On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 1:47 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Enable tracing and enable the following tracepoints:
> [...]
Sorry for the delay. I had to learn a bit about how to use the tracing
infrastructure. I don't know if I can post here, but to my untrained
eye, one big difference between the
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 2:14 AM Greg KH wrote:
> To give context, the commit is now 46eb1701c046 ("hrtimer: Update
> softirq_expires_next correctly after __hrtimer_get_next_event()") and is
> attached below.
>
> The f_ncm.c driver is doing a lot of calls to hrtimer_start() with mode
>
\
> opts->_n_ = val;\
> ret = len; \
> } \
Acked-by: Lorenzo Colitti
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 4:30 PM Steffen Klassert
wrote:
> > In esp's tunnel mode,if inner interface is ipv4,outer is ipv4,one big
> > packet which travels through tunnel will be fragmented with outer
> > interface's mtu,peer server will remove tunnelled esp header and assemble
> > them in big
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > IPSEC doesn't work with a 64bit kernel and 32bit userspace right now.
> > >
> > > Back in 2015 someone started to work on that, and properly marked that
> > > the kernel could not handle this with commit
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > IPSEC doesn't work with a 64bit kernel and 32bit userspace right now.
> > >
> > > Back in 2015 someone started to work on that, and properly marked that
> > > the kernel could not handle this with commit 74005991b78a ("xfrm: Do not
> > > parse
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Amit Pundir wrote:
> Reviewed-at: https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/322674/
Note: that change was a mistake.
> --- a/kernel/configs/android-base.config
> +++ b/kernel/configs/android-base.config
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Amit Pundir wrote:
> Reviewed-at: https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/322674/
Note: that change was a mistake.
> --- a/kernel/configs/android-base.config
> +++ b/kernel/configs/android-base.config
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y
>
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 1:29 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem is that ping sockets should not use udp_poll() in the first
> place, and recent changes in UDP stack finally exposed this old bug.
Acked-By: Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com>
Tested-B
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 1:29 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> The problem is that ping sockets should not use udp_poll() in the first
> place, and recent changes in UDP stack finally exposed this old bug.
Acked-By: Lorenzo Colitti
Tested-By: Lorenzo Colitti
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> The protocol field is checked when deleting IPv4 routes, but ignored for
> IPv6, which causes problems with routing daemons accidentally deleting
> externally set routes (observed by multiple bird6 users).
>
> This can
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> The protocol field is checked when deleting IPv4 routes, but ignored for
> IPv6, which causes problems with routing daemons accidentally deleting
> externally set routes (observed by multiple bird6 users).
>
> This can be verified using
android-review.googlesource.com/316594 .
Tested-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com>
ally only valid when ATTR_UID is set in ia_valid, indicating that
> the uid is being changed, e.g. by chown.
> [...]
> - if (!err) {
> + if (!err && (iattr->ia_valid & ATTR_UID)) {
Oops. Thanks for fixing this. Unit tested in
https://android-review.googlesourc
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> - if (len > 0x)
> + if (len > 0x || len < icmph_len)
> return -EMSGSIZE;
EMSGSIZE usually means the message is too long. Maybe use EINVAL?
That's what the code will return if the
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> - if (len > 0x)
> + if (len > 0x || len < icmph_len)
> return -EMSGSIZE;
EMSGSIZE usually means the message is too long. Maybe use EINVAL?
That's what the code will return if the passed-in ICMP header is
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:00 AM, David Miller wrote:
> > index 96161b8..ce19c5b 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h
> > @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ enum {
> > FRA_TABLE, /* Extended table id */
> > FRA_FWMASK,
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:00 AM, David Miller wrote:
> > index 96161b8..ce19c5b 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h
> > @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ enum {
> > FRA_TABLE, /* Extended table id */
> > FRA_FWMASK, /* mask for
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 1:57 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>
> With the patch reverted, and the system working, I see:
>
> # ip rule ls
> 0: from all lookup local
> 1: from all fwmark 0xc/0xd lookup legacy_system
> 13000: from all fwmark 0x10063/0x1 lookup
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 1:57 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>
> With the patch reverted, and the system working, I see:
>
> # ip rule ls
> 0: from all lookup local
> 1: from all fwmark 0xc/0xd lookup legacy_system
> 13000: from all fwmark 0x10063/0x1 lookup local_network
> 13000:
6 port, u32 info, u8 *payload) {}
> int dummy_ipv6_chk_addr(struct net *net, const struct in6_addr *addr,
> - struct net_device *dev, int strict)
> + const struct net_device *dev, int strict)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 1.7.1
)
+ const struct net_device *dev, int strict)
{
return 0;
}
--
1.7.10.4
Acked-by: Lorenzo Colitti lore...@google.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Vendor: Hewlett-Packard
- Version: 68BDD Ver. F.0F
- Release Date: 07/23/2004
+ Version: 68BDD Ver. F.11
+ Release Date: 11/22/2004
Ok, so you both have different BIOS versions and different CPUs.
S3
Matthew Garrett wrote:
I beg to differ: it works for me on 2.6.11-rc3 (even with the swsusp2
patch). However, I need to use acpi_sleep=s3_bios, and I can't use
radeonfb or it will lock up on resume.
Could you grab dmidecode from http://www.nongnu.org/dmidecode/ and
provide the output? It'd be
Matthew Garrett wrote:
I beg to differ: it works for me on 2.6.11-rc3 (even with the swsusp2
patch). However, I need to use acpi_sleep=s3_bios, and I can't use
radeonfb or it will lock up on resume.
Could you grab dmidecode from http://www.nongnu.org/dmidecode/ and
provide the output? It'd be
Alistair John Strachan wrote:
.config attached.
As recommended elsewhere in this thread, I'm not using any sort of framebuffer
driver, but vesafb IS compiled in (but no vga= option is present). Does it
need to be compiled out completely?
I don't remember, maybe you can deduce it from the .config
Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Monday 14 Feb 2005 21:11, Pavel Machek wrote:
Table of known working systems:
Model hack (or "how to do it")
[...]
HP NC6000 s3_bios (2)
The above report is incorrect. On 2.6.11-rc4, even with the s3_bios option,
the
Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Monday 14 Feb 2005 21:11, Pavel Machek wrote:
Table of known working systems:
Model hack (or how to do it)
[...]
HP NC6000 s3_bios (2)
The above report is incorrect. On 2.6.11-rc4, even with the s3_bios option,
the
Alistair John Strachan wrote:
.config attached.
As recommended elsewhere in this thread, I'm not using any sort of framebuffer
driver, but vesafb IS compiled in (but no vga= option is present). Does it
need to be compiled out completely?
I don't remember, maybe you can deduce it from the .config
Matthew Garrett wrote:
I beg to differ: it works for me on 2.6.11-rc3 (even with the swsusp2
patch). However, I need to use acpi_sleep=s3_bios, and I can't use
radeonfb or it will lock up on resume.
Could you grab dmidecode from http://www.nongnu.org/dmidecode/ and
provide the output? It'd be
Matthew Garrett wrote:
I beg to differ: it works for me on 2.6.11-rc3 (even with the swsusp2
patch). However, I need to use acpi_sleep=s3_bios, and I can't use
radeonfb or it will lock up on resume.
Could you grab dmidecode from http://www.nongnu.org/dmidecode/ and
provide the output? It'd be
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Vendor: Hewlett-Packard
- Version: 68BDD Ver. F.0F
- Release Date: 07/23/2004
+ Version: 68BDD Ver. F.11
+ Release Date: 11/22/2004
Ok, so you both have different BIOS versions and different CPUs.
S3
32 matches
Mail list logo