2014-01-29 Jan Kara :
> On Tue 28-01-14 19:26:08, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Al Viro wrote:
>> > Assorted stuff; the biggest pile here is Christoph's ACL series.
>> > Plus assorted cleanups and fixes all over the place... There will be
>> > another pile late
Hi Gu,
2013/9/11 Gu Zheng :
> Hi Jaegeuk, Chao,
>
> On 09/10/2013 08:52 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> At first, thank you for the report and please follow the email writing
>> rules. :)
>>
>> Anyway, I agree to the below issue.
>> One thing that I can think of is that we don't need to use
Hi Russ,
The usage of fs_locks is for the recovery, so it doesn't matter
with stress-testing.
Actually what I've concerned is that we should not grab two or
more fs_locks in the same call path.
Thanks,
2013/9/11 Russ Knize :
> Hi Jaegeuk/Gu,
>
> I've removed the lock and have been stress-testing
Hi,
2013/9/11 Chao Yu
>
> Hi Kim,
>
> I did some tests as you mention of using random instead of spin_lock.
> The test model is as following:
> eight threads race to grab one of eight locks for one thousand times,
> and I used four methods to generate lock num:
>
> 1.atomic_add_return(1, &sbi->ne
2012/11/2 Martin Steigerwald
>
> Am Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2012 schrieb Jaegeuk Kim:
> > Change log from v2:
> >
> > o Fix compilation error for arm [Max]
> > o Move proc entries to debugfs [Greg]
> > o Add i_atime, i_generation, etc [Neil]
> > o Support NFS export [Changman]
> > o Move the f2
5 matches
Mail list logo