NFSACL broken from 3.13 to 3.14

2014-05-15 Thread JA Magallón
(sorry if this gets twice to the list, my ISP's SMPT seems to have gone haywire) Hi... I mount homes from a Solaris 10 server, via NFSv3. Solaris nfs has a special sideband server on a port for NFS to check ACLs. With previous version of kernel (3.13.10 was the latest I check), I need no spe

NFSACL broken from 3.13 to 3.14

2014-05-08 Thread JA Magallón
Hi... I mount homes from a Solaris 10 server, via NFSv3. Solaris nfs has a special sideband server on a port for NFS to check ACLs. With previous version of kernel (3.13.10 was the latest I check), I need no special option to mount Solaris shares. With 3.14, it began to give errors, directories c

Re: Accessing more than 2GB of memory with a 32 bit kernel

2013-06-12 Thread JA Magallón
On 06/12/2013 10:10 PM, Rik van Riel wrote: On 06/12/2013 12:54 PM, Simon Brown wrote: Hello, For the sake of an old prototype peripheral I'm using a non PAE 32 bit x86 kernel and I'm having trouble accessing memory above 2 GB. The system has 4GB installed and all is well with a PAE kernel. I'

Re: Accessing more than 2GB of memory with a 32 bit kernel

2013-06-12 Thread JA Magallón
On 06/12/2013 06:54 PM, Simon Brown wrote: Hello, For the sake of an old prototype peripheral I'm using a non PAE 32 bit x86 kernel and I'm having trouble accessing memory above 2 GB. The system has 4GB installed and all is well with a PAE kernel. I have also 3 or 4 32-bit boxes running with

Re: Corrupt packets with ath5k

2013-03-15 Thread JA Magallón
On 02/21/2013 01:29 AM, JA Magallón wrote: On 02/20/2013 08:58 PM, JA Magallón wrote: Hi all... I have a strange problem with latest kernels. When I update my netbook I get many "Installation failed, bad rpms:" mesages. First I thougt that the oldie cheap ssd was failing (it is

Re: Corrupt packets with ath5k

2013-02-20 Thread JA Magallón
On 02/20/2013 08:58 PM, JA Magallón wrote: Hi all... I have a strange problem with latest kernels. When I update my netbook I get many "Installation failed, bad rpms:" mesages. First I thougt that the oldie cheap ssd was failing (it is an Aspire AOA110). But the updates work always

Corrupt packets with ath5k

2013-02-20 Thread JA Magallón
Hi all... I have a strange problem with latest kernels. When I update my netbook I get many "Installation failed, bad rpms:" mesages. First I thougt that the oldie cheap ssd was failing (it is an Aspire AOA110). But the updates work always fine when plugged to ethernet. Now i tried to copy a cou

Re: Problems with late 3.8-rc5 and 3.8-rc6 on i686

2013-02-04 Thread JA Magallón
On 02/05/2013 12:28 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 14:13:32 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: One is that the rtkit-daemon service fails to start up and the other is that there are issues with X. One one machine with an rv280 based video card the background image doesn't show u

Inconsistency in /proc/cpuinfo about topology ?

2012-09-14 Thread JA Magallón
Hi... Probably there is something I don't understand, but it looks to me like an inconsistency in the info given by /proc/cpuinfo about processor/core/thread topology. For new processors, data seems to account for each 'physycal id', all virtual processors in the same package repeat the same inf

Question on /proc/cpuinfo

2012-09-13 Thread JA Magallón
Hi... Probably it is a stupid question, but... I wan to count the number of processors, cores and threads on a linux system. I do it by reading /proc/cpuinfo. The problem is that the meaning of 'cpu cores' and 'siblings' seems to have changed over time. Nowadays, it looks like this: Dual P4 X

Question on /proc/cpuinfo

2012-09-13 Thread JA Magallón
Hi... Probably it is a stupid question, but... I wan to count the number of processors, cores and threads on a linux system. I do it by reading /proc/cpuinfo. The problem is that the meaning of 'cpu cores' and 'siblings' seems to have changed over time. Nowadays, it looks like this: Dual P4 X