On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
Replacing strncpy with strlcpy to avoid strings that lacks null terminate.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se
---
drivers/s390/char/sclp_async.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2
asha could confirm
that reverting the patch actually does fix the crash, please revert the
commit, unless somebody else can make sense of the report of course.
I'm still wondering how Sasha could reproduce the crash.
Thanks,
Heiko
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 12:04:20PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> O
that reverting the patch actually does fix the crash, please revert the
commit, unless somebody else can make sense of the report of course.
I'm still wondering how Sasha could reproduce the crash.
Thanks,
Heiko
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 12:04:20PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 02:00:46PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> Add support for DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS to 64-bit and 31-bit s390
> architectures. This is required for kGraft and kpatch to work on s390.
>
> It's done by adding a _regs variant of ftrace_caller that preserves
> registers and
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 02:00:46PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
Add support for DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS to 64-bit and 31-bit s390
architectures. This is required for kGraft and kpatch to work on s390.
It's done by adding a _regs variant of ftrace_caller that preserves
registers and puts
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:54:37PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
> > So for sys_fanotify_mark everything is fine on s390, and probably most other
> > architectures as well. Having a 64 bit syscall parameter indeed does work,
> > if all the architecture specific details have been correctly
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:54:37PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
Hi Heiko,
So for sys_fanotify_mark everything is fine on s390, and probably most other
architectures as well. Having a 64 bit syscall parameter indeed does work,
if all the architecture specific details have been correctly
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 10:55:13AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 07/03/2014 05:37 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running the latest
> >>> -next
> >>> kernel I've stumbled on
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 05:12:35PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> This patch affects big endian architectures only.
>
> On those with 32bit userspace and 64bit kernel (CONFIG_COMPAT=y) the
> 64bit mask parameter is correctly constructed out of two 32bit values in
> the compat_fanotify_mark()
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 05:12:35PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
This patch affects big endian architectures only.
On those with 32bit userspace and 64bit kernel (CONFIG_COMPAT=y) the
64bit mask parameter is correctly constructed out of two 32bit values in
the compat_fanotify_mark() function
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 10:55:13AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 07/03/2014 05:37 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running the latest
-next
kernel I've stumbled on the following spew:
[
hes, I think.
But they don't apply against Linus' master tree and I wouldn't know which
tree these patches are against.
But anyway, it all looks good ;)
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord..
.
But they don't apply against Linus' master tree and I wouldn't know which
tree these patches are against.
But anyway, it all looks good ;)
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:06:55AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 08:58 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > While I like the general idea; does anyone have a better name for this?
> > So in particular, the difference is that on s390:
> >
> > cpu_relax()-
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:52:22PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:10:58 +0200 Heiko Carstens
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > I'm uncle
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:52:22PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:10:58 +0200 Heiko Carstens
heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
I'm unclear on how urgent
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:06:55AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 08:58 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
While I like the general idea; does anyone have a better name for this?
So in particular, the difference is that on s390:
cpu_relax()- yields the
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:04:50 +0200 Heiko Carstens
> wrote:
>
> > These two patches are supposed to "fix" failed order-4 memory
> > allocations which have been observed when reading /proc/stat.
&g
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:04:50 +0200 Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
These two patches are supposed to fix failed order-4 memory
allocations which have been observed when reading /proc/stat.
The problem has
_last+0x382/0x10d0
[62129.701612] [<00287570>] path_openat+0xc8/0x4f8
[62129.701614] [<00288bde>] do_filp_open+0x46/0xa8
[62129.701616] [<0027541c>] do_sys_open+0x114/0x1f0
[62129.701618] [<005b1c1c>] sysc_tracego+0x14/0x1a
Signed-off-by:
.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens
---
fs/proc/stat.c | 22 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
index 9d231e9e5f0e..bf2d03f8fd3e 100644
--- a/fs/proc/stat.c
+++ b/fs/proc/stat.c
@@ -184,29 +184,11 @@ static int show_stat
tions also work if memory
is fragmented.
This approach seems to be simpler and less intrusive than changing
/proc/stat to use an interator. Also it "fixes" other users as well,
which use seq_file's single_open() interface.
Heiko Carstens (2):
proc/stat: convert to single_open_size()
f
.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
---
fs/proc/stat.c | 22 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
index 9d231e9e5f0e..bf2d03f8fd3e 100644
--- a/fs/proc/stat.c
+++ b/fs/proc/stat.c
@@ -184,29 +184,11
work if memory
is fragmented.
This approach seems to be simpler and less intrusive than changing
/proc/stat to use an interator. Also it fixes other users as well,
which use seq_file's single_open() interface.
Heiko Carstens (2):
proc/stat: convert to single_open_size()
fs/seq_file: fallback
] [00288bde] do_filp_open+0x46/0xa8
[62129.701616] [0027541c] do_sys_open+0x114/0x1f0
[62129.701618] [005b1c1c] sysc_tracego+0x14/0x1a
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
---
fs/seq_file.c | 30 +-
1 file changed, 21 insertions
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 03:00:17PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
> When reading from /proc/stat we allocate a large buffer to maximise
> the chances of the results being from a single run and thus internally
> consistent. This currently is sized at 128 * num_possible_cpus() which,
> in the face of
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:27:41AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:52:31PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > > +static void seq_alloc(struct seq_file *m)
> > > > > +{
> > > >
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:52:31PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > +static void seq_alloc(struct seq_file *m)
> > > > +{
> > > > + m->size = PAGE_SIZE;
> > > > + m->buf = kmalloc(m->size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> > > > + if
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:52:31PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Ian Kent wrote:
+static void seq_alloc(struct seq_file *m)
+{
+ m-size = PAGE_SIZE;
+ m-buf = kmalloc(m-size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ if (!m-buf)
+
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:27:41AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:52:31PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Ian Kent wrote:
+static void seq_alloc(struct seq_file *m)
+{
+ m-size = PAGE_SIZE;
+ m-buf = kmalloc(m-size
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 03:00:17PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
When reading from /proc/stat we allocate a large buffer to maximise
the chances of the results being from a single run and thus internally
consistent. This currently is sized at 128 * num_possible_cpus() which,
in the face of
[full quote, since I added Al to cc]
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 04:11:59PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 15:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 May 2014 11:01:53 +0200 Heiko Carstens
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Now, /proc/stat uses single_
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:46:20AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> This makes sure format strings can't accidentally leak into kernel
> interface names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
> ---
> drivers/s390/block/dcssblk.c |2 +-
> drivers/s390/char/vmlogrdr.c |2 +-
>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:46:20AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
This makes sure format strings can't accidentally leak into kernel
interface names.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org
---
drivers/s390/block/dcssblk.c |2 +-
drivers/s390/char/vmlogrdr.c |2 +-
[full quote, since I added Al to cc]
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 04:11:59PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 15:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2014 11:01:53 +0200 Heiko Carstens
heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Now, /proc/stat uses single_open() for showing
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 11:31:11PM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> Added a guaranteed null-terminate after call to strncpy.
>
> This was partly found using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
> ---
> drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c |1 +
>
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 11:31:11PM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
Added a guaranteed null-terminate after call to strncpy.
This was partly found using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se
---
leading potentially to inconsistent data. This is
still the case after the change, however because of the iterator interface,
and the additional latencies we get with that, the per cpu statistics may
get more inconsistent than before.
If this is really an issue remains to b
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 03:37:04PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2014 11:01:53 +0200 Heiko Carstens
> wrote:
> > With this patch it should not happen anymore that reading /proc/stat
> > fails because of a failing high order memory allocation.
>
> So this
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 03:37:04PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2014 11:01:53 +0200 Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
With this patch it should not happen anymore that reading /proc/stat
fails because of a failing high order memory allocation.
So this deletes
of the iterator interface,
and the additional latencies we get with that, the per cpu statistics may
get more inconsistent than before.
If this is really an issue remains to be seen.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
ges like e.g. that the cpu iterator
handles 32 cpus in a batch to avoid lots of iterations.
With this patch it should not happen anymore that reading /proc/stat
fails because of a failing high order memory allocation.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens
---
fs/proc/
ilp_open+0x46/0xa8
[62129.701616] [<0027541c>] do_sys_open+0x114/0x1f0
[62129.701618] [<005b1c1c>] sysc_tracego+0x14/0x1a
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens
---
fs/proc/stat.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
index 9d
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 07:32:29AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:25:21PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm just wondering why /proc/stat is a single_open() seq_file and not a
> > regular seq_file with an iterator (
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 07:32:29AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:25:21PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
Hi all,
I'm just wondering why /proc/stat is a single_open() seq_file and not a
regular seq_file with an iterator (say 48 online cpus for each iteration
] sysc_tracego+0x14/0x1a
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
---
fs/proc/stat.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
index 9d231e9e5f0e..3898ca5f1e92 100644
--- a/fs/proc/stat.c
+++ b/fs/proc/stat.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7
-off-by: Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
---
fs/proc/stat.c | 278 +
1 file changed, 203 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
index 3898ca5f1e92..652e255fee90 100644
--- a/fs/proc/stat.c
+++ b
Hi all,
I'm just wondering why /proc/stat is a single_open() seq_file and not a
regular seq_file with an iterator (say 48 online cpus for each iteration
or something similar).
Of course, in theory, the "intr" line may be very long as well...
With the current implementation everything must fit
Hi all,
I'm just wondering why /proc/stat is a single_open() seq_file and not a
regular seq_file with an iterator (say 48 online cpus for each iteration
or something similar).
Of course, in theory, the intr line may be very long as well...
With the current implementation everything must fit
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:31:15AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> Delete unnecessary local variable whose value is always 0 and that hides
> the fact that the result is always 0.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
> follows:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:31:15AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
From: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr
Delete unnecessary local variable whose value is always 0 and that hides
the fact that the result is always 0.
A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 05:35:43PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> This fixes:
> arch/s390/appldata/appldata_mem.c:135:2: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'kzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> arch/s390/appldata/appldata_mem.c:141:3: error: implicit declaration of
> function
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 05:35:43PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
This fixes:
arch/s390/appldata/appldata_mem.c:135:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'kzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
arch/s390/appldata/appldata_mem.c:141:3: error: implicit declaration of
function
h it and
> inform us about it during our next kernel build.
>
> If you add it to x86_64 only, bad luck for anyone else ;-)
Also it would be nice if somebody would pick up the patch below as well :)
>From 97cdc756ca508f2200ae0cebf1cf1f1b8daa711b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heiko
pick up the patch below as well :)
From 97cdc756ca508f2200ae0cebf1cf1f1b8daa711b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:55:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] include/linux/syscalls.h: add sys_renameat2() prototype
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens
less bugs, and much more sanity checking.
Thanks,
Heiko
Heiko Carstens (44):
compat: let architectures define __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_GETDENTS64
compat: add COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE0 macro
s390/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINEx part 1
s390/compa
, and much more sanity checking.
Thanks,
Heiko
Heiko Carstens (44):
compat: let architectures define __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_GETDENTS64
compat: add COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE0 macro
s390/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINEx part 1
s390/compat: convert
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:09:25PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Otherwise we leak a tracking object when DEBUG_OBJECTS is enabled.
> drivers/s390/net/lcs.c |1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Index: tip/drivers/s390/net/lcs.c
>
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:09:25PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Otherwise we leak a tracking object when DEBUG_OBJECTS is enabled.
>
[...]
> del_timer_sync();
> + destroy_timer_on_stack();
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:09:24PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> del_timer() does not wait for a possible running callback to
> complete. So the call side might free request and the associated
> objects while on another cpu the timer handler runs.
[...]
>
> - del_timer();
> +
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:09:24PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
del_timer() does not wait for a possible running callback to
complete. So the call side might free request and the associated
objects while on another cpu the timer handler runs.
[...]
- del_timer(timeout);
+
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:09:25PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Otherwise we leak a tracking object when DEBUG_OBJECTS is enabled.
drivers/s390/net/lcs.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: tip/drivers/s390/net/lcs.c
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:09:25PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Otherwise we leak a tracking object when DEBUG_OBJECTS is enabled.
[...]
del_timer_sync(timeout);
+ destroy_timer_on_stack(timeout);
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
gt; select VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
> select VIRT_TO_BUS
> + select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
>
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens
FWIW, it would have been nice to keep the list of selected configs sorted.
However no need to resend.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib
VIRT_TO_BUS
+ select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
FWIW, it would have been nice to keep the list of selected configs sorted.
However no need to resend.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 07:47:52AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> As per the existing implementation; implement the new one using
> smp_mb().
>
> AFAICT the s390 compare-and-swap does imply a barrier, however there
> are some immediate ops that seem to be singly-copy atomic and do not
> imply a
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 07:47:52AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
As per the existing implementation; implement the new one using
smp_mb().
AFAICT the s390 compare-and-swap does imply a barrier, however there
are some immediate ops that seem to be singly-copy atomic and do not
imply a
Hi Andrew,
your patch "mm-per-thread-vma-caching-fix-5" in linux-next (see below) breaks
s390:
[ 10.101173] kernel BUG at mm/vmacache.c:76!
[ 10.101206] illegal operation: 0001 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 10.101210] Modules linked in:
[ 10.101212] CPU: 3 PID: 2286 Comm: ifup-eth Not
Hi Andrew,
your patch mm-per-thread-vma-caching-fix-5 in linux-next (see below) breaks
s390:
[ 10.101173] kernel BUG at mm/vmacache.c:76!
[ 10.101206] illegal operation: 0001 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 10.101210] Modules linked in:
[ 10.101212] CPU: 3 PID: 2286 Comm: ifup-eth Not
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 04:20:24PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> On 03/11/2014 04:17 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:59:16PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> >>+#define NICE_TO_RLIMIT(nice) (MAX_NICE - nice + 1)
> >Where is MAX_NICE defin
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:59:16PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> This patch add a macro named NICE_TO_RLIMIT in prio.h to
> convert nice value [19,-20] to rlimit style value [1,40].
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang
> ---
> include/linux/sched/prio.h | 5 +
> 1 file changed, 5
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:59:16PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
This patch add a macro named NICE_TO_RLIMIT in prio.h to
convert nice value [19,-20] to rlimit style value [1,40].
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang yangds.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
include/linux/sched/prio.h | 5 +
1 file
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 04:20:24PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 03/11/2014 04:17 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:59:16PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
+#define NICE_TO_RLIMIT(nice) (MAX_NICE - nice + 1)
Where is MAX_NICE defined? The s390 patch fails to compile
Commit-ID: 03b8c7b623c80af264c4c8d6111e5c6289933666
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/03b8c7b623c80af264c4c8d6111e5c6289933666
Author: Heiko Carstens
AuthorDate: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 13:09:47 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:32:08 +0100
futex: Allow
Commit-ID: 03b8c7b623c80af264c4c8d6111e5c6289933666
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/03b8c7b623c80af264c4c8d6111e5c6289933666
Author: Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
AuthorDate: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 13:09:47 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
CommitDate: Mon, 3 Mar
away.
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven
Cc: Finn Thain
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens
---
arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
include/linux/futex.h | 4
init/Kconfig | 7 +++
kernel/futex.c| 37 -
4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions
away.
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
Cc: Finn Thain fth...@telegraphics.com.au
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
---
arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
include/linux/futex.h | 4
init/Kconfig | 7 +++
kernel/futex.c| 37
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 06:13:06PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> The unconditionally built keyboard driver, drivers/s390/char/keyboard.c,
> requires CONFIG_TTY, so select it from CONFIG_S390 to prevent a build
> error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
> ---
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 06:13:06PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
The unconditionally built keyboard driver, drivers/s390/char/keyboard.c,
requires CONFIG_TTY, so select it from CONFIG_S390 to prevent a build
error.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
arch/s390/Kconfig | 1
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 05:04:57PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 02/24/2014 05:02 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 16:52 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> I've been lead to
> >> believe that most cases now people should be using regmap instead, which
> >> just leaves the case of having to
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 05:04:57PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
On 02/24/2014 05:02 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 16:52 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
I've been lead to
believe that most cases now people should be using regmap instead, which
just leaves the case of having to match
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:33:56PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Thanks, this info was helpful and looks like it's stupid mistake I did. I
> deleted a line unknowingly while trying to minimise the diff for
> show_cacheinfo.
> The below fix-up must work IIUC the issue. I will squash this in my next
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:06:11PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> From: Sudeep Holla
>
> This patch removes the redundant sysfs cacheinfo code by making use of
> the newly introduced generic cacheinfo infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky
Schwidefsky schwidef...@de.ibm.com
Cc: Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
Cc: linux...@de.ibm.com
Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/s390/kernel/cache.c | 388
---
1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 295 deletions(-)
(FWIW, if you send
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:33:56PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
Thanks, this info was helpful and looks like it's stupid mistake I did. I
deleted a line unknowingly while trying to minimise the diff for
show_cacheinfo.
The below fix-up must work IIUC the issue. I will squash this in my next
Hi Sudeep,
> > Please have a look at these two commits which should describe why things
> > are as they are on s390:
> >
> > 881730ad365130f64b5c70c40904b04eb3b79de3
> > "s390/cache: expose cpu cache topology via sysfs"
> > 6668022c7bde3fdc96d3d257294a7216c7a46829
> > "s390/cache: add cpu
Hi Sudeep,
Please have a look at these two commits which should describe why things
are as they are on s390:
881730ad365130f64b5c70c40904b04eb3b79de3
s390/cache: expose cpu cache topology via sysfs
6668022c7bde3fdc96d3d257294a7216c7a46829
s390/cache: add cpu cache information to
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:50:40AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 09:20 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 06:15:27PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > No, I want to keep them, so there is a config symbol for each cpu generation
> > and
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 06:15:27PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> The Kconfig symbols HAVE_MARCH_Z900_FEATURES and
> HAVE_MARCH_Z990_FEATURES were added in v3.5. They have never been used.
> Apparently they are not needed. They can safely be removed.
>
No, I want to keep them, so there is a config
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 06:15:27PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
The Kconfig symbols HAVE_MARCH_Z900_FEATURES and
HAVE_MARCH_Z990_FEATURES were added in v3.5. They have never been used.
Apparently they are not needed. They can safely be removed.
No, I want to keep them, so there is a config
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:50:40AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 09:20 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 06:15:27PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
No, I want to keep them, so there is a config symbol for each cpu generation
and we don't have to add the config
Hi all,
we plan to remove 31 bit kernel support of the s390 architecture in the
Linux kernel sources.
The reason for this is quite simple: the current 31 bit kernel was broken
for nearly a year before somebody noticed.
Keeping the 31 bit kernel support adds extra maintenance and development
Hi all,
we plan to remove 31 bit kernel support of the s390 architecture in the
Linux kernel sources.
The reason for this is quite simple: the current 31 bit kernel was broken
for nearly a year before somebody noticed.
Keeping the 31 bit kernel support adds extra maintenance and development
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:34:55AM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On 10/02/14 09:50, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:49:18PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >> - show_cacheinfo(m);
> >>}
> >>get_online_cpus();
> >>i
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:49:18PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> From: Sudeep Holla
>
> This patch removes the redundant sysfs cacheinfo code by making use of
> the newly introduced generic cacheinfo infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla
[...]
> -static ssize_t
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:49:18PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> From: Sudeep Holla
>
> This patch removes the redundant sysfs cacheinfo code by making use of
> the newly introduced generic cacheinfo infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky
Schwidefsky schwidef...@de.ibm.com
Cc: Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
Cc: linux...@de.ibm.com
Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org
---
[...]
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c b/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
index 2461202..1f875db 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
+++ b
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:49:18PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
From: Sudeep Holla sudeep.ho...@arm.com
This patch removes the redundant sysfs cacheinfo code by making use of
the newly introduced generic cacheinfo infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla sudeep.ho...@arm.com
[...]
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:34:55AM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 10/02/14 09:50, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:49:18PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
- show_cacheinfo(m);
}
get_online_cpus();
if (cpu_online(n)) {
You can't remove that. It's a user
ent compat lookup_dcookie() versions have
been merged.
The declaration is now in include/linux/compat.h
The build error was reported by Fenguang's build bot.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens
---
arch/tile/include/asm/compat.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/tile/include/asm/compat.h b
1101 - 1200 of 1909 matches
Mail list logo
