On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 08:27:23PM -0800, Tim Bird wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/size/Makefile
[...]
+LIBGCC=$(shell $(CC) -print-libgcc-file-name)
+
+get_size: get_size.c
+ $(CC) --static -ffreestanding -nostartfiles \
+ -Wl,--entry=_start get_size.c
timer subsystem commit d1f6d68d03ea with this
> > magnitude of linecount increase:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Catalina Mocanu
> > [josh: Handle CONFIG_COMPAT=y.]
> > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
> > ---
> &g
c to test_udelay.c") from the tip tree and commit
> > d1f6d68d03ea ("kernel: time: Compile out NTP support") from the tiny
> > tree.
>
> So I think a timer subsystem commit d1f6d68d03ea with this
> magnitude of linecount increase:
>
> Signed-off-by: C
422 (-8399)
I replied to one patch with a minor nit in the commit message. Other
than that, I don't see any obvious issues with this.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More major
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:01:02AM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
> Many embedded systems will not need the splice-family syscalls (splice,
> vmsplice, tee and sendfile). Omitting them saves space. This adds a new
> EXPERT
> config option CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE (default y) to support compiling them
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:49:31AM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 03:23:02PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith wrote:
> > > > T
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:01:38AM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 04:32:51PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:28:10PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:36:37 -0800
> > > Josh Triplett wrote:
> >
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 09:38:20AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 09:30:40PM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:43:26AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >> >
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 09:38:20AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 09:30:40PM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:43:26AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:01:38AM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 04:32:51PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:28:10PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:36:37 -0800
Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:49:31AM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 03:23:02PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl wrote:
To implement splice
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:01:02AM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
Many embedded systems will not need the splice-family syscalls (splice,
vmsplice, tee and sendfile). Omitting them saves space. This adds a new
EXPERT
config option CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE (default y) to support compiling them out.
that, I don't see any obvious issues with this.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
drivers/pps/Kconfig| 2 +-
include/linux/timex.h | 15 +--
init/Kconfig | 10 ++
kernel/compat.c| 8 ++--
kernel/sys_ni.c
Mocanu catalina.moc...@gmail.com
[josh: Handle CONFIG_COMPAT=y.]
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
drivers/pps/Kconfig| 2 +-
include/linux/timex.h | 15 +--
init/Kconfig
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:28:10PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:36:37 -0800
> Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 09:30:40PM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:43:26AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > >
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 09:30:40PM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:43:26AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 01:46:23PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > > Truly removing sendfile/sendpage means that you can't even compile NFS
&
uct page *page);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
> > +#define __splice_p(x) x
> > +#else
> > +#define __splice_p(x) NULL
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> This needs to go into a different patch.
> One logical change per patch please. :-)
Easy enough to merge this one into the patch introducing
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE, then.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
eral *users* of sendpage; it doesn't compile out the sendpage
support/infrastructure itself.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/ma
out the sendpage
support/infrastructure itself.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
+#define __splice_p(x) x
+#else
+#define __splice_p(x) NULL
+#endif
+
This needs to go into a different patch.
One logical change per patch please. :-)
Easy enough to merge this one into the patch introducing
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE, then.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 09:30:40PM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:43:26AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 01:46:23PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
Truly removing sendfile/sendpage means that you can't even compile NFS
into the tree.
If you mean
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:28:10PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:36:37 -0800
Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 09:30:40PM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:43:26AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014
the code to prevent linking
> against the struct. Do you know of a better technique to get the same
> result?
No, I don't. The approach you took seems fine; I'm just saying that you
need to explain the need for it in the commit message.
- JosH Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list
)
Very nice!
- Josh Triplett
> function old new delta
> pipe_to_null 4 - -4
> generic_pipe_buf_nosteal 6 - -6
> spd_release_page 10
ing splice-related infrastructure.
This commit message doesn't reflect the new approach of leaving those
members in the structure.
The patch looks good otherwise.
- Josh Triplett
> add/remove: 0/16 grow/shrink: 2/5 up/down: 114/-3693 (-3579)
> function
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:00:00PM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
> Compile out splice support from networking core when the splice-family of
> syscalls is not supported by the system (i.e. CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is
> undefined).
Please explain in the commit message why this particular bit of splice
commit message why this particular splice_read function (and only the
splice_read function, not the splice_write function) needs compiling
out, when others do not?
- Josh Triplett
> Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith
> ---
> fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
> include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
>
why this particular splice_read function (and only the
splice_read function, not the splice_write function) needs compiling
out, when others do not?
- Josh Triplett
Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
2 files changed
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:00:00PM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
Compile out splice support from networking core when the splice-family of
syscalls is not supported by the system (i.e. CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is
undefined).
Please explain in the commit message why this particular bit of splice
.
This commit message doesn't reflect the new approach of leaving those
members in the structure.
The patch looks good otherwise.
- Josh Triplett
add/remove: 0/16 grow/shrink: 2/5 up/down: 114/-3693 (-3579)
function old new delta
splice_direct_to_actor
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:00:01PM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
Entirely compile out splice translation unit when the system is configured
without splice family of syscalls (i.e. CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined).
add/remove: 0/25 grow/shrink: 0/5 up/down: 0/-4845 (-4845)
Very nice!
- Josh
to prevent linking
against the struct. Do you know of a better technique to get the same
result?
No, I don't. The approach you took seems fine; I'm just saying that you
need to explain the need for it in the commit message.
- JosH Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
wrong approach to me. Rather than changing Linux to
ignore excess data in the initramfs, could you change your bootloader to
pass the true length of the initramfs to Linux? Even if you reserve
extra space, if you know how much data you've actually included, you
could have your bootloader pass that infor
your bootloader to
pass the true length of the initramfs to Linux? Even if you reserve
extra space, if you know how much data you've actually included, you
could have your bootloader pass that information to Linux.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 04:35:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tiny tree got a conflict in
> net/openvswitch/Kconfig between commit 8cd4313aa775 ("openvswitch: Fix
> build failure") from the net-next tree and commit b043d487e255 ("lib:
>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 04:35:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Josh,
Today's linux-next merge of the tiny tree got a conflict in
net/openvswitch/Kconfig between commit 8cd4313aa775 (openvswitch: Fix
build failure) from the net-next tree and commit b043d487e255 (lib:
Conditionally
in, you have *exactly* the same credentials as the
target)?
> Also, I much prefer a sysctl to a boot option. Boot options are nasty
> to configure in many distributions.
Agreed.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the b
t that
> this option exists, and when/if we want to make it the default, so
> it's perfectly clear and transparent to all what is happening.
An option sounds sensible to me. I think a sysctl makes more sense,
though. I'll add one in v4.
What did you have in mind about the shell script? Som
rt:
> fs/splice:
> syscalls only: add/remove: 0/16 grow/shrink: 2/5 up/down: 114/-3693
> (-3579)
> the remainder: add/remove: 0/24 grow/shrink: 0/4 up/down: 0/-4824
> (-4824)
Nice!
Go ahead and submit the patches for that portion, and the rest can wait
until we get compile
/remove: 0/16 grow/shrink: 2/5 up/down: 114/-3693
(-3579)
the remainder: add/remove: 0/24 grow/shrink: 0/4 up/down: 0/-4824
(-4824)
Nice!
Go ahead and submit the patches for that portion, and the rest can wait
until we get compiler support for omitting structure fields.
- Josh Triplett
sense,
though. I'll add one in v4.
What did you have in mind about the shell script? Something like:
grep -r !% /etc/sudoers /etc/sudoers.d
?
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
to configure in many distributions.
Agreed.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:08:31PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> asmlinkage long sys_setgroups(int gidsetsize, gid_t __user *grouplist);
> +asmlinkage long sys_setusers(int uidsetsize, uid_t __user *grouplist);
Obvious typo here: s/grouplist/userlist/. Will fix in a v2, but I'll
wait for
Add new manpages for getusers(2) and setusers(2). Discuss supplementary
UIDs in credentials(7). Update manpages for seteuid(2), setfsuid(2),
setresuid(2), setreuid(2), and setuid(2).
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
---
man2/getusers.2| 177
t;setresuid 2");
if (setusers(5, list1) < 0)
err(1, "setusers 5");
show_users();
return 0;
}
In this test, all but the last call to setusers succeeds; the last call
fails with EPERM because the unprivileged process attempts to add UID 5
to the supplementary UID list, wh
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 09:08:07PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Josh Triplett writes:
> > On November 15, 2014 6:05:11 PM PST, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> >>On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:20:42PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >>> > However, sudoers seems to allow
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:40:06PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 06:35:05PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > >So arbitrarily anyone to drop groups from their supplemental group
> > >list will result in a change from both existing practice and leg
On November 15, 2014 6:05:11 PM PST, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:20:42PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> > However, sudoers seems to allow negative group matches. So maybe
>> > allowing this only with no_new_privs already set would make sense.
>>
This way, functions that already need to sort the group list need not do
so twice.
The new set_groups_sorted is intentionally not exported.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
---
v2, v3: No changes to patch 1/2.
kernel/groups.c | 16 +---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
---
v3: Document use of gid/egid/sgid.
v2: Document requirement for no_new_privs.
(If this doesn't end up going into 3.18, the version number in the patch will
need updating.)
man2/getgroups.2 | 11 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
n 0;
}
Without this patch, the test program gets EPERM from the second
setgroups call, after dropping root privileges. With this patch, the
test program successfully drops groups 1 and 5, but then gets EPERM from
the third setgroups call, since that call attempts to add groups the
process does n
second
setgroups call, after dropping root privileges. With this patch, the
test program successfully drops groups 1 and 5, but then gets EPERM from
the third setgroups call, since that call attempts to add groups the
process does not currently have.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
---
v2: Require
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
---
v2: Document requirement for no_new_privs.
(If this doesn't end up going into 3.18, the version number in the patch will
need updating.)
man2/getgroups.2 | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man2/getgroups.2 b/man2/getgroups
This way, functions that already need to sort the group list need not do
so twice.
The new set_groups_sorted is intentionally not exported.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
---
kernel/groups.c | 16 +---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/groups.c b
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:06:20PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 09:37:27AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Josh Triplett writes:
> >>
> >> > Currently, unprivilege
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 09:37:27AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Josh Triplett writes:
>
> > Currently, unprivileged processes (without CAP_SETGID) cannot call
> > setgroups at all. In particular, processes with a set of supplementary
> > groups cannot further
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
---
This should probably also include appropriate documentation for what
kernel introduces this behavior.
man2/getgroups.2 | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man2/getgroups.2 b/man2/getgroups.2
index 373c204..edca37c 100644
This way, functions that already need to sort the group list need not do
so twice.
The new set_groups_sorted is intentionally not exported.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
---
kernel/groups.c | 16 +---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/groups.c b
program successfully drops groups 1 and 5, but then gets EPERM from
the third setgroups call, since that call attempts to add groups the
process does not currently have.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
---
kernel/groups.c | 33 ++---
kernel/uid16.c | 2 --
2 files c
This way, functions that already need to sort the group list need not do
so twice.
The new set_groups_sorted is intentionally not exported.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
kernel/groups.c | 16 +---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
attempts to add groups the
process does not currently have.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
kernel/groups.c | 33 ++---
kernel/uid16.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/groups.c b/kernel/groups.c
index
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
This should probably also include appropriate documentation for what
kernel introduces this behavior.
man2/getgroups.2 | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man2/getgroups.2 b/man2/getgroups.2
index 373c204
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 09:37:27AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org writes:
Currently, unprivileged processes (without CAP_SETGID) cannot call
setgroups at all. In particular, processes with a set of supplementary
groups cannot further drop permissions
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:06:20PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 09:37:27AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org writes:
Currently, unprivileged processes
This way, functions that already need to sort the group list need not do
so twice.
The new set_groups_sorted is intentionally not exported.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
kernel/groups.c | 16 +---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
EPERM from
the third setgroups call, since that call attempts to add groups the
process does not currently have.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
v2: Require no_new_privs.
kernel/groups.c | 34 +++---
kernel/uid16.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 31
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
v2: Document requirement for no_new_privs.
(If this doesn't end up going into 3.18, the version number in the patch will
need updating.)
man2/getgroups.2 | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man2
, the
test program successfully drops groups 1 and 5, but then gets EPERM from
the third setgroups call, since that call attempts to add groups the
process does not currently have.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
v3: Allow gid, egid, or sgid.
v2: Require no_new_privs.
kernel
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
v3: Document use of gid/egid/sgid.
v2: Document requirement for no_new_privs.
(If this doesn't end up going into 3.18, the version number in the patch will
need updating.)
man2/getgroups.2 | 11 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions
This way, functions that already need to sort the group list need not do
so twice.
The new set_groups_sorted is intentionally not exported.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
v2, v3: No changes to patch 1/2.
kernel/groups.c | 16 +---
1 file changed, 13
On November 15, 2014 6:05:11 PM PST, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:20:42PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
However, sudoers seems to allow negative group matches. So maybe
allowing this only with no_new_privs already set would make sense.
Sigh, bad sudo. Sure
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:40:06PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 06:35:05PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
So arbitrarily anyone to drop groups from their supplemental group
list will result in a change from both existing practice and legacy
Unix systems, and it could
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 09:08:07PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org writes:
On November 15, 2014 6:05:11 PM PST, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:20:42PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
However, sudoers seems to allow negative
Add new manpages for getusers(2) and setusers(2). Discuss supplementary
UIDs in credentials(7). Update manpages for seteuid(2), setfsuid(2),
setresuid(2), setreuid(2), and setuid(2).
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
man2/getusers.2| 177
call to setusers succeeds; the last call
fails with EPERM because the unprivileged process attempts to add UID 5
to the supplementary UID list, which it does not currently have.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 2 +
arch/x86/syscalls
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:08:31PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
asmlinkage long sys_setgroups(int gidsetsize, gid_t __user *grouplist);
+asmlinkage long sys_setusers(int uidsetsize, uid_t __user *grouplist);
Obvious typo here: s/grouplist/userlist/. Will fix in a v2, but I'll
wait for other
timex __user *utp, struct timex
> *txc)
> ^
>
> Introduced by commit 7beb114f18e0 ("kernel: time: Compile out NTP
> support"). Neither of these functions is needed if CONFIG_NTP is not
> set.
Fixed.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
7beb114f18e0 (kernel: time: Compile out NTP
support). Neither of these functions is needed if CONFIG_NTP is not
set.
Fixed.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
rhashtable: Make rhashtable.c
> optional") from the tiny tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
This resolution looks correct to me.
- Josh Triplett
> diff --cc net/Kconfig
> index 99815b5454bf,02badd46823f.
79b518a3 ("lib: Add CRC64
> ECMA module") from the akpm-current tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
Looks good.
- Josh Triplett
> diff --cc lib/Kconfig
> index b8c97f05140d,2faf7b2de5b3..
> --
b79ef ("lib:
> rhashtable: Make rhashtable.c optional") from the tiny tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
This resolution looks correct to me.
- Josh Triplett
> diff --cc lib/Makefile
> index 04e53dd
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:56:04PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:17:16PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > After merging the tiny tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
> > allnoconfig)
> > failed like this:
> &
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:56:04PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:17:16PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Josh,
After merging the tiny tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
allnoconfig)
failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function
rhashtable.c optional) from the tiny tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
This resolution looks correct to me.
- Josh Triplett
diff --cc lib/Makefile
index 04e53dd16070,47b8305288e2..
--- a/lib/Makefile
+++ b/lib/Makefile
module) from the akpm-current tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
Looks good.
- Josh Triplett
diff --cc lib/Kconfig
index b8c97f05140d,2faf7b2de5b3..
--- a/lib/Kconfig
+++ b/lib/Kconfig
@@@ -186,9 -180,13 +186,16
) from the tiny tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
This resolution looks correct to me.
- Josh Triplett
diff --cc net/Kconfig
index 99815b5454bf,02badd46823f..
--- a/net/Kconfig
+++ b/net/Kconfig
@@@ -6,7 -6,8 +6,8
clear why that build failure didn't show up on
x86.
Looks like the two compat syscalls need cond_syscall lines as well.
I'll add those to the patch.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kern
like the two compat syscalls need cond_syscall lines as well.
I'll add those to the patch.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 12:49:29PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 11:01 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 08:37:27PM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > CREDITS | 7 +++
> > > MAINTAINERS | 10 ++
> >
>
> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart
> Cc: Josh Triplett
One comment below; with that addressed:
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett
> +def main(argv):
> +try:
> +opts, args = getopt.getopt(argv[1:], "dh", ["help"])
> +except getopt.GetoptError
hemselves to the MAINTAINERS
file (perhaps in the same entry as get_maintainer.pl), so that
get_maintainer.pl does not fall back to git history for them?
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
file (perhaps in the same entry as get_maintainer.pl), so that
get_maintainer.pl does not fall back to git history for them?
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
dvh...@linux.intel.com
Cc: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
One comment below; with that addressed:
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
+def main(argv):
+try:
+opts, args = getopt.getopt(argv[1:], dh, [help])
+except getopt.GetoptError, err:
+print
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 12:49:29PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 11:01 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 08:37:27PM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote:
CREDITS | 7 +++
MAINTAINERS | 10 ++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
Given
e this to the user via Kconfig?
> > >
> > > No sane person would even turn it on if they don't need it.
> >
> > IOW, I think you should just make it:
> >
> > config FLEX_ARRAY
> > def_bool n
>
> Joe Pershes complained on a similar
it default to 'n'.
Will rework the patches this way.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/josh/linux.git/commit/?h=tiny/unflex-arrayid=6631d5fb4cf395ebd2dc0f2da05525b9d3436a3f
Already done.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:47:40AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 11:46 -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:15:17 -0700
> > Josh Triplett wrote:
> >
> > > Document several common practices and conventions regarding condi
gt;
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad
> Tested-by: Aaron Brown
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher
Good catch.
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett
> include/linux/compiler.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/in
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:10:49PM +, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 09:33:01 -0800
> Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > On the vast majority of modern systems, no processes will use the
> > userspsace IO syscalls, iopl and ioperm. Add a new config option,
801 - 900 of 2693 matches
Mail list logo
