Some warnings at tdfxfb.c

This is on kernel 2.4.5. It's look like a long time has passed since this driver was modified. Haven't tested if works, but things like using char *name in tdfxb_init without initializing needs some fix. Is enough to do a kmalloc to get some free space? gcc -D__KERNEL__

Some warnings at tdfxfb.c

This is on kernel 2.4.5. It's look like a long time has passed since this driver was modified. Haven't tested if works, but things like using char *name in tdfxb_init without initializing needs some fix. Is enough to do a kmalloc to get some free space? gcc -D__KERNEL__

ov511 driver doesn't compile

On kernel 2.4.5, the ov511 usb driver shows a failure at compile time. const version is not defined. gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.5/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -DMODULE -c -o ov511.o

ov511 driver doesn't compile

On kernel 2.4.5, the ov511 usb driver shows a failure at compile time. const version is not defined. gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.5/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -DMODULE -c -o ov511.o

Re: looking for books

On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Xiong Zhao wrote: > hello.currently,i need to know the details about linux kernel,things > like how fork and pthread are implemented,how clone actually work and > so on.where can i get materials on these topics? > thanx Take a look on the new book from O'Reilly,

Re: looking for books

On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Xiong Zhao wrote: hello.currently,i need to know the details about linux kernel,things like how fork and pthread are implemented,how clone actually work and so on.where can i get materials on these topics? thanx Take a look on the new book from O'Reilly, Understanding

Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [PATCH] Single user linux

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Tomas Telensky wrote: > > But, what I should say to the network security, is that AFAIK in the most > of linux distributions the standard daemons (httpd, sendmail) are run as > root! Having multi-user system or not! Why? For only listening to a port > <1024? Is there any

Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [PATCH] Single user linux

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Tomas Telensky wrote: But, what I should say to the network security, is that AFAIK in the most of linux distributions the standard daemons (httpd, sendmail) are run as root! Having multi-user system or not! Why? For only listening to a port 1024? Is there any elegant