You are correct, this is supposed to be handled by ACPI. However, this has
yet to be implemented in Linux's ACPI support. Check back in 6 months. :)
Regards -- Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 2:52 PM
>
This is pretty weird, since the latest ACPI update went in pre10, and it was
pretty minor. That you are saying problems started in pre8 implies this is
not a problem with the ACPI driver, but something else.. hmm..
So it worked in pre7 and broke in pre8?
Regards -- Andy
> Date: Wed, 24 Jan
This is pretty weird, since the latest ACPI update went in pre10, and it was
pretty minor. That you are saying problems started in pre8 implies this is
not a problem with the ACPI driver, but something else.. hmm..
So it worked in pre7 and broke in pre8?
Regards -- Andy
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001
You are correct, this is supposed to be handled by ACPI. However, this has
yet to be implemented in Linux's ACPI support. Check back in 6 months. :)
Regards -- Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 2:52 PM
To:
acpi_get_rsdp_ptr is no longer used, so you can just remove its declaration.
I'm putting together another patch not so I'll include this fix.
Thanks -- Regards -- Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam J. Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 12:23 AM
> To:
acpi_get_rsdp_ptr is no longer used, so you can just remove its declaration.
I'm putting together another patch not so I'll include this fix.
Thanks -- Regards -- Andy
-Original Message-
From: Adam J. Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 12:23 AM
To:
> From: Michael D. Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > How is each of your setups, ie, what is compiled in kernel
> and what is
> > a module ? My guess is:
> > - ACPI+APM in kernel: ACPI wins
> > - APM in kernel, ACPI module; APM starts, blocks ACPI
> > - and so on
>
> Nope. If
> From: safemode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Well, it seems the only way to look at sensor readings with
> lmsensors is
> to activate acpi in linux for my motherboard.
Can you please send me the output from dmesg, as well as /proc/interrupts? I
don't think anyone's tried lmsensors and acpi.
From: safemode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Well, it seems the only way to look at sensor readings with
lmsensors is
to activate acpi in linux for my motherboard.
Can you please send me the output from dmesg, as well as /proc/interrupts? I
don't think anyone's tried lmsensors and acpi. It
From: Michael D. Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
How is each of your setups, ie, what is compiled in kernel
and what is
a module ? My guess is:
- ACPI+APM in kernel: ACPI wins
- APM in kernel, ACPI module; APM starts, blocks ACPI
- and so on
Nope. If they're both in
(I'm keeping the CC to l-k, but let's move this to the acpilist, ok?)
acpi_get_battery_info is brand new code. It worked on my box, though ;-) can
you help me narrow down which of the assignments near the end of the
function is to blame? (via printk, I guess)
If you could post your DSDT that
(I'm keeping the CC to l-k, but let's move this to the acpilist, ok?)
acpi_get_battery_info is brand new code. It worked on my box, though ;-) can
you help me narrow down which of the assignments near the end of the
function is to blame? (via printk, I guess)
If you could post your DSDT that
I'm thinking arch/i386/kernel/acpi.c should just go away, yes?
Its purpose is probably better served by an ifdef, like you mentioned.
Regards -- Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam J. Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 5:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL
I'm thinking arch/i386/kernel/acpi.c should just go away, yes?
Its purpose is probably better served by an ifdef, like you mentioned.
Regards -- Andy
-Original Message-
From: Adam J. Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 5:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Is there?
If not, I think there may be a need for one, and I will start it.
-- Andy
Andrew Grover
Intel/TRL/MAL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read
I've had second-hand reports of an issue with ACPI and cardbus, but I
haven't enough about this to actually diagnose the problem.
Is anyone experiencing this?
If so, could you please provide some more details to me, so we can get this
fixed ASAP?
Thanks -- Regards -- Andy
I've had second-hand reports of an issue with ACPI and cardbus, but I
haven't enough about this to actually diagnose the problem.
Is anyone experiencing this?
If so, could you please provide some more details to me, so we can get this
fixed ASAP?
Thanks -- Regards -- Andy
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
