Re: O_DIRECT please; Sybase 12.5

2001-07-03 Thread Daryll Strauss
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 10:42:53AM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 02:39:00AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > > > It supports raw partitions, which is good; that might satisfy my > > boss (although the administration will be a pain, and I'm not > > sure whether it's really

Re: O_DIRECT please; Sybase 12.5

2001-07-03 Thread Daryll Strauss
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 10:42:53AM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 02:39:00AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: It supports raw partitions, which is good; that might satisfy my boss (although the administration will be a pain, and I'm not sure whether it's really supported

Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools]

2000-12-09 Thread Daryll Strauss
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:34:59PM -0500, David Feuer wrote: > At 08:12 PM 12/9/2000 -0600, Rene wrote: > >I think part of the problem is that there are other things labeled > >DANGEROUS that actually do work fairly reliably (offhand, I'm thinking > >off the IDE config stuff..). Perhaps it needs

Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools]

2000-12-09 Thread Daryll Strauss
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:34:59PM -0500, David Feuer wrote: At 08:12 PM 12/9/2000 -0600, Rene wrote: I think part of the problem is that there are other things labeled DANGEROUS that actually do work fairly reliably (offhand, I'm thinking off the IDE config stuff..). Perhaps it needs to