Re: Nested events with zero deltas, can use absolute timestamps instead?

2019-05-24 Thread Jason Behmer
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 8:25 AM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Fri, 24 May 2019 08:11:12 -0700 > Jason Behmer wrote: > > > > > What do you think of that? > > > > > > I don't think that's confusing if its well documented. Have the user > >

Re: Nested events with zero deltas, can use absolute timestamps instead?

2019-05-24 Thread Jason Behmer
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 8:00 AM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Fri, 24 May 2019 07:17:15 -0700 > Jason Behmer wrote: > > > > Hi Steven, > > Your other email reminded me of this thread. The easy "fix" we > > decided to pursue was to simply turn on absolu

Re: Nested events with zero deltas, can use absolute timestamps instead?

2019-05-24 Thread Jason Behmer
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 9:42 PM Jason Behmer wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 7:21 PM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 15:54:20 -0700 > > Jason Behmer wrote: > > > > > The concurrency model is still a little bit unclear to me as I'

Re: Correct commit mask for page data size

2019-05-24 Thread Jason Behmer
Yup, that makes sense, thanks for the response. On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 7:54 PM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 06:49:07 -0700 > Jason Behmer wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > I just noticed this email. I know it's a late response, but since you > Cc'

Re: Nested events with zero deltas, can use absolute timestamps instead?

2019-04-01 Thread Jason Behmer
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 7:21 PM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 15:54:20 -0700 > Jason Behmer wrote: > > > The concurrency model is still a little bit unclear to me as I'm new > > to this codebase. So I'm having some trouble reasoning about what &g

Re: Nested events with zero deltas, can use absolute timestamps instead?

2019-04-01 Thread Jason Behmer
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:53 AM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 09:30:36 -0700 > Jason Behmer wrote: > > > Hi Steven and Tom, > > I recently ran into a problem with correlating timestamps across CPUs and > > finally was able to track it down to the fac

Correct commit mask for page data size

2019-04-01 Thread Jason Behmer
Hi Steven, We're wondering what the correct number of bits to take from the commit field is when determining the size of the page data. The format file shows the bottom 56 bits not overlapping with anything: field: local_t commit; offset:8; size:8; signed:1; field: int over