IRQ problem? (oops in test12)

2000-12-15 Thread Harley Anderson
Howdy again folks, I have another oops for ya's to look over... Yesterday when I was about to patch and build the new (test12) kernel I found the ominous message: Kernel panic: attempted to kill init! Something like that anyway. No other info, just locked up solid. No real clues on that one

IRQ problem? (oops in test12)

2000-12-15 Thread Harley Anderson
Howdy again folks, I have another oops for ya's to look over... Yesterday when I was about to patch and build the new (test12) kernel I found the ominous message: Kernel panic: attempted to kill init! Something like that anyway. No other info, just locked up solid. No real clues on that one

Re: 2.4.0-test8 tried to kill init! (addendum)

2000-09-16 Thread Harley Anderson
> This sounds like either some bit errors in memory > (memtest86 will find those), or a device driver > scribbling over memory, or the memory not being > refreshed or operated at the right speed (memory > to slow for the speed you're running it at?)... Hmm, Andrew just informed me that the

2.4.0-test8 tried to kill init!

2000-09-16 Thread Harley Anderson
I was just sitting here reading a page in lynx that I grabbed yesterday and got spammed by 2 or 3 oopsies.. The machine had been up for approximately 44 hours with fairly light load. Only caught the bottom of the 1st or second one but it had kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:194! at the bottom. The

2.4.0-test8 tried to kill init!

2000-09-16 Thread Harley Anderson
I was just sitting here reading a page in lynx that I grabbed yesterday and got spammed by 2 or 3 oopsies.. The machine had been up for approximately 44 hours with fairly light load. Only caught the bottom of the 1st or second one but it had kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:194! at the bottom. The

Re: 2.4.0-test8 tried to kill init! (addendum)

2000-09-16 Thread Harley Anderson
This sounds like either some bit errors in memory (memtest86 will find those), or a device driver scribbling over memory, or the memory not being refreshed or operated at the right speed (memory to slow for the speed you're running it at?)... Hmm, Andrew just informed me that the rtl8139

Problems with bluesmoke.c in 2.2.17

2000-09-08 Thread Harley Anderson
The other day I got the patch for 2.2.17 and after just over a day of normal operation, while my sister was playing kpat (KDE solitaire) yesterday afternoon, X died and dropped her out to the console. After she told me about it later on I found this at the bottom of my dmesg: CPU 0: Machine

Recurring oops in test7

2000-09-08 Thread Harley Anderson
While preparing my first ever post to lkml just now about a problem in 2.2.17 (which I will post after this hopefully), I was fortunate enough to get my first ever oops. I was in X at the time so I was unaware of the happy occasion. All I noticed was su segfault once or thrice and then I couldn't

Recurring oops in test7

2000-09-08 Thread Harley Anderson
While preparing my first ever post to lkml just now about a problem in 2.2.17 (which I will post after this hopefully), I was fortunate enough to get my first ever oops. I was in X at the time so I was unaware of the happy occasion. All I noticed was su segfault once or thrice and then I couldn't

Problems with bluesmoke.c in 2.2.17

2000-09-08 Thread Harley Anderson
The other day I got the patch for 2.2.17 and after just over a day of normal operation, while my sister was playing kpat (KDE solitaire) yesterday afternoon, X died and dropped her out to the console. After she told me about it later on I found this at the bottom of my dmesg: CPU 0: Machine