On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 16:17 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> No information about the device/driver that refuses to resume.
You should be able to identify the problematic driver by removing each
driver manually before suspending.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 19:19 +, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Saturday 30 December 2006 19:11, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Friday 29 December 2006 06:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Virtual MIDI Card 1
> > >
> > > Compile this feature out, I bet things start working again.
> >
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 11:25 -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If any of you have used a Commodore 64 emulator in Linux (such as vice)
> noticed when using audio there is severe starvation while other activities of
> the system are going on. i.e. moving a window in X or starting another
>
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 18:02 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Dec 14 2006 10:56, Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
> >
> >A small German manufacturer produces high-end AD converter cards. He sells
> >100 pieces per year, only in Germany and only with Windows drivers. He would
> >now like to make his cards wo
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 09:33 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 07:56:58PM -0600, Wenji Wu wrote:
> > Yes, when CONFIG_PREEMPT is disabled, the "problem" won't happen. That is
> > why I put "for 2.6 desktop, low-latency desktop" in the uploaded paper.
> > This "problem" happ
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 11:53 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I know you've pushed
> me to move to PAM telling me realtime-lsm wasn't going to work in the
> future. I really just wanted to know that PAM was now a requirement
> instead of only best practice.
I said it was not guaranteed to work. It sho
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 11:58 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying out the latest -rt patch and getting alsa xruns when
> using jackd and jack clients. This is a sample from the output of
> qjackctl / jackd (jack 0.102.25, qjackctl 0.2.21):
Any improvement if you disable high res ti
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 18:21 +0300, realales wrote:
> Also I analyzed XTEST sources without any success.
> I know that this is unlikely the right place to ask this but could
> someone please point me on the right way to move further?! Or may it
> be already a know problem for somebody?
Sounds lik
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 06:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Ingo,
>I started building the new kernels a few days ago with your
> 2.6.19-rc6-rt0 announcement. The kernels have built fine but so far I
> am unable to build the realtime-lsm package against them so no reason
> to reboot.
>
>I know
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 12:49 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> +int set_mixer_volume(int mixer_vol)
> {
> - int retVal;
> + /* FIXME: Alsa has mixer_vol in 0-100 range, while SX1 needs
> 0-9 range */
Untrue. ALSA uses whatever range you define in the info callback for
the mixer element. I
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 08:51 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> That makes sense, I/O tasks don't generally hold the cpu for extended
> periods, whereas a cpu bound task does.
So what can we do about I/O intensive tasks that also want a lot of CPU,
for example, the bloatier Gnome/KDE apps? Evolution i
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 17:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> thanks, please do that. Right now i have no open boot-crash regression
> left that i can reproduce.
Possibly old news, but with 2.6.18-rt7 this user gets an Oops in
read_hpet() if high res timers are enabled.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthr
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 23:07 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [...] Should we start a known regression list?
>
> please resend the bugs that still trigger for you with 2.6.19-rt0.
I'm working with the developers of the 64Studio distro who are
attempting
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 15:19 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 at 23:38:10 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 18:58 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > > I just bought a new notebook.
> >
>
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 12:17 +0200, Budde, Marco wrote:
> Well, it is not the first driver I am writing for Linux.
> So yes, I do know, what is part of a Linux driver and
> what is not.
It should be fairly obvious. Windows drivers do all kinds of crap that
just obviously doesn't belong in the kern
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 00:45 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >What is drbd? An out of tree driver? Did it work with 2.6.13-rcX? If
>
> Yes, it implements RAID 1 across two computers over a network link in
> realtime. Generally, you combine with a program called heartbeat to
> implement high-av
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 21:35 -0400, John Richard Moser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Are there any recent kernel profiles? I think from an acedemic
> perspective it'd be nice to see some graphs and numbers nobody
> understands showing where the longest running code p
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 21:59 -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > There are only two stacks involved, the normal kernel stack and your new
> > ndis
> > stack. You save ESP of the kernel stack at the base of the ndis stack.
> > When
> > the Windows code calls your api, you get t
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 17:13 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> The kernel module drbd (version 0.7.13) can no longer find its
> devices (e.g., /dev/drbd0, /dev/drbd1) in kernel 2.6.13. The version
> of udev I am using 065/068 didn't make a difference. It works fine
> with kernel 2.6.12.5 and 2.6.12
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 13:39 -0700, Rumen Ivanov Zarev wrote:
> Trivial patch against 2.6.13 to unhide SMBus on Compaq Evo N620c laptop using
> Intel 82855PM chipset.
> + } else if (unlikely(dev->subsystem_vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_COMPAQ)) {
Should unlikely() be used for cases where the conditi
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 09:36 +0200, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> >>4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the pro
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it
> initially caused are now sorted out.
>
> Does anyone knows about any currently unsolved problems?
ndiswrapper
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 18:58 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> I just bought a new notebook.
I'd return it if I were you.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 01:15 -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > Are lost ticks really that common? If so, any idea what's disabling
> >
> >interrupts for so long (or if it's a hardware issue)? And if not, it
> >seems like you'd nee
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 14:18 +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
> In my experience, turning off DMA for IDE disks is a pretty good way to
> generate lost ticks :-)
For this to "work" you have to unset "unmask IRQ" with hdparm, right?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linu
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 22:42 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> With this patch, time had kept up really well on one particular
> machine (Intel 4way Pentium 3 box) overnight, while
> on another newer machine (Intel 4way Xeon with HT) it didnt do so
> well (time sped up after 3 or 4 hours). Hence I
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 19:03 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> Hi, I'm starting to look at a strange problem. The configuration is:
> hardware: AMD X2 4400+ dual core, NForce3 chipset, Midiman 66 soundcard
> software: 2.6.13 smp + patch-2.6.13-rt1, PREEMPT_DESKTOP
> jack 0.100.4, curr
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 18:15 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 01:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm getting a build error for 2.6.13-rc7-rt4 with PREEMPT_DESKTOP for
> > > i386:
> >
> > hm, cannot reproduce thi
The controversy over the introduction of CONFIG_HZ demonstrated the
urgency of getting a dynamic tick solution merged before 2.6.14.
Anyone care to give a status report? Con, do you feel that the last
version you posted is ready to go in?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 12:48 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > I built and installed 2.6.13 today, and oldconfig revealed the new option
> > for
> > timer frequency.
> >
> > I searched the LKML on this, but all I found is the technical stuff - not
> > really any layman solutions.
>
> I wrote a
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 14:23 -0400, Masoud Sharbiani wrote:
> Sadly, with 2.6.13 (as in with 2.6.13-rc7), it crashes on boot, on a
> dual P3 machine
> It works just fine when compiled UP.
> This bug did NOT exist on 2.6.13-rc6 version.
Did you discover this bug with 2.6.13-rc7 before 2.6.13 was re
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 18:57 +0100, Nick Warne wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I built and installed 2.6.13 today, and oldconfig revealed the new option for
> timer frequency.
>
> I searched the LKML on this, but all I found is the technical stuff - not
> really any layman solutions.
>
> Two n00b question
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 17:17 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> As for volume settings, I always try to keep the sound card mixers at
> around 75 to 80% since it seems most amplifiers and mixer do distort a
> bit when you max them out. Why would you want them all at 100%
> anyhow, then you might as w
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 14:28 -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> - you're very interesting in real-time patches. linux should
> clearly have all real-time stuff merged. second to your interest
> in realtime is probably something like selinux
Please don't lump the -rt kernel people in with the
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 20:48 +0200, J. B. wrote:
> if got it from
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.10.tar.bz2
> and applied some patches
"some patches" could be anything. Please don't waste our time with bug
reports for randomly patched kernels.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from t
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 20:18 +0200, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
> I have now been told that SPDIF cannot support more than 2 channels
> except with AC3 compression. Given the fact that we can send 580MBit/s
> over USB2.0 I would not have even remotely considered this to be the
> problem and find it an
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 14:44 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 14:20 -0400, Michael Krufky wrote:
> > Todd Bailey wrote:
> >
> > > I'm all for this but I think there is little uncle George can do.
> >
> > Was it necessary to cc this to
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 14:20 -0400, Michael Krufky wrote:
> Todd Bailey wrote:
>
> > I'm all for this but I think there is little uncle George can do.
>
> Was it necessary to cc this to everybody in the world?
God, I can't believe this epidemic of bitching about gas prices has
invaded LKML of all
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 11:50 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 12:21 +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > My suggestion was, and still is:
Never mind, I misread the original post. This workaround is probably OK
if you only do the reset when this error condition arises.
Just found this in dmesg.
BUG: scheduling with irqs disabled: libc6.postinst/0x2000/13229
caller is ___down_mutex+0xe9/0x1a0
[] schedule+0x59/0xf0 (8)
[] ___down_mutex+0xe9/0x1a0 (28)
[] cfq_exit_single_io_context+0x22/0xa0 (84)
[] cfq_exit_io_context+0x3a/0x50 (16)
[] exit_io_context+0x6
[added alsa-devel to cc:]
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:26 -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> I think these are all real bugs.
>
> sound/synth/emux/emux_synth.c snd_emux_note_on, line 101
> snd_assert will return without unlocking emu->voice_lock (line 89)
This one is probably a real bug.
Lee
-
To unsubs
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 12:21 +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> My suggestion was, and still is:
>
> >Since it happens less than once a day, why not just add a code
> >to reset the NIC completely in this case, like it is
> >typically done in tx_timeout handlers of many NICs, and forget about
> it?
>
>
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 14:48 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> I don't mind if the fancy DSP algorithms and EAX is windows only
Actually the emu10k1 DSP code to implement EAX 1.x, 2.x, and 3.x is
known. Someone could easily implement it on Linux, it's just never
happened.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe fro
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 21:41 +0100, Peter Zubaj wrote:
> This is too expensive card to be only able use it as simple card.
> My advice buy something else.
> I don't think fight with creative can bring anything good to linux.
> Leave Creative as is. There is plenty of other hardware from other
> manu
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 21:38 +0100, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> We are not going to get any support from Creative for the X-Fi chip.
> We do not get support from Creative for any Creative chip that has a
> DSP in it.
Well, except for the emu10k1 driver that Creative wrote and released
years ago
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 11:38 -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Robert Hancock wrote:
> > > I fail to see how sched_yield is going to be very helpful in this
> > > situation. Since that call can sleep from a range of time ranging
> > > from zero to a long time, it's going to give unp
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 11:38 -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> But I also found that I needed to add a new
> yield(), to work around yet another unexpected issue on this system -
> we have a number of threads waiting on a condition variable, and the
> thread holding the mutex signals the var, unlocks the
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 03:07 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 at 20:02:27 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch enables tracking semaphore ownership.
> >
> > Why? I can't think of any bug in recent years which needed this
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 10:31 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> It's an X problem and it's being fixed. Get over it, we're not tuning
> the scheduler for a broken app.
>
You're right, this problem seems much, much better in Xorg 6.8.2. I
think the Damage extension might be responsible. There's definite
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 08:48 +0200, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> So, there is no project about this yet
No, not yet. The ALSA team has a contact at Creative, I guess the next
step is to ask them.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message t
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 18:52 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> If this is the long awaited emu10k3, then there's a good chance we can
> support it. But we'll need at the very least a hardware sample from
> Creative.
OK, it's the ca20k1 (!). So it's likely to be as d
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 10:31 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 06:13, Lee Revell wrote:
> >
> > I agree that tweaking the scheduler is probably pointless, as long as X
> > is burning gazillions of CPU cycles redrawing things that don't need to
> > be
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 19:11 +0100, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> Ralink Tech (www.ralink.com.tw) took a design decision to incorporate
> the firmware into an EEPROM on-board, allowing their driver to be
> GPL'd
Binary only firmware and firmware loading is perfectly compatible with
the GPL, as long as
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 11:55 +0200, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I did try to look for Alsa drivers for the new X-Fi chip from Creatives
> (http://www.tomshardware.com/consumer/20050818/), but I didn't find any.
>
> I there something running around this chip ? Or no plan yet ?
Are these e
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 14:36 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:41 pm, Peter Williams wrote:
> > Maybe we could use interbench to find a nice value for X that doesn't
> > destroy Audio and Video? The results that I just posted for
> > spa_no_frills with X reniced to -10 suggest that
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 22:59 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while tracking down some timer related ugliness I stumbled over the
> timer driven function rt_secret_rebuild(), which does a loop over
> rt_has_mask (1024 in my case) entries and possibly some subsequent
> variable sized loops in
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 05:09 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
> here are interbench v0.29 resoults:
The X test under simulated "Compile" load looks most interesting.
Most of the schedulers do quite poorly on this test - only Zaphod with
default max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus manages to delive
What ever happened with cpuinfo(1)? This thread:
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:_uCmn69gfyoJ:lists.debian.org/lsb-discuss/2002/01/msg00084.html+cpuinfo&hl=en
ended inconclusively.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [E
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 01:29 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Iau, 2005-08-18 at 19:16 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > A search for a 200MB file tells you it's available on 2000 hosts, all of
> > whom are on dialup.
>
> What about the real world ?
>
OK that was a poorly c
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 00:13 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Iau, 2005-08-18 at 14:17 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Maybe the distros need to just increase the default FD limit to 1024. I
> > hit this constantly with gtk-gnutella, if try to download a file that's
> > availab
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 18:19 +0200, Wieland Gmeiner wrote:
> As an example: It seems to be a common problem with numerous services
> to run out of available file descriptors. There are several
> workarounds to this problem, the most common seems to be increasing
> the systemwide max number of filede
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 00:27 +0900, Akira Tsukamoto wrote:
> My computer with Athlon K7 was faster with manually prefetching,
> but I did not know it is already becoming obsolete.
>
Don't listen to people who tell you $FOO hardware is obsolete, they have
a very narrow view. "Obsolete" is meaningl
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 14:48 +0200, Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
> I think the problem here is outside afs.
Does not matter. If you want people to give a shit about openafs then
GET IT MERGED. Why is that so hard to understand?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kern
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 20:59 +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> The only limitation would be that when the
> speaker driver is enabled in the config,
> the ability to manually select the CONFIG_HZ
> will be lost, but maybe it is not that bad
> at all
CONFIG_HZ is just a short term hack to placate people
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 21:41 +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> I guess now I realized how you (and Nish)
> assume I could use it: is it that I
> should set CONFIG_HZ to the value I
> need at compile-time, and just remove
> all the timer reprogramming from the
> driver in a hope the dynamic-tick patch
> w
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 20:21 +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> perhaps allowing a single higher frequency, or allowing just any
> frequency, is pretty much the same task, and doesn't
> look achievable within the currently existing
> timer API anyway
Lots of things aren't doable with the current timer AP
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 00:21 +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 1. It needs the higher interrupt frequency.
> Since there seem to be no API to change
> the timer frequency at runtime, the driver
> does this itself. Now I have googled out
> the thread
Wow, your driver implements bass and treble controls
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 19:53 +0200, Henk wrote:
> Ehm, I did not know there was still an OSS usb driver.
Thankfully it's going away real soon. It failed to depend on OSS,
didn't have decent help text, and doesn't live under Sound so lots of
people got them confused. Most ALSA based distros failed
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 16:21 +0200, Henk wrote:
> - audio playbackvia generic usb audio diver
> - audio record via generic usb audio diver
There is no such thing.
Do you mean the obsolete OSS usb-audio driver, or snd-usb-audio?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 09:25 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
> We are currently almost there with hdaps. We are thinking how we should
> make things and have made most of the decesions. We still need help from
> anyone that might know about this. Please, if you can think of anything,
>
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 13:25 +1000, Dmytro Bablinyuk wrote:
> I hope this is the right place to ask. My apologise if it's wrong.
> I have found 2.4.25-low-latency.patch.gz for the 2.4.25 kernel but I
> couldn't find preemptible patch for this version of kernel.
> I found preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.23-p
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 13:13 -0700, Stephen Pollei wrote:
> Seems like lots of Europeans might want a bigger
> charset, not to mention Asians, Hindus, and whomever else.
For strings, of course. But there's no need for UTF-8 operators.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 21:19 -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> And those of us who are Mac OS X oriented have patched our console and
> X keycodes to match the mac way of generating symbols:
>
> Alt-\= «
> Alt-Shift-\ = »
> Alt-Shift-+ = ±
>
My point exactly, it's idiotic for Perl6 to use th
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 19:49 +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 02:42:52PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 09:35 -0700, Stephen Pollei wrote:
> > > Thats great for the perl6 people.
> > > http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 19:49 +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 02:42:52PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 09:35 -0700, Stephen Pollei wrote:
> > > Thats great for the perl6 people.
> > > http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 09:35 -0700, Stephen Pollei wrote:
> Thats great for the perl6 people.
> http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S03.html says they are going
> to be using « and » as operators...
Is Larry smoking crack? That's one of the worst ideas I've heard in a
long time. There's no e
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 12:28 +1200, Ryan Brown wrote:
> is there a patch available for -rc6?
>
Not yet. Whatever you see here:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/
is the latest version.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 19:49 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:13:51PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 17:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > This patch schedules obsolete OSS drivers (with ALSA drivers that
> > > support the
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 23:07 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> Very nice to see this going in (via) the RT patch.
>
Also, does not compile for me with ACPI PM timer selected:
CC arch/i386/kernel/timers/hrtimer_pm.o
In file included from include/asm/hrtime.h:220,
from i
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 12:59 +1000, roucaries bastien wrote:
> They post on this list 1 year and a half ago no answer.
>
I guess everyone on LKML has day jobs now, no one has time for fun stuff
like reverse engineering drivers anymore... :-(
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 13:00 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i have released the -53-01 Real-Time Preemption patch, which can be
> downloaded from:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
>
> there are two new features in this release, which justified the jump
> from .52 to .53:
>
> - the
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 09:52 -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> they are much less likely to participate in any kind of reverse
> engineering effort, even if it's just testing a new driver.
I think anyone launching a reverse engineering effort should announce
the project to LKML! When I set out to add
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 11:56 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > For the record, some shortcomings of this patch:
> >
> > o Needs lots more testing on more architectures.
> >
> > o Needs performance and stress testing.
> >
> > o Needs testing in Ingo's PREEMPT_RT environment.
>
> cool patch! I h
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 17:17 +0200, Michael Thonke wrote:
> *frustrated*
Hey I don't like it any more than you do. But Nvidia is an IP company
and they act like one. Most of us would probably do the exact same
thing in their position, AKA whatever the lawyers tell them ;-)
Lee
-
To unsubscribe
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 09:09 +0200, Gábor Lénárt wrote:
> I want to buy a new system including
> motherboard with some Athlon64 CPU. I was told that nforce4 chipset is
> the "right" choice. However I'm using *only* Linux
Who told you that? Some Windows user?
It's common knowledge that Nvidia is
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 19:39 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> Ah, I've got a patch on my laptop that takes that down to ~2% or less.
> I didn't include it in this patch set but I'll work to get it
> integrated before the next release. Sorry about that.
>
> If you have any suggestions for further perform
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 19:13 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> All,
> Here's the next rev in my rework of the current timekeeping subsystem.
> No major changes, only some cleanups and further splitting the larger
> patches into smaller ones.
Last I heard this made gettimeofday() 20% slower on x86.
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 19:49 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I'd deprecate them without moving them.
>
OK, I think that will still be slightly confusing becuase it comes
before Sound in the kernel config, but maybe the deprecated part will
make people think twice.
I think we should at least label the
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 17:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch schedules obsolete OSS drivers (with ALSA drivers that
> support the same hardware) for removal.
>
> Scheduling the via82cxxx driver for removal was ACK'ed by Jeff Garzik.
>
Someone on linux-audio-user just pointed out that the
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 17:44 +0200, Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz wrote:
> I know that in general no one here is interested in vmware affairs, but in
> hope that VMware folks are reading this list too, here's the oops:
> It's the newest vmware5 for linux from vmware.com
>
> ksymoops 2.4.9 on i686 2.6.
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 16:36 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> Running very recent Fedora Core Development kernel I can following
> soft-oops.. ( 2.6.12-1.1455_FC5smp )
>
>
> e100: eth0: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex
> BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Could this be a false positive
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 17:12 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> We did system switchover last weekend, and nobody reacted trulu
> adversely.Probably nobody noticed it either. :-)
It's definitely faster. Lately I have had a few replies to list
messages where the reply hit LKML several minutes befo
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 17:19 +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> I recently installed a SCSI tape drive and Adaptec AHA-2940U2W SCSI
> controller into my server to run backups.
>
> Since then, the driver issues these warnings on a semi-regular basis
> while the drive is busy:
>
> Aug 9 17:00:26 anu ke
[added James to cc:]
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 09:40 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 10:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Raymond Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I remember there's a kernel pcmcia bug preventing the development for
> > > the Audigy2 p
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 12:56 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> Again, the point is that ndiswrapper is a great project, but people
> uses it for the leftovers! We *shouldn't* buy leftovers or from Manuf
> that don't care about Linux.
If you are always speccing out new systems then of course, but in
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 20:24 +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 20:13 +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> >
> >>I gave up on my laptop's built in Inprocomm IPN 2220 quite some time ago
> >>(one more reason not to like
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 20:13 +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> I gave up on my laptop's built in Inprocomm IPN 2220 quite some time ago
> (one more reason not to like Cisco). In the rare cases I do really need
> wlan there is http://zd1211.sourceforge.net/
Any idea how much hardware is out there th
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 14:01 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Some BIOSes do not lock SMM, and you *could* turn it off at the chipset
> > level.
>
> Doing so would be wasteful though. Both AMD and Intel CPUs need SMM code
> for the deeper C* sleep states.
>
Wouldn't it be useful for !CONFIG_PM? Many
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 22:50 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> It doesn't actually say it works on Linux. Perhaps you wanted
> mysticgooglepsychic.com? ;-)
>
> I don't think it is reasonable to expect google to know what ndiswrapper
> is ... or perhaps it just has a taste filter installed? ;-)
Tr
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 09:31 +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2005 03:39, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
> > > supported?
101 - 200 of 631 matches
Mail list logo
