bug: can't mount -o loop or -t nfs in 2.4.4, 2.4.4-ac2

2.4.4-pre7 worked fine. situation: mounting a remote nfs share or a loopback local filesystems doesn't work. it doesn't crash the system, the userspace process just hangs on the mount() call. all of these hang: # mount -o loop /my/ext2/image /mnt/ext2 # mount -o loop /my/fat16/image

bug: can't mount -o loop or -t nfs in 2.4.4, 2.4.4-ac2

2.4.4-pre7 worked fine. situation: mounting a remote nfs share or a loopback local filesystems doesn't work. it doesn't crash the system, the userspace process just hangs on the mount() call. all of these hang: # mount -o loop /my/ext2/image /mnt/ext2 # mount -o loop /my/fat16/image

KMALLOC_MAXSIZE undeclared in drivers/media/video/buz.c

2.4.3-pre4. i also see a reference to KMALLOC_MAXSIZE in drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c this kernel won't compile, is KMALLOC_MAXSIZE set somewhere? i can't find it. is it deprecated? gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/RedmondLinux/BUILD/linux-2.4.3/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2

KMALLOC_MAXSIZE undeclared in drivers/media/video/buz.c

2.4.3-pre4. i also see a reference to KMALLOC_MAXSIZE in drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c this kernel won't compile, is KMALLOC_MAXSIZE set somewhere? i can't find it. is it deprecated? gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/RedmondLinux/BUILD/linux-2.4.3/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2

Re: test12 + initrd = swapper at 99.8% CPU time

hi, ps axufw shows it as pid 1. Russell King wrote: > Joseph Cheek writes: > > i'm using test12 to perform a clean linux install. as soon as i get to > > a command prompt, ps axufw shows swapper at 99.8% CPU usage. this > > didn't repro with test11, and doesn't repro if

Re: test12 + initrd = swapper at 99.8% CPU time

hi, ps axufw shows it as pid 1. Russell King wrote: Joseph Cheek writes: i'm using test12 to perform a clean linux install. as soon as i get to a command prompt, ps axufw shows swapper at 99.8% CPU usage. this didn't repro with test11, and doesn't repro if i don't use an initrd

Re: test12: eth0 trasmit timed out after one hour uptime

well, it seems to be working fine now, so i guess it was a fluke. Michael Peddemors wrote: > On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Joseph Cheek wrote: > > 00:0e.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] > > (rev 30) > > Hmm, maybe I thru it out too fast.. 3Co

test12: eth0 trasmit timed out after one hour uptime

: @c7c732f0 length 802a status 0001002a after reboot it works fine again [i'll give it an hour...] test12-pre8 and before worked fine. any ideas? -- thanks! joe -- Joseph Cheek, Sr Linux Consultant, Linuxcare | http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the Revolution. | [EMAIL

test12: eth0 trasmit timed out after one hour uptime

: @c7c732f0 length 802a status 0001002a after reboot it works fine again [i'll give it an hour...] test12-pre8 and before worked fine. any ideas? -- thanks! joe -- Joseph Cheek, Sr Linux Consultant, Linuxcare | http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the Revolution. | [EMAIL

Re: test12: eth0 trasmit timed out after one hour uptime

well, it seems to be working fine now, so i guess it was a fluke. Michael Peddemors wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Joseph Cheek wrote: 00:0e.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] (rev 30) Hmm, maybe I thru it out too fast.. 3Com905B -TXNM XL PCI SN=6xb1b85caf

Re: [FIXED!] kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

this works fine in pre8. thanks all! Joseph Cheek wrote: > copying files off a loopback-mounted vfat filesystem exposes this bug. > test11 worked fine. > > loop.o built as module. this hard crashes the machine, every time > [PIII-450]. i don't know how to debug this,

Re: [FIXED!] kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

this works fine in pre8. thanks all! Joseph Cheek wrote: copying files off a loopback-mounted vfat filesystem exposes this bug. test11 worked fine. loop.o built as module. this hard crashes the machine, every time [PIII-450]. i don't know how to debug this, is there a FAQ

Re: kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

hi, comments below. Linus Torvalds wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Joseph Cheek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >copying files off a loopback-mounted vfat filesystem exposes this bug. > >test11 worked fine. > > It's not a new bug - it's an

Re: kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

at > (make an ext2 filesystem or similar instead). That woul dnarrow down the > bug further. thanks! joe -- Joseph Cheek, Sr Linux Consultant, Linuxcare | http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the Revolution. | [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTO / Acting PM, Redmond Linux Project | [

kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

>] [] [] [c010b56b>] Code: 0f 0b 83 c4 0c 8d 5e 28 8d 46 2c 39 46 2c 74 24 b9 01 00 00 as soon as i reboot i will look what's at buffer.c:827 -- thanks! joe -- Joseph Cheek, Sr Linux Consultant, Linuxcare | http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the Revolution. |

kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

-- thanks! joe -- Joseph Cheek, Sr Linux Consultant, Linuxcare | http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the Revolution. | [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTO / Acting PM, Redmond Linux Project | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 425 990-1072 vox [1074 fax] 206 679-6838 pcs | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe

Re: kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

or similar instead). That woul dnarrow down the bug further. thanks! joe -- Joseph Cheek, Sr Linux Consultant, Linuxcare | http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the Revolution. | [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTO / Acting PM, Redmond Linux Project | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 425 990-1072 vox

Re: kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

hi, comments below. Linus Torvalds wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joseph Cheek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: copying files off a loopback-mounted vfat filesystem exposes this bug. test11 worked fine. It's not a new bug - it's an old bug that apparently is uncovered by a new stricter