o raid card users would be useful
>
> Alan
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please re
this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL
ivers for the card. I've asked them to make
> a few more changes for me but their change making cycle seems very slow and
> I'm waiting for the next round.
Is it possible to get this beta somewhere? I'd like to try it.
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
--
E-Ma
tributed Processing Technology SmartRAID V Controller (rev
> > 2).
>
> This card isnt supported by the eata driver.
Is there any other way to make it working under 2.4.x? Only working drivers
are up to 2.2.16. I tried to compile them for 2.2.17 from RH 6.2 updates, but
they hang u
V Controller (rev
2).
This card isnt supported by the eata driver.
Is there any other way to make it working under 2.4.x? Only working drivers
are up to 2.2.16. I tried to compile them for 2.2.17 from RH 6.2 updates, but
they hang up PC.
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
to make
a few more changes for me but their change making cycle seems very slow and
I'm waiting for the next round.
Is it possible to get this beta somewhere? I'd like to try it.
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HomePage: http
... It looks like
it is again a problem with kernel does not use all possibilities before kill
a process.
And what worries me is that I found mentioned above lines in kernel log.
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HomePage: http
above lines in kernel log.
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
Hello,
one small question... Will O_DSYNC flag be available in Linux?
It is available at least on AIX, and HP-UX. The difference with O_SYNC is the
same as between fsync and fdatasync.
Any comments?
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL
Hello,
one small question... Will O_DSYNC flag be available in Linux?
It is available at least on AIX, and HP-UX. The difference with O_SYNC is the
same as between fsync and fdatasync.
Any comments?
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL
idea, but it is assumed that this program
is the only one running on the machine.
I do not want to use proc as some people can just do not mount it.
Any comments, suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
Denis Perchine.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
idea, but it is assumed that this program
is the only one running on the machine.
I do not want to use proc as some people can just do not mount it.
Any comments, suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
Denis Perchine.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
On Sunday 18 February 2001 18:22, Denis Perchine wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as fas as I can see from fdatasync man page, and from the latest kernel
> sources (2.4.1ac3, fs/buffer.c), they are equivalent.
>
> Using of fdatasync in database can gain significant gain on systems which
&g
).
Are there any plans to implement this correctly? And due to what problems it
was not implemented yet?
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
).
Are there any plans to implement this correctly? And due to what problems it
was not implemented yet?
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
On Sunday 18 February 2001 18:22, Denis Perchine wrote:
Hello,
as fas as I can see from fdatasync man page, and from the latest kernel
sources (2.4.1ac3, fs/buffer.c), they are equivalent.
Using of fdatasync in database can gain significant gain on systems which
supports it (on HP it gains
ned off in its case. MS do this.
> http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001127-00075.html
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
---
99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001127-00075.html
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
apache with mod_perl. Actually this
connection should be closed, if there was a failure, but somehow it is not.
And possibly it is a fd in DBD::Pg code (or libpq code). I will think how to
check this...
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HomePage: http:
(or libpq code). I will think how to
check this...
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
on Linux
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:51:46 +0600
From: Denis Perchine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have quite strange problem. It's lsof -i -n -P
postmaste 20018 postgres6u IPv4 12241380 TCP
127.0.0.1:5432->127.0.0.1:6651 (CLOSE)
And there i
on Linux
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:51:46 +0600
From: Denis Perchine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have quite strange problem. It's lsof -i -n -P
postmaste 20018 postgres6u IPv4 12241380 TCP
127.0.0.1:5432-127.0.0.1:6651 (CLOSE)
And there is no pair
22 matches
Mail list logo
