Lukas Hejtmanek,
I have to say, that I've heard this subject before, the summary answer
seems to be, that the kernel can not guess the wishes of the user 100%
of the time. If you have a low priority I/O task use ionice(1) to set
the priority of that task so it doesn't nuke your high priority
Lukas Hejtmanek,
I have to say, that I've heard this subject before, the summary answer
seems to be, that the kernel can not guess the wishes of the user 100%
of the time. If you have a low priority I/O task use ionice(1) to set
the priority of that task so it doesn't nuke your high priority
linux-2.6.10 has some bio problems that are fixed in the current
linux-2.6.11 release candidates. The bio problems wreaked havoc with
XFS and there were people reporting EXT3 problems as well with this
bug. I'd recommend trying the latest release candidate and see if your
problem vanishes.
linux-2.6.10 has some bio problems that are fixed in the current
linux-2.6.11 release candidates. The bio problems wreaked havoc with
XFS and there were people reporting EXT3 problems as well with this
bug. I'd recommend trying the latest release candidate and see if your
problem vanishes.
Anders Saaby wrote:
Is this system running SMP og UP?
On Monday 07 February 2005 16:38, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote:
I'm sorry for this truncated report... but it's all I've got. If you
need .config or system configuration, etc. let me know and I'll send'em
ASAP. I don't believe
I'm sorry for this truncated report... but it's all I've got. If you
need .config or system configuration, etc. let me know and I'll send'em
ASAP. I don't believe this is hardware related; ide-smart shows all fine.
From dmesg:
xfs_da_do_buf: bno 8388608
dir: inode 117526252
Filesystem "hda4":
I'm sorry for this truncated report... but it's all I've got. If you
need .config or system configuration, etc. let me know and I'll send'em
ASAP. I don't believe this is hardware related; ide-smart shows all fine.
From dmesg:
xfs_da_do_buf: bno 8388608
dir: inode 117526252
Filesystem hda4:
Anders Saaby wrote:
Is this system running SMP og UP?
On Monday 07 February 2005 16:38, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote:
I'm sorry for this truncated report... but it's all I've got. If you
need .config or system configuration, etc. let me know and I'll send'em
ASAP. I don't believe
Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 20:15, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote:
Does linux-2.6.11-rc2 have both the linux-2.6.10-ac10 fix and the xattr
problem fixed?
Not sure about how much of -ac went in, but it has the xattr fix.
I've had my machine that would
Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 15:09, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
I wonder if there are several problems. Alan Cox claimed that there was
a fix in linux-2.6.10-ac10 that might alleviate the
Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 15:09, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
I wonder if there are several problems. Alan Cox claimed that there was
a fix in linux-2.6.10-ac10 that might alleviate the
Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 20:15, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote:
Does linux-2.6.11-rc2 have both the linux-2.6.10-ac10 fix and the xattr
problem fixed?
Not sure about how much of -ac went in, but it has the xattr fix.
I've had my machine that would
Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
For more of this look up subjects:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
and from author:
Anders Saaby
I also can't keep a recent 2.6 or 2.6*-ac* kernel up more than a few
hours on a machine under real load. Perhaps us folks with the
XFS is an SGI project.
http://oss.sgi.com/
I've been using it for quite a while and am quite happy with it; it is
very fast and very fault tolerant. The only warning I'd like to give
about it is it seems that some Linux developers seem to have a bad taste
in their mouth when it comes to XFS;
XFS is an SGI project.
http://oss.sgi.com/
I've been using it for quite a while and am quite happy with it; it is
very fast and very fault tolerant. The only warning I'd like to give
about it is it seems that some Linux developers seem to have a bad taste
in their mouth when it comes to XFS;
Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
For more of this look up subjects:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
and from author:
Anders Saaby
I also can't keep a recent 2.6 or 2.6*-ac* kernel up more than a few
hours on a machine under real load. Perhaps us folks with the
16 matches
Mail list logo
