Re: Lenovo P50 headphone issue

2020-10-09 Thread Fabio Coatti
it is alc298, and I don't have > the P50 to debug. It is better to report a bug to bugzilla against the > upstream kernel and cc the realtek engineers to take a look. > > Regards, > > Hui. > > On 2020/10/9 下午3:14, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm experienci

Lenovo P50 headphone issue

2020-10-09 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi All, I'm experiencing issues with a Lenovo P50 regarding headphones. It has some similarities with the issue fixed in 5.8.13 with commit ad0643252831ede7d6ab7b70a4f03768e032e6b4 Author: Hui Wang Date: Mon Sep 14 14:51:18 2020 +0800 ALSA: hda/realtek - Couldn't detect Mic if booting with

posix acl issue

2018-09-26 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi All, I'm seeing a weird behaviour wrt posix acl. Basically it seems that they are not working, even though ACLs are enabled for all the filesystems on my machine. attrs are working just fine for the same files. Example: > getfacl pippo # file: pippo # owner: cova # group: cova other::r--

posix acl issue

2018-09-26 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi All, I'm seeing a weird behaviour wrt posix acl. Basically it seems that they are not working, even though ACLs are enabled for all the filesystems on my machine. attrs are working just fine for the same files. Example: > getfacl pippo # file: pippo # owner: cova # group: cova other::r--

Re: iwlwifi problem with iommu/intel-iommu: Enable CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS=y and clean up intel_{alloc,free}_coherent()

2018-07-23 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi, any hope to see this backported to 4.17.X as well? Just to avoid to revert that commit at every new release :) Many thanks! Il giorno gio 5 lug 2018 alle ore 21:31 Christoph Hellwig ha scritto: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 08:23:00PM +0200, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > Yep, it does.

Re: iwlwifi problem with iommu/intel-iommu: Enable CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS=y and clean up intel_{alloc,free}_coherent()

2018-07-23 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi, any hope to see this backported to 4.17.X as well? Just to avoid to revert that commit at every new release :) Many thanks! Il giorno gio 5 lug 2018 alle ore 21:31 Christoph Hellwig ha scritto: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 08:23:00PM +0200, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > Yep, it does.

Re: iwlwifi problem with iommu/intel-iommu: Enable CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS=y and clean up intel_{alloc,free}_coherent()

2018-07-02 Thread Fabio Coatti
On Monday 2 July 2018 15:19:51 CEST Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > By reverting this commit the card works again, tested in 4.17.3 . I've > > noticed that the corresponding amd commit ( > > b468620f2a1dfdcfddfd6fa54367b8bcc1b51248) has been reverted in linus tree > >

Re: iwlwifi problem with iommu/intel-iommu: Enable CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS=y and clean up intel_{alloc,free}_coherent()

2018-07-02 Thread Fabio Coatti
On Monday 2 July 2018 15:19:51 CEST Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > By reverting this commit the card works again, tested in 4.17.3 . I've > > noticed that the corresponding amd commit ( > > b468620f2a1dfdcfddfd6fa54367b8bcc1b51248) has been reverted in linus tree > >

iwlwifi problem with iommu/intel-iommu: Enable CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS=y and clean up intel_{alloc,free}_coherent()

2018-07-01 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, since kernel 4.17 my laptop fails to enable wireless card (04:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wireless 8260 (rev 3a) ) with this error: Jul 01 09:34:36 hobbes kernel: iwlwifi: probe of :04:00.0 failed with error -12 I bisected the issue to this result:

iwlwifi problem with iommu/intel-iommu: Enable CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS=y and clean up intel_{alloc,free}_coherent()

2018-07-01 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, since kernel 4.17 my laptop fails to enable wireless card (04:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wireless 8260 (rev 3a) ) with this error: Jul 01 09:34:36 hobbes kernel: iwlwifi: probe of :04:00.0 failed with error -12 I bisected the issue to this result:

Re: kernel 4.9 iwlwifi startup error

2017-01-10 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data martedì 10 gennaio 2017 00:21:51 CET, Luca Coelho ha scritto: > On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 13:42 +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > > On 02/01/17 21:12, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I'm using kernel 4.9 and maybe half of the times I boot my laptop I get >

Re: kernel 4.9 iwlwifi startup error

2017-01-10 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data martedì 10 gennaio 2017 00:21:51 CET, Luca Coelho ha scritto: > On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 13:42 +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > > On 02/01/17 21:12, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I'm using kernel 4.9 and maybe half of the times I boot my laptop I get >

kernel 4.9 iwlwifi startup error

2017-01-02 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, I'm using kernel 4.9 and maybe half of the times I boot my laptop I get the error reported below, and the wifi does not work. I have to remove iwlwifi (like modprobe -r iwldvm iwlwifi) and insert it again to get things workig again. This seems a bit random, it does not happens all the

kernel 4.9 iwlwifi startup error

2017-01-02 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, I'm using kernel 4.9 and maybe half of the times I boot my laptop I get the error reported below, and the wifi does not work. I have to remove iwlwifi (like modprobe -r iwldvm iwlwifi) and insert it again to get things workig again. This seems a bit random, it does not happens all the

WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 0 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:11098 intel_check_page_flip+0xb2/0xfb()

2015-09-23 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi All, With freshly compiled 4.2.1, I get the following kernel warning: [mer set 23 09:22:27 2015] [ cut here ] [mer set 23 09:22:27 2015] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 0 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:11098 intel_check_page_flip+0xb2/0xfb() [mer set 23 09:22:27 2015]

WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 0 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:11098 intel_check_page_flip+0xb2/0xfb()

2015-09-23 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi All, With freshly compiled 4.2.1, I get the following kernel warning: [mer set 23 09:22:27 2015] [ cut here ] [mer set 23 09:22:27 2015] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 0 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:11098 intel_check_page_flip+0xb2/0xfb() [mer set 23 09:22:27 2015]

Re: Linux 4.1 WARNING in drm_ioctl.c

2015-06-23 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data martedì 23 giugno 2015 15:29:41, Daniel Vetter ha scritto: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:46:09PM +0200, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > In data martedì 23 giugno 2015 11:48:47, Daniel Vetter ha scritto: > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:27:13AM +0100, Daniel Stone

Re: Linux 4.1 WARNING in drm_ioctl.c

2015-06-23 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data martedì 23 giugno 2015 11:48:47, Daniel Vetter ha scritto: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:27:13AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 23 June 2015 at 07:39, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Which drm driver are you using? I didn't spot anything in your module > > > list > > > but might

Re: Linux 4.1 WARNING in drm_ioctl.c

2015-06-23 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data martedì 23 giugno 2015 08:39:47, Daniel Vetter ha scritto: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 04:04:20PM +0200, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > just compiled 4.1 and just got this warning, twice, in my dmesg: > > > > > > [lun giu 2

Re: Linux 4.1 WARNING in drm_ioctl.c

2015-06-23 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data martedì 23 giugno 2015 15:29:41, Daniel Vetter ha scritto: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:46:09PM +0200, Fabio Coatti wrote: In data martedì 23 giugno 2015 11:48:47, Daniel Vetter ha scritto: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:27:13AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: Hi, On 23 June 2015

Re: Linux 4.1 WARNING in drm_ioctl.c

2015-06-23 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data martedì 23 giugno 2015 08:39:47, Daniel Vetter ha scritto: On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 04:04:20PM +0200, Fabio Coatti wrote: Hi All, just compiled 4.1 and just got this warning, twice, in my dmesg: [lun giu 22 11:43:18 2015] [ cut here ] [lun giu 22 11

Re: Linux 4.1 WARNING in drm_ioctl.c

2015-06-23 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data martedì 23 giugno 2015 11:48:47, Daniel Vetter ha scritto: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:27:13AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: Hi, On 23 June 2015 at 07:39, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote: Which drm driver are you using? I didn't spot anything in your module list but might

Linux 4.1 WARNING in drm_ioctl.c

2015-06-22 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi All, just compiled 4.1 and just got this warning, twice, in my dmesg: [lun giu 22 11:43:18 2015] [ cut here ] [lun giu 22 11:43:18 2015] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2184 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c:144 drm_setversion+0xe1/0x179() [lun giu 22 11:43:18 2015] No

Linux 4.1 WARNING in drm_ioctl.c

2015-06-22 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi All, just compiled 4.1 and just got this warning, twice, in my dmesg: [lun giu 22 11:43:18 2015] [ cut here ] [lun giu 22 11:43:18 2015] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2184 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c:144 drm_setversion+0xe1/0x179() [lun giu 22 11:43:18 2015] No

Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:171 __ioremap_caller+0x290/0x2fa()

2014-07-11 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data giovedì 10 luglio 2014 14:05:27, Bjorn Helgaas ha scritto: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 09:12:44PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > > In data giovedì 10 luglio 2014 10:54:48, Peter Zijlstra ha scritto: > >

Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:171 __ioremap_caller+0x290/0x2fa()

2014-07-11 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data giovedì 10 luglio 2014 14:05:27, Bjorn Helgaas ha scritto: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 09:12:44PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Fabio Coatti fabio.coa...@gmail.com wrote: In data giovedì 10 luglio 2014 10:54:48, Peter Zijlstra ha scritto: On Thu, Jul

Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:171 __ioremap_caller+0x290/0x2fa()

2014-07-10 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data giovedì 10 luglio 2014 10:54:48, Peter Zijlstra ha scritto: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:52:08AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:44:21AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:48:05PM -0700, Fabio Coatti wrote: > >

Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:171 __ioremap_caller+0x290/0x2fa()

2014-07-10 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data giovedì 10 luglio 2014 10:54:48, Peter Zijlstra ha scritto: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:52:08AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:44:21AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:48:05PM -0700, Fabio Coatti wrote: In data mercoledì 9 luglio

Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:171 __ioremap_caller+0x290/0x2fa()

2014-07-09 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data mercoledì 9 luglio 2014 11:54:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman ha scritto: > Try cc:ing everyone on that patch, with the original information you > provided, and the linux-kernel mailing list. Those developers should be > able to help you out properly. Ok, here you can find the description of a

Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:171 __ioremap_caller+0x290/0x2fa()

2014-07-09 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data lunedì 7 luglio 2014 13:47:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman ha scritto: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:32:56PM +0200, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > I'm seeing this message in latest kernels (this is from 3.15.4, but I have > > same > > message starting from 3.15.0, IIRC): &g

Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:171 __ioremap_caller+0x290/0x2fa()

2014-07-09 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data lunedì 7 luglio 2014 13:47:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman ha scritto: On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:32:56PM +0200, Fabio Coatti wrote: I'm seeing this message in latest kernels (this is from 3.15.4, but I have same message starting from 3.15.0, IIRC): So 3.14.0 didn't show this? If so, can

Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:171 __ioremap_caller+0x290/0x2fa()

2014-07-09 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data mercoledì 9 luglio 2014 11:54:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman ha scritto: Try cc:ing everyone on that patch, with the original information you provided, and the linux-kernel mailing list. Those developers should be able to help you out properly. Ok, here you can find the description of a

Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:171 __ioremap_caller+0x290/0x2fa()

2014-07-07 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data lunedì 7 luglio 2014 13:47:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman ha scritto: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:32:56PM +0200, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > I'm seeing this message in latest kernels (this is from 3.15.4, but I have > > same > > message starting from 3.15.0, IIRC): &g

Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:171 __ioremap_caller+0x290/0x2fa()

2014-07-07 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data lunedì 7 luglio 2014 13:47:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman ha scritto: On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:32:56PM +0200, Fabio Coatti wrote: I'm seeing this message in latest kernels (this is from 3.15.4, but I have same message starting from 3.15.0, IIRC): So 3.14.0 didn't show this? If so, can

Re: 3.10.9 Crash

2013-08-26 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data lunedì 26 agosto 2013 03:59:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman ha scritto: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:36:30AM +0200, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm remotely managing a 3.10.9 server and this morning I found it locked. > > The only data I could gather is a screensho

Re: 3.10.9 Crash

2013-08-26 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data lunedì 26 agosto 2013 03:59:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:36:30AM +0200, Fabio Coatti wrote: Hi all, I'm remotely managing a 3.10.9 server and this morning I found it locked. The only data I could gather is a screenshot (thru AMT interface). I've

3.10.2 Trace: Freezing of tasks failed

2013-07-22 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, I just installed 3.10.2 and I started to see this kind of messages: === [lun lug 22 15:45:28 2013] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done. [lun lug 22 15:45:28 2013] Freezing user space processes ... [lun lug 22 15:45:48 2013] Freezing of tasks

3.10.2 Trace: Freezing of tasks failed

2013-07-22 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, I just installed 3.10.2 and I started to see this kind of messages: === [lun lug 22 15:45:28 2013] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done. [lun lug 22 15:45:28 2013] Freezing user space processes ... [lun lug 22 15:45:48 2013] Freezing of tasks

Re: 3.7.10 kernel crash

2013-04-02 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data giovedì 28 marzo 2013 08:35:47, Peter Hurley ha scritto: > [ +cc Matt Carlson, Michael Chan, netdev because this is a tg3-related oops] > On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 09:31 +0100, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > 2013/3/27 Fabio Coatti : > > > Hi all, > > > we are experi

Re: 3.7.10 kernel crash

2013-04-02 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data giovedì 28 marzo 2013 08:35:47, Peter Hurley ha scritto: [ +cc Matt Carlson, Michael Chan, netdev because this is a tg3-related oops] On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 09:31 +0100, Fabio Coatti wrote: 2013/3/27 Fabio Coatti fabio.coa...@gmail.com: Hi all, we are experiencing crashes on some

Re: 3.7.10 kernel crash

2013-03-28 Thread Fabio Coatti
11:09:50, 王金浦 ha scritto: > > Hi Fabio, > > > Have you try latest tg3 driver from Broadcom, the backtrace show the tg3 may the cause of the panic? > > > Jack > > > 2013/3/27 Fabio Coatti : > > > Hi all, > > we are experiencing crashes on so

Re: 3.7.10 kernel crash

2013-03-28 Thread Fabio Coatti
2013/3/27 Fabio Coatti : > Hi all, > we are experiencing crashes on some servers, right now running 3.7.10; > I've been able to get only screenshots from dying server that I > attached below. Probably we can exclude hardware issues, as it > happened on two different servers. Furt

Re: 3.7.10 kernel crash

2013-03-28 Thread Fabio Coatti
2013/3/27 Fabio Coatti fabio.coa...@gmail.com: Hi all, we are experiencing crashes on some servers, right now running 3.7.10; I've been able to get only screenshots from dying server that I attached below. Probably we can exclude hardware issues, as it happened on two different servers

Re: 3.7.10 kernel crash

2013-03-28 Thread Fabio Coatti
:09:50, 王金浦 ha scritto: Hi Fabio, Have you try latest tg3 driver from Broadcom, the backtrace show the tg3 may the cause of the panic? Jack 2013/3/27 Fabio Coatti fabio.coa...@gmail.com: Hi all, we are experiencing crashes on some servers, right now running 3.7.10; I've

Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression?

2013-01-14 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data lunedì 14 gennaio 2013 17:50:59, joeyli ha scritto: > 於 一,2013-01-14 於 09:13 +0100,Fabio Coatti 提到: > > > While looking at a different issue (rfkill), related to this commit: > > > > > > > a57f7f9175b8ccbc9df83ac13860488913115de4 is

Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression?

2013-01-14 Thread Fabio Coatti
pened that I got the wrong commit while bisecting. Sorry for the noise, now the issue is still there but makes more sense ):) 2013/1/12 Fabio Coatti : > well, I tried to do that, bisecting between 3.6.10 and 3.7. I'm not > sure to have done that properly, as the result seems quite harmless, &g

Re: rf kill button not working on hp folio 9470m - bisected

2013-01-14 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data lunedì 14 gennaio 2013 08:59:55, Fabio Coatti ha scritto: > > hmm... this machine changed wlan0 status on working kernel and also emit > > e078 code like on Windows 8 mode. > > > > Then I think your machine control RF power by different way but BIOS, >

Re: rf kill button not working on hp folio 9470m - bisected

2013-01-14 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data lunedì 14 gennaio 2013 08:59:55, Fabio Coatti ha scritto: hmm... this machine changed wlan0 status on working kernel and also emit e078 code like on Windows 8 mode. Then I think your machine control RF power by different way but BIOS, maybe wmi or other ways. Please

Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression?

2013-01-14 Thread Fabio Coatti
that I got the wrong commit while bisecting. Sorry for the noise, now the issue is still there but makes more sense ):) 2013/1/12 Fabio Coatti fabio.coa...@gmail.com: well, I tried to do that, bisecting between 3.6.10 and 3.7. I'm not sure to have done that properly, as the result seems quite

Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression?

2013-01-14 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data lunedì 14 gennaio 2013 17:50:59, joeyli ha scritto: 於 一,2013-01-14 於 09:13 +0100,Fabio Coatti 提到: While looking at a different issue (rfkill), related to this commit: a57f7f9175b8ccbc9df83ac13860488913115de4 is the first bad commit commit

Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression?

2013-01-12 Thread Fabio Coatti
57bc8451026afe02fdbc2970b152164ff4e5412a 55311ce2f9fed66501b06f93f67fa99b54d46e86 M drivers Please let me know If I've done something wrong or if I can help in other ways. Many thanks for the hint. 2013/1/12 Daniel Vetter : > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Fabio Coatti wrote: >> I'm seeing the same

Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression?

2013-01-12 Thread Fabio Coatti
I'm seeing the same behaviour on 3.7.2; even echo "NN" > brightness has no effect. I've tried to look at changes between 3.6.11 and 3.7.2 but probably this is beyond my skills ;) 2012/12/20 Fabio Coatti : > In data mercoledì 19 dicembre 2012 17:10:29, hai scritto: >>

Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression?

2013-01-12 Thread Fabio Coatti
I'm seeing the same behaviour on 3.7.2; even echo NN brightness has no effect. I've tried to look at changes between 3.6.11 and 3.7.2 but probably this is beyond my skills ;) 2012/12/20 Fabio Coatti fabio.coa...@gmail.com: In data mercoledì 19 dicembre 2012 17:10:29, hai scritto

Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression?

2013-01-12 Thread Fabio Coatti
daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch: On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Fabio Coatti fabio.coa...@gmail.com wrote: I'm seeing the same behaviour on 3.7.2; even echo NN brightness has no effect. I've tried to look at changes between 3.6.11 and 3.7.2 but probably this is beyond my skills ;) If the regression

Fwd: usb issues with 3.6.X and 3.7.X

2012-12-26 Thread Fabio Coatti
Forgot to CC: possibly interested people, sorry. -- Forwarded message -- From: Fabio Coatti Date: 2012/12/24 Subject: usb issues with 3.6.X and 3.7.X To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I'm experiencing some usb-related issues with recent kernels (3.6.7 and 3.7.1 at least

Fwd: usb issues with 3.6.X and 3.7.X

2012-12-26 Thread Fabio Coatti
Forgot to CC: possibly interested people, sorry. -- Forwarded message -- From: Fabio Coatti fabio.coa...@gmail.com Date: 2012/12/24 Subject: usb issues with 3.6.X and 3.7.X To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I'm experiencing some usb-related issues with recent kernels

usb issues with 3.6.X and 3.7.X

2012-12-24 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, I'm experiencing some usb-related issues with recent kernels (3.6.7 and 3.7.1 at least.) Basically I have a V500 epson scanner that worked just fine with older kernels; since last time I used it I've changed several kernels and now the oldest that I have on my machine is 3.6.7. Recently I

usb issues with 3.6.X and 3.7.X

2012-12-24 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, I'm experiencing some usb-related issues with recent kernels (3.6.7 and 3.7.1 at least.) Basically I have a V500 epson scanner that worked just fine with older kernels; since last time I used it I've changed several kernels and now the oldest that I have on my machine is 3.6.7. Recently I

Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression?

2012-12-20 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data mercoledì 19 dicembre 2012 17:10:29, hai scritto: > - Original Message - > > > From: "Fabio Coatti" > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2012 5:01:30 PM > > Subject: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m bri

Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression?

2012-12-20 Thread Fabio Coatti
In data mercoledì 19 dicembre 2012 17:10:29, hai scritto: - Original Message - From: Fabio Coatti fabio.coa...@gmail.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2012 5:01:30 PM Subject: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? Hi, I'm

3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression?

2012-12-19 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi, I'm testing kernels 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 on an HP Folio 9470m machine, i915 driver for a VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) 8086:0166 With 3.6.11, the brightness can be correctly set using fn+f9/10: kde shows the bar and brightness

3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression?

2012-12-19 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi, I'm testing kernels 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 on an HP Folio 9470m machine, i915 driver for a VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) 8086:0166 With 3.6.11, the brightness can be correctly set using fn+f9/10: kde shows the bar and brightness

Re: ext3 issue on 3.6.1

2012-10-22 Thread Fabio Coatti
2012/10/22 Jan Kara : > On Mon 22-10-12 18:01:56, Fabio Coatti wrote: >> 2012/10/22 Jan Kara : >> >> Uhu, my fault, I was sure to have answered to your request, sorry. >> >> So yes, we have an ext3 R/O partition mounted on that machine. The >> >

Re: ext3 issue on 3.6.1

2012-10-22 Thread Fabio Coatti
2012/10/22 Jan Kara : >> Uhu, my fault, I was sure to have answered to your request, sorry. >> So yes, we have an ext3 R/O partition mounted on that machine. The >> 3.6.3, with patch applied, dmesg is here: > Interesting. You seem to be using data=journal on R/O partition, don't > you? Can you

Re: ext3 issue on 3.6.1

2012-10-22 Thread Fabio Coatti
2012/10/22 Jan Kara j...@suse.cz: Uhu, my fault, I was sure to have answered to your request, sorry. So yes, we have an ext3 R/O partition mounted on that machine. The 3.6.3, with patch applied, dmesg is here: Interesting. You seem to be using data=journal on R/O partition, don't you? Can

Re: ext3 issue on 3.6.1

2012-10-22 Thread Fabio Coatti
2012/10/22 Jan Kara j...@suse.cz: On Mon 22-10-12 18:01:56, Fabio Coatti wrote: 2012/10/22 Jan Kara j...@suse.cz: Uhu, my fault, I was sure to have answered to your request, sorry. So yes, we have an ext3 R/O partition mounted on that machine. The 3.6.3, with patch applied, dmesg is here

Re: ext3 issue on 3.6.1

2012-10-19 Thread Fabio Coatti
2012/10/19 NeilBrown : > On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:08:09 +0200 Jan Kara wrote: > >> On Thu 18-10-12 23:40:25, Paul Bolle wrote: >> > On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 23:23 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: >> > > On Fri 12-10-12 14:57:55, Fabio Coatti wrote: >> >

Re: ext3 issue on 3.6.1

2012-10-19 Thread Fabio Coatti
2012/10/19 NeilBrown ne...@suse.de: On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:08:09 +0200 Jan Kara j...@suse.cz wrote: On Thu 18-10-12 23:40:25, Paul Bolle wrote: On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 23:23 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: On Fri 12-10-12 14:57:55, Fabio Coatti wrote: [13031.051521] [ cut here

fs/inode.c WARNING still present in 3.6.2

2012-10-16 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, I'm still seeing WARNING in dmesg of 3.6.2 version (and it seems related to high load on servers), as reported for 3.6.1. is it something dangerous? If details are needed, please CC: as I'm not subscribed to this mailing list now . Many thanks for any answer :) [64356.668774]

fs/inode.c WARNING still present in 3.6.2

2012-10-16 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, I'm still seeing WARNING in dmesg of 3.6.2 version (and it seems related to high load on servers), as reported for 3.6.1. is it something dangerous? If details are needed, please CC: as I'm not subscribed to this mailing list now . Many thanks for any answer :) [64356.668774]

ext3 issue on 3.6.1

2012-10-12 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, I'm getting this message on a hp g7 server with kernel 3.6.1: [ 248.026545] [ cut here ] [ 248.026723] WARNING: at fs/ext3/inode.c:1754 ext3_journalled_writepage+0x55/0x1a7() [ 248.026920] Hardware name: ProLiant BL465c G7 [ 248.027049] Pid: 2266, comm:

ext3 issue on 3.6.1

2012-10-12 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, I'm getting this message on a hp g7 server with kernel 3.6.1: [ 248.026545] [ cut here ] [ 248.026723] WARNING: at fs/ext3/inode.c:1754 ext3_journalled_writepage+0x55/0x1a7() [ 248.026920] Hardware name: ProLiant BL465c G7 [ 248.027049] Pid: 2266, comm:

Re: stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64

2008-02-14 Thread Fabio Coatti
Alle giovedì 14 febbraio 2008, Len Brown ha scritto: > > > > > > You're not supposed to have CONFIG_PM unset and CONFIG_ACPI set at the > > > same time. The oldconfig generation must have gone wrong at one point. > > > > Maybe it's not supposed to have this situation, but maybe you should tell >

Re: stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64

2008-02-14 Thread Fabio Coatti
Alle giovedì 14 febbraio 2008, Len Brown ha scritto: You're not supposed to have CONFIG_PM unset and CONFIG_ACPI set at the same time. The oldconfig generation must have gone wrong at one point. Maybe it's not supposed to have this situation, but maybe you should tell this to the

Re: stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64

2008-02-13 Thread Fabio Coatti
Alle mercoledì 13 febbraio 2008, Andrew Morton ha scritto: > > > Hardware: x86_64 AMD 2216HE > > > SCSI controller: HP Smart Array E200i Controller > > > Compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.1.1 > > > binutils: 2.16.1 > > > > > > On a x86 machine, Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz > > > with a cciss0: HP Smart

Re: stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64

2008-02-13 Thread Fabio Coatti
Alle mercoledì 13 febbraio 2008, Randy Dunlap ha scritto: > > > > > > You're not supposed to have CONFIG_PM unset and CONFIG_ACPI set at the > > > same time. The oldconfig generation must have gone wrong at one point. > > > > Maybe it's not supposed to have this situation, but maybe you should

Re: stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64

2008-02-13 Thread Fabio Coatti
Alle martedì 12 febbraio 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto: > On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > Alle martedì 12 febbraio 2008, Randy Dunlap ha scritto: > > > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:03:41 +0100 Fabio Coatti wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > >

Re: stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64

2008-02-13 Thread Fabio Coatti
Alle martedì 12 febbraio 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto: On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, Fabio Coatti wrote: Alle martedì 12 febbraio 2008, Randy Dunlap ha scritto: On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:03:41 +0100 Fabio Coatti wrote: Hi all, I'm stuck in a weird situation: I'm unable to go

Re: stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64

2008-02-13 Thread Fabio Coatti
Alle mercoledì 13 febbraio 2008, Randy Dunlap ha scritto: You're not supposed to have CONFIG_PM unset and CONFIG_ACPI set at the same time. The oldconfig generation must have gone wrong at one point. Maybe it's not supposed to have this situation, but maybe you should tell this to

Re: stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64

2008-02-13 Thread Fabio Coatti
Alle mercoledì 13 febbraio 2008, Andrew Morton ha scritto: Hardware: x86_64 AMD 2216HE SCSI controller: HP Smart Array E200i Controller Compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.1.1 binutils: 2.16.1 On a x86 machine, Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz with a cciss0: HP Smart Array 6i Controller,

Re: stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64

2008-02-12 Thread Fabio Coatti
Alle martedì 12 febbraio 2008, Randy Dunlap ha scritto: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:03:41 +0100 Fabio Coatti wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm stuck in a weird situation: I'm unable to go beyond 2.6.23.14, so to > > fix the splice bug I've had to apply by hand the patch. (x86_

stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64

2008-02-12 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, I'm stuck in a weird situation: I'm unable to go beyond 2.6.23.14, so to fix the splice bug I've had to apply by hand the patch. (x86_64) Basically, with 2.6.24.2 (the same with 2.6.24 and .1), tha machine won't boot due to a problem with cciss driver, that prevents to find the /

Re: stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64

2008-02-12 Thread Fabio Coatti
Alle martedì 12 febbraio 2008, Randy Dunlap ha scritto: On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:03:41 +0100 Fabio Coatti wrote: Hi all, I'm stuck in a weird situation: I'm unable to go beyond 2.6.23.14, so to fix the splice bug I've had to apply by hand the patch. (x86_64) Basically, with 2.6.24.2

stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64

2008-02-12 Thread Fabio Coatti
Hi all, I'm stuck in a weird situation: I'm unable to go beyond 2.6.23.14, so to fix the splice bug I've had to apply by hand the patch. (x86_64) Basically, with 2.6.24.2 (the same with 2.6.24 and .1), tha machine won't boot due to a problem with cciss driver, that prevents to find the /

Re: bonnie++ uninterruptible under heavy I/O load

2005-03-11 Thread Fabio Coatti
sponsiveness of a desktop becomes poor (say, to open a "K" menu takes several seconds on a pIV 2.8G HT). In every case, we seen that the I/O bound processes are stuck in "D" state, the same stands for pdflush and kswapd. -- Fabio Coatti Wireless Solutions SpA - DA

Re: bonnie++ uninterruptible under heavy I/O load

2005-03-11 Thread Fabio Coatti
lt-SysRq-T will be interesting to see Unfortunately this machine is on a remote location, so we don't have access to keyboard. In some days we will be able to have a report of Alt-SysRq-T, but until this of course we can provide any information that can be gathered on a remote shell. -- F

Re: bonnie++ uninterruptible under heavy I/O load

2005-03-11 Thread Fabio Coatti
access to keyboard. In some days we will be able to have a report of Alt-SysRq-T, but until this of course we can provide any information that can be gathered on a remote shell. -- Fabio Coatti Wireless Solutions SpA - DADA group Services ManagerEurope HQ, via

Re: bonnie++ uninterruptible under heavy I/O load

2005-03-11 Thread Fabio Coatti
). In every case, we seen that the I/O bound processes are stuck in D state, the same stands for pdflush and kswapd. -- Fabio Coatti Wireless Solutions SpA - DADA group Services ManagerEurope HQ, via Castiglione 25 Bologna http://www.wseurope.com Tel: +390512966811 Fax

Re: 2.6.11-rc[1,2]-mmX scsi cdrom problem, 2.6.10-mm2 ok

2005-01-31 Thread Fabio Coatti
ing out that patch the problem disappears. Let me know if you need to narrow further that issue. Thanks :) -- Fabio Coatti http://members.ferrara.linux.it/cova Ferrara Linux Users Group http://ferrara.linux.it GnuPG fp:9765 A5B6 6843 17BC A646 BE8C FA56 373A 5374 C703 Ol

2.6.11-rc[1,2]-mmX scsi cdrom problem, 2.6.10-mm2 ok

2005-01-30 Thread Fabio Coatti
.36 Adaptec 2902/04/10/15/20C/30C SCSI adapter aic7850: Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 3/253 SCBs Allocated SCBs: 4, SG List Length: 128 Let me know if further details/testing are needed. -- Fabio Coatti http://members.ferrara.linux.it/cova Ferrara Linux Users Group http://fer

Re: 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 (and others): heavy disk I/O -> poor performance

2005-01-19 Thread Fabio Coatti
Alle 13:42, mercoledì 19 gennaio 2005, bert hubert ha scritto: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:39:35PM +0100, Fabio Coatti wrote: > > vmstat under load is the following, and config.gz attached. Of course I > > can provide any other needed detail; many thanks for any hint. > > Lo

Re: 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 (and others): heavy disk I/O - poor performance

2005-01-19 Thread Fabio Coatti
Alle 13:42, mercoledì 19 gennaio 2005, bert hubert ha scritto: On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:39:35PM +0100, Fabio Coatti wrote: vmstat under load is the following, and config.gz attached. Of course I can provide any other needed detail; many thanks for any hint. Looks mightily like DMA

2.6.11-rc1-mm1 (and others): heavy disk I/O -> poor performance

2005-01-18 Thread Fabio Coatti
2-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1 -- Fabio Coatti http://members.ferrara.linux.it/cova Ferrara Linux Users Group http://ferrara.linux.it GnuPG fp:9765 A5B6 6843 17BC A646 BE8C FA56 373A 5374 C703 Old SysOps never die... t

2.6.11-rc1-mm1 (and others): heavy disk I/O - poor performance

2005-01-18 Thread Fabio Coatti
] Memory at f2105000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1 -- Fabio Coatti http://members.ferrara.linux.it/cova Ferrara Linux Users Group http://ferrara.linux.it GnuPG fp:9765 A5B6 6843 17BC A646 BE8C FA56 373A 5374