Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:35:12PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > > > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > >> It is valuable for a testing organization to say "We tested this > >> series on top of version X. We know it works, we

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:35:12PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > > > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > >> It is valuable for a testing organization to say "We tested this > >> series on top of version X. We know it works, we have tested on a > >>

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:51:31AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> writes: > > >> >> I have a mixed feeling about this one, primarily because this was > >> >> already tried quite early in the life of "format-pat

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:51:31AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Fengguang Wu writes: > > >> >> I have a mixed feeling about this one, primarily because this was > >> >> already tried quite early in the life of "format-patch" command. > &g

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 04:31:35PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Blergh... You want it machine readable and I want it human readable. I Yeah. It's kind of tasting which may differ among people. I'll leave the judgments to Junio and others, and only add necessary comments to your points. >

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 04:31:35PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Blergh... You want it machine readable and I want it human readable. I Yeah. It's kind of tasting which may differ among people. I'll leave the judgments to Junio and others, and only add necessary comments to your points. >

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

Hi Eric, On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 01:56:07PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Fengguag Wu, Xiaolong Ye, have you attempted to use the truncated > sha1 of the file the patch applies to? Git already places a file sha1 > at the top of a patch. See the index line? > > > diff --git

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

Hi Eric, On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 01:56:07PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Fengguag Wu, Xiaolong Ye, have you attempted to use the truncated > sha1 of the file the patch applies to? Git already places a file sha1 > at the top of a patch. See the index line? > > > diff --git

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

Hi Dan, On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 01:32:53PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > So this is the format for the first patch? > > base commit: 0233b800c838ddda41db318ee396320b3c21a560 What's in my mind is lines like base tree/branch: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

Hi Dan, On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 01:32:53PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > So this is the format for the first patch? > > base commit: 0233b800c838ddda41db318ee396320b3c21a560 What's in my mind is lines like base tree/branch: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 01:23:19AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/23/16 01:17, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > However we are facing a new situation: in test robot POV, IMHO there > > are values to test exactly the same tree as the patch submitter. > > Otherwise the r

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 01:23:19AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/23/16 01:17, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > However we are facing a new situation: in test robot POV, IMHO there > > are values to test exactly the same tree as the patch submitter. > > Otherwise the r

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

Hi Junio and All, CC more relevant people. FYI this thread starts here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:54:38PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> writes: > > > Hi Junio, > >

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info

Hi Junio and All, CC more relevant people. FYI this thread starts here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:54:38PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Fengguang Wu writes: > > > Hi Junio, > > > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at

Re: [PATCH] Optimize int_sqrt for small values for faster idle

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 12:44:00PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 10:32:26PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 01 2016, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:25:17PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > >> On Thu, Jan 28 2016, Andi Kleen wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] Optimize int_sqrt for small values for faster idle

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 12:44:00PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 10:32:26PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 01 2016, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:25:17PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > >> On Thu, Jan 28 2016,

[PATCH kernel-tests] kbuild: don't CC the list for BUILD DONE notifications

2078d3920abf1d89be7eaf087100b4482dd532dc drivers:mtd:ubi: Kconfig Makefile Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu --- lib/kbuild.sh | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/kbuild.sh b/lib/kbuild.sh index 757aefb..bb879e5 100755 --- a/lib/kbuild.sh +++ b/lib/kbuild.sh @@ -5075,9 +5075,6 @@ email_header

[PATCH kernel-tests] kbuild: don't CC the list for BUILD DONE notifications

104450 2078d3920abf1d89be7eaf087100b4482dd532dc drivers:mtd:ubi: Kconfig Makefile Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> --- lib/kbuild.sh | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/kbuild.sh b/lib/kbuild.sh index 757aefb..bb879e5 100755 --- a/lib/kbuild.sh +++ b/l

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - add async support to algif_aead

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:41:36PM -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote: > On 01/27/2016 02:29 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Tadeusz, > > > > [auto build test ERROR on cryptodev/master] > > [also build test ERROR on v4.5-rc1 next-20160127] > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - add async support to algif_aead

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:41:36PM -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote: > On 01/27/2016 02:29 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Tadeusz, > > > > [auto build test ERROR on cryptodev/master] > > [also build test ERROR on v4.5-rc1 next-20160127] > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please

Re: [linux-review:James-Hogan/kbuild-Remove-stale-asm-generic-wrappers/20160119-183642] d979f99e9cc14e2667e9b6e268db695977e4197a BUILD DONE

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:44:01AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 27 January 2016 17:30:18 Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > Looks good, I'm just unsure about "multi_v8_defconfig", this does not > > > exist. Do you mean multi_v5_defconfig? > > >

Re: [linux-review:James-Hogan/kbuild-Remove-stale-asm-generic-wrappers/20160119-183642] d979f99e9cc14e2667e9b6e268db695977e4197a BUILD DONE

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:11:47AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 27 January 2016 16:37:45 Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > Thank you for the tips! I've updated the lists accordingly. > > > > 1st priority > > > > > >

Re: [linux-review:James-Hogan/kbuild-Remove-stale-asm-generic-wrappers/20160119-183642] d979f99e9cc14e2667e9b6e268db695977e4197a BUILD DONE

: > On Tuesday 26 January 2016 13:35:04 Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > There are a fixed set of config files for fast build tests (which I > > > selected randomly, feel free to ask me to change the list to more > > > reasonable ones): > > > > > > a

Re: [linux-review:James-Hogan/kbuild-Remove-stale-asm-generic-wrappers/20160119-183642] d979f99e9cc14e2667e9b6e268db695977e4197a BUILD DONE

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:44:01AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 27 January 2016 17:30:18 Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > Looks good, I'm just unsure about "multi_v8_defconfig", this does not > > > exist. Do you mean multi_v5_defconfig? > > >

Re: [linux-review:James-Hogan/kbuild-Remove-stale-asm-generic-wrappers/20160119-183642] d979f99e9cc14e2667e9b6e268db695977e4197a BUILD DONE

: > On Tuesday 26 January 2016 13:35:04 Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > There are a fixed set of config files for fast build tests (which I > > > selected randomly, feel free to ask me to change the list to more > > > reasonable ones): > > > > > > a

Re: [linux-review:James-Hogan/kbuild-Remove-stale-asm-generic-wrappers/20160119-183642] d979f99e9cc14e2667e9b6e268db695977e4197a BUILD DONE

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:11:47AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 27 January 2016 16:37:45 Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > Thank you for the tips! I've updated the lists accordingly. > > > > 1st priority > > > > > >

Re: [linux-review:James-Hogan/kbuild-Remove-stale-asm-generic-wrappers/20160119-183642] d979f99e9cc14e2667e9b6e268db695977e4197a BUILD DONE

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:30:50PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > Sorry for the delay! I lost access to my email account for some week. > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:26:16PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 19:27:55 kbuild test r

Re: [linux-review:James-Hogan/kbuild-Remove-stale-asm-generic-wrappers/20160119-183642] d979f99e9cc14e2667e9b6e268db695977e4197a BUILD DONE

Hi Arnd, Sorry for the delay! I lost access to my email account for some week. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:26:16PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 19:27:55 kbuild test robot wrote: > > arm allnoconfig > > arm

Re: [linux-review:James-Hogan/kbuild-Remove-stale-asm-generic-wrappers/20160119-183642] d979f99e9cc14e2667e9b6e268db695977e4197a BUILD DONE

Hi Arnd, Sorry for the delay! I lost access to my email account for some week. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:26:16PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 19:27:55 kbuild test robot wrote: > > arm allnoconfig > > arm

Re: [linux-review:James-Hogan/kbuild-Remove-stale-asm-generic-wrappers/20160119-183642] d979f99e9cc14e2667e9b6e268db695977e4197a BUILD DONE

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:30:50PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > Sorry for the delay! I lost access to my email account for some week. > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:26:16PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 19:27:55 kbuild test r

Re: [kbuild-all] arch/mips/vdso/gettimeofday.c:1:0: error: '-march=r3900' requires '-mfp32'

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:59:13PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > > However I find that the latest mainline no longer has the error. > > So let's we ignore this error. > > Oops, sorry that's not true -- I was testing rather old mainline HEAD. >

Re: arch/mips/vdso/gettimeofday.c:1:0: error: '-march=r3900' requires '-mfp32'

Hi Guenter, > However I find that the latest mainline no longer has the error. > So let's we ignore this error. Oops, sorry that's not true -- I was testing rather old mainline HEAD. Here is the new build log. wfg@inn ~/linux% /c/kernel-tests/reproduce-build 398c7500a 168309855 linus/master

Re: arch/mips/vdso/gettimeofday.c:1:0: error: '-march=r3900' requires '-mfp32'

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:30:39PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 06:02:47AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 01/05/2016 12:22 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > >On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 12:09:14AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > &g

Re: [PATCH] scripts: recordmcount: fix incorrect use of sprintf

Hi Steven, On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 10:42:46AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:06:41 + > Colin King wrote: > > > From: Colin Ian King > > > > Fix build warning: > > > > scripts/recordmcount.c:589:4: warning: format not a string > > literal and no format arguments

Re: [kbuild-all] arch/mips/vdso/gettimeofday.c:1:0: error: '-march=r3900' requires '-mfp32'

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:59:13PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > > However I find that the latest mainline no longer has the error. > > So let's we ignore this error. > > Oops, sorry that's not true -- I was testing rather old mainline HEAD. >

Re: [PATCH] scripts: recordmcount: fix incorrect use of sprintf

Hi Steven, On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 10:42:46AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:06:41 + > Colin King wrote: > > > From: Colin Ian King > > > > Fix build warning: > > > > scripts/recordmcount.c:589:4: warning: format

Re: arch/mips/vdso/gettimeofday.c:1:0: error: '-march=r3900' requires '-mfp32'

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:30:39PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 06:02:47AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 01/05/2016 12:22 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > >On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 12:09:14AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > &g

Re: arch/mips/vdso/gettimeofday.c:1:0: error: '-march=r3900' requires '-mfp32'

Hi Guenter, > However I find that the latest mainline no longer has the error. > So let's we ignore this error. Oops, sorry that's not true -- I was testing rather old mainline HEAD. Here is the new build log. wfg@inn ~/linux% /c/kernel-tests/reproduce-build 398c7500a 168309855 linus/master

Re: arch/mips/vdso/gettimeofday.c:1:0: error: '-march=r3900' requires '-mfp32'

Hi Guenter, On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 06:02:47AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 01/05/2016 12:22 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 12:09:14AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>On 01/04/2016 11:23 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > >>>Hi Guenter, >

Re: arch/mips/vdso/gettimeofday.c:1:0: error: '-march=r3900' requires '-mfp32'

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 12:09:14AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 01/04/2016 11:23 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > >Hi Guenter, > > > >First bad commit (maybe != root cause): > > > >tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > >master > >head:

Re: arch/mips/vdso/gettimeofday.c:1:0: error: '-march=r3900' requires '-mfp32'

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 12:09:14AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 01/04/2016 11:23 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > >Hi Guenter, > > > >First bad commit (maybe != root cause): > > > >tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > >master > >head:

Re: arch/mips/vdso/gettimeofday.c:1:0: error: '-march=r3900' requires '-mfp32'

Hi Guenter, On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 06:02:47AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 01/05/2016 12:22 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 12:09:14AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>On 01/04/2016 11:23 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > >>>Hi Guenter, >

Re: a configfs update for 4.5, and the configfs tree question

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:51:01PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 03:05:30PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote: > > > > Hoi, > > > > I'm well aware that I've caught some reviews and missed some others. I > > support funneling through hch's tree here. > > Thanks. I've created

Re: a configfs update for 4.5, and the configfs tree question

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:51:01PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 03:05:30PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote: > > > > Hoi, > > > > I'm well aware that I've caught some reviews and missed some others. I > > support funneling through hch's tree here. > > Thanks. I've created

[memdup_user_nul] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000100

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git work.misc commit c7af9d5728bed29ef614324e67e066896d087c8f Author: Al Viro AuthorDate: Thu Dec 24 00:13:10 2015 -0500 Commit: Al Viro CommitDate: Thu Dec 24 10:52:16 2015 -0500 kernel/*: switch to memdup_user_nul()

[memdup_user_nul] kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2735!

Hi Al, It looks this patch has various impacts. Here are some more bug messages. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git work.misc commit c7af9d5728bed29ef614324e67e066896d087c8f Author: Al Viro AuthorDate: Thu Dec 24 00:13:10 2015 -0500 Commit: Al Viro

[memdup_user_nul] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000100

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git work.misc commit c7af9d5728bed29ef614324e67e066896d087c8f Author: Al Viro AuthorDate: Thu Dec 24 00:13:10 2015 -0500 Commit: Al Viro CommitDate: Thu Dec 24 10:52:16 2015 -0500

[memdup_user_nul] kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2735!

Hi Al, It looks this patch has various impacts. Here are some more bug messages. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git work.misc commit c7af9d5728bed29ef614324e67e066896d087c8f Author: Al Viro AuthorDate: Thu Dec 24 00:13:10 2015 -0500

Re: Makefile:610: arch/m32r/Makefile: No such file or directory

Hi Sudip, Sorry for the noise -- it looks like a bug caused by a recent change to our build scripts. Your commit is fine. Thanks, Fengguang On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 05:44:19PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 04:17:51PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > tree:

Re: Makefile:610: arch/m32r/Makefile: No such file or directory

Hi Sudip, Sorry for the noise -- it looks like a bug caused by a recent change to our build scripts. Your commit is fine. Thanks, Fengguang On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 05:44:19PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 04:17:51PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > tree:

Re: [PATCH 18/43] MAINTAINERS: add kdbus

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 04:23:51PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:10:24AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 07:33:36AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 03:51:41PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > CC: Greg

Re: [PATCH 18/43] MAINTAINERS: add kdbus

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 04:23:51PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:10:24AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 07:33:36AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 03:51:41PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > &g

Re: [LKP] [PATCH v2] rhashtable: Kill harmless RCU warning in rhashtable_walk_init

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:42:59PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Herbert Xu > Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:45:28 +0800 > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 04:27:31PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Herbert Xu > >> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:14:08 +0800 > >> > >> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at

Re: [PATCH 20/43] MAINTAINERS: add git URL for KVM/s390

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:42:09PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 20:32:15 +0800 > Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > Thanks! The background is, the 0day patch test script relies on the > > information in MAINTAINERS to decide which tree it can apply the LKML >

Re: [PATCH 18/43] MAINTAINERS: add kdbus

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 07:33:36AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 03:51:41PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 10 ++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) &g

Re: [PATCH 20/43] MAINTAINERS: add git URL for KVM/s390

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:16:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 15:51:43 +0800 > Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > CC: Christian Borntraeger > > CC: Cornelia Huck > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > > --- > > MAINTAINERS |

Re: [PATCH 13/43] MAINTAINERS: fix git URL for EDAC

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:41:55PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 06:57:33PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > That's the required format, documented earlier in MAINTAINERS: > > > > T: SCM tree type and location. > >Type is on

Re: [PATCH 13/43] MAINTAINERS: fix git URL for EDAC

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:49:08AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 03:51:36PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > CC: Doug Thompson > > CC: Borislav Petkov > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > > --- > > MAINTAINERS |4 ++-- > > 1 fil

Re: [PATCH 24/43] MAINTAINERS: add git URL for metag

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:37:21AM +, James Hogan wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 03:51:47PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > CC: James Hogan > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > > Acked-by: James Hogan > > Let me know if you want me to take this through the met

Re: [PATCH 02/43] MAINTAINERS: add git URL for at91

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:16:06AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Le 18/12/2015 09:26, Alexandre Belloni a 閏rit : > > On 18/12/2015 at 15:51:25 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote : > >> CC: Nicolas Ferre > >> CC: Alexandre Belloni > >> CC: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villa

Re: [PATCH 02/43] MAINTAINERS: add git URL for at91

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:16:06AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Le 18/12/2015 09:26, Alexandre Belloni a 閏rit : > > On 18/12/2015 at 15:51:25 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote : > >> CC: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@atmel.com> > >> CC: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre

Re: [PATCH 24/43] MAINTAINERS: add git URL for metag

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:37:21AM +, James Hogan wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 03:51:47PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > CC: James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com> > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> > > Acked-by: James Hogan <jame

Re: [PATCH 13/43] MAINTAINERS: fix git URL for EDAC

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:49:08AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 03:51:36PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > CC: Doug Thompson <dougthomp...@xmission.com> > > CC: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> > > Signed-off-by: Fen

Re: [PATCH 13/43] MAINTAINERS: fix git URL for EDAC

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:41:55PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 06:57:33PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > That's the required format, documented earlier in MAINTAINERS: > > > > T: SCM tree type and location. > >Type is on

Re: [PATCH 20/43] MAINTAINERS: add git URL for KVM/s390

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:16:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 15:51:43 +0800 > Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> wrote: > > > CC: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> > > CC: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com> >

Re: [PATCH 18/43] MAINTAINERS: add kdbus

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 07:33:36AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 03:51:41PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> > > --- > > MAINTAINER

Re: [LKP] [PATCH v2] rhashtable: Kill harmless RCU warning in rhashtable_walk_init

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:42:59PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Herbert Xu > Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:45:28 +0800 > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 04:27:31PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Herbert Xu > >> Date: Fri, 18 Dec

Re: [PATCH 20/43] MAINTAINERS: add git URL for KVM/s390

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:42:09PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 20:32:15 +0800 > Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> wrote: > > > Thanks! The background is, the 0day patch test script relies on the > > information in MAINTAINERS to decide which

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest

Hi Sebastian, On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 06:59:44PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 11/23/2015 04:03 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Thanks! Yes, a stable branch name would be better than "linux-4.1.y-rt" > > that's like to become stable over time. > > final

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest

Hi Sebastian, On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 06:59:44PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 11/23/2015 04:03 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Thanks! Yes, a stable branch name would be better than "linux-4.1.y-rt" > > that's like to become stable over time. > > final

Re: [PATCH] fix an endianness bug in ext4_encrypted_follow_link()

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 02:47:56PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 22:28 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Al Viro wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:40:37AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > (cc'ing Julia Lawall) > > > > On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 15:27 +, Al

Re: [PATCH] fix an endianness bug in ext4_encrypted_follow_link()

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 02:47:56PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 22:28 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Al Viro wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:40:37AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > (cc'ing Julia Lawall) > > > > On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 15:27 +, Al

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 11/23/2015 03:14 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > >> Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang > >> can have his tests either ignore these or test agains

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 09:17:56AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:14:08 +0800 > Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang > > > can have his tests either ignore these or test

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 08:43:25AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:30:30 +0800 > kbuild test robot wrote: > > > Hi Jianchuan, > > > > [auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc2] > > [also build test ERROR on: next-20151120] > > > > url: > >

Re: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Hi Michael, On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 08:54:53PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 09:05 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > Hi Anton, > > > > FYI, the error/warning still remains. > > ... > > > > >

Re: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Hi Michael, On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 08:54:53PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 09:05 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > Hi Anton, > > > > FYI, the error/warning still remains. > > ... > > > > >

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 08:43:25AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:30:30 +0800 > kbuild test robot wrote: > > > Hi Jianchuan, > > > > [auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc2] > > [also build test ERROR on: next-20151120] > > > > url: > >

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 11/23/2015 03:14 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > >> Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang > >> can have his tests either ignore these or test agains

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 09:17:56AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:14:08 +0800 > Fengguang Wu <l...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang > > > can have his tests either

Re: [kbuild-all] [patch -mm] mm, vmalloc: remove VM_VPAGES

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 01:37:45PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote: > Hi Fengguang, > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:35:46PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git > > > > I'll teach the robot to use it instead of linux

Re: [kbuild-all] [patch -mm] mm, vmalloc: remove VM_VPAGES

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 09:23:41PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:00:07PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > > > On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Davi

Re: [kbuild-all] [patch -mm] mm, vmalloc: remove VM_VPAGES

Hi David, On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:00:07PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > Hi David, > > > > [auto build test ERROR on: next-20151118] > > [also build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc1] > > > > You need to teach your bot what patches I'm proposing

Re: [kbuild-all] [patch -mm] mm, vmalloc: remove VM_VPAGES

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 01:37:45PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote: > Hi Fengguang, > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:35:46PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git > > > > I'll teach the robot to use it instead of linux

Re: [kbuild-all] [patch -mm] mm, vmalloc: remove VM_VPAGES

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 09:23:41PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:00:07PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > > > On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Davi

Re: [kbuild-all] [patch -mm] mm, vmalloc: remove VM_VPAGES

Hi David, On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:00:07PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > Hi David, > > > > [auto build test ERROR on: next-20151118] > > [also build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc1] > > > > You need to teach your bot what patches I'm proposing

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH V3 4/4] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA channel driver

Hi Arnd, On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:42:00AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 11 November 2015 10:21:03 Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Hi Sinan, > > > > Sorry please ignore this warning -- it's actually a problem specific > > to the mn10300 arch. I'll disable such w

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH V3 4/4] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA channel driver

Hi Arnd, On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:42:00AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 11 November 2015 10:21:03 Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Hi Sinan, > > > > Sorry please ignore this warning -- it's actually a problem specific > > to the mn10300 arch. I'll disable such w

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH V3 4/4] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA channel driver

Hi Sinan, Sorry please ignore this warning -- it's actually a problem specific to the mn10300 arch. I'll disable such warning in mn10300 in future. Thanks, Fengguang On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 07:43:52PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > > > On 11/8/2015 2:13 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > >Hi Sinan, >

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH V3 4/4] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA channel driver

Hi Sinan, Sorry please ignore this warning -- it's actually a problem specific to the mn10300 arch. I'll disable such warning in mn10300 in future. Thanks, Fengguang On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 07:43:52PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > > > On 11/8/2015 2:13 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > >Hi Sinan, >

Re: [LKP] [x86/context_tracking] db23da8b95: inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.

72877. Only the other > two are. > > I'm sorry for the inconvenience. > > Thanks, > > Paolo > > On 02/11/2015 13:11, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Hi Paolo, > > > > FYI, here is another bisect result. > > > > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux >

Re: [LKP] [x86/context_tracking] db23da8b95: inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.

72877. Only the other > two are. > > I'm sorry for the inconvenience. > > Thanks, > > Paolo > > On 02/11/2015 13:11, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Hi Paolo, > > > > FYI, here is another bisect result. > > > > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux >

Re: [kbuild-all] linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:37:55PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 11/02, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc7 -- if it's inappropriate base, please > > suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] > > > > url: > >

Re: [kbuild-all] linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:37:55PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 11/02, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc7 -- if it's inappropriate base, please > > suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] > > > > url: > >

Re: [PATCH 2/3][v2] ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events

gguang > > -Original Message- > > From: linux-pm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pm- > > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Fengguang Wu > > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 9:22 AM > > To: Chen, Yu C > > Cc: kbuild-...@01.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; l...@ke

Re: [PATCH 2/3][v2] ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:08:29AM +0800, Chen, Yu C wrote: > This should not be a valid warning IMO, > because PATCH 2/3 is based on PATCH 1/3, > and the warning of implicit declaration is defined > in PATCH 1/3. Yes sorry, the robot treats the patchset as 3 independent patches: 2754 N L Oct

Re: [PATCH 2/3][v2] ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events

gguang > > -Original Message- > > From: linux-pm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pm- > > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Fengguang Wu > > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 9:22 AM > > To: Chen, Yu C > > Cc: kbuild-...@01.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; l...@ke

Re: [PATCH 2/3][v2] ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:08:29AM +0800, Chen, Yu C wrote: > This should not be a valid warning IMO, > because PATCH 2/3 is based on PATCH 1/3, > and the warning of implicit declaration is defined > in PATCH 1/3. Yes sorry, the robot treats the patchset as 3 independent patches: 2754 N L Oct

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:47:23PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:14 AM, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here.

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings

sed which set it automatically > > > > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci > > > > CC: William Breathitt Gray > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > > This is confusing, I mix up the mails coming from my pushed git branches > with thi

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >