Hi Tejun,
I do not have ordering as requirement. I can use system work queue as
well. what is max_active by default for system wq per cpu?
Regards,
Deepa
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:57:40PM +0100, Deepawali Verma wrote:
&g
.
Regards,
Deepa
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:56:10PM +0100, Deepawali Verma wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is sample code snippet as I cannot post my project code. In
>> reality here, this work handler is copying the big
unning on a SMP(multicore) system?...
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Deepawali Verma
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Tejun,
>>>
>>> Here are some code snippets from my device driver:
>>>
>>> #defind NUMBER_OF_SUBTASKS 3
>>>
Hi Tejun,
Here are some code snippets from my device driver:
#defind NUMBER_OF_SUBTASKS 3
struct my_driver_object
{
struct workqueue_struct *sub_task_wq;
struct work_struct sub_task_work;
char my_obj_wq_name[80];
int task_id;
};
struct my_driver_object obj[3];
Hi Tejun,
Here are some code snippets from my device driver:
#defind NUMBER_OF_SUBTASKS 3
struct my_driver_object
{
struct workqueue_struct *sub_task_wq;
struct work_struct sub_task_work;
char my_obj_wq_name[80];
int task_id;
};
struct my_driver_object obj[3];
, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Deepawali Verma dverma...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Tejun,
Here are some code snippets from my device driver:
#defind NUMBER_OF_SUBTASKS 3
struct my_driver_object
{
struct workqueue_struct *sub_task_wq;
struct work_struct sub_task_work;
char
.
Regards,
Deepa
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:56:10PM +0100, Deepawali Verma wrote:
Hi,
This is sample code snippet as I cannot post my project code. In
reality here, this work handler is copying the big chunks of data that
code
Hi Tejun,
I do not have ordering as requirement. I can use system work queue as
well. what is max_active by default for system wq per cpu?
Regards,
Deepa
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:57:40PM +0100, Deepawali Verma wrote
worker threads?
Regards,
Deepa
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:26:01PM +0100, Deepawali Verma wrote:
>> kworker/u:1-21[000] 110.964895: task_event: MYTASKJOB2381 XStarted
>> kworker/u:1-21[000] 110.964
and so on. What I expected that it should start the three
sub tasks in parallel, not one by one.
Where is concurrency here?
Regards,
Deepa
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:30:21PM +0100, Deepawali Verma wrote:
>> Actually
Hi Tejun,
Actually I want to make parallelization of one task into three tasks.
Therefore I created three single threaded work queues means divide the
task into three tasks. You are right that I can use one work queue as
well. But when I am doing three times schedule on different work
queues, I
Hi Tejun,
Actually I want to make parallelization of one task into three tasks.
Therefore I created three single threaded work queues means divide the
task into three tasks. You are right that I can use one work queue as
well. But when I am doing three times schedule on different work
queues, I
and so on. What I expected that it should start the three
sub tasks in parallel, not one by one.
Where is concurrency here?
Regards,
Deepa
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:30:21PM +0100, Deepawali Verma wrote:
Actually I want
worker threads?
Regards,
Deepa
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:26:01PM +0100, Deepawali Verma wrote:
kworker/u:1-21[000] 110.964895: task_event: MYTASKJOB2381 XStarted
kworker/u:1-21[000] 110.964909: task_event
14 matches
Mail list logo
