own > > NULL, which may be defined as ((void*)0), but it's _st

<    1   2   3