Re: [PATCH] f2fs: enlarge block plug coverage

On 04/08, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/4/5 11:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 04/04, Chao Yu wrote: > >> This patch enlarges block plug coverage in __issue_discard_cmd, in > >> order to collect more pending bios before issuing them, to avoid > >> being disturbed

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: enlarge block plug coverage

On 04/04, Chao Yu wrote: > This patch enlarges block plug coverage in __issue_discard_cmd, in > order to collect more pending bios before issuing them, to avoid > being disturbed by previous discard I/O in IO aware discard mode. Hmm, then we need to wait for huge discard IO for over 10 secs,

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: enlarge block plug coverage

On 04/04, Chao Yu wrote: > This patch enlarges block plug coverage in __issue_discard_cmd, in > order to collect more pending bios before issuing them, to avoid > being disturbed by previous discard I/O in IO aware discard mode. Hmm, then we need to wait for huge discard IO for over 10 secs,

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to show encrypt flag in FS_IOC_GETFLAGS

On 04/03, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/4/3 4:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 04/02, Chao Yu wrote: > >> This patch fixes to show encrypt flag in FS_IOC_GETFLAGS like ext4 does. > > > > Actually, we have to show internal flags owned by f2fs, not generic ones. > &g

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to show encrypt flag in FS_IOC_GETFLAGS

On 04/03, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/4/3 4:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 04/02, Chao Yu wrote: > >> This patch fixes to show encrypt flag in FS_IOC_GETFLAGS like ext4 does. > > > > Actually, we have to show internal flags owned by f2fs, not generic ones. > &g

[GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.17-rc1

ion f2fs: add nowait aio support Jaegeuk Kim (11): f2fs: handle quota for orphan inodes f2fs: don't stop GC if GC is contended f2fs: add mount option for segment allocation policy f2fs: add auto tuning for small devices f2fs: set readdir_ra by default f2fs: is

[GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.17-rc1

ion f2fs: add nowait aio support Jaegeuk Kim (11): f2fs: handle quota for orphan inodes f2fs: don't stop GC if GC is contended f2fs: add mount option for segment allocation policy f2fs: add auto tuning for small devices f2fs: set readdir_ra by default f2fs: is

Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: remain written times to update inode during fsync

On 04/03, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/4/3 13:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 04/03, Chao Yu wrote: > >> On 2018/3/31 0:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>> Change log from v1: > >>> - add more description > >>> > >>> This fixes xfstests/

Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: remain written times to update inode during fsync

On 04/03, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/4/3 13:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 04/03, Chao Yu wrote: > >> On 2018/3/31 0:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>> Change log from v1: > >>> - add more description > >>> > >>> This fixes xfstests/

Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: remain written times to update inode during fsync

On 04/03, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/3/31 0:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > Change log from v1: > > - add more description > > > > This fixes xfstests/generic/392. > > > > The failure was caused by different times between 1) one marked in the last > >

Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: remain written times to update inode during fsync

On 04/03, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/3/31 0:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > Change log from v1: > > - add more description > > > > This fixes xfstests/generic/392. > > > > The failure was caused by different times between 1) one marked in the last > >

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: remain written times to update inode during fsync

was that we skipped updating inode block at 1), since its i_size was recoverable along with 4KB-aligned data writes, which was fixed by: "f2fs: fix a wrong condition in f2fs_skip_inode_update" Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 +++ fs/f

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: remain written times to update inode during fsync

was that we skipped updating inode block at 1), since its i_size was recoverable along with 4KB-aligned data writes, which was fixed by: "f2fs: fix a wrong condition in f2fs_skip_inode_update" Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 +++ fs/f2fs/inode.c | 8 +++

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to show encrypt flag in FS_IOC_GETFLAGS

On 04/02, Chao Yu wrote: > This patch fixes to show encrypt flag in FS_IOC_GETFLAGS like ext4 does. Actually, we have to show internal flags owned by f2fs, not generic ones. We may need to define all of them separately? > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > --- > fs/f2fs/file.c | 9

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to show encrypt flag in FS_IOC_GETFLAGS

On 04/02, Chao Yu wrote: > This patch fixes to show encrypt flag in FS_IOC_GETFLAGS like ext4 does. Actually, we have to show internal flags owned by f2fs, not generic ones. We may need to define all of them separately? > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > --- > fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 +++-- > 1 file

[PATCH] f2fs: truncate preallocated blocks in error case

If write is failed, we must deallocate the blocks that we couldn't write. Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c index 8068b015ece5..f18f62

[PATCH] f2fs: truncate preallocated blocks in error case

If write is failed, we must deallocate the blocks that we couldn't write. Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c index 8068b015ece5..f18f62dd60a3 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: remain written times to update inode during fsync

On 03/30, Chao Yu wrote: > Hi Jaegeuk, > > On 2018/3/30 13:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > This fixes xfstests/generic/392. > > Hmm... Could you please give more details about this issue and solution in > commit message, since I can catch up the solution only with the co

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: remain written times to update inode during fsync

On 03/30, Chao Yu wrote: > Hi Jaegeuk, > > On 2018/3/30 13:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > This fixes xfstests/generic/392. > > Hmm... Could you please give more details about this issue and solution in > commit message, since I can catch up the solution only with the co

Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: remain written times to update inode during fsync

its i_size was recoverable along with 4KB-aligned data writes, which was fixed by: "f2fs: fix a wrong condition in f2fs_skip_inode_update" Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 +++ fs/f2fs/inode.c | 4 2 files changed, 19 ins

Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: remain written times to update inode during fsync

its i_size was recoverable along with 4KB-aligned data writes, which was fixed by: "f2fs: fix a wrong condition in f2fs_skip_inode_update" Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 +++ fs/f2fs/inode.c | 4 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git

[PATCH] f2fs: remain written times to update inode during fsync

This fixes xfstests/generic/392. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 +++ fs/f2fs/inode.c | 4 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h index 000f93f6767e..675c39d85111 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h

[PATCH] f2fs: remain written times to update inode during fsync

This fixes xfstests/generic/392. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 +++ fs/f2fs/inode.c | 4 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h index 000f93f6767e..675c39d85111 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h

[PATCH] ext4: handle errors on ext4_commit_super

From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@google.com> When remounting ext4 from ro to rw, currently it allows its transition, even if ext4_commit_super() returns EIO. Even worse thing is, after that, fs/buffer complains buffer dirty bits like: Call trace: [] mark_buffer_dirty+0x184

[PATCH] ext4: handle errors on ext4_commit_super

From: Jaegeuk Kim When remounting ext4 from ro to rw, currently it allows its transition, even if ext4_commit_super() returns EIO. Even worse thing is, after that, fs/buffer complains buffer dirty bits like: Call trace: [] mark_buffer_dirty+0x184/0x1a4 [] __ext4_handle_dirty_super+0x4c/0xfc

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: don't put dentry page in pagecache into highmem

On 03/19, Yunlong Song wrote: > Hi, Jaegeuk, > I find this patch is removed from current branch of dev-test > recently, why? Any bugs? Moved into the beginning of the tree for cherry-picking into f2fs-stable. Thanks, > > On 2018/2/28 20:31, Yunlong Song wrote: > > Previous dentry page uses

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: don't put dentry page in pagecache into highmem

On 03/19, Yunlong Song wrote: > Hi, Jaegeuk, > I find this patch is removed from current branch of dev-test > recently, why? Any bugs? Moved into the beginning of the tree for cherry-picking into f2fs-stable. Thanks, > > On 2018/2/28 20:31, Yunlong Song wrote: > > Previous dentry page uses

[PATCH] f2fs: align memory boundary for bitops

For example, in arm64, free_nid_bitmap should be aligned to word size in order to use bit operations. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +- fs/f2fs/node.c | 20 +--- include/linux/f2fs_fs.h | 4 3 files chang

[PATCH] f2fs: align memory boundary for bitops

For example, in arm64, free_nid_bitmap should be aligned to word size in order to use bit operations. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +- fs/f2fs/node.c | 20 +--- include/linux/f2fs_fs.h | 4 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid selinux denial on CAP_SYS_RESOURCE

On 03/09, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/3/9 12:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > This fixes CAP_SYS_RESOURCE denial of selinux when using resgid. > > A little confusion, if capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) is false, we still have > chance > to return true for below resuid & resgid ca

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid selinux denial on CAP_SYS_RESOURCE

On 03/09, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/3/9 12:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > This fixes CAP_SYS_RESOURCE denial of selinux when using resgid. > > A little confusion, if capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) is false, we still have > chance > to return true for below resuid & resgid ca

[PATCH] f2fs: avoid selinux denial on CAP_SYS_RESOURCE

This fixes CAP_SYS_RESOURCE denial of selinux when using resgid. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h index f6dc70666ebb..3d12277fbe9e 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/

[PATCH] f2fs: avoid selinux denial on CAP_SYS_RESOURCE

This fixes CAP_SYS_RESOURCE denial of selinux when using resgid. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h index f6dc70666ebb..3d12277fbe9e 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +++ b/fs/f2fs

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/5 v2] f2fs: add mount option for segment allocation policy

On 02/28, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/2/28 13:09, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > Change log from v1: > > - add doc :) > > > > This patch adds an mount option, "alloc_mode=%s" having two options, > > "default" > > and "reuse". > >

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/5 v2] f2fs: add mount option for segment allocation policy

On 02/28, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/2/28 13:09, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > Change log from v1: > > - add doc :) > > > > This patch adds an mount option, "alloc_mode=%s" having two options, > > "default" > > and "reuse". > >

Re: [PATCH v4] Revert "f2fs crypto: avoid unneeded memory allocation in ->readdir"

On 02/28, Chao Yu wrote: > Hi Jaegeuk, > > On 2018/2/28 13:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > Hi Yunlong, > > > > As Eric pointed out, how do you think using nohighmem for directory likewise > > I'd like to ask, at the beginning, why we choose to use highmem for den

Re: [PATCH v4] Revert "f2fs crypto: avoid unneeded memory allocation in ->readdir"

On 02/28, Chao Yu wrote: > Hi Jaegeuk, > > On 2018/2/28 13:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > Hi Yunlong, > > > > As Eric pointed out, how do you think using nohighmem for directory likewise > > I'd like to ask, at the beginning, why we choose to use highmem for den

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to restore whint_mode in ->remount_fs

On 02/28, Chao Yu wrote: > From: Chao Yu > > If we fail in ->remount_fs, it needs to restore old whint_mode as other > mount options. > > Fixes: e25afe01822f ("f2fs: support passing down write hints given by users > to block layer") Hi Chao, It was not merged, so please

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to restore whint_mode in ->remount_fs

On 02/28, Chao Yu wrote: > From: Chao Yu > > If we fail in ->remount_fs, it needs to restore old whint_mode as other > mount options. > > Fixes: e25afe01822f ("f2fs: support passing down write hints given by users > to block layer") Hi Chao, It was not merged, so please allow me to integrate

Re: [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: issue discard aggressively in the gc_urgent mode

Change log from v1: - relax more to issue discard commands This patch avoids to skip discard commands when user sets gc_urgent mode. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/segment.c | 11 +-- 1 file changed,

Re: [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: issue discard aggressively in the gc_urgent mode

Change log from v1: - relax more to issue discard commands This patch avoids to skip discard commands when user sets gc_urgent mode. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/segment.c | 11 +-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs

Re: [PATCH v4] Revert "f2fs crypto: avoid unneeded memory allocation in ->readdir"

Hi Yunlong, As Eric pointed out, how do you think using nohighmem for directory likewise ext4, which looks like more efficient? Actually, we don't need to do this in most of recent kernels, right? Thanks, On 02/28, Yunlong Song wrote: > This reverts commit

Re: [PATCH v4] Revert "f2fs crypto: avoid unneeded memory allocation in ->readdir"

Hi Yunlong, As Eric pointed out, how do you think using nohighmem for directory likewise ext4, which looks like more efficient? Actually, we don't need to do this in most of recent kernels, right? Thanks, On 02/28, Yunlong Song wrote: > This reverts commit

Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support {d,id,did,x}node checksum

On 02/27, Chao Yu wrote: > Ping, > > On 2018/2/13 15:34, Chao Yu wrote: > > Hi Jaegeuk, > > > > On 2018/2/10 10:52, Chao Yu wrote: > >> On 2018/2/10 9:41, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>> On 02/01, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>> > >>>&g

Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support {d,id,did,x}node checksum

On 02/27, Chao Yu wrote: > Ping, > > On 2018/2/13 15:34, Chao Yu wrote: > > Hi Jaegeuk, > > > > On 2018/2/10 10:52, Chao Yu wrote: > >> On 2018/2/10 9:41, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>> On 02/01, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>> > >>>&g

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: handle quota for orphan inodes

On 02/27, Chao Yu wrote: > Ping, > > On 2018/2/13 22:33, Chao Yu wrote: > > On 2018/2/10 10:28, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >> This is to fix missing dquot_initialize for orphan inodes. > > > > IMO, we don't need to call dquot_initialize as we have call the function

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: handle quota for orphan inodes

On 02/27, Chao Yu wrote: > Ping, > > On 2018/2/13 22:33, Chao Yu wrote: > > On 2018/2/10 10:28, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >> This is to fix missing dquot_initialize for orphan inodes. > > > > IMO, we don't need to call dquot_initialize as we have call the function

Re: [PATCH 1/5 v2] f2fs: add mount option for segment allocation policy

for small-sized eMMC parts. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.txt | 2 ++ fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 8 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 5 + fs/f2fs/super.c| 24

Re: [PATCH 1/5 v2] f2fs: add mount option for segment allocation policy

for small-sized eMMC parts. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.txt | 2 ++ fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 8 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 5 + fs/f2fs/super.c| 24 4 files changed, 39 i

[PATCH] f2fs: do gc in greedy mode for whole range if gc_urgent mode is set

Otherwise, f2fs conducts GC on 8GB range only based on slow cost-benefit. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/gc.c | 11 +-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c index bc9420ce2275..bfb7a4a3a929 100644 --

[PATCH] f2fs: do gc in greedy mode for whole range if gc_urgent mode is set

Otherwise, f2fs conducts GC on 8GB range only based on slow cost-benefit. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/gc.c | 11 +-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c index bc9420ce2275..bfb7a4a3a929 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c +++ b/fs

[PATCH 2/5] f2fs: add auto tuning for small devices

If f2fs is running on top of very small devices, it's worth to avoid abusing free LBAs. In order to achieve that, this patch introduces some parameter tuning. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/segment.h | 2 ++ fs/f2fs/super.c | 14 ++ 2 files chang

[PATCH 2/5] f2fs: add auto tuning for small devices

If f2fs is running on top of very small devices, it's worth to avoid abusing free LBAs. In order to achieve that, this patch introduces some parameter tuning. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/segment.h | 2 ++ fs/f2fs/super.c | 14 ++ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) diff

[PATCH 1/5] f2fs: add mount option for segment allocation policy

This patch adds an mount option, "alloc_mode=%s" having two options, "default" and "reuse". In "alloc_mode=reuse" case, f2fs starts to allocate segments from 0'th segment all the time to reassign segments. It'd be useful for small-sized eMMC parts. Signed

[PATCH 1/5] f2fs: add mount option for segment allocation policy

This patch adds an mount option, "alloc_mode=%s" having two options, "default" and "reuse". In "alloc_mode=reuse" case, f2fs starts to allocate segments from 0'th segment all the time to reassign segments. It'd be useful for small-sized eMMC parts. Signed-

[PATCH 4/5] f2fs: issue discard aggressively in the gc_urgent mode

This patch avoids to skip discard commands when user sets gc_urgent mode. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index 5e5e2936a26a..bda2ad048ea0

[PATCH 4/5] f2fs: issue discard aggressively in the gc_urgent mode

This patch avoids to skip discard commands when user sets gc_urgent mode. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index 5e5e2936a26a..bda2ad048ea0 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c

[PATCH 5/5] f2fs: don't stop GC if GC is contended

Let's do GC as much as possible, while gc_urgent is set. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/gc.c | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c index b9d93fd532a9..bc9420ce2275 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c ++

[PATCH 5/5] f2fs: don't stop GC if GC is contended

Let's do GC as much as possible, while gc_urgent is set. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/gc.c | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c index b9d93fd532a9..bc9420ce2275 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c @@ -76,14

[PATCH 3/5] f2fs: set readdir_ra by default

It gives general readdir improvement. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/super.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c index 9515c10eebad..425eb4f6654a 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c @@ -1297,6 +

[PATCH 3/5] f2fs: set readdir_ra by default

It gives general readdir improvement. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/super.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c index 9515c10eebad..425eb4f6654a 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c @@ -1297,6 +1297,7 @@ static void

Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: expose extension_list sysfs entry

On 02/11, Chao Yu wrote: > From: Chao Yu > > This patch adds a sysfs entry 'extension_list' to support lookup/ > add/delete item in extension list. Hi Chao, We need Doc change as well. Thanks, > > Lookup: > cat /sys/fs/f2fs//extentsion_list > > Add: > echo 'extension' >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: expose extension_list sysfs entry

On 02/11, Chao Yu wrote: > From: Chao Yu > > This patch adds a sysfs entry 'extension_list' to support lookup/ > add/delete item in extension list. Hi Chao, We need Doc change as well. Thanks, > > Lookup: > cat /sys/fs/f2fs//extentsion_list > > Add: > echo 'extension' >

Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] scsi: ufs: sysfs: device descriptor

On 02/12, Stanislav Nijnikov wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org] > > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 3:08 AM > > To: Stanislav Nijnikov <stanislav.nijni...@wdc.com> > > Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.

Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] scsi: ufs: sysfs: device descriptor

On 02/12, Stanislav Nijnikov wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org] > > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 3:08 AM > > To: Stanislav Nijnikov > > Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;

Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] scsi: ufs: sysfs: device descriptor

On 02/06, Stanislav Nijnikov wrote: > This patch introduces a sysfs group entry for the UFS device descriptor > parameters. The group adds "device_descriptor" folder under the UFS driver > sysfs entry (/sys/bus/platform/drivers/ufshcd/*). The parameters are shown > as hexadecimal numbers. The full

Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] scsi: ufs: sysfs: device descriptor

On 02/06, Stanislav Nijnikov wrote: > This patch introduces a sysfs group entry for the UFS device descriptor > parameters. The group adds "device_descriptor" folder under the UFS driver > sysfs entry (/sys/bus/platform/drivers/ufshcd/*). The parameters are shown > as hexadecimal numbers. The full

Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] scsi: ufs: sysfs: attribute group for existing sysfs entries.

On 02/06, Stanislav Nijnikov wrote: > This patch introduces attribute group to show existing sysfs entries. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Nijnikov > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/Makefile| 3 +- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c | 156 >

Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] scsi: ufs: sysfs: attribute group for existing sysfs entries.

On 02/06, Stanislav Nijnikov wrote: > This patch introduces attribute group to show existing sysfs entries. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Nijnikov > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/Makefile| 3 +- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c | 156 > +++ >

[PATCH] f2fs: handle quota for orphan inodes

This is to fix missing dquot_initialize for orphan inodes. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 28 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c index 8b0945

[PATCH] f2fs: handle quota for orphan inodes

This is to fix missing dquot_initialize for orphan inodes. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 28 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c index 8b0945ba284d..e3bf753a47be 100644

Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support {d,id,did,x}node checksum

On 02/01, Chao Yu wrote: > > > On 2018/2/1 6:15, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > >> On 2018/1/31 10:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>> What if we want to add more entries in addition to node_checksum? Do we > >>> have > >>&g

Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support {d,id,did,x}node checksum

On 02/01, Chao Yu wrote: > > > On 2018/2/1 6:15, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > >> On 2018/1/31 10:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>> What if we want to add more entries in addition to node_checksum? Do we > >>> have > >>&g

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] f2fs: Add the 'whint_mode' mount option to f2fs documentation

Hi Hyunchul, I've added the policy in the Doc as wel. Thanks, On 01/31, Hyunchul Lee wrote: > From: Hyunchul Lee > > Signed-off-by: Hyunchul Lee > --- > Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.txt | 6 ++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] f2fs: Add the 'whint_mode' mount option to f2fs documentation

Hi Hyunchul, I've added the policy in the Doc as wel. Thanks, On 01/31, Hyunchul Lee wrote: > From: Hyunchul Lee > > Signed-off-by: Hyunchul Lee > --- > Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.txt | 6 ++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.txt >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support {d,id,did,x}node checksum

On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/31 10:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > What if we want to add more entries in addition to node_checksum? Do we have > > to add a new feature flag at every time? How about adding a layout value > > instead > > Hmm.. for previous implement

Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support {d,id,did,x}node checksum

On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/31 10:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > What if we want to add more entries in addition to node_checksum? Do we have > > to add a new feature flag at every time? How about adding a layout value > > instead > > Hmm.. for previous implement

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: add sanity check for quota sysfile ino

On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/31 11:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > >> On 2018/1/31 10:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>> On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>> On 2018/1/31 9:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>>>> On 01

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: add sanity check for quota sysfile ino

On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/31 11:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > >> On 2018/1/31 10:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>> On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>> On 2018/1/31 9:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>>>> On 01

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: add sanity check for quota sysfile ino

On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/31 10:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > >> On 2018/1/31 9:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>> On 01/29, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>> Add missing sanity check for quota sysfile ino. > >>> > >

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: add sanity check for quota sysfile ino

On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/31 10:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > >> On 2018/1/31 9:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>> On 01/29, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>> Add missing sanity check for quota sysfile ino. > >>> > >

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: add sanity check for quota sysfile ino

On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/31 9:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/29, Chao Yu wrote: > >> Add missing sanity check for quota sysfile ino. > > > > We don't need to limit the specific inode numbers for quota files, since > > we may be able to set any ino

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: add sanity check for quota sysfile ino

On 01/31, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/31 9:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/29, Chao Yu wrote: > >> Add missing sanity check for quota sysfile ino. > > > > We don't need to limit the specific inode numbers for quota files, since > > we may be able to set any ino

Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support {d,id,did,x}node checksum

On 01/27, Chao Yu wrote: > This patch adds to support {d,id,did,x}node checksum in kernel side. > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > --- > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 +++- > fs/f2fs/inode.c | 98 > +++-- > fs/f2fs/node.c

Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support {d,id,did,x}node checksum

On 01/27, Chao Yu wrote: > This patch adds to support {d,id,did,x}node checksum in kernel side. > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > --- > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 +++- > fs/f2fs/inode.c | 98 > +++-- > fs/f2fs/node.c | 2 +- >

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix heap mode to reset it back

On 01/29, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/29 16:31, Yunlong Song wrote: > > The old commit allocates hot data & nodes in the beginning of partition > > both for heap and > > noheap mode. But from the commit message, the heap mode should be like > > before, i.e., > > allocate hot data & nodes from

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix heap mode to reset it back

On 01/29, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/29 16:31, Yunlong Song wrote: > > The old commit allocates hot data & nodes in the beginning of partition > > both for heap and > > noheap mode. But from the commit message, the heap mode should be like > > before, i.e., > > allocate hot data & nodes from

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: add sanity check for quota sysfile ino

On 01/29, Chao Yu wrote: > Add missing sanity check for quota sysfile ino. We don't need to limit the specific inode numbers for quota files, since we may be able to set any inode numbers later. How about checkint the numbers are allocated as quota? > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu

Re: [PATCH] f2fs: add sanity check for quota sysfile ino

On 01/29, Chao Yu wrote: > Add missing sanity check for quota sysfile ino. We don't need to limit the specific inode numbers for quota files, since we may be able to set any inode numbers later. How about checkint the numbers are allocated as quota? > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > --- >

Re: [GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.16-rc1

On 01/31, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:32:20 -0800 Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > Could you please consider the below pull request? > > > > Thanks, > > > > The following changes si

Re: [GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.16-rc1

On 01/31, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:32:20 -0800 Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > > Could you please consider the below pull request? > > > > Thanks, > > > > The following changes since commit ace52288edf0cb5e7a52b681f057

[GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.16-rc1

itch to fscrypt_prepare_link() f2fs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_rename() f2fs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_lookup() f2fs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_setattr() Hyunchul Lee (1): f2fs: apply write hints to select the type of segment for direct write Jaegeuk Kim (12): f2fs: return error du

[GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.16-rc1

itch to fscrypt_prepare_link() f2fs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_rename() f2fs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_lookup() f2fs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_setattr() Hyunchul Lee (1): f2fs: apply write hints to select the type of segment for direct write Jaegeuk Kim (12): f2fs: return error du

Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: support inode creation time

On 01/22, Chao Yu wrote: > From: Chao Yu > > This patch adds creation time field in inode layout to support showing > kstat.btime in ->statx. Hi Chao, Could you please check this patch again? I reverted this due to kernel panic. Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu

Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: support inode creation time

On 01/22, Chao Yu wrote: > From: Chao Yu > > This patch adds creation time field in inode layout to support showing > kstat.btime in ->statx. Hi Chao, Could you please check this patch again? I reverted this due to kernel panic. Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > --- > v2: > - add

Re: [PATCH v2] mkfs.f2fs: expand scalability of nat bitmap

On 01/24, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/24 10:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/24, Chao Yu wrote: > >> On 2018/1/24 6:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>> On 01/23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>>> On 01/23, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>>> On 2018/1/23 7:00, Ja

Re: [PATCH v2] mkfs.f2fs: expand scalability of nat bitmap

On 01/24, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/24 10:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/24, Chao Yu wrote: > >> On 2018/1/24 6:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>> On 01/23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>>> On 01/23, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>>> On 2018/1/23 7:00, Ja

Re: [PATCH v2] mkfs.f2fs: expand scalability of nat bitmap

On 01/24, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/24 6:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >> On 01/23, Chao Yu wrote: > >>> On 2018/1/23 7:00, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>>> On 01/17, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>>> Hi Jaegeuk, > &g

Re: [PATCH v2] mkfs.f2fs: expand scalability of nat bitmap

On 01/24, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/1/24 6:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >> On 01/23, Chao Yu wrote: > >>> On 2018/1/23 7:00, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>>> On 01/17, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>>> Hi Jaegeuk, > &g

Re: [PATCH v2] mkfs.f2fs: expand scalability of nat bitmap

On 01/23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 01/23, Chao Yu wrote: > > On 2018/1/23 7:00, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > On 01/17, Chao Yu wrote: > > >> Hi Jaegeuk, > > >> > > >> On 2018/1/17 8:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > >>> Hi Chao, > &g

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >