Hello Mark,
On 1/21/21 12:30 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hi Mark,
On 21.01.2021 16:44, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:41:59AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
On 18.01.2021 21:49, Mark Brown wrote:
Does this help (completely untested):
Sadly nope. I get same warning:
Try this
'17a0.rsc:rpmh-regulator-gfxlvl-pm8350_s5_level'
already present!
Avoid this race condition by holding the rdev->mutex lock inside
of regulator_resolve_supply() while checking and setting
rdev->supply.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
---
drive
On 10/2/20 2:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> I see things like this on my console:
>
> [1.684617] spmi spmi-0: PMIC arbiter version v5 (0x5000)
>
> and 'spmi' is the bus name I'm thinking about. But I think that's
> because there isn't a driver attached. Nothing prints for the 0-00
> device
On 10/1/20 11:51 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Mark Brown (2020-10-01 10:43:26)
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 05:07:20PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting David Collins (2020-09-22 15:04:18)
>>
>>>> This helps to disambiguate SPMI device regmaps from I2C o
Change the format of spmi bus device names from:
-
Example: 0-01
to this:
spmi-
Example: spmi0-01
This helps to disambiguate SPMI device regmaps from I2C ones
at /sys/kernel/debug/regmap since I2C devices use a very
similar naming scheme: 0-.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Change the format of spmi bus device names from:
-
Example: 0-01
to this:
spmi-
Example: spmi0-01
This helps to disambiguate SPMI device regmaps from I2C ones
at /sys/kernel/debug/regmap since I2C devices use a very
similar naming scheme: 0-.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Hello Saravana,
On 7/1/19 5:48 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
...
> TODO:
> - For the case of consumer child sub-nodes being added by a parent
> device after late_initcall_sync we might be able to address that by
> recursively parsing all child nodes and adding all their suppliers as
>
Hello Saravana,
On 6/27/19 7:22 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index 04ad312fd85b..8d690fa0f47c 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,72 @@ struct platform_device *of_find_device_by_node(struct
Hello Saravana,
On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
...
> Having functional dependencies explicitly called out in DT and
> automatically added before the devices are probed, provides the
> following benefits:
...
> - Supplier devices like clock providers, regulators providers, etc
> need
Hello Doug,
On 08/16/2018 01:07 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> I'll work on either adding more regulator_set_load() calls to clients
> or perhaps disabling the "regulator-allow-set-load" for a bunch of
> rails. David: presumably if we have a rail that we never need to be
> on-and-in-low-power-mode
Hello Doug,
On 08/16/2018 01:07 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> I'll work on either adding more regulator_set_load() calls to clients
> or perhaps disabling the "regulator-allow-set-load" for a bunch of
> rails. David: presumably if we have a rail that we never need to be
> on-and-in-low-power-mode
On 08/14/2018 04:56 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 2:59 PM, David Collins
> wrote:
>> On 08/14/2018 01:03 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:30 AM, David Collins
>>> wrote:>>> --- a/drivers/regulator/core
On 08/14/2018 04:56 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 2:59 PM, David Collins
> wrote:
>> On 08/14/2018 01:03 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:30 AM, David Collins
>>> wrote:>>> --- a/drivers/regulator/core
Hi,
On 08/14/2018 01:03 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:30 AM, David Collins
> wrote:>>> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
>>> @@ -732,6 +732,7 @@ static int drms_uA_update(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
&g
Hi,
On 08/14/2018 01:03 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:30 AM, David Collins
> wrote:>>> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
>>> @@ -732,6 +732,7 @@ static int drms_uA_update(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
&g
Hello Doug,
On 08/14/2018 10:06 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Not all regulator consumers call regulator_set_load(). On some
> regulators (like on RPMh-regulator) this could be bad since the
> regulator framework will treat this as if consumer needs no load.
> It's much better to assume that a
Hello Doug,
On 08/14/2018 10:06 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Not all regulator consumers call regulator_set_load(). On some
> regulators (like on RPMh-regulator) this could be bad since the
> regulator framework will treat this as if consumer needs no load.
> It's much better to assume that a
8,7 @@ static unsigned int
> rpmh_regulator_pmic4_bob_of_map_mode(unsigned int rpmh_mode)
> break;
> default:
> mode = REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID;
> + break;
> }
>
> return mode;
Reviewed-by: David Collins
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
8,7 @@ static unsigned int
> rpmh_regulator_pmic4_bob_of_map_mode(unsigned int rpmh_mode)
> break;
> default:
> mode = REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID;
> + break;
> }
>
> return mode;
Reviewed-by: David Collins
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
the final PMIC
regulator hardware state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
---
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160 +
.../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h| 36 +
2 files changed, 196
of enable state, voltage, and mode.
XOB supports manipulation of enable state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke
---
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh
lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/701
[13]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/13/687
[14]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1431
David Collins (2):
regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings
regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160
the final PMIC
regulator hardware state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
---
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160 +
.../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h| 36 +
2 files changed, 196
of enable state, voltage, and mode.
XOB supports manipulation of enable state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke
---
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh
lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/701
[13]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/13/687
[14]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1431
David Collins (2):
regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings
regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160
On 07/12/2018 09:54 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:44:14PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> On 07/02/2018 03:28 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 05:46:14PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>>>> +static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_pmic
On 07/12/2018 09:54 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:44:14PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> On 07/02/2018 03:28 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 05:46:14PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>>>> +static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_pmic
Hello Doug,
On 07/11/2018 03:43 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:36 PM, David Collins
> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:45 AM, David Collins
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 06/29/2018 04:54 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>>>> On F
Hello Doug,
On 07/11/2018 03:43 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:36 PM, David Collins
> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:45 AM, David Collins
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 06/29/2018 04:54 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>>>> On F
Hello Doug,
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:45 AM, David Collins
> wrote:
>> On 06/29/2018 04:54 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 02:29:55PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> ...
>>>> The PMIC TEMP_ALARM hardware peripheral will perform
Hello Doug,
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:45 AM, David Collins
> wrote:
>> On 06/29/2018 04:54 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 02:29:55PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> ...
>>>> The PMIC TEMP_ALARM hardware peripheral will perform
Hi,
On 07/10/2018 03:55 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:32 PM, David Collins
> wrote:
>> On 07/10/2018 03:02 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>> ...
>>> + vdd-s1-supply = <_pwr>;
>>> + vdd-s2-supply = <_
Hi,
On 07/10/2018 03:55 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:32 PM, David Collins
> wrote:
>> On 07/10/2018 03:02 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>> ...
>>> + vdd-s1-supply = <_pwr>;
>>> + vdd-s2-supply = <_
Hello Doug,
On 07/10/2018 03:02 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
...
> + vdd-s1-supply = <_pwr>;
> + vdd-s2-supply = <_pwr>;
> + vdd-s3-supply = <_pwr>;
> + vdd-s4-supply = <_pwr>;
> + vdd-s5-supply = <_pwr>;
> + vdd-s6-supply =
Hello Doug,
On 07/10/2018 03:02 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
...
> + vdd-s1-supply = <_pwr>;
> + vdd-s2-supply = <_pwr>;
> + vdd-s3-supply = <_pwr>;
> + vdd-s4-supply = <_pwr>;
> + vdd-s5-supply = <_pwr>;
> + vdd-s6-supply =
Hello Matthias,
On 06/29/2018 04:54 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 02:29:55PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
...
>> The PMIC TEMP_ALARM hardware peripheral will perform an automatic partial
>> PMIC shutdown upon hitting over-temperature stage 2 (125 C). Th
Hello Matthias,
On 06/29/2018 04:54 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 02:29:55PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
...
>> The PMIC TEMP_ALARM hardware peripheral will perform an automatic partial
>> PMIC shutdown upon hitting over-temperature stage 2 (125 C). Th
Hello Mark,
On 07/02/2018 03:28 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 05:46:14PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,746 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/* Copy
Hello Mark,
On 07/02/2018 03:28 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 05:46:14PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,746 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/* Copy
(135°C ?). This
> would be roughly in line with a system reset I observed in an earlier
> test at a temperature > 125°C. If that's correct the trip points need
> to be revisited.
>
> Maybe David Collins who recently extended the driver to add support
> for GEN2 PMIC peripherals can pr
(135°C ?). This
> would be roughly in line with a system reset I observed in an earlier
> test at a temperature > 125°C. If that's correct the trip points need
> to be revisited.
>
> Maybe David Collins who recently extended the driver to add support
> for GEN2 PMIC peripherals can pr
Hello Mark,
On 06/28/2018 03:18 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:28:03AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>
>> OK, great. I guess I'm confused about the "|| COMPILE_TEST" causing
>> problems then? I was worried that anyone trying to do "COMPILE_TEST"
>> on your tree (or linuxnext
Hello Mark,
On 06/28/2018 03:18 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:28:03AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>
>> OK, great. I guess I'm confused about the "|| COMPILE_TEST" causing
>> problems then? I was worried that anyone trying to do "COMPILE_TEST"
>> on your tree (or linuxnext
lkml/2018/6/8/573
[8]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/4/879
[9]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/1/895
[10]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/1168
[11]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/701
[12]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/13/687
[13]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1431
David Collins (2):
regulator: d
lkml/2018/6/8/573
[8]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/4/879
[9]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/1/895
[10]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/1168
[11]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/701
[12]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/13/687
[13]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1431
David Collins (2):
regulator: d
of enable state, voltage, and mode.
XOB supports manipulation of enable state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke
---
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh
of enable state, voltage, and mode.
XOB supports manipulation of enable state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke
---
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh
the final PMIC
regulator hardware state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
---
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160 +
.../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h| 36 +
2 files changed, 196
the final PMIC
regulator hardware state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
---
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160 +
.../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h| 36 +
2 files changed, 196
Hello Ulf,
On 06/15/2018 02:25 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 14 June 2018 at 20:17, David Collins wrote:
>> On 06/13/2018 11:54 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>> On 06/14/2018 06:02 AM, David Collins wrote:
>>>> On 06/11/2018 09:40 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> ..
Hello Ulf,
On 06/15/2018 02:25 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 14 June 2018 at 20:17, David Collins wrote:
>> On 06/13/2018 11:54 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>> On 06/14/2018 06:02 AM, David Collins wrote:
>>>> On 06/11/2018 09:40 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> ..
Hello Rajendra,
On 06/13/2018 11:54 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On 06/14/2018 06:02 AM, David Collins wrote:
>> On 06/11/2018 09:40 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
...
>>> +static int rpmhpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
>>> +{
>>> + struct
Hello Rajendra,
On 06/13/2018 11:54 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On 06/14/2018 06:02 AM, David Collins wrote:
>> On 06/11/2018 09:40 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
...
>>> +static int rpmhpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
>>> +{
>>> + struct
Hello Rajendra,
On 06/11/2018 09:40 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> The RPMh Power domain driver aggregates the corner votes from various
> consumers for the ARC resources and communicates it to RPMh.
>
> We also add data for all power domains on sdm845 SoC as part of the patch.
> The driver can be
Hello Rajendra,
On 06/11/2018 09:40 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> The RPMh Power domain driver aggregates the corner votes from various
> consumers for the ARC resources and communicates it to RPMh.
>
> We also add data for all power domains on sdm845 SoC as part of the patch.
> The driver can be
Hello Rajendra,
On 06/11/2018 09:40 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> As we move from no clients/consumers in kernel voting on corners,
> to *some* voting and some not voting, we might end up in a situation
> where the clients which remove votes can adversly impact others
s/adversly/adversely/
> who
Hello Rajendra,
On 06/11/2018 09:40 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> As we move from no clients/consumers in kernel voting on corners,
> to *some* voting and some not voting, we might end up in a situation
> where the clients which remove votes can adversly impact others
s/adversly/adversely/
> who
Hello Rajendra,
On 06/11/2018 09:40 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Add DT bindings to describe the rpmh powerdomains found on Qualcomm
s/powerdomains/power domains/
> Technologies, Inc. SoCs. These power domains communicate a performance
> state to RPMh, which then translates it into corresponding
Hello Rajendra,
On 06/11/2018 09:40 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Add DT bindings to describe the rpmh powerdomains found on Qualcomm
s/powerdomains/power domains/
> Technologies, Inc. SoCs. These power domains communicate a performance
> state to RPMh, which then translates it into corresponding
5/15/1005
[6]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/4/879
[7]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/1/895
[8]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/1168
[9]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/701
[10]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/13/687
[11]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1431
David Collins (2):
regulator: dt-bindings: add
the final PMIC
regulator hardware state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
---
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160 +
.../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h| 36 +
2 files changed, 196
5/15/1005
[6]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/4/879
[7]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/1/895
[8]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/1168
[9]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/701
[10]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/13/687
[11]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1431
David Collins (2):
regulator: dt-bindings: add
the final PMIC
regulator hardware state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
---
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160 +
.../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h| 36 +
2 files changed, 196
of enable state, voltage, and mode.
XOB supports manipulation of enable state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
---
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 753
of enable state, voltage, and mode.
XOB supports manipulation of enable state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
---
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 753
Hello Matthias,
On 06/07/2018 05:26 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:15:12PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> static int rpmh_regulator_send_request(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
>> + struct tcs_cmd *cmd, int count, bool wait_for_ack)
>>
Hello Matthias,
On 06/07/2018 05:26 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:15:12PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> static int rpmh_regulator_send_request(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
>> + struct tcs_cmd *cmd, int count, bool wait_for_ack)
>>
lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/701
[9]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/13/687
[10]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1431
David Collins (2):
regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings
regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160
lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/701
[9]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/13/687
[10]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1431
David Collins (2):
regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings
regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160
of enable state, voltage, and mode.
XOB supports manipulation of enable state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
---
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 767
3 files
of enable state, voltage, and mode.
XOB supports manipulation of enable state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
---
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 767
3 files
the final PMIC
regulator hardware state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
---
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160 +
.../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h| 36 +
2 files changed, 196 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
the final PMIC
regulator hardware state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
---
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160 +
.../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h| 36 +
2 files changed, 196 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
of enable state, voltage, and mode.
XOB supports manipulation of enable state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
---
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 770
3 files
of enable state, voltage, and mode.
XOB supports manipulation of enable state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
---
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 770
3 files
lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/18/556
[4]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/696
[5]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/15/1005
[6]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/1168
[7]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/701
[8]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/13/687
[9]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1431
David Collins
the final PMIC
regulator hardware state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
---
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160 +
.../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h| 36 +
2 files changed, 196 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree
lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/18/556
[4]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/696
[5]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/15/1005
[6]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/1168
[7]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/701
[8]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/13/687
[9]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1431
David Collins
the final PMIC
regulator hardware state.
Signed-off-by: David Collins
---
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160 +
.../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h| 36 +
2 files changed, 196 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree
Hello Mark,
On 05/31/2018 04:48 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:39:10PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> The DRMS modes to use and max allowed current per mode need to be
>> specified at the board level in device tree instead of hard-coded per
>> regulat
Hello Mark,
On 05/31/2018 04:48 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:39:10PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> The DRMS modes to use and max allowed current per mode need to be
>> specified at the board level in device tree instead of hard-coded per
>> regulat
Hello Rajendra,
On 06/01/2018 01:48 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On 05/26/2018 06:38 AM, David Collins wrote:
>>
>>> + [1] = _mx,
>>> + [2] = _mx_ao,
>>> + [3] = _cx,
>>> + [4] = _cx_ao,
>>> + [5] = _lmx,
>
Hello Rajendra,
On 06/01/2018 01:48 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On 05/26/2018 06:38 AM, David Collins wrote:
>>
>>> + [1] = _mx,
>>> + [2] = _mx_ao,
>>> + [3] = _cx,
>>> + [4] = _cx_ao,
>>> + [5] = _lmx,
>
Hi Doug,
On 05/30/2018 05:34 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:39 PM, David Collins
> wrote:
>> Consider the case of a regulator with physical 10 mA LPM max current. Say
>> that modem and application processors each have a load on the regulator
Hi Doug,
On 05/30/2018 05:34 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:39 PM, David Collins
> wrote:
>> Consider the case of a regulator with physical 10 mA LPM max current. Say
>> that modem and application processors each have a load on the regulator
Hello Mark,
On 05/30/2018 09:33 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 07:43:16PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> This patch series adds a driver and device tree binding documentation for
>> PMIC regulator control via Resource Power Manager-hardened (RPMh) on some
>>
Hello Mark,
On 05/30/2018 09:33 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 07:43:16PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> This patch series adds a driver and device tree binding documentation for
>> PMIC regulator control via Resource Power Manager-hardened (RPMh) on some
>>
Hello Doug,
On 05/29/2018 10:32 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 7:43 PM, David Collins
> wrote:
>> + * @ever_enabled: Boolean indicating that the regulator has
>> been
>> + * explicitly enabled
Hello Doug,
On 05/29/2018 10:32 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 7:43 PM, David Collins
> wrote:
>> + * @ever_enabled: Boolean indicating that the regulator has
>> been
>> + * explicitly enabled
Hello Mark and Doug,
On 05/30/2018 09:24 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 09:12:25AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
No, I'm saying that I don't know why that
Hello Mark and Doug,
On 05/30/2018 09:24 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 09:12:25AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
No, I'm saying that I don't know why that
Hello Rajendra,
On 05/30/2018 03:14 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On 05/30/2018 02:47 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 25 May 2018 at 12:01, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
...
>>> + pm_genpd_init([i]->pd, NULL, true);
>>
>> Question: Is there no hierarchical topology of the PM domains. No
>>
Hello Rajendra,
On 05/30/2018 03:14 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On 05/30/2018 02:47 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 25 May 2018 at 12:01, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
...
>>> + pm_genpd_init([i]->pd, NULL, true);
>>
>> Question: Is there no hierarchical topology of the PM domains. No
>>
Hello Rajendra,
On 05/29/2018 03:19 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On 05/26/2018 06:38 AM, David Collins wrote:
>> On 05/25/2018 03:01 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>> The RPMh powerdomain driver aggregates the corner votes from various
...
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom
Hello Rajendra,
On 05/29/2018 03:19 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On 05/26/2018 06:38 AM, David Collins wrote:
>> On 05/25/2018 03:01 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>> The RPMh powerdomain driver aggregates the corner votes from various
...
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom
Hello Rajendra,
On 05/25/2018 03:01 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> The RPMh powerdomain driver aggregates the corner votes from various
s/powerdomain/power domain/
This applies to all instances in this patch. "Power domain" seems to be
the preferred spelling in the kernel.
> consumers for the
Hello Rajendra,
On 05/25/2018 03:01 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> The RPMh powerdomain driver aggregates the corner votes from various
s/powerdomain/power domain/
This applies to all instances in this patch. "Power domain" seems to be
the preferred spelling in the kernel.
> consumers for the
Hello Rajendra,
On 05/25/2018 03:01 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On Qualcomm platforms, an OPP node needs to describe an
s/Qualcomm/Qualcomm Technologies, Inc./
> additional level/corner value that is then communicated to
> a remote microprocessor by the CPU, which then takes some
> actions
Hello Rajendra,
On 05/25/2018 03:01 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On Qualcomm platforms, an OPP node needs to describe an
s/Qualcomm/Qualcomm Technologies, Inc./
> additional level/corner value that is then communicated to
> a remote microprocessor by the CPU, which then takes some
> actions
ttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/18/556
[4]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/696
[5]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/15/1005
[6]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/701
[7]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/13/687
[8]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1431
David Collins (2):
regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPM
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
