Can we just reverse the prior change that caused the bug, or are you saying
that the owner of the prior patch has to fix it?
Dave
> On Jan 17, 2015, at 2:44 AM, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
>
> Dudley,
>
> Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I
> could not test them because I
Can we just reverse the prior change that caused the bug, or are you saying
that the owner of the prior patch has to fix it?
Dave
On Jan 17, 2015, at 2:44 AM, Jeremiah Mahler jmmah...@gmail.com wrote:
Dudley,
Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I
could not test
will again look into the possibility of what you are requesting, however, the
changes are extremely low if not zero that it will be accepted.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torok...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 4:16 PM
To: David Solda
Cc: Troy
Kamal,
My name is Dave Solda and I would be happy to answer any other questions that
you have. Troy's response is correct however as in order to support the default
Linux mouse class, our firmware would also have to be modified to do so, which
cannot be done in system. Our packet protocol
Kamal,
My name is Dave Solda and I would be happy to answer any other questions that
you have. Troy's response is correct however as in order to support the default
Linux mouse class, our firmware would also have to be modified to do so, which
cannot be done in system. Our packet protocol
will again look into the possibility of what you are requesting, however, the
changes are extremely low if not zero that it will be accepted.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torok...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 4:16 PM
To: David Solda
Cc: Troy
6 matches
Mail list logo
