[PATCH v3 6/6] module: add install target for modules.builtin.ranges

2024-05-16 Thread Kris Van Hees
When CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES is enabled, the modules.builtin.ranges file should be installed in the module install location. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- Changes since v2: - Include modules.builtin.ranges in modules install target --- scripts/Makefile.modinst

[PATCH v3 5/6] kbuild: generate modules.builtin.ranges when linking the kernel

2024-05-16 Thread Kris Van Hees
Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- Changes since v2: - 1st arg to generate_builtin_ranges.awk is now modules.builtin.modinfo - Use $(real-prereqs) rather than $(filter-out ...) --- scripts/Makefile.vmlinux | 16 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff

[PATCH v3 4/6] module: script to generate offset ranges for builtin modules

2024-05-16 Thread Kris Van Hees
order) offset ranges in that section that cover the symbols of one or more builtin modules. Multiple ranges can apply to a single module, and ranges can be shared between modules. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- Changes since v2: - 1st arg

[PATCH v3 3/6] kbuild: generate a linker map for vmlinux.o

2024-05-16 Thread Kris Van Hees
When CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES is set, a linker map for vmlinux.o needs to be generated. The generation of offset range data for builtin modules depends on that linker map to know what offsets in an ELF section belong to an object file for a particular builtin module. Signed-off-by: Kris Van

[PATCH v3 2/6] trace: add CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES option

2024-05-16 Thread Kris Van Hees
The CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES option controls whether offset range data is generated for kernel modules that are built into the kernel image. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire --- Changes since v2: - Add explicit dependency on FTRACE

[PATCH v3 1/6] kbuild: add mod(name,file)_flags to assembler flags for module objects

2024-05-16 Thread Kris Van Hees
$(modname_flags) to a_flags (similar to c_flags). Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees --- scripts/Makefile.lib | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.lib b/scripts/Makefile.lib index 3179747cbd2cc..a2524ffd046f4 100644 --- a/scripts/Makefile.lib +++ b

[PATCH v3 0/6] Generate address range data for built-in modules

2024-05-16 Thread Kris Van Hees
install target Changes since v1: - Renamed CONFIG_BUILTIN_RANGES to CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES - Moved the config option to the tracers section - 2nd arg to generate_builtin_ranges.awk should be vmlinux.map Kris Van Hees (5): trace: add CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES option kbuild: generate

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Generate address range data for built-in modules

2024-05-15 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 01:43:15PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 7:42???AM Kris Van Hees > wrote: > > > > Especially for tracing applications, it is convenient to be able to > > refer to a symbol using a pair and to be able > > to tra

[PATCH v2 6/6] module: add install target for modules.builtin.ranges

2024-05-11 Thread Kris Van Hees
When CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES is enabled, the modules.builtin.ranges file should be installed in the module install location. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- Changes since v1: - Renamed CONFIG_BUILTIN_RANGES to CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES --- scripts

[PATCH v2 5/6] kbuild: generate modules.builtin.ranges when linking the kernel

2024-05-11 Thread Kris Van Hees
Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- Changes since v1: - Renamed CONFIG_BUILTIN_RANGES to CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES --- scripts/Makefile.vmlinux | 17 + 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.vmlinux b/scripts/Makefile.vmlinux

[PATCH v2 4/6] module: script to generate offset ranges for builtin modules

2024-05-11 Thread Kris Van Hees
or more builtin modules. Multiple ranges can apply to a single module, and ranges can be shared between modules. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- Changes since v1: - Updated commit msg (vmlinux.o -> vmlinux.map) --- scripts/generate_builtin_ranges.awk |

[PATCH v2 3/6] kbuild: generate a linker map for vmlinux.o

2024-05-11 Thread Kris Van Hees
When CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES is set, a linker map for vmlinux.o needs to be generated. The generation of offset range data for builtin modules depends on that linker map to know what offsets in an ELF section belong to an object file for a particular builtin module. Signed-off-by: Kris Van

[PATCH v2 2/6] trace: add CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES option

2024-05-11 Thread Kris Van Hees
The CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES option controls whether offset range data is generated for kernel modules that are built into the kernel image. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire --- Changes since v1: - Renamed CONFIG_BUILTIN_RANGES

[PATCH v2 1/6] kbuild: add modules.builtin.objs

2024-05-11 Thread Kris Van Hees
/vmlinux.lds.h). Orabug: 29891866 Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain Signed-off-by: Nick Alcock Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock Reviewed-by: Kris Van Hees --- Changes since v1: - None --- .gitignore | 2 +- Documentation/dontdiff | 2 +- Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 5

[PATCH v2 0/6] Generate address range data for built-in modules

2024-05-11 Thread Kris Van Hees
. Changes since v1: - Renamed CONFIG_BUILTIN_RANGES to CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES - Moved the config option to the tracers section - 2nd arg to generate_builtin_ranges.awk should be vmlinux.map Kris Van Hees (5): trace: add CONFIG_BUILTIN_MODULE_RANGES option kbuild: generate a linker map

Re: [PATCH 2/6] module: add CONFIG_BUILTIN_RANGES option

2023-12-11 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 07:59:17AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 00:07:48 -0500 > Kris Van Hees wrote: > > > The CONFIG_BUILTIN_RANGES option controls whether offset range data is > > generated for kernel modules that are built into the kernel image

[PATCH 6/6] module: add install target for modules.builtin.ranges

2023-12-07 Thread Kris Van Hees
When CONFIG_BUILTIN_RANGES is enable, the modules.builtin.ranges file should be installed in the module install location. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- scripts/Makefile.modinst | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.modinst b

[PATCH 5/6] kbuild: generate modules.builtin.ranges when linking the kernel

2023-12-07 Thread Kris Van Hees
Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- scripts/Makefile.vmlinux | 17 + 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.vmlinux b/scripts/Makefile.vmlinux index c9f3e03124d7..c23d40b023ff 100644 --- a/scripts/Makefile.vmlinux +++ b/scripts

[PATCH 4/6] module: script to generate offset ranges for builtin modules

2023-12-07 Thread Kris Van Hees
or more builtin modules. Multiple ranges can apply to a single module, and ranges can be shared between modules. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- scripts/generate_builtin_ranges.awk | 149 1 file changed, 149 insertions(+) create mode 100755

[PATCH 3/6] kbuild: generate a linker map for vmlinux.o

2023-12-07 Thread Kris Van Hees
When CONFIG_BUILTIN_RANGES is set, a linker map for vmlinux.o needs to be generated. The generation of offset range data for builtin modules depends on that linker map to know what offsets in an ELF section belong to an object file for a particular builtin module. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees

[PATCH 2/6] module: add CONFIG_BUILTIN_RANGES option

2023-12-07 Thread Kris Van Hees
The CONFIG_BUILTIN_RANGES option controls whether offset range data is generated for kernel modules that are built into the kernel image. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire --- kernel/module/Kconfig | 17 + 1 file changed, 17

[PATCH 1/6] kbuild: add modules.builtin.objs

2023-12-07 Thread Kris Van Hees
/vmlinux.lds.h). Orabug: 29891866 Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain Signed-off-by: Nick Alcock Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock Reviewed-by: Kris Van Hees --- .gitignore | 2 +- Documentation/dontdiff | 2 +- Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 5 + Makefile

[PATCH 0/6] Generate address range data for built-in modules

2023-12-07 Thread Kris Van Hees
with the other modules.builtin.* files. The impact on the kernel build is minimal because everything is done using a single-pass AWK script. The generated data size is minimal as well, (depending on the exact kernel configuration) in the range of 500-600 lines, with a file size of 20-30KB. Kris Van

Re: [PATCH v5] scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: Add alias to duplicate symbols for kallsyms

2023-10-10 Thread Kris Van Hees
introducing these new symbols would enable tracers to > > directly employ the new names without any modifications, and humans could > > easily identify the symbol they are dealing with just by examining the > > name. > > These are the fundamental principles beh

Re: [PATCH v5] scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: Add alias to duplicate symbols for kallsyms

2023-10-05 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 12:24:03PM -0400, Kris Van Hees wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 05:35:16PM +, Alessandro Carminati (Red Hat) > wrote: > > It is not uncommon for drivers or modules related to similar peripherals > > to have symbols with the exact sa

Re: [PATCH v5] scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: Add alias to duplicate symbols for kallsyms

2023-10-05 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 05:35:16PM +, Alessandro Carminati (Red Hat) wrote: > It is not uncommon for drivers or modules related to similar peripherals > to have symbols with the exact same name. > While this is not a problem for the kernel's binary itself, it becomes an > issue when attempting

Re: [PATCH V2 1/1 (was 0/1 by accident)] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace

2019-07-10 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:19:43PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 07/10/2019 10:30 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 21:32:25 +0200 > > Daniel Borkmann wrote: > > > >> Looks like you missed Brendan Gregg's prior feedback from v1 [0]. I haven't > >> seen a strong compelling

Re: [PATCH V2 1/1 (was 0/1 by accident)] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace

2019-07-10 Thread Kris Van Hees
This patch's subject should of course be [PATCH V2 1/1] rather than 0/1. Sorry about that. On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 08:42:24AM -0700, Kris Van Hees wrote: > This initial implementation of a tiny subset of DTrace functionality > provides the following options: > > dtrace [-lvV] [

[PATCH V2 0/1] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace

2019-07-10 Thread Kris Van Hees
dependency (libbpf) is in the kernel tree under tools/lib/bpf. A simple 'make' in the tools/dtrace directory suffices. The 'dtrace' executable needs to run as root because BPF programs cannot be loaded by non-root users. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: David Mc Lean Reviewed-by: Eugene

[PATCH V2 0/1] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace

2019-07-10 Thread Kris Van Hees
/bpf_sample.c = sample BPF program using two probe types I included an entry for the MAINTAINERS file. I offer to actively maintain this code, and to keep advancing its development. Cheers, Kris Van Hees

Re: [PATCH 1/1] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace

2019-07-08 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 02:15:37PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:14:30PM -0700, Kris Van Hees escreveu: > > This initial implementation of a tiny subset of DTrace functionality > > provides the following options: > > > > dtrace

Re: [PATCH 1/1] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace

2019-07-08 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 03:03:36PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:14:30PM -0700, Kris Van Hees wrote: > > +/* > > + * Read the data_head offset from the header page of the ring buffer. The > > + * argument is declared 'volatile' because it refer

Re: [PATCH 1/1] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace

2019-07-08 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 03:05:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:14:30PM -0700, Kris Van Hees wrote: > > +int dt_bpf_attach(int event_id, int bpf_fd) > > +{ > > + int event_fd; > > + int rc; >

[PATCH 1/1] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace

2019-07-03 Thread Kris Van Hees
dependency (libbpf) is in the kernel tree under tools/lib/bpf. A simple 'make' in the tools/dtrace directory suffices. The 'dtrace' executable needs to run as root because BPF programs cannot be loaded by non-root users. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: David Mc Lean Reviewed-by: Eugene

[PATCH 0/1] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace

2019-07-03 Thread Kris Van Hees
. Cheers, Kris Van Hees

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-06-17 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 08:01:52PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 6:54 PM Kris Van Hees > wrote: > > > > It is not hypothetical. The folowing example works fine: > > > > static int noinline bpf_action(void *ctx, long fd, long buf, lon

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-06-17 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 06:32:22PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 6:25 PM Kris Van Hees > wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:28:44PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > > << stuff skipped because it is not

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-06-17 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:28:44PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: << stuff skipped because it is not relevant to the technical discussion... >> > > > In particular you brought up a good point that there is a use case > > > for sharing a piece of bpf program between kprobe and tracepoint

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-06-06 Thread Kris Van Hees
out the process and less about the technical details, so please > forgive me if I've ignored or changed the technical meaning of anything > below. > > On 30 May 2019, at 12:15, Kris Van Hees wrote: > > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:28:44PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: >

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-30 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:28:44PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:16:08AM -0400, Kris Van Hees wrote: > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:16:25PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:12:53AM -0400, Kris Van Hees wrote: >

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-23 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 07:08:51PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:57:37PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Thu, 23 May 2019 17:31:50 -0700 > > Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > > > > > > Now from what I'm reading, it seams that the Dtrace layer may be > > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-23 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 07:02:43PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 23 May 2019 14:13:31 -0700 > Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > > In DTrace, people write scripts based on UAPI-style interfaces and they > > > don't > > > have to concern themselves with e.g. knowing how to get the value of

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-23 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 02:13:31PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:46:10AM -0400, Kris Van Hees wrote: > > > > I think there is a difference between a solution and a good solution. > > Adding > > a lot of knowledge in the userspace

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-22 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:53:31PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:23:27AM -0400, Kris Van Hees wrote: > > > > Userspace aside, there are various features that are not currently available > > such as retrieving the ppid of the current task, a

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-22 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:55:27PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 02:22:15PM -0400, Kris Van Hees wrote: > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 04:25:32PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:56:18AM -0700, Alexei

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-22 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:16:25PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:12:53AM -0400, Kris Van Hees wrote: > > > > Could you elaborate on why you believe my patches are not adding generic > > features? I can certainly agree that the DTrace-speci

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-22 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 04:25:32PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:56:18AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > and no changes are necessary in kernel/events/ring_buffer.c either. > > Let me just NAK them on the principle that I don't see them in my inbox. My

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 05:48:11PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 21 May 2019 14:43:26 -0700 > Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > Steve, > > sounds like you've missed all prior threads. > > I probably have missed them ;-) > > > The feedback was given to Kris it was very clear: > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 04:26:19PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 05:36:49PM -0400, Kris Van Hees wrote: > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 01:55:34PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 02:41:37PM -0400, Kris Van Hees wrote: >

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 01:55:34PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 02:41:37PM -0400, Kris Van Hees wrote: > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:56:18AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 11:47:00PM +0000, Kris Van Hees wrote: >

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
As suggested, I resent the patch set as replies to the cover letter post to support threaded access to the patches.

[RFC PATCH 05/11] trace: update Kconfig and Makefile to include DTrace

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
This commit adds the dtrace implementation in kernel/trace/dtrace to the trace Kconfig and Makefile. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- kernel/trace/Kconfig | 2 ++ kernel/trace/Makefile | 1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel

[RFC PATCH 01/11] bpf: context casting for tail call

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
compilation when CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=n. Fixed casting issue on platforms with 32-bit pointers. v3: Renamed the new program type operations to be more descriptive. Added finalize_context() helper. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/linux/bpf.h

[RFC PATCH 02/11] bpf: add BPF_PROG_TYPE_DTRACE

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
the BPF_PROG_TYPE_DTRACE implementation (building not enabled) 3. add the CONFIG_DTRACE option and enable compilation of the prog type implementation The reason for this sequence is to ensure that the kernel tree remains buildable between these commits. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock

[RFC PATCH 10/11] bpf: add bpf_buffer_reserve and bpf_buffer_commit

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
visible to userspace. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 39 ++- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 +++- tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h| 39 ++- tools/testing/selftests

[RFC PATCH 11/11] dtrace: make use of writable buffers in BPF

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
(and size 0). Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/uapi/linux/dtrace.h | 4 + kernel/trace/dtrace/bpf.c | 150 tools/dtrace/dt_buffer.c| 54 + tools/dtrace/probe1_bpf.c | 47 ++- 4 files changed, 198

[RFC PATCH 09/11] bpf: mark helpers explicitly whether they may change

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
. This way, whenever a new helper is added that may change the content of the context, there is no need to update a hardcoded list of functions. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/linux/bpf.h| 1 + include/linux/filter.h | 1 - kernel/bpf/core.c | 5

[RFC PATCH 08/11] perf: add perf_output_begin_forward_in_page

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
function perf_output_begin_forward_in_page() is to be used to commence output that cannot cross page boundaries. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/linux/perf_event.h | 3 ++ kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 65 - 2 files changed

[RFC PATCH 06/11] dtrace: tiny userspace tool to exercise DTrace support

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
of a helper (aside from using bpf_probe_read() on an address that is derived from the current task). Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + tools/dtrace/.gitignore | 1 + tools/dtrace/Makefile | 79 tools/dtrace/dt_bpf.c

[RFC PATCH 04/11] trace: initial implementation of DTrace based on kernel

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
l(ctx, , 1); /* fall through -> program not found or call failed */ return 0; } This patch also adds DTrace as a new subsystem in the MAINTAINERS file, with me as current maintainer and our development mailing list for specific development discussio

[RFC PATCH 07/11] bpf: implement writable buffers in contexts

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
ers to a buffer is cleared, just as it is done for packet pointers. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/linux/bpf.h | 3 + include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 4 +- kernel/bpf/verifier.c| 198 --- 3 files changed, 145 inserti

[RFC PATCH 03/11] bpf: export proto for bpf_perf_event_output helper

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
(bpf_get_perf_event_output_proto()). Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/linux/bpf.h | 1 + kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 7a40a3cd7ff2..e4bcb79656c4 100644

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:56:18AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 11:47:00PM +0000, Kris Van Hees wrote: > > > > 2. bpf: add BPF_PROG_TYPE_DTRACE > > > > This patch adds BPF_PROG_TYPE_DTRACE as a new BPF program type, without

Re: [RFC PATCH 07/11] bpf: implement writable buffers in contexts

2019-05-20 Thread Kris Van Hees
. I will update my list. Kris > On Mon, 20 May 2019 23:52:24 + (UTC) > Kris Van Hees wrote: > > > Currently, BPF supports writes to packet data in very specific cases. > > The implementation can be of more general use and can be extended to any > > number of writable

[RFC PATCH 05/11] trace: update Kconfig and Makefile to include DTrace

2019-05-20 Thread Kris Van Hees
This commit adds the dtrace implementation in kernel/trace/dtrace to the trace Kconfig and Makefile. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- kernel/trace/Kconfig | 2 ++ kernel/trace/Makefile | 1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel

[RFC PATCH 01/11] bpf: context casting for tail call

2019-05-20 Thread Kris Van Hees
compilation when CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=n. Fixed casting issue on platforms with 32-bit pointers. v3: Renamed the new program type operations to be more descriptive. Added finalize_context() helper. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/linux/bpf.h

[RFC PATCH 03/11] bpf: export proto for bpf_perf_event_output helper

2019-05-20 Thread Kris Van Hees
(bpf_get_perf_event_output_proto()). Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/linux/bpf.h | 1 + kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 7a40a3cd7ff2..e4bcb79656c4 100644

[RFC PATCH 11/11] dtrace: make use of writable buffers in BPF

2019-05-20 Thread Kris Van Hees
(and size 0). Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/uapi/linux/dtrace.h | 4 + kernel/trace/dtrace/bpf.c | 150 tools/dtrace/dt_buffer.c| 54 + tools/dtrace/probe1_bpf.c | 47 ++- 4 files changed, 198

[RFC PATCH 10/11] bpf: add bpf_buffer_reserve and bpf_buffer_commit helpers

2019-05-20 Thread Kris Van Hees
visible to userspace. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 39 ++- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 +++- tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h| 39 ++- tools/testing/selftests

[RFC PATCH 02/11] bpf: add BPF_PROG_TYPE_DTRACE

2019-05-20 Thread Kris Van Hees
the BPF_PROG_TYPE_DTRACE implementation (building not enabled) 3. add the CONFIG_DTRACE option and enable compilation of the prog type implementation The reason for this sequence is to ensure that the kernel tree remains buildable between these commits. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock

[RFC PATCH 04/11] trace: initial implementation of DTrace based on kernel facilities

2019-05-20 Thread Kris Van Hees
l(ctx, , 1); /* fall through -> program not found or call failed */ return 0; } This patch also adds DTrace as a new subsystem in the MAINTAINERS file, with me as current maintainer and our development mailing list for specific development discussio

[RFC PATCH 06/11] dtrace: tiny userspace tool to exercise DTrace support features

2019-05-20 Thread Kris Van Hees
of a helper (aside from using bpf_probe_read() on an address that is derived from the current task). Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + tools/dtrace/.gitignore | 1 + tools/dtrace/Makefile | 79 tools/dtrace/dt_bpf.c

[RFC PATCH 08/11] perf: add perf_output_begin_forward_in_page

2019-05-20 Thread Kris Van Hees
function perf_output_begin_forward_in_page() is to be used to commence output that cannot cross page boundaries. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/linux/perf_event.h | 3 ++ kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 65 - 2 files changed

[RFC PATCH 09/11] bpf: mark helpers explicitly whether they may change the context

2019-05-20 Thread Kris Van Hees
. This way, whenever a new helper is added that may change the content of the context, there is no need to update a hardcoded list of functions. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/linux/bpf.h| 1 + include/linux/filter.h | 1 - kernel/bpf/core.c | 5

[RFC PATCH 07/11] bpf: implement writable buffers in contexts

2019-05-20 Thread Kris Van Hees
ers to a buffer is cleared, just as it is done for packet pointers. Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock --- include/linux/bpf.h | 3 + include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 4 +- kernel/bpf/verifier.c| 198 --- 3 files changed, 145 inserti

[RFC PATCH 00/11] bpf, trace, dtrace: DTrace BPF program type implementation and sample use

2019-05-20 Thread Kris Van Hees
This patch set is also available, applied to bpf-next, at the following URL: https://github.com/oracle/dtrace-linux-kernel/tree/dtrace-bpf The patches in this set are part of an larger effort to re-implement DTrace based on existing Linux kernel features wherever possible. This allows