with a vanilla 2.6.18.6 kernel.
If anyone is interested in our oprofile code or other info, just ask and I'll
post it. Otherwise I'll be reporting this to the gentoo developers.
-E
> - Original Message -
> From: "Elliott Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: linux-kernel@vger
with a vanilla 2.6.18.6 kernel.
If anyone is interested in our oprofile code or other info, just ask and I'll
post it. Otherwise I'll be reporting this to the gentoo developers.
-E
- Original Message -
From: Elliott Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: strange
>What problem are you trying to solve? IOW, how do you know it's not
>just an artifact of diferent load average calculation between 2.4 and
>2.6?
>
>Are you actually seeing reduced throughput/performance? Or are you
>just looking at load average?
>
>Lee
Well the problem is apparent, we are
and not something
settable via /proc. Does any one know more about buffered memory and how to
adjust it?
-Elliott Johnson
=
Search for products and services at:
http://search.mail.com
--
Powered by Outblaze
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
and not something
settable via /proc. Does any one know more about buffered memory and how to
adjust it?
-Elliott Johnson
=
Search for products and services at:
http://search.mail.com
--
Powered by Outblaze
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
What problem are you trying to solve? IOW, how do you know it's not
just an artifact of diferent load average calculation between 2.4 and
2.6?
Are you actually seeing reduced throughput/performance? Or are you
just looking at load average?
Lee
Well the problem is apparent, we are having
6 matches
Mail list logo
