Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] docs: path-lookup: update follow_managed() part

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:22 AM Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > Fox Chen writes: > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:25 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:33:00AM +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > >> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:17 AM Ma

RE: [PATCH 5.11 000/122] 5.11.16-rc1 review

11.16-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.11.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > 5.11.16-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711) Tested-by: Fox Chen

RE: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review

10.32-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > 5.10.32-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711) Tested-by: Fox Chen

Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] docs: path-lookup: update follow_managed() part

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:25 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:33:00AM +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:17 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:47:16PM +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > > &

Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] docs: path-lookup: update symlink description

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 9:59 AM NeilBrown wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 16 2021, Fox Chen wrote: > > > instead of lookup_real()/vfs_create(), i_op->lookup() and > > i_op->create() will be called directly. > > > > update vfs_open() logic > > >

Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] docs: path-lookup: update follow_managed() part

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:17 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:47:16PM +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > > -In the absence of symbolic links, ``walk_component()`` creates a new > > +As the last step of ``walk_component()``, ``step_into()`` will be called > >

RE: [PATCH 5.10 00/25] 5.10.31-rc1 review

z > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > 5.10.31-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711) Tested-by: Fox Chen

RE: [PATCH 5.11 00/23] 5.11.15-rc1 review

z > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.11.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > 5.11.15-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711) Tested-by: Fox Chen

[PATCH v2 12/12] docs: path-lookup: update symlink description

instead of lookup_real()/vfs_create(), i_op->lookup() and i_op->create() will be called directly. update vfs_open() logic should_follow_link is merged into lookup_last() or open_last_lookup() which returns symlink name instead of an integer. Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documen

[PATCH v2 10/12] docs: path-lookup: update WALK_GET, WALK_PUT desc

t;) commit 1c4ff1a87e46 ("namei: invert WALK_PUT logics") Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 12 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rs

[PATCH v2 09/12] docs: path-lookup: no get_link()

no get_link() anymore. we have step_into() and pick_link(). walk_component() will call step_into(), in turn call pick_link, and return symlink name. Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 10 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff

[PATCH v2 11/12] docs: path-lookup: update get_link() ->follow_link description

get_link() is merged into pick_link(). i_op->follow_link is replaced with i_op->get_link(). get_link() can return ERR_PTR(0) which equals NULL. Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 13 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff

[PATCH v2 06/12] docs: path-lookup: Add macro name to symlink limit description

Add macro name MAXSYMLINKS to the symlink limit description, so that it is consistent with path name length description above. Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems

[PATCH v2 07/12] docs: path-lookup: i_op->follow_link replaced with i_op->get_link

follow_link has been replaced by get_link() which can be called in RCU mode. see commit: commit 6b2553918d8b ("replace ->follow_link() with new method that could stay in RCU mode") Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 12 +--- 1 fi

[PATCH v2 08/12] docs: path-lookup: update i_op->put_link and cookie description

No inode->put_link operation anymore. We use delayed_call to deal with link destruction. Cookie has been replaced with struct delayed_call. Related commit: commit fceef393a538 ("switch ->get_link() to delayed_call, kill ->put_link()") Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentati

[PATCH v2 05/12] docs: path-lookup: remove filename_mountpoint

ctions" Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst index a65cb477d524..66697db74955 100644 --- a/Docume

[PATCH v2 04/12] docs: path-lookup: update do_last() part

traling_symlink() was merged into lookup_last, do_last(). do_last() has later been split into open_last_lookups() and do_open(). see related commit: commit c5971b8c6354 ("take post-lookup part of do_last() out of loop") Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-

[PATCH v2 02/12] docs: path-lookup: update path_to_nameidata() part

No path_to_namei() anymore, step_into() will be called. Related commit: commit c99687a03a78 ("fold path_to_nameidata() into its only remaining caller") Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

[PATCH v2 01/12] docs: path-lookup: update follow_managed() part

No follow_managed() anymore, handle_mounts(), traverse_mounts(), will do the job. see commit 9deed3ebca24 ("new helper: traverse_mounts()") Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

[PATCH v2 03/12] docs: path-lookup: update path_mountpoint() part

path_mountpoint() doesn't exist anymore. Have been folded into path_lookup_at when flag is set with LOOKUP_MOUNTPOINT. Check commit: commit 161aff1d93abf0e ("LOOKUP_MOUNTPOINT: fold path_mountpointat() into path_lookupat()") Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-

[PATCH v2 00/12] docs: path-lookup: Update pathlookup docs

p out of RCU-walk" 6. In Patch 08 "latter" should be "later", fix it and restructure the next paragrah removing "Finally" To help review, I've put a compiled html version here: http://linux-docs.54fox.com/linux_docs/filesystems/path-lookup-v2.html Fo

Re: [PATCH 00/12] docs: path-lookup: Update pathlookup docs

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:58 AM NeilBrown wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26 2021, Fox Chen wrote: > > > The Path lookup is a very complex subject in VFS. The path-lookup > > document provides a very detailed guidance to help people understand > > how path lookup works

Re: [PATCH 00/12] docs: path-lookup: Update pathlookup docs

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 4:31 AM Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:24:31 +0800 > Fox Chen wrote: > > > The Path lookup is a very complex subject in VFS. The path-lookup > > document provides a very detailed guidance to help people understand &

Re: [PATCH 01/12] docs: path-lookup: update follow_managed() part

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:03 PM Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 03:24:32PM +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > > No follow_managed() anymore, handle_mounts(), > > traverse_mounts(), will do the job. > > see commit: 9deed3ebca244663530782631834e706a86a8c8f >

[PATCH 10/12] docs: path-lookup: update WALK_GET, WALK_PUT desc

1c4ff1a87e46a06fc00a83da2fbbc3ac0298f221 Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 12 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst index 915c9ffe22c1..921779a4636f 100644

[PATCH 08/12] docs: path-lookup: update i_op->put_link and cookie description

No inode->put_link operation anymore. We use delayed_call to deal with link destruction. Cookie has been replaced with struct delayed_call. Related commit: fceef393a538134f03b778c5d2519e670269342f Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst |

[PATCH 09/12] docs: path-lookup: no get_link()

no get_link() anymore. we have step_into() and pick_link(). walk_component() will call step_into(), in turn call pick_link, and return symlink name. Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 10 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff

Re: [PATCH 00/12] docs: path-lookup: Update pathlookup docs

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 3:25 PM Fox Chen wrote: > > The Path lookup is a very complex subject in VFS. The path-lookup > document provides a very detailed guidance to help people understand > how path lookup works in the kernel.This document was originally > written based on thr

[PATCH 07/12] docs: path-lookup: i_op->follow_link replaced with i_op->get_link

follow_link has been replaced by get_link() which can be called in RCU mode. see commit: 6b2553918d8b4e6de9853fd6315bec7271a2e592 Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 12 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation

[PATCH 12/12] docs: path-lookup: update symlink description

instead of lookup_real()/vfs_create(), i_op->lookup() and i_op->create() will be called directly. update vfs_open() logic should_follow_link is merged into lookup_last() or open_last_lookup() which returns symlink name instead of an integer. Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documen

[PATCH 11/12] docs: path-lookup: update get_link() ->follow_link description

get_link() is merged into pick_link(). i_op->follow_link is replaced with i_op->get_link(). get_link() can return ERR_PTR(0) which equals NULL. Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 13 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff

[PATCH 04/12] docs: path-lookup: update do_last() part

traling_symlink() was merged into lookup_last, do_last(). do_last() has later been split into open_last_lookups() and do_open(). see related commit: c5971b8c6354a95c9ee7eb722928af5000bac247 Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 34 +++ 1

[PATCH 06/12] docs: path-lookup: Add macro name to symlink limit description

Add macro name MAXSYMLINKS to the symlink limit description, so that it is consistent with path name length description above. Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems

[PATCH 00/12] docs: path-lookup: Update pathlookup docs

was outdated. This patchset is intended to update the document to make it more relevant to current codebase. Fox Chen (12): docs: path-lookup: update follow_managed() part docs: path-lookup: update path_to_nameidata() parth docs: path-lookup: update path_mountpoint() part docs: path-lookup: update

[PATCH 02/12] docs: path-lookup: update path_to_nameidata() parth

No path_to_namei() anymore, step_into() will be called. Related commit: c99687a03a78775f77d57fe9b07af4c8ec3dd03c Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst b

[PATCH 03/12] docs: path-lookup: update path_mountpoint() part

path_mountpoint() doesn't exist anymore. Have been folded into path_lookup_at when flag is set with LOOKUP_MOUNTPOINT. check out commit:161aff1d93abf0e5b5e9dbca88928998c155f677 Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1

[PATCH 05/12] docs: path-lookup: remove filename_mountpoint

No filename_mountpoint any more see commit: 161aff1d93abf0e5b5e9dbca88928998c155f677 Without filename_mountpoint and path_mountpoint(), the numbers should be four & three: "These four correspond roughly to the three path_*() functions" Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentati

[PATCH 01/12] docs: path-lookup: update follow_managed() part

No follow_managed() anymore, handle_mounts(), traverse_mounts(), will do the job. see commit: 9deed3ebca244663530782631834e706a86a8c8f Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] kernfs: proposed locking and concurrency improvement

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 7:52 AM Ian Kent wrote: > > On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 11:23 -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 03:08:13PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > And looking further I see there's a race that kernfs can't do > > > anything > > > about between

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] kernfs: proposed locking and concurrency improvement

On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 8:53 AM Ian Kent wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 21:20 +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:21 PM Ian Kent wrote: > > > On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 16:01 +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 3:36 PM Ian Kent

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] kernfs: proposed locking and concurrency improvement

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:21 PM Ian Kent wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 16:01 +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 3:36 PM Ian Kent wrote: > > > On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 10:14 -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] kernfs: proposed locking and concurrency improvement

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 3:36 PM Ian Kent wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 10:14 -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 07:48:49PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > What could be done is to make the kernfs node attr_mutex > > > > a pointer and dynamically allocate it but

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] kernfs: proposed locking and concurrency improvement

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:46 PM Ian Kent wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 20:59 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 16:33 +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:30 PM Ian Kent wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2020-12-14 at 14:14 +0800, Fox Che

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] kernfs: proposed locking and concurrency improvement

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:30 PM Ian Kent wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-12-14 at 14:14 +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 11:46 AM Ian Kent wrote: > > > On Fri, 2020-12-11 at 10:17 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2020-12-

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] kernfs: proposed locking and concurrency improvement

On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 11:46 AM Ian Kent wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-12-11 at 10:17 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-12-11 at 10:01 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > For the patches, there is a mutex_lock in kn->attr_mutex, as > > > > Tejun > > > > mentioned here > > > >

[tip: core/rcu] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Fix a typo in CPU MEMORY BARRIERS section

The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip: Commit-ID: d8566f15da9b1e51fd35f24321ec133095e02d06 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/d8566f15da9b1e51fd35f24321ec133095e02d06 Author:Fox Chen AuthorDate:Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:53:40 +08:00 Committer

RE:[PATCH v2 0/6] kernfs: proposed locking and concurrency improvement

Hi, I found this series of patches solves exact the problem I am trying to solve. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201202145837.48040-1-foxhlc...@gmail.com/ The problem is reported by Brice Goglin on thread: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers core: Introduce CPU type sysfs interface

[PATCH V2] kernfs: replace the mutex in kernfs_iop_permission with a rwlock

96-core AMD EPYC ROME server, I can observe 50% boost on a open+read+close cycle when I call open+read+close one thread per core concurrently 1000 times after applying the patch. Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- fs/kernfs/inode.c | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deleti

Re: [PATCH 2/2] kernfs: remove mutex in kernfs_dop_revalidate

On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:46 AM Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:58:37PM +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > > There is a big mutex in kernfs_dop_revalidate which slows down the > > concurrent performance of kernfs. > > > > Since kernfs_dop_revali

Re: [PATCH 0/2] kernfs: speed up concurrency performance

On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:28 AM Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:58:35PM +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > > Hello, > > > > kernfs is an important facillity to support pseudo file systems and cgroup. > > Currently, with a global mutex, reading files concurrent

Re: [PATCH 2/2] kernfs: remove mutex in kernfs_dop_revalidate

On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:26 AM Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:58:37PM +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > > There is a big mutex in kernfs_dop_revalidate which slows down the > > concurrent performance of kernfs. > > > > Since kernfs_dop_revalidate o

Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernfs: replace the mutex in kernfs_iop_permission with a rwlock

Hi, Thanks for your comments. > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:58:36PM +0800, Fox Chen wrote: > > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ int kernfs_iop_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct > > iattr *iattr) > > if (!kn) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > - m

[PATCH 1/2] kernfs: replace the mutex in kernfs_iop_permission with a rwlock

te. So that kernfs_iop_permission can perform concurrently. Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- fs/kernfs/inode.c | 16 include/linux/kernfs.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/kernfs/inode.c b/fs/kernfs/inode.c index fc2469a20fed..c8c2ea669e6d 100644 --- a/fs/

[PATCH 0/2] kernfs: speed up concurrency performance

Hello, kernfs is an important facillity to support pseudo file systems and cgroup. Currently, with a global mutex, reading files concurrently from kernfs (e.g. /sys) is very slow. This problem is reported by Brice Goglin on thread: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers core: Introduce CPU type sysfs

[PATCH 2/2] kernfs: remove mutex in kernfs_dop_revalidate

/locking.html locking is not in the protocal for d_revalidate operation. This patch remove this mutex from kernfs_dop_revalidate, so kernfs_dop_revalidate can run concurrently. Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- fs/kernfs/dir.c | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs

Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers core: Introduce CPU type sysfs interface

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 2:15 PM Brice Goglin wrote: > > > Le 12/11/2020 à 11:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman a écrit : > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:10:57AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: > > Le 12/11/2020 à 07:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman a écrit : > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 07:19:48AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:

[PATCH] squashfs: Add id_table sanity check to squashfs_get_id

_table - msblk->id_table[0] and check if index is larger than this. While this provides some sort of check, it is imperfect because id_table can be smaller than that. Reported-by: syzbot+8e28bba73ed1772a6...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- fs/squashfs/id.c | 8 +++

[PATCH] NTFS: Add name sanity check to ntfs_attr_find

-by: syzbot+ecbcf37464c627253...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- fs/ntfs/attrib.c | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/ntfs/attrib.c b/fs/ntfs/attrib.c index d563abc3e136..e7366f74ff62 100644 --- a/fs/ntfs/attrib.c +++ b/fs/ntfs/attrib.c

Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] fs: gfs2: prevent OOB access in gfs2_read_sb()

Hi Andrew, On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:04 PM Andrew Price wrote: > Just a heads-up to avoid duplication of effort: Fox Chen (CCed) has > attempted to fix this also[1], but I don't know if they plan to send > another patch. Oh, I thought it was solved by someone else as you've po

Re: [Cluster-devel] KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Write in,gfs2_fill_super

Yes, it's the same bug, https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/10/5/538 this may help thanks,

Re: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Read in squashfs_get_id

Hi, I found this bug was caused by either uid/gid info in superblocks or id_index_table is corrupted. The uid/gid index is larger than the size of msblk->id_table. Should I add a sanity check to squashfs_get_id?? The complete solution is to record the size of msblk->id_table in msblk and

Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] gfs2: gfs2_read_sb: put gfs2_assert inside the loop

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:23 PM Andrew Price wrote: > > On 03/10/2020 07:31, Fox Chen wrote: > > for (x = 2;; x++) { > > ... > > gfs2_assert(sdp, x <= GFS2_MAX_META_HEIGHT); <--- after > > ... > >

[PATCH] gfs2: gfs2_read_sb: put gfs2_assert inside the loop

ries to reach the out-of-bound location, gfs2_assert won't help here. This patch fixes this by moving gfs2_assert into the loop. We will check x value each time to see if it exceeds GFS2_MAX_META_HEIGHT. Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 del

[PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Fix a typo in CPU MEMORY BARRIERS section

Commit 39323c6 smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic(): update Documentation has a typo in CPU MEORY BARRIERS section: "RMW functions that do not imply are memory barrier are ..." should be "RMW functions that do not imply a memory barrier are ...". This patch fixes this typo. Sig

HCI_EV_PHY_LINK_COMPLETE in net/bluetooth/hci_event.c

Dear all, I have a question about static void hci_phy_link_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) -- HCI_EV_PHY_LINK_COMPLETE event packet handler in hci_even.c:4940 if (ev->status) { hci_conn_del(hcon); <-- hci_dev_unlock(hdev);

[PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Cleanup open brace issues

This cleans up open brace issues reported by checkpatch.pl Signed-off-by: Fox Chen --- .../staging/rtl8723bs/include/HalPwrSeqCmd.h | 6 +-- drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/HalVerDef.h | 18 +++ drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/drv_types.h | 6 +-- .../rtl8723bs/include