>
>
>Hi!
>
>> v3->v2, fixed the issues Matthew Wilcox raised.
>>
>> PCI Express ASPM defines a protocol for PCI Express components in the
D0
>> state to reduce Link power by placing their Links into a low power
state
>> and instructing the other end of the Link to do likewise. This
>> capability
Hi!
v3-v2, fixed the issues Matthew Wilcox raised.
PCI Express ASPM defines a protocol for PCI Express components in the
D0
state to reduce Link power by placing their Links into a low power
state
and instructing the other end of the Link to do likewise. This
capability allows
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:59 AM
>To: Zan Lynx
>Cc: Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Raj, Ashok; Li,
Shaohua;
>Keshavamurthy, Anil S
>Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 Intel DMAR crash on A
-Original Message-
From: Robert Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:59 AM
To: Zan Lynx
Cc: Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Raj, Ashok; Li,
Shaohua;
Keshavamurthy, Anil S
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 Intel DMAR crash on AMD x86_64
Zan Lynx wrote
Hi,
>> > If you think it is a linux bug, can you produce small test case
doing
>> > just the sigwait, and post it on l-k with big title "sigwait()
breaks
>> > when straced, and on suspend"?
>> >
>> > That way it is going to get some attetion, and you'll get either
>> > documentation or kernel
Hi,
If you think it is a linux bug, can you produce small test case
doing
just the sigwait, and post it on l-k with big title sigwait()
breaks
when straced, and on suspend?
That way it is going to get some attetion, and you'll get either
documentation or kernel fixed.
Looks like a
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 13:31, Li Shaohua wrote:
> @@ -1052,7 +1086,7 @@ static void __init smp_boot_cpus(unsigne
> if (max_cpus <= cpucount+1)
> continue;
>
> - if (do_boot_cpu(apicid))
> + if ((cpu = alloc_cpu_id(
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 13:31, Li Shaohua wrote:
@@ -1052,7 +1086,7 @@ static void __init smp_boot_cpus(unsigne
if (max_cpus = cpucount+1)
continue;
- if (do_boot_cpu(apicid))
+ if ((cpu = alloc_cpu_id() 0) do_boot_cpu(apicid, cpu
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 16:27, Li Shaohua wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 16:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1# dmesg | tail -25
> > [] activate_task+0x1/0xa0
> > [] resched_task+0x68/0x90
> > [] try_to_wake_up+0x2aa/0x2f0
>
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 16:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1# dmesg | tail -25
> [] activate_task+0x1/0xa0
> [] resched_task+0x68/0x90
> [] try_to_wake_up+0x2aa/0x2f0
> [] fbcon_cursor+0x19a/0x270
> [] hide_cursor+0x18/0x30
> []
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 16:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1# dmesg | tail -25
[c011d001] activate_task+0x1/0xa0
[c011d128] resched_task+0x68/0x90
[c011d8ba] try_to_wake_up+0x2aa/0x2f0
[c025ed7a] fbcon_cursor+0x19a/0x270
[c02c4958]
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 16:27, Li Shaohua wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 16:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1# dmesg | tail -25
[c011d001] activate_task+0x1/0xa0
[c011d128] resched_task+0x68/0x90
[c011d8ba] try_to_wake_up+0x2aa/0x2f0
[c025ed7a
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 20:17, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Li Shaohua wrote:
>
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > +int __attribute__ ((weak)) smp_prepare_cpu(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Any way for you to av
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 17:32, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Li Shaohua wrote:
> > Trival patch for CPU hotplug. In CPU identify part, only did cleaup
> for
> > intel CPUs. Need do for other CPUs if they support S3 SMP.
> >
> > @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 01:57, Protasevich, Natalie wrote:
> Hello,
> This is a hotplug CPU patch for i386, done against 2.6.12-rc2-mm3.
> Somewhat alternative to the one posted by Li Shaohua, but not really
> (and I didn't mean that :). If you look closer, our patches are
> di
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 20:17, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Li Shaohua wrote:
>
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > +int __attribute__ ((weak)) smp_prepare_cpu(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Any way for you to avo
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 18:51, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Using CPU hotplug to support suspend/resume SMP. Both S3 and S4 use
> > disable/enable_nonboot_cpus API. The S4 part is based on Pavel's
> > original S4 SMP patch.
>
> I tested it on 2x PII(?) 550MHz system. Suspend went ok, resume loaded
>
Trival patch for CPU hotplug. In CPU identify part, only did cleaup for
intel CPUs. Need do for other CPUs if they support S3 SMP.
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/apic.c| 14 +++
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kern
, so it is hotplug safed.
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c |6 ++
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/sysenter.c | 12 +++-
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c |4
Make sibling map init per-cpu. Hotplug CPU may change the map at
runtime.
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c | 86 ++-
1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/smp
Make sibling map init per-cpu. Hotplug CPU may change the map at
runtime.
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c | 86 ++-
1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c
, so it is hotplug safed.
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c |6 ++
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/sysenter.c | 12 +++-
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c |4
linux
Trival patch for CPU hotplug. In CPU identify part, only did cleaup for
intel CPUs. Need do for other CPUs if they support S3 SMP.
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/apic.c| 14 +++
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/cpu
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 18:51, Pavel Machek wrote:
Using CPU hotplug to support suspend/resume SMP. Both S3 and S4 use
disable/enable_nonboot_cpus API. The S4 part is based on Pavel's
original S4 SMP patch.
I tested it on 2x PII(?) 550MHz system. Suspend went ok, resume loaded
image from
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 20:17, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Li Shaohua wrote:
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+int __attribute__ ((weak)) smp_prepare_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
Any way for you to avoid using weak attribute?
Just want to avoid more 'ifdef
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 01:57, Protasevich, Natalie wrote:
Hello,
This is a hotplug CPU patch for i386, done against 2.6.12-rc2-mm3.
Somewhat alternative to the one posted by Li Shaohua, but not really
(and I didn't mean that :). If you look closer, our patches are
different and can complement
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 17:32, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Li Shaohua wrote:
Trival patch for CPU hotplug. In CPU identify part, only did cleaup
for
intel CPUs. Need do for other CPUs if they support S3 SMP.
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ void __init init_bsp_APIC(void)
apic_write_around(APIC_LVT1
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 20:17, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Li Shaohua wrote:
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+int __attribute__ ((weak)) smp_prepare_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
Any way for you to avoid using weak attribute?
Replace weak attribute with define
Clean CPU states in order to reuse smp boot code for CPU hotplug.
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c | 12
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c|5 +
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
Using CPU hotplug to support suspend/resume SMP. Both S3 and S4 use
disable/enable_nonboot_cpus API. The S4 part is based on Pavel's
original S4 SMP patch.
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.11-root/drivers/acpi/Kconfig|2
linux-2.6.11-root/include
Boot a CPU at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c | 112 ---
linux-2.6.11-root/drivers/base/cpu.c |8 +
linux-2.6.11-root/include/asm-i386/smp.h |2
3 files changed, 93 inse
Boot a CPU at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c | 112 ---
linux-2.6.11-root/drivers/base/cpu.c |8 +
linux-2.6.11-root/include/asm-i386/smp.h |2
3 files changed, 93 insertions
Using CPU hotplug to support suspend/resume SMP. Both S3 and S4 use
disable/enable_nonboot_cpus API. The S4 part is based on Pavel's
original S4 SMP patch.
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
linux-2.6.11-root/drivers/acpi/Kconfig|2
linux-2.6.11-root/include/linux/suspend.h
Clean CPU states in order to reuse smp boot code for CPU hotplug.
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c | 12
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c|5 +
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/process.c| 19
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:33, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't understand why this is needed at all. It looks like a fair
> > > amount of code from do_exit is being duplicated here.
> > Yes, exactly. Someone who understand do_exit please help clean up the
> > code. I'd like to remove the
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:33, Nathan Lynch wrote:
I don't understand why this is needed at all. It looks like a fair
amount of code from do_exit is being duplicated here.
Yes, exactly. Someone who understand do_exit please help clean up the
code. I'd like to remove the idle thread,
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 03:10, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Li Shaohua wrote:
>
> > linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c |6 ++
> > linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/sysenter.c | 10 ++
> > linux-2.6.11-roo
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:33, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>
> I'd say fix the smpboot code so that it doesn't create new idle tasks
> except during boot.
I'd like the the CPU hotremove case just likes the case that CPU isn't
boot. A non-boot CPU hasn't a idle thread. But you may think it's not
worthy
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 03:11, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Li Shaohua wrote:
>
> > Clean up all CPU states including its runqueue and idle thread,
> > so we can use boot time code without any changes.
> > Note this makes /sys/devices/system/cp
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 17:10, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > I'm switching suspend2 to use hotplug too. Li, I'll try adding your
> > > patches as well as Zwane's if you like
> > Great!
> >
> > > (suspend2 can enter S3, S4 or S5
> > > after writing the image). I'd love to try it on my HT
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 16:59, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Add kconfig for IA32 S3 SMP.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shaohua
> >
> > ---
> >
> > linux-2.6.11-root/kernel/power/Kconfig |7 +++
> > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff -puN kernel/power/Kconfig~smp_s3_kconfig
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 16:46, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > ---
> >
> > linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c |6 ++
> > linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/sysenter.c | 10 ++
> > linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c |6 ++
> >
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 16:01, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm switching suspend2 to use hotplug too. Li, I'll try adding your
> patches as well as Zwane's if you like
Great!
> (suspend2 can enter S3, S4 or S5
> after writing the image). I'd love to try it on my HT desktop, and
> hotplug
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 16:01, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
I'm switching suspend2 to use hotplug too. Li, I'll try adding your
patches as well as Zwane's if you like
Great!
(suspend2 can enter S3, S4 or S5
after writing the image). I'd love to try it on my HT desktop, and
hotplug will get
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 16:46, Pavel Machek wrote:
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c |6 ++
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/sysenter.c | 10 ++
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c |6 ++
3 files
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 16:59, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Add kconfig for IA32 S3 SMP.
Thanks,
Shaohua
---
linux-2.6.11-root/kernel/power/Kconfig |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff -puN kernel/power/Kconfig~smp_s3_kconfig kernel/power/Kconfig
---
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 17:10, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I'm switching suspend2 to use hotplug too. Li, I'll try adding your
patches as well as Zwane's if you like
Great!
(suspend2 can enter S3, S4 or S5
after writing the image). I'd love to try it on my HT desktop, and
hotplug
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 03:11, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Li Shaohua wrote:
Clean up all CPU states including its runqueue and idle thread,
so we can use boot time code without any changes.
Note this makes /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online unworkable.
#ifdef
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:33, Nathan Lynch wrote:
I'd say fix the smpboot code so that it doesn't create new idle tasks
except during boot.
I'd like the the CPU hotremove case just likes the case that CPU isn't
boot. A non-boot CPU hasn't a idle thread. But you may think it's not
worthy
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 03:10, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Li Shaohua wrote:
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c |6 ++
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/sysenter.c | 10 ++
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 13:28, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:07:02AM +0800, Li Shaohua wrote:
> > Clean up all CPU states including its runqueue and idle thread,
> > so we can use boot time code without any changes.
> > Note this makes /sys/devices/s
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 10:48, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Li Shaohua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 10:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Li Shaohua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The patches are against 2.
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 10:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Li Shaohua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The patches are against 2.6.11-rc1 with Zwane's CPU hotplug patch in -mm
> > tree.
>
> Should I merge that thing into mainline? It seems that a few people are
Boot a CPU at runtime and use it to support S3 SMP.
Thanks,
Shaohua
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c | 79 +++
linux-2.6.11-root/include/asm-i386/smp.h |4 +
linux-2.6.11-root/kernel/power/main.c| 30 ++
3 files changed, 104
Clean up all CPU states including its runqueue and idle thread,
so we can use boot time code without any changes.
Note this makes /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online unworkable.
Thanks,
Shaohua
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c | 12
Trival patch for CPU hotplug. In CPU identify part, only did cleanup for intel
CPUs. Need do for other CPUs if they support S3 SMP.
Thanks,
Shaohua
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/apic.c| 14 +++
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c | 30
Add kconfig for IA32 S3 SMP.
Thanks,
Shaohua
---
linux-2.6.11-root/kernel/power/Kconfig |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff -puN kernel/power/Kconfig~smp_s3_kconfig kernel/power/Kconfig
--- linux-2.6.11/kernel/power/Kconfig~smp_s3_kconfig2005-03-31
10:49:57.156487160
Make sibling map init per-cpu. Hotplug CPU may change the map at runtime.
cpuhotplug semaphore should be used to protect the map.
Thanks,
Shaohua
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c | 56 +--
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff -puN
Hi,
The following 6 patches try to add suspend-to-ram (or S3) SMP support
for IA32. It's for support HT based system suspend/resume currently and
most of the code are also useful for physical CPU hotplug.
In a SMP system, after S3 resume, the BP is starting to execute the ACPI
wakeup address just
Make SEP init per-cpu, so is hotplug safe.
Thanks,
Shaohua
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c |6 ++
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/sysenter.c | 10 ++
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c |6 ++
3 files changed,
Make SEP init per-cpu, so is hotplug safe.
Thanks,
Shaohua
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c |6 ++
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/sysenter.c | 10 ++
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c |6 ++
3 files changed,
Hi,
The following 6 patches try to add suspend-to-ram (or S3) SMP support
for IA32. It's for support HT based system suspend/resume currently and
most of the code are also useful for physical CPU hotplug.
In a SMP system, after S3 resume, the BP is starting to execute the ACPI
wakeup address just
Make sibling map init per-cpu. Hotplug CPU may change the map at runtime.
cpuhotplug semaphore should be used to protect the map.
Thanks,
Shaohua
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c | 56 +--
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff -puN
Clean up all CPU states including its runqueue and idle thread,
so we can use boot time code without any changes.
Note this makes /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online unworkable.
Thanks,
Shaohua
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c | 12
Boot a CPU at runtime and use it to support S3 SMP.
Thanks,
Shaohua
---
linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c | 79 +++
linux-2.6.11-root/include/asm-i386/smp.h |4 +
linux-2.6.11-root/kernel/power/main.c| 30 ++
3 files changed, 104
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 10:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
Li Shaohua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patches are against 2.6.11-rc1 with Zwane's CPU hotplug patch in -mm
tree.
Should I merge that thing into mainline? It seems that a few people are
needing it.
I'd like to listen to some comments
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 10:48, Andrew Morton wrote:
Li Shaohua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 10:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
Li Shaohua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patches are against 2.6.11-rc1 with Zwane's CPU hotplug patch in -mm
tree.
Should I merge
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 13:28, Nathan Lynch wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:07:02AM +0800, Li Shaohua wrote:
Clean up all CPU states including its runqueue and idle thread,
so we can use boot time code without any changes.
Note this makes /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online unworkable
On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 02:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday, 25 of March 2005 15:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 25 of March 2005 13:54, you wrote:
> > ]--snip--[
> > > >My box is still hanged solid on resume (swsusp) by the drivers:
> > > >
> > > >ohci_hcd
> > >
On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 02:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Friday, 25 of March 2005 15:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 25 of March 2005 13:54, you wrote:
]--snip--[
My box is still hanged solid on resume (swsusp) by the drivers:
ohci_hcd
ehci_hcd
yenta_socket
Hi,
>On Friday, 25 of March 2005 09:21, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-
>rc1/2.6.12-rc1-mm3/
>>
>> - Mainly a bunch of fixes relative to 2.6.12-rc1-mm2.
>
>First, rmmod works again (thanks ;-)).
>
>> - Again, we'd like people who
Hi,
On Friday, 25 of March 2005 09:21, Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-
rc1/2.6.12-rc1-mm3/
- Mainly a bunch of fixes relative to 2.6.12-rc1-mm2.
First, rmmod works again (thanks ;-)).
- Again, we'd like people who have had recent
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 21:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, 24 of March 2005 02:27, Li Shaohua wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 09:03, Len Brown wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 18:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > &g
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 21:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday, 24 of March 2005 02:27, Li Shaohua wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 09:03, Len Brown wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 18:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 23 of March 2005 23:39, Pavel Machek wrote
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 20:20, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > >> > Yes, but it is needed. There are many drivers, and they look at
> > >> > numerical value of PMSG_*. I'm proceeding in steps. I hopefully
> > killed
> > >> > all direct accesses to the constants, and will switch constants
> to
> >
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 09:03, Len Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 18:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday, 23 of March 2005 23:39, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > > > > Will this do it for the moment?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Its certainly better.
> > > > >
> >
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 09:03, Len Brown wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 18:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 23 of March 2005 23:39, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Will this do it for the moment?
Its certainly better.
With the Len's patch applied I have
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 20:20, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Yes, but it is needed. There are many drivers, and they look at
numerical value of PMSG_*. I'm proceeding in steps. I hopefully
killed
all direct accesses to the constants, and will switch constants
to
something else... But
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 04:57, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Your patch applied with some problems:
> >
> > patching file arch/i386/pci/irq.c
> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 1081 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
> > patching file drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
> > patching file drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at
>
>> > Yes, but it is needed. There are many drivers, and they look at
>> > numerical value of PMSG_*. I'm proceeding in steps. I hopefully
killed
>> > all direct accesses to the constants, and will switch constants to
>> > something else... But that is going to be tommorow (need some
sleep).
>>
Yes, but it is needed. There are many drivers, and they look at
numerical value of PMSG_*. I'm proceeding in steps. I hopefully
killed
all direct accesses to the constants, and will switch constants to
something else... But that is going to be tommorow (need some
sleep).
The patches are
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 04:57, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
Your patch applied with some problems:
patching file arch/i386/pci/irq.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1081 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
patching file drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
patching file drivers/pci/quirks.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 678 (offset
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 09:35, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > and that says:
> > >
> > > #define PMSG_FREEZE ((__force pm_message_t) 3)
> > >
> > > ... I certainly have _FREEZE defined as 1 in my local tree, but I
> do
> > > not see that change in -mm yet.
> >
> > Both 2.6.12-rc1-mm1 and
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 09:35, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
and that says:
#define PMSG_FREEZE ((__force pm_message_t) 3)
... I certainly have _FREEZE defined as 1 in my local tree, but I
do
not see that change in -mm yet.
Both 2.6.12-rc1-mm1 and 2.6.12-rc1 have:
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 02:08, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 09:33 +0800, Li Shaohua wrote:
> > The comments in previous quirk said it's required only in PIC mode.
> ...
> > I feel we concerned too much. Changing the interrupt line isn't harmful,
> > right
Hi,
In one of machines in our lab, spmi->addr.register_bit_width is 0 (so
the returned address is invalid). Ignoring the check will cause
inserting the module oops.
Thanks,
Shaohua
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c 2005-03-03 10:56:51.
Hi,
In one of machines in our lab, spmi-addr.register_bit_width is 0 (so
the returned address is invalid). Ignoring the check will cause
inserting the module oops.
Thanks,
Shaohua
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c 2005-03-03 10:56:51.0
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 02:08, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 09:33 +0800, Li Shaohua wrote:
The comments in previous quirk said it's required only in PIC mode.
...
I feel we concerned too much. Changing the interrupt line isn't harmful,
right? Linux actually ignored interrupt
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 00:10, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 16:02 -0700, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > That seems awfully suspicious to me. So the following is
> > > probably safe as far as it goes, but not sufficient for all
> > >
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 00:10, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 16:02 -0700, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
That seems awfully suspicious to me. So the following is
probably safe as far as it goes, but not sufficient for all
cases.
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 16:00, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > * MySQL (hinders the actual suspension process and kicks the pc
> back to
> > where it was)
>
> Try this patch...
> Pavel
>
> --- clean/kernel/signal.c
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 16:00, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
* MySQL (hinders the actual suspension process and kicks the pc
back to
where it was)
Try this patch...
Pavel
--- clean/kernel/signal.c 2005-02-03
Hi,
This issue is quite interesting. We removed all specific VIA quirk
recently and apply a generic VIA quirk. But in this case, the MCH 00:0.0
is from AMD, and the ISA bridge and built-in devices are from VIA, this
means VIA quirk is useless, since it takes action only when the MCH is
from VIA.
Hi,
This issue is quite interesting. We removed all specific VIA quirk
recently and apply a generic VIA quirk. But in this case, the MCH 00:0.0
is from AMD, and the ISA bridge and built-in devices are from VIA, this
means VIA quirk is useless, since it takes action only when the MCH is
from VIA.
Hi,
>> >
>> > Is there single user of s4bios? It used to work for me 4 notebooks
>> > ago, but I never really used it.
>>
>> I don't have anymore my toshiba laptop where S4 bios was first
>> implemented.
>>
>> > I think I'm the only person that ever
>> > seen it working, but I could be wrong.
>>
Hi,
Is there single user of s4bios? It used to work for me 4 notebooks
ago, but I never really used it.
I don't have anymore my toshiba laptop where S4 bios was first
implemented.
I think I'm the only person that ever
seen it working, but I could be wrong.
You are indeed wrong.
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 08:24, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> During the wakeup from suspend-to-ram I get several warnings (see below).
> This patch fixes the warnings for me, but I am not an expert in ACPI. Please
> read the patch and consider to apply it.
Thanks looking at this issue. We (intel
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 19:28, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > The series of patches implement binding physical devices with ACPI
> > > devices. With it, device drivers can utilize methods provided by
> > > firmware (ACPI). These patches are against 2.6.10, please give your
> > > comments.
>
> >
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 10:50, Li Shaohua wrote:
> Hi,
> The series of patches implement binding physical devices with ACPI
> devices. With it, device drivers can utilize methods provided by
> firmware (ACPI). These patches are against 2.6.10, please give your
> comments.
Hi,
This is
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 10:50, Li Shaohua wrote:
Hi,
The series of patches implement binding physical devices with ACPI
devices. With it, device drivers can utilize methods provided by
firmware (ACPI). These patches are against 2.6.10, please give your
comments.
Hi,
This is updated patches
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
