BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! in 2.6.23.8

2007-11-19 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
[ 124.441388] === -- ----- Erik de Castro Lopo - Linux, the UNIX defragmentation tool. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i

BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! in 2.6.23.8

2007-11-19 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
] [c04102e0] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x1d0 [ 124.441388] === -- - Erik de Castro Lopo - Linux, the UNIX defragmentation tool. - To unsubscribe from

Re: 2.6.10 : kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:483!

2005-02-16 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
tant? Nope, very, very unlikely. My driver is not doing anything complicated with memory mapping and I know the user space code is reading the right memory location because the read data is valid. Thanks Hugh. Your input was very helpful. Erik -- ----

Re: 2.6.10 : kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:483!

2005-02-16 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
know the user space code is reading the right memory location because the read data is valid. Thanks Hugh. Your input was very helpful. Erik -- --- [N] Erik de Castro Lopo, Senior Computer Engineer [E] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [W] http

2.6.10 : kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:483!

2005-02-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
? Does /dev/mem on a 2.6 kerel behave the same way as on a 2.4 kernel? I can supply more info if needed. Regards, Erik -- --- [N] Erik de Castro Lopo, Senior Computer Engineer [E] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [W] http://www.sensorynetworks.com [T] +61 2 83022

2.6.10 : kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:483!

2005-02-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
e0 01 41 2c 38 c0 eb cf 8d Is there anything I have missed? Does /dev/mem on a 2.6 kerel behave the same way as on a 2.4 kernel? I can supply more info if needed. Regards, Erik -- --- [N] Erik de Castro Lopo, Senior Computer Engineer [E