<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Joerg Pommnitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>; Linux Kernel Mailing List ; Andi
Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet: Freitag, den 28. September 2007, 01:15:52 Uhr
Bet
PROTECTED]
An: H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Joerg Pommnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL
PROTECTED]; Linux Kernel Mailing List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Andi
Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, den 28. September 2007, 01:15:52 Uhr
Betreff: Re: More
I just tried 2.6.23-rc8 with the patch applied. Works fine here, so my very
first
Acked-by: Joerg Pommnitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for whatever it's worth, since it is already in Linus' tree.
Thanks to Peter and Jordan for taking the interest and time to track
this one down a
I just tried 2.6.23-rc8 with the patch applied. Works fine here, so my very
first
Acked-by: Joerg Pommnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for whatever it's worth, since it is already in Linus' tree.
Thanks to Peter and Jordan for taking the interest and time to track
this one down and fix
> There is something very fishy.
>
> The only documentation you've given us so far is a screen shot which
> contained a message ("BIOS data check successful") which doesn't occur
> in the kernel.
>
> The loader string doesn't look all that familiar either; it looks like
> an extremely old
PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:04 04 6560eb5b7e40d93813276544bced8c478f9067f5
fe5f90d9ca08e526559815789175602ba2c51743 M arch
--
Regards
Joerg
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Jordan Crouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An
]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:04 04 6560eb5b7e40d93813276544bced8c478f9067f5
fe5f90d9ca08e526559815789175602ba2c51743 M arch
--
Regards
Joerg
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Joerg Pommnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC
There is something very fishy.
The only documentation you've given us so far is a screen shot which
contained a message (BIOS data check successful) which doesn't occur
in the kernel.
The loader string doesn't look all that familiar either; it looks like
an extremely old version
Chuck, Jordan,
thanks for taking an interest in this problem. As suggested by Jordan I tried a
new
BIOS revision from
http://www.digitallogic.ch/index.php?id=256=/MSEP800%20-%20SM800PCX%20%20-%20MPC20%20-%20MPC21=23
Unfortunately the kernel still fails to boot in the same way.
Do you still need
Chuck, Jordan,
thanks for taking an interest in this problem. As suggested by Jordan I tried a
new
BIOS revision from
http://www.digitallogic.ch/index.php?id=256dir=/MSEP800%20-%20SM800PCX%20%20-%20MPC20%20-%20MPC21mountpoint=23
Unfortunately the kernel still fails to boot in the same way.
Do
Hello all,
I want to be able to distinguish between two (or more) mostly identical USB
serial devices. The devices in question are UMTS modems. AFAIK they are
identical except for the SIM card and the point of attachment. Externally the
cards are CardBus devices with an integrated USB host
Hello all,
I want to be able to distinguish between two (or more) mostly identical USB
serial devices. The devices in question are UMTS modems. AFAIK they are
identical except for the SIM card and the point of attachment. Externally the
cards are CardBus devices with an integrated USB host
during development and I would like to avoid to many
configuration files.
Regards
Joerg
--- Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Joerg Pommnitz wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> > I have a question that I could not figure out from other sources. I
Hello all,
I have a question that I could not figure out from other sources. I have
the following hardware: an integrated CardBus USB host adapter with a
connected USB serial device with three interfaces (normally
ttyUSB0...ttyUSB2). Now I want to use 3 of these devices (remember: they
are
Hello all,
I have a question that I could not figure out from other sources. I have
the following hardware: an integrated CardBus USB host adapter with a
connected USB serial device with three interfaces (normally
ttyUSB0...ttyUSB2). Now I want to use 3 of these devices (remember: they
are
during development and I would like to avoid to many
configuration files.
Regards
Joerg
--- Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Joerg Pommnitz wrote:
Hello all,
I have a question that I could not figure out from other sources. I
have
the following hardware
Robert Hancock wrote:
> I thought this (hangup on remove [jpo]) had been merged, but I could be
> wrong.
I just checked bitkeeper. The patch went in some time ago:
4 months eolson 1.126 usb-serial: add tty_hangup on disconnect
Regards
Joerg
Robert Hancock wrote:
> There was discussion at one point about doing a tty_hangup() when the >
USB device was disconnected (this causes the read() to return with 0 > >
bytes and future open attempts to fail), and a patch was put out to do >
this. I thought this had been merged, but I could be
Robert Hancock wrote:
There was discussion at one point about doing a tty_hangup() when the
USB device was disconnected (this causes the read() to return with 0
bytes and future open attempts to fail), and a patch was put out to do
this. I thought this had been merged, but I could be
Robert Hancock wrote:
I thought this (hangup on remove [jpo]) had been merged, but I could be
wrong.
I just checked bitkeeper. The patch went in some time ago:
4 months eolson 1.126 usb-serial: add tty_hangup on disconnect
Regards
Joerg
Hello all,
currently it seems that select keeps blocking when the USB device behind
ttyUSBx gets unplugged. My understanding is, that select should return
when the next call to one of the operations (read/write) will not block.
This is certainly true for failing with ENODEV. So, is this an issue
Hello all,
currently it seems that select keeps blocking when the USB device behind
ttyUSBx gets unplugged. My understanding is, that select should return
when the next call to one of the operations (read/write) will not block.
This is certainly true for failing with ENODEV. So, is this an issue
> But that foregoes the point that the code is far more complex and
> harder to make 'obviously correct', a concept that *does* translate
> well to userspace.
Check the state threads library from SGI:
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/state-threads/
It should provide the code clarity one is used
But that foregoes the point that the code is far more complex and
harder to make 'obviously correct', a concept that *does* translate
well to userspace.
Check the state threads library from SGI:
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/state-threads/
It should provide the code clarity one is used from
> Pathchar, yet another Van Jacobsen toy does this. Unfortunately the old
> and rotten pre-version you can find in ftp.ee.lbl.gov/pathchar/ is afaik
> the last one. In the past it served me well you find about how ISPs are
> lying ... 100mbit backbone = fast ethernet in their computer room ...
Pathchar, yet another Van Jacobsen toy does this. Unfortunately the old
and rotten pre-version you can find in ftp.ee.lbl.gov/pathchar/ is afaik
the last one. In the past it served me well you find about how ISPs are
lying ... 100mbit backbone = fast ethernet in their computer room ...
clink
Ah, now you are arguing semantics. When somebody writes
something to improve the Linux kernel this makes them
part of the Linux kernel community. The project might
be a new file system or a tool to verify the consistency
of certain rules. The CHECKER people set out to make a
tool that finds
David Konerding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But the attitude that "many eyes make all bugs shallow" and "let the
> users test the code for us" just don't hold up. For the former,
> clearly, many eyes didn't find a lot of basically obvious bugs, for the
> latter, it's just impolite.
You
David Konerding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the attitude that "many eyes make all bugs shallow" and "let the
users test the code for us" just don't hold up. For the former,
clearly, many eyes didn't find a lot of basically obvious bugs, for the
latter, it's just impolite.
You
Here is a message from nntp://news.grc.com/news.feedback
Somebody with good knowledge of the Linux SYN-Cookies should
probably drop by and discuss the matter...
Regards
Joerg
Subject: A *significant* dilemma . . .
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:15:59 -0700
From: Steve Gibson <[EMAIL
Here is a message from nntp://news.grc.com/news.feedback
Somebody with good knowledge of the Linux SYN-Cookies should
probably drop by and discuss the matter...
Regards
Joerg
Subject: A *significant* dilemma . . .
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:15:59 -0700
From: Steve Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
31 matches
Mail list logo