Re: [2.6 patch] make stk_camera_{suspend,resume}() static

2008-02-20 Thread Jaime Velasco Juan
El mar. 19 de feb. de 2008, a las 21:29:08 +0200, Adrian Bunk escribió: > This patch makes the needlessly global stk_camera_{suspend,resume}() > static. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Acked-by: Jaime Velasco Juan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thanks -- To

Re: [2.6 patch] make stk_camera_{suspend,resume}() static

2008-02-20 Thread Jaime Velasco Juan
El mar. 19 de feb. de 2008, a las 21:29:08 +0200, Adrian Bunk escribió: This patch makes the needlessly global stk_camera_{suspend,resume}() static. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jaime Velasco Juan [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: [2.6 patch] make stk_camera_cleanup() static

2008-01-29 Thread Jaime Velasco Juan
El mar. 29 de ene. de 2008, a las 00:11:01 +0200, Adrian Bunk escribió: > stk_camera_cleanup() can become static. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Acked-by: Jaime Velasco Juan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &

Re: [2.6 patch] stk-sensor.c: make 2 functions static

2008-01-29 Thread Jaime Velasco Juan
El mar. 29 de ene. de 2008, a las 00:10:58 +0200, Adrian Bunk escribió: > This patch makes the following needlessly global functions static: > - stk_sensor_outb() > - stk_sensor_inb() > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Acked-by: Jaime Velasc

Re: [2.6 patch] make stk_camera_cleanup() static

2008-01-29 Thread Jaime Velasco Juan
El mar. 29 de ene. de 2008, a las 00:11:01 +0200, Adrian Bunk escribió: stk_camera_cleanup() can become static. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jaime Velasco Juan [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body

Re: [2.6 patch] stk-sensor.c: make 2 functions static

2008-01-29 Thread Jaime Velasco Juan
El mar. 29 de ene. de 2008, a las 00:10:58 +0200, Adrian Bunk escribió: This patch makes the following needlessly global functions static: - stk_sensor_outb() - stk_sensor_inb() Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jaime Velasco Juan [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe

[PATCH] USB: option: Bind to the correct interface of the Huawei E220

2007-11-30 Thread Jaime Velasco Juan
Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Jaime Velasco Juan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c index a18659e..352c94c 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c @@ -

[PATCH] USB: option: Bind to the correct interface of the Huawei E220

2007-11-30 Thread Jaime Velasco Juan
Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Jaime Velasco Juan [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c index a18659e..352c94c 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c @@ -158,8 +158,8

Re: Add the infamous Huawei E220 to option.c

2007-11-29 Thread Jaime Velasco Juan
Hi, El jue. 29 de nov. de 2007, a las 15:05:50 +0100, Johann Wilhelm escribió: > If everything's working please also add code to also support the other E220 > device... so both PID 0x1003 and 0x1004 should be treaded the same way... > > to test the device with the 0x1004-PID maybe Jaime Velasco

Re: Add the infamous Huawei E220 to option.c

2007-11-29 Thread Jaime Velasco Juan
Hi, El jue. 29 de nov. de 2007, a las 15:05:50 +0100, Johann Wilhelm escribió: If everything's working please also add code to also support the other E220 device... so both PID 0x1003 and 0x1004 should be treaded the same way... to test the device with the 0x1004-PID maybe Jaime Velasco