> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Greg KH
> Envoyé : 13 décembre 2007 01:35
>
> 2.6.22-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections,
> please let us know.
>
> --
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Greg KH
Envoyé : 13 décembre 2007 01:35
2.6.22-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections,
please let us know.
--
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
patch
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Dhaval Giani
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:57:33AM -0500, Fortier,Vincent
> [Montreal] wrote:
> > > -Message d'origine-
> > > De : Dhaval Giani [mailto:[
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
> Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
>
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : Dhaval Giani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dhaval Giani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:06:53PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > That has changed from /sy
-Message d'origine-
De : Dhaval Giani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:06:53PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That has changed from /sys/kernel/uids/uid/cpu_share
Here is my config.
Maybie
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
-Message d'origine-
De : Dhaval Giani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:06:53PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fortier,Vincent
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Dhaval Giani
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:57:33AM -0500, Fortier,Vincent
[Montreal] wrote:
-Message d'origine-
De : Dhaval Giani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Dhaval Giani
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:04:00AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:13:19PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 08:24:37PM +0530, Dhaval
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Dhaval Giani
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:04:00AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:13:19PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 08:24:37PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Randy Dunlap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : 10 décembre 2007 12:15
>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:03:17 -0500 Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] wrote:
>
> Ingo, can you look at this, please?
> Vincent is getting oopses on 2.6.22.14-cfs-etc
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
> Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
> Envoyé : 10 décembre 2007 08:21
> À : Randy Dunlap; Andrew Morton
> Cc : linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Objet : RE: 2.6.22.14 oops m
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Randy Dunlap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : 7 décembre 2007 20:15
>
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:11:13 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:15:36 -0800
> > Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Help would really be
-Message d'origine-
De : Randy Dunlap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 7 décembre 2007 20:15
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:11:13 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:15:36 -0800
Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Help would really be appreciated.
Let's
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
Envoyé : 10 décembre 2007 08:21
À : Randy Dunlap; Andrew Morton
Cc : linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Objet : RE: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy
-Message d'origine-
De : Randy Dunlap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 10 décembre 2007 12:15
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:03:17 -0500 Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] wrote:
Ingo, can you look at this, please?
Vincent is getting oopses on 2.6.22.14-cfs-etch.
Vincent, did you apply
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Randy Dunlap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : 30 novembre 2007 12:13
>
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:02:54 + Vincent Fortier wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm using a 2.6.22.14 + CFS v24 and I got theses errors
> when starting
> > up my commvault galaxy
-Message d'origine-
De : Randy Dunlap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 30 novembre 2007 12:13
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:02:54 + Vincent Fortier wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using a 2.6.22.14 + CFS v24 and I got theses errors
when starting
up my commvault galaxy client... Do
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
>
>
> * Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 04:17:56PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > By popular demand, here is release -v24 of the CFS
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
>
> By popular demand, here is release -v24 of the CFS scheduler patch.
>
> It is a full backport of the latest & greatest scheduler code
> to v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13,
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
By popular demand, here is release -v24 of the CFS scheduler patch.
It is a full backport of the latest greatest scheduler code
to v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7. The
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
* Erik Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 04:17:56PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
By popular demand, here is release -v24 of the CFS
scheduler patch.
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : 7 novembre 2007 15:33
>
> (+linux-usb-devel)
>
> > On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:19:47 -0500 "Fortier,Vincent
> [Montreal]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
Hi all,
I'm having a preblem with a few workstations that are hard freezing from
time to time since about a week. Curiously since then we upgraded from
2.6.20.6 to 2.6.20.10...
While investigating I found out that there seems to be a problem,
occuring randomly on some workstations after a
Hi all,
I'm having a preblem with a few workstations that are hard freezing from
time to time since about a week. Curiously since then we upgraded from
2.6.20.6 to 2.6.20.10...
While investigating I found out that there seems to be a problem,
occuring randomly on some workstations after a
-Message d'origine-
De : Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 7 novembre 2007 15:33
(+linux-usb-devel)
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:19:47 -0500 Fortier,Vincent
[Montreal] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a preblem with a few workstations that are hard freezing
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
> Envoyé : 26 septembre 2007 07:14
>
> By popular demand, here is release -v22 of the CFS scheduler.
> It is a full backport of the latest & greatest
> sched-devel.git code to v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7 and
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
Envoyé : 26 septembre 2007 07:14
By popular demand, here is release -v22 of the CFS scheduler.
It is a full backport of the latest greatest
sched-devel.git code to v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7 and
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Nick Bowler
>
> I haven't read too much into the patch, but some quick
> comments. Most applies
> throughout:
>
> > +#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= 0x020616)
> KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,22) is much more
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Nick Bowler
I haven't read too much into the patch, but some quick
comments. Most applies
throughout:
+#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x020616)
KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,22) is much more readable than
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Eric Dumazet
>
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:37:50 -0400
> "Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> &g
Hi all,
We are testing new hardware and planning a switch from our old redhat
7.3 to a Debian Etch 4.0 for our radar forecast analysis systems. We
found out that our main IPC dispatcher software module would use 100% of
a CPU all the time and that the IPC queues would fill up quickly on a
2.6
Hi all,
We are testing new hardware and planning a switch from our old redhat
7.3 to a Debian Etch 4.0 for our radar forecast analysis systems. We
found out that our main IPC dispatcher software module would use 100% of
a CPU all the time and that the IPC queues would fill up quickly on a
2.6
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Eric Dumazet
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:37:50 -0400
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
We are testing new hardware and planning a switch from our old
redhat
7.3
Hi all,
Sadly I have to use the Apani/Nortel VPN linux client to connect to my office.
The latest version (3.5) stopped being compatible with the latest stable 2.6.22
kernel (how suprising :().
Since
1) I'm stuck using that closed source/proprietary software
2) there will most probably not be
Hi all,
Sadly I have to use the Apani/Nortel VPN linux client to connect to my office.
The latest version (3.5) stopped being compatible with the latest stable 2.6.22
kernel (how suprising :().
Since
1) I'm stuck using that closed source/proprietary software
2) there will most probably not be
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Chuck Ebbert
> Envoyé : 3 juillet 2007 17:03
>
> On 07/03/2007 03:28 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> > Arne Georg Gleditsch wrote:
> >
> >> An interesting exercise might be to
> >> code up a small
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
> Chris Friesen
>
> Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > All my servers and workstations running a 2.6.21.5 kernel hanged
> > exactly
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
> Arne Georg Gleditsch
>
> Florian Attenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > yep, controlled by ntpd.
> > You're right according to
> > ftp://hpiers.obspm.fr/iers/bul/bulc/bulletinc.33
> > that
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Clemens Koller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : 3 juillet 2007 09:05
>
> Hi, Vincent!
>
> Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] schrieb:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > All my servers and workstations running a 2.6.21.5 kernel hanged
&g
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
> Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
> Envoyé : 3 juillet 2007 08:44
>
> Hi all,
>
> All my servers and workstations running a 2.6.21.5 kernel
> hanged exactly when the dat
Hi all,
All my servers and workstations running a 2.6.21.5 kernel hanged exactly
when the date shift from june 30th to july 1st.
On my monitoring system every single station running a 2.6.21.5 kernel
stoped responding exactly after midnight on the date shift from June
30th to July 1st.
Hi all,
All my servers and workstations running a 2.6.21.5 kernel hanged exactly
when the date shift from june 30th to july 1st.
On my monitoring system every single station running a 2.6.21.5 kernel
stoped responding exactly after midnight on the date shift from June
30th to July 1st.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
Envoyé : 3 juillet 2007 08:44
Hi all,
All my servers and workstations running a 2.6.21.5 kernel
hanged exactly when the date shift from june 30th to july 1st
-Message d'origine-
De : Clemens Koller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 3 juillet 2007 09:05
Hi, Vincent!
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] schrieb:
Hi all,
All my servers and workstations running a 2.6.21.5 kernel hanged
exactly when the date shift from june 30th to july
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Arne Georg Gleditsch
Florian Attenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yep, controlled by ntpd.
You're right according to
ftp://hpiers.obspm.fr/iers/bul/bulc/bulletinc.33
that event shouldn't
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Chris Friesen
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] wrote:
Hi all,
All my servers and workstations running a 2.6.21.5 kernel hanged
exactly when the date shift from june 30th to july 1st
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Chuck Ebbert
Envoyé : 3 juillet 2007 17:03
On 07/03/2007 03:28 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
Arne Georg Gleditsch wrote:
An interesting exercise might be to
code up a small program to call
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
> Envoyé : 22 juin 2007 18:02
>
> i'm pleased to announce release -v18 of the CFS scheduler patchset.
>
> The rolled-up CFS patch against today's -git kernel,
> v2.6.22-rc5,
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
Envoyé : 22 juin 2007 18:02
i'm pleased to announce release -v18 of the CFS scheduler patchset.
The rolled-up CFS patch against today's -git kernel,
v2.6.22-rc5, v2.6.22-rc4-mm2,
> Huh? eth0 and eth1 are the e1000 adapters, eth3 (and
> presumably eth2) are the bnx2 adapters..
Got it... Almost...
There was a confusion between
/etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules, the fact that bnx2 was in
the initrd image but not e1000.
So I edited
Huh? eth0 and eth1 are the e1000 adapters, eth3 (and
presumably eth2) are the bnx2 adapters..
Got it... Almost...
There was a confusion between
/etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules, the fact that bnx2 was in
the initrd image but not e1000.
So I edited
When trying manually to get the on-board broadcom adapter working I get
this:
Jun 21 16:50:47 urpdev1 kernel: [ 184.528092] Broadcom NetXtreme II
Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v1.4.45 (September 29, 2006)
Jun 21 16:50:47 urpdev1 kernel: [ 184.539831] ACPI: PCI Interrupt
:05:00.0[A] -> GSI 16
When trying manually to get the on-board broadcom adapter working I get
this:
Jun 21 16:50:47 urpdev1 kernel: [ 184.528092] Broadcom NetXtreme II
Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v1.4.45 (September 29, 2006)
Jun 21 16:50:47 urpdev1 kernel: [ 184.539831] ACPI: PCI Interrupt
:05:00.0[A] - GSI 16
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Natalie Protasevich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : 18 juin 2007 18:56
>
> On 6/18/07, Martin Bligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > So if you make changes to random-driver.c you can do `git-log
> > >> > random-driver.c|grep Tested-by" to find people
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
> Andrew Morton
>
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:15:15 +0200 Stefan Richter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Tested-by
>
> Tested-by would be good too. Because over time, we will
> generate a list
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Andrew Morton
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:15:15 +0200 Stefan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tested-by
Tested-by would be good too. Because over time, we will
generate a list of people who
-Message d'origine-
De : Natalie Protasevich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 18 juin 2007 18:56
On 6/18/07, Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if you make changes to random-driver.c you can do `git-log
random-driver.c|grep Tested-by to find people who can test your
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
> Envoyé : 14 juin 2007 18:49
>
> i'm pleased to announce release -v17 of the CFS scheduler patchset.
>
> The rolled-up CFS patch against v2.6.22-rc4, v2.6.22-rc4-mm2,
> v2.6.21.5 or
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
Envoyé : 14 juin 2007 18:49
i'm pleased to announce release -v17 of the CFS scheduler patchset.
The rolled-up CFS patch against v2.6.22-rc4, v2.6.22-rc4-mm2,
v2.6.21.5 or v2.6.20.13
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
> Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
> Envoyé : 12 juin 2007 21:36
> À : Miguel Figueiredo; linux kernel mailing list; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc : Con Kolivas; Ingo Molnar
> Objet : RE:
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
> Miguel Figueiredo
> Envoyé : 11 juin 2007 20:30
>
> Hi all,
>
> some results based on massing_intr.c by Satoru, can be found
> on
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Miguel Figueiredo
Envoyé : 11 juin 2007 20:30
Hi all,
some results based on massing_intr.c by Satoru, can be found
on http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/massive_intr.c
I
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
Envoyé : 12 juin 2007 21:36
À : Miguel Figueiredo; linux kernel mailing list; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : Con Kolivas; Ingo Molnar
Objet : RE: call for more SD versus CFS
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Chris Wright
> Envoyé : 8 juin 2007 03:15
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the
> 2.6.20.14 release.
> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a
> response to
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Chris Wright
Envoyé : 8 juin 2007 03:15
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the
2.6.20.14 release.
There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a
response to this one.
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Greg KH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : 22 mai 2007 23:37
> À : Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Fortier,Vincent
> [Montreal] wrote:
> > > -Message d'origine-
> > &g
-Message d'origine-
De : Greg KH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 22 mai 2007 23:37
À : Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Fortier,Vincent
[Montreal] wrote:
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Chuck Ebbert
> Envoyé : 21 mai 2007 18:24
>
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:12 -0700
> >> Chris Wright <[EMAIL
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Chuck Ebbert
Envoyé : 21 mai 2007 18:24
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:12 -0700
Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
> Envoyé : 7 mai 2007 12:34
>
>
> i'm pleased to announce release -v10 of the CFS scheduler patchset.
> (The main goal of CFS is to implement "desktop scheduling"
> with as high
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
Envoyé : 7 mai 2007 12:34
i'm pleased to announce release -v10 of the CFS scheduler patchset.
(The main goal of CFS is to implement desktop scheduling
with as high quality as
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Con Kolivas
> Envoyé : 3 mai 2007 02:30
>
> I've done some minor cleanups and microoptimisations to the
> code since version
> 0.46 in preparation for releasing -ck with SD as its base.
>
>
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Con Kolivas
Envoyé : 3 mai 2007 02:30
I've done some minor cleanups and microoptimisations to the
code since version
0.46 in preparation for releasing -ck with SD as its base.
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Con Kolivas
> Envoyé : 21 avril 2007 03:57
>
> A significant bugfix for forking tasks was just posted, so
> here is an updated version of the staircase deadline cpu
> scheduler. This may cause
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Con Kolivas
Envoyé : 21 avril 2007 03:57
A significant bugfix for forking tasks was just posted, so
here is an updated version of the staircase deadline cpu
scheduler. This may cause noticeable
>
> I've noticed that with 4GB physical ram, I'm only see 3098000
> MB on the Dell 745, and 3107056MB on the IBM X60s.
>
> I've tested with CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y, CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y,
> CONFIG_X86_PAE=y, but nothing makes any difference.
>
> Tested on Linux 2.6.20, Linux 2.6.21-rc7.
Got similar
I've noticed that with 4GB physical ram, I'm only see 3098000
MB on the Dell 745, and 3107056MB on the IBM X60s.
I've tested with CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y, CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y,
CONFIG_X86_PAE=y, but nothing makes any difference.
Tested on Linux 2.6.20, Linux 2.6.21-rc7.
Got similar problem
Hi all,
In reference to this Bugzilla entry:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7110
I'm getting ACPI errors in the dmesg:
[7.443482] ACPI Error (evgpe-0711): No handler or method for GPE[
0], disabling event [20060707]
[7.449881] ACPI Error (evgpe-0711): No handler or method for
Hi all,
In reference to this Bugzilla entry:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7110
I'm getting ACPI errors in the dmesg:
[7.443482] ACPI Error (evgpe-0711): No handler or method for GPE[
0], disabling event [20060707]
[7.449881] ACPI Error (evgpe-0711): No handler or method for
Hi all,
Backports of the staircase deadline cpu scheduler version 0.37 for
2.6.18.8 and 2.6.19.7 kernels are available at
http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca/.
Also, Debian Etch 4.0 and Sarge 3.1 kernels for i686 are available (Deb
etch amd64 is currently compiling and FC6 will follow).
Vincent
Hi all,
Backports of the staircase deadline cpu scheduler version 0.37 for
2.6.18.8 and 2.6.19.7 kernels are available at
http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca/.
Also, Debian Etch 4.0 and Sarge 3.1 kernels for i686 are available (Deb
etch amd64 is currently compiling and FC6 will follow).
Vincent
Hi all,
Backports of the staircase deadline cpu scheduler for 2.6.18.8 and
2.6.19.7 kernels are available at http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca/.
Also, Debian Etch 4.0 kernels for both i686 and x86_64 are available.
Fedora Core 6 kernels might also be available later today/tomorrow.
Both patches
Hi all,
Backports of the staircase deadline cpu scheduler for 2.6.18.8 and
2.6.19.7 kernels are available at http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca/.
Also, Debian Etch 4.0 kernels for both i686 and x86_64 are available.
Fedora Core 6 kernels might also be available later today/tomorrow.
Both patches
Hi all,
A backported version of the RSDL 0.33 patch is now available at
http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca for a 2.6.18.8 kernel.
There are also a few 2.6.18/2.6.20 pre-built kernels available for both
Debian Etch (x86_64) and Fedora 6 (x86_64, i686 will follow).
Vincent Fortier
Informatique
>
> Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > Con Kolivas wrote:
> >> On Friday 23 March 2007 05:17, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> >>> Ok, I have yet a third x86_64 machine is is blowing up with the
> >>> latest
> >>> 2.6.21-rc4-mm1+hotfixes+rsdl-0.32 but working with
> >>> 2.6.21-rc4-mm1+hotfixes-RSDL. I have
Andy Whitcroft wrote:
Con Kolivas wrote:
On Friday 23 March 2007 05:17, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
Ok, I have yet a third x86_64 machine is is blowing up with the
latest
2.6.21-rc4-mm1+hotfixes+rsdl-0.32 but working with
2.6.21-rc4-mm1+hotfixes-RSDL. I have results on various hotfix
Hi all,
A backported version of the RSDL 0.33 patch is now available at
http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca for a 2.6.18.8 kernel.
There are also a few 2.6.18/2.6.20 pre-built kernels available for both
Debian Etch (x86_64) and Fedora 6 (x86_64, i686 will follow).
Vincent Fortier
Informatique
Hi all,
A backported version of the RSDL 0.32 patch is now available at
http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca for a 2.6.18.8 kernel.
There are also a few 2.6.18/2.6.20 pre-built kernels available for both
Debian Etch (x86_64) and Fedora 6 (x86_64).
Vincent Fortier
Informatique
Environnement Canada
-
Hi all,
A backported version of the RSDL 0.32 patch is now available at
http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca for a 2.6.18.8 kernel.
There are also a few 2.6.18/2.6.20 pre-built kernels available for both
Debian Etch (x86_64) and Fedora 6 (x86_64).
Vincent Fortier
Informatique
Environnement Canada
-
> On Monday 12 March 2007 22:21, Michael Gerdau wrote:
> > > > And here are the backported RSDL 0.30 patches in case any of you
> > > > would still be running an older 2.6.18.8 kernel ...
> >
> > The original mail doesn't seem to have made it to the ck-list.
> >
> > Where would I find the
>
> Hello Vincent,
>
> As it seems the 5s net gain is during the early phase of the
> boot process, could you please post longer dmesgs, to let us
> know where the gain occurs ?
Hi Paul,
Here is an sdiff between the two dmesg:
[0.00] Linux version 2.6.18.8-amd64-envcan-003 (root@ | [
Hello Vincent,
As it seems the 5s net gain is during the early phase of the
boot process, could you please post longer dmesgs, to let us
know where the gain occurs ?
Hi Paul,
Here is an sdiff between the two dmesg:
[0.00] Linux version 2.6.18.8-amd64-envcan-003 (root@ | [
On Monday 12 March 2007 22:21, Michael Gerdau wrote:
And here are the backported RSDL 0.30 patches in case any of you
would still be running an older 2.6.18.8 kernel ...
The original mail doesn't seem to have made it to the ck-list.
Where would I find the backported RSDL 0.30
Hi all,
>
> Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
>
> Full patch:
> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-
> rsdl-0.28.patch
>
> Series:
> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/
>
> The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28:
>
Hi all,
Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
Full patch:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-
rsdl-0.28.patch
Series:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/
The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28:
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : 27 février 2007 11:15
> À : Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
> Objet : RE: Boot time Bluetooth BUG: warning: (value > m) at
> hid-core.c:793
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] wrote:
>
> > Actually it's the first time I'm trying this
>
> we understand the original CSR HID proxy dongles, but for the Logitech
> ones, it is wild guesses. The current support in hid2hci has been
> tested on Logitech diNovo first generation and I have no other
> Logitech hardware to verify it with. We might simply need
> the full HID report
we understand the original CSR HID proxy dongles, but for the Logitech
ones, it is wild guesses. The current support in hid2hci has been
tested on Logitech diNovo first generation and I have no other
Logitech hardware to verify it with. We might simply need
the full HID report
.
- vin
-Message d'origine-
De : Jiri Kosina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 27 février 2007 11:15
À : Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
Objet : RE: Boot time Bluetooth BUG: warning: (value m) at
hid-core.c:793
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] wrote:
Actually
100 matches
Mail list logo
