[PATCH 3/4] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d3 xplained: add fixed regulator for vmmc0

2015-04-27 Thread Ludovic Desroches
this is to be used properly. Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks [use a fixed regulator instead of gpio one] Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches --- arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts b/arch/arm

[PATCH 2/4] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d3 xplained: add mmc0 vqmmc entry

2015-04-27 Thread Ludovic Desroches
From: Ben Dooks The SAM5D3 Xplained device tree is missing the vqmmc node which is tied to 3.3V on the board. Add this to avoid the kernel warning that there is no vqmmc node. atmel_mci f000.mmc: No vqmmc regulator found Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches --- arch

[PATCH 1/4] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d3 xplained: fill in mmc1 and set it to disabled

2015-04-27 Thread Ludovic Desroches
necessary slot configuration if this node were enabled to avoid the following warnings from the driver: atmel_mci f800.mmc: No vmmc regulator found atmel_mci f800.mmc: No vqmmc regulator found Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches --- arch/arm/boot/dts/at91

[PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: update pinctrl ranges

2015-04-27 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Update the pinctrl ranges property to support pioD controller whose mapping is not contiguous with other pio controllers. Without this update, getting resource will fail, then pinctrl probe will fail too because there is a missing pio controller. Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches --- arch/arm

[PATCH] tty/serial: at91: maxburst was missing for dma transfers

2015-04-16 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Maxburst was not set when doing the dma slave configuration. This value is checked by the recently introduced xdmac. It causes an error when doing the slave configuration and so prevents from using dma. Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches Cc: # 3.12 and later --- drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c

Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] dmaengine: Introduce scheduled DMA framework

2015-03-23 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 12:42:06PM -0700, Maxime Ripard wrote: > This framework aims at easing the development of dmaengine drivers by > providing > generic implementations of the functions usually required by dmaengine, while > abstracting away most of the logic required. > For sure it will eas

Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] dmaengine: Introduce scheduled DMA framework

2015-03-23 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 12:42:06PM -0700, Maxime Ripard wrote: [...] > +/* > + * Besoin d'une fonction pour pusher un descriptor vers un pchan > + * > + * Flow normal: > + * - Election d'un pchan (Framework) > + * - Push d'un descripteur vers le pchan (Driver) > + * - idle > + * - int

Re: [RFC V2 03/12] i2c: at91: make use of the new infrastructure for quirks

2015-03-10 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hi Wolfram, You can add my Acked-by and Tested-By: Ludovic Desroches Tested on sama5d3, some problems with at24 eeprom on sama5d4 but it doesn't come from the i2c quirks patch series. Regards Ludovic On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 09:28:45AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 20

Re: [RFC V2 03/12] i2c: at91: make use of the new infrastructure for quirks

2015-03-09 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hi Wolfram, On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 09:28:45AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 05:01:54PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > From: Wolfram Sang > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > Hi Ludovic, > > if you have a few minutes, could you please test this series? I'd like to >

Re: [PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure

2015-02-22 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:48:18AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:09:58PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote: > > Hi Guenter, > > > > On 02/20/2015 11:47 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > I am open to hearing your suggestions for our use case, where the CPU > > >

Re: [PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure

2015-02-22 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hi Rob, On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:30:12AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote: > >> On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >> >

Re: [PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure

2015-02-20 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > > > >> On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand wrote: > >> > >> On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >>> Hi Frank, > >>> > On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand

Re: [PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure

2015-02-20 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:01:14PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: > > On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >> Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence. > >> > >> A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can

Re: [PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure

2015-02-20 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:30:58AM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > > Hi Frank, > > > >> On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand wrote: > >> > >> On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >>> Hi Mark, > >>> > On Feb 18, 2015, at 19:31 , Ma

Re: [PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure

2015-02-18 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:39:01PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi Ludovic, > > > On Feb 18, 2015, at 18:32 , Ludovic Desroches > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Great something we are waiting for a long time! > > > > On Wed, Feb

Re: [PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure

2015-02-18 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hi, Great something we are waiting for a long time! On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:53:50PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > On Feb 18, 2015, at 17:41 , Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > Hi Pantelis, > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 02:59:34PM +, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >> Implemen

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma: at_hdmac: Fix calculation of the residual bytes

2015-02-18 Thread Ludovic Desroches
r 2: residue = 1048380 > You're right about these points. Good job. I think it should be sent to stable if it can be applied properly. For multilines comments, please follow the coding rule /* * my * comments */ > Signed-off-by: T

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: move lock/unlock_as_irq calls into request/release resources methods

2015-02-18 Thread Ludovic Desroches
tions have been created to address this > problem. > > Move gpiochip_lock/unlock_as_irq calls into > irq_request/release_resources functions to prevent using a gpio as an irq > if the gpiochip_lock_as_irq call failed. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon It sounds good for m

Re: [PATCH] i2c: at91: fixup return type of wait_for_completion_timeout

2015-02-10 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 11:12:07AM -0500, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > Return type of wait_for_completion_timeout is unsigned long not int. This > patch adds a timeout variable of appropriate type and fixes up the assignment. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire Acked-by: Ludov

Re: [RFC 02/11] i2c: add quirk checks to core

2015-01-12 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hi Wolfram, On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 06:21:32PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Let the core do the checks if HW quirks prevent a transfer. Saves code > from drivers and adds consistency. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > --- > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 53 >

Re: [PATCH v5 00/61] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval

2014-12-08 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:47:46AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:41:54PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, this is the third attempt at > > creating a generic behaviour for slave capabilities retrieval so that > > generic lay

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree

2014-11-12 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hi Vinod, On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:36:16AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:58:46AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Vinod, > > > > After merging the slave-dma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) > > failed like this: > > > > drivers/dma/at_xdmac

Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: atmel-mci: add runtime pm support

2014-11-04 Thread Ludovic Desroches
enable auto suspend delay. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang > Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches > Ludovic, any objections to this one? I am not a PM runtime guru, since you have reviewed the first version, it is ok for me :) Regards Ludovic > > Kind regards > Uffe > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] i2c/at91: add support PM functions

2014-10-29 Thread Ludovic Desroches
For the whole serie Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:50:14PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > The patches is to add the PM functions support for the at91 i2c controller. > > It is based on the i2c/for-next branch of > git://git.kernel.org/pu

Re: [PATCH 8/8] MAINTAINERS: add at91 power and memory entries

2014-10-21 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:55:40PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > --- > MAINTAINERS | 19 +++ > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index a20df9bf8ab0..e325c81ee2fa 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/

Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c/at91: add support for runtime PM

2014-10-20 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Adding Kevin in the CC list since he had some comments about the PM runtime support for the SPI driver. On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:39:14PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > Hi Wenyou, > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:42:12AM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote: > > Drivers should put the

Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c/at91: add support for system PM

2014-10-20 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Adding Kevin in the CC list since he had some comments about the PM runtime support for the SPI driver. On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:42:42PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:42:13AM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang > > Ac

Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c/at91: adopt pinctrl support

2014-10-20 Thread Ludovic Desroches
) > > This should make it possible to optimize energy usage for the pins > both for the suspend/resume cycle > > Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang Acked by: Ludovic Desroches > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c | 12 +++- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 de

Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c/at91: add support for system PM

2014-10-20 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:42:13AM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote: > Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang Acked by: Ludovic Desroches > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c | 30 ++ > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at

Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c/at91: add support for runtime PM

2014-10-20 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hi Wenyou, On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:42:12AM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote: > Drivers should put the device into low power states proactively whenever the > device is not in use. Thus implement support for runtime PM and use the > autosuspend feature to make sure that we can still perform well in case

Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Remove mach/atmel-mci.h

2014-10-20 Thread Ludovic Desroches
header. Otherwise, for the whole series: Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches > > Alexandre Belloni (3): > mmc: atmel-mci: move mache header to platform_data > ARM: at91: remove mach/atmel-mci.h > avr32: remove mach/atmel-mci.h > > arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c

Re: [PATCH] mmc: atmel-mci: fix mismatched section on atmci_cleanup_slot

2014-09-29 Thread Ludovic Desroches
gt; > Gcc correctly warns about this function getting dropped in the link stage > for the built-in case, which would cause undefined behavior when this error > path is hit. The solution is to simply drop the __exit annotation. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Ludovic

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: atmel-mci: Release mmc resources on failure in probe

2014-09-23 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:50:06PM +0530, Pramod Gurav wrote: > This change takes care of releasing mmc resources on error cases in > probe function which was missing. Also release timer in remove function. > Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches > Cc: Ludovic Desroches > Cc: Chris

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: atmel-mci: Switch to using managed resource in probe

2014-09-23 Thread Ludovic Desroches
/resorces/resources > lables and remove function. /s/lables/labels Otherwise Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches Thanks > > Cc: Ludovic Desroches > Cc: Chris Ball > Cc: Ulf Hansson > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav > > --- > Changes since v1

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: atmel-mci: Switch to using managed resource in probe

2014-09-22 Thread Ludovic Desroches
> lables and remove function. > > Cc: Ludovic Desroches > Cc: Chris Ball > Cc: Ulf Hansson > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav > --- > drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c | 57 > > 1 fi

Re: [PATCH] i2c:at91: Fix a race condition during signal handling in at91_do_twi_xfer.

2014-09-01 Thread Ludovic Desroches
shutting down the transfer and > disabling the interrupts. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Lindgren Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches Thanks for this fix. > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c |4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/driver

Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] drm: add support for Atmel HLCDC Display Controller

2014-08-21 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hi Boris, You can add Tested-by: Ludovic Desroches Only one issue but not related to your patches, you can't display quickly the bootup logo since the panel detection takes too much time. Regards Ludovic On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 03:11:24PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > Hello, &

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dmaengine: Add a documentation for the dma controller API

2014-08-14 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 06:03:13PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The dmaengine is neither trivial nor properly documented at the moment, which > means a lot of trial and error development, which is not that good for such a > central piece of the system. > > Attempt at making such a documentation.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/i2c/busses: use correct type for dma_map/unmap

2014-07-22 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > dma_{un}map_* uses 'enum dma_data_direction' not 'enum > dma_transfer_direction'. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches Thanks Wolfram. > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2

Re: [PATCH 02/16] i2c: i2c-at91: Drop class based scanning to improve bootup time

2014-07-17 Thread Ludovic Desroches
the removal. Keep > the > DEPRECATED flag, so the core can inform users that the behaviour finally > changed now. After another transition period, this flag can go, too. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches Thanks > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-a

Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: host: add slot argument to mmc_of_parse

2014-05-26 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 07:25:19PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > From: Ludovic Desroches > > Some hosts manage several slots. In these case information such as the > bus width, chi detect and others are into the slot node. So we have to /s/chi detect/chip detect > parse child no

Re: [PATCH RFC] mmc: add slot argument to mmc_of_parse

2014-05-26 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:03:01AM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry I was on vacation, I'll send a cleaner patch updating other drivers > this week. Continuing to clear out my inbox, I have seen you send a patch for it. Thanks. > > Regards > > Ludo

Re: [PATCH RFC] mmc: add slot argument to mmc_of_parse

2014-05-26 Thread Ludovic Desroches
problem. > > If this patch didn't work on progress, i will send the patch based-on this > patch. > > Best Regards, > Jaehoon Chung > > On 05/14/2014 06:53 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On 7 May 2014 12:06, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > >> Some hosts ma

Re: [PATCH] mmc: atmel: don't test host->data

2014-05-07 Thread Ludovic Desroches
ot NULL at that point. I agree > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches > --- > drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c | 13 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci

[PATCH RFC] mmc: add slot argument to mmc_of_parse

2014-05-07 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Some hosts manage several slots. In these case information such as the bus width, chip detect and others are into the slot node. So we have to parse child nodes. If not NULL, slot node will be used instead of the device node. Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches --- Hi, Since this patch is only a

Re: [PATCH v2] dt: platform driver: Fill the resources before probe and defer if needed

2014-02-27 Thread Ludovic Desroches
l fail to probe because the ressources don't exist > at this time. > > This patch fills the resource structure only before the device is probed and > will defer the probe if the resource are not available yet. > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot > Reviewed-by: Gregory CLE

Re: [PATCH 04/17] i2c: i2c-at91: deprecate class based instantiation

2014-02-11 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:03:58AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Warn users that class based instantiation is going away soon in favour > of more robust probing and faster bootup times. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > Cc: Ludovic Desroches Acked-by: Ludovic Des

Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: add Atmel's SAMA5D3 Xplained board

2014-02-04 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 06:42:47PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Add DT file for new SAMA5D3 Xpained board. > This board is based on Atmel's SAMA5D36 Cortex-A5 SoC. > You may also add the board to the Makefile. Ludovic > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d3_xpla

Re: [PATCH] at91: dt: i2c: add a new compatibility string for the at91sam9261

2014-01-15 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:24:27AM +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches Thanks > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c b/

Re: possible regression on 3.13 when calling flush_dcache_page

2014-01-06 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:26:48AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 03:54:04PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 03:38:37PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > &

Re: possible regression on 3.13 when calling flush_dcache_page

2014-01-03 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Jan 3 12:33:55 2014 +0100 Revert "slab: remove useless statement for checking pfmemalloc" Ludovic Desroches ff7487d Fri Jan 3 12:32:33 2014 +0100 Revert "slab: rename slab_bufctl to slab_freelist" Ludovic Desroches b963564 Fri Jan 3 12:32:13 2014 +0100 Revert "slab: fi

Re: possible regression on 3.13 when calling flush_dcache_page

2013-12-23 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 09:08:51AM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 04:21:17PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:43:43PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2

Re: possible regression on 3.13 when calling flush_dcache_page

2013-12-20 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hello, On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 04:21:17PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:43:43PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:59:09AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:36:19PM

Re: [PATCH] mmc: atmel-mci: document clock properties

2013-12-19 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:36:17AM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > Document the clock properties required by the atmel-mci driver. > > Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/atmel-hsmci.txt|5 + >

Re: [PATCH] i2c: at91: document clock properties

2013-12-19 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:54:04PM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > Document the clock properties required by the at91 i2c bus driver. > > Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-at91.txt |2 ++ >

Re: [PATCHv3] mmc: atmel-mci: add vmmc-supply support

2013-12-18 Thread Ludovic Desroches
e I am wrong. So Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches Regards Ludovic > > Regards, > > On 17/10/2013 15:56, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On 17 October 2013 12:46, Alexandre Belloni > > wrote: > >> Other MMC hosts handle a regulator named vmmc-supply that allows to power

Re: possible regression on 3.13 when calling flush_dcache_page

2013-12-16 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hello, On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:59:09AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:36:19PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > fix mmc mailing list address error > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:31:50PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > > Hi, >

Re: possible regression on 3.13 when calling flush_dcache_page

2013-12-16 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:13:22PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:31:50PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > I'll investigate on atmel-mci driver side but if someone has also this > > issue or see what is wrong in the driver, please

Re: possible regression on 3.13 when calling flush_dcache_page

2013-12-12 Thread Ludovic Desroches
fix mmc mailing list address error On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:31:50PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > Hi, > > With v3.13-rc3 I have an error when the atmel-mci driver calls > flush_dcache_page (log at the end of the message). > > Since I didn't have it before, I d

possible regression on 3.13 when calling flush_dcache_page

2013-12-12 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hi, With v3.13-rc3 I have an error when the atmel-mci driver calls flush_dcache_page (log at the end of the message). Since I didn't have it before, I did a git bisect and the commit introducing the error is the following one: 106a74e slab: replace free and inuse in struct slab with newly introd

<    2   3   4   5   6   7