On Wednesday 06 April 2005 04:50, you wrote:
> Since tasklets are typically used for bottom half processing, is it
> acceptable/recommended that they be scheduled from a process context
> (say an ioctl handler)?
>
> Should one try to minimize such scheduling and try to do things in process
>
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 04:09, Matt Mackall wrote:
> While there may be reasons why mixed case is suboptimal, the real
> reason is that it's hard to keep track of which style is used where.
> It's annoying and error-prone to have to remember the naming format
> for everything in addition to its
Hi,
while reading Documentation/CodingStyle for the nth time, I realized that I had
read some conflicting coding style in some patch posted to the linux-kernel
mailing-list; in include/linux/page-flags.h, there is a lot of defines that are
apparently frowned upon:
HOWEVER, while mixed-case names
Hi,
while reading Documentation/CodingStyle for the nth time, I realized that I had
read some conflicting coding style in some patch posted to the linux-kernel
mailing-list; in include/linux/page-flags.h, there is a lot of defines that are
apparently frowned upon:
HOWEVER, while mixed-case names
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 04:09, Matt Mackall wrote:
While there may be reasons why mixed case is suboptimal, the real
reason is that it's hard to keep track of which style is used where.
It's annoying and error-prone to have to remember the naming format
for everything in addition to its
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 04:50, you wrote:
Since tasklets are typically used for bottom half processing, is it
acceptable/recommended that they be scheduled from a process context
(say an ioctl handler)?
Should one try to minimize such scheduling and try to do things in process
context
On Friday 11 March 2005 13:58, Juri Haberland wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > With version 2.6.10 the driver for the tuner frontend from ALPS TDLB7
> > was removed.
> >
> > Why do you think that this is a dead file?
> > While I'm happy with the work you do for dvb on
On Friday 11 March 2005 13:58, Juri Haberland wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
With version 2.6.10 the driver for the tuner frontend from ALPS TDLB7
was removed.
Why do you think that this is a dead file?
While I'm happy with the work you do for dvb on Linux, and I want
8 matches
Mail list logo
