Re: Regarding request for IBM camera patch to be applied to the main tree

2007-12-26 Thread David Hilvert
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:32:09 -0800 Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 03:21:30PM -0600, David Hilvert wrote: > > > > http://www.linux-usb.org/ibmcam/ > > > > > > http://auricle.dyndns.org/xvp610/ > > > > [Remainder

Re: Regarding request for IBM camera patch to be applied to the main tree

2007-12-26 Thread David Hilvert
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:32:09 -0800 Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 03:21:30PM -0600, David Hilvert wrote: http://www.linux-usb.org/ibmcam/ http://auricle.dyndns.org/xvp610/ [Remainder of private e-mail context snipped; message has been blind-CC'ed

Regarding request for IBM camera patch to be applied to the main tree

2007-12-21 Thread David Hilvert
> > http://www.linux-usb.org/ibmcam/ > > http://auricle.dyndns.org/xvp610/ [Remainder of private e-mail context snipped; message has been blind-CC'ed to the original recipients. Please CC any replies intended for me.] As the author of the second patch noted, I had avoided sending it to lkml

Regarding request for IBM camera patch to be applied to the main tree

2007-12-21 Thread David Hilvert
http://www.linux-usb.org/ibmcam/ http://auricle.dyndns.org/xvp610/ [Remainder of private e-mail context snipped; message has been blind-CC'ed to the original recipients. Please CC any replies intended for me.] As the author of the second patch noted, I had avoided sending it to lkml due to