On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 00:02:10 +0100 (CET) Lukasz Trabinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello
On 2.6.19 I had about 60 days uptime, on 2.6.20 2 days :(
Did the machine actually fail? Or did it just print these messages and
keep going?
Was m
Hello
On 2.6.19 I had about 60 days uptime, on 2.6.20 2 days :(
oceanic:~$ uname -a
Linux oceanic.wsisiz.edu.pl 2.6.20-oceanic #2 SMP Sun Feb 4 21:55:29 CET
2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Feb 7 22:46:00 oceanic kernel: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Feb 7 22:46:00 oceanic kerne
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
Hello again
good to hear. what does atmdiag say about that interface? does it have
a large percentage of tx drops?
After one month work without oops, we have experienced oops again. It
happen when one or more VC is down (for example on atm s
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Lukasz Trabinski writes:
OK, I think that dirver works much better with udelay() function.
good to hear. what does atmdiag say about that interface? does it have
a large percentage of tx drops?
After 12
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Lukasz Trabinski wrote:
Ok, i have just put udelay() function to the driver. If router will not crash
after 5-6 days, it mean that driver works fine. I will inform about
it. Generally problems has stareted (frequently crashes) when we puted to
them more atm interfaces/VCs
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
the author sent me the latest version of the driver and i
got it applied. the driver does has some useful changes
along with this broken change. i suggest udelay() since
it preserves the author's original intent.
Ok, i have just put udelay()
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
the system keeps running right? the error is a 'warning' that the
fore200e is driver is sleeping when it should not (probably while holding
interrupts). the schedule() around like 1782 is not a good idea since
the fore200e_send() might not be
Hello
Lately we have problem with our router. For me it's look like driver
fore200e problems. We know that's not a hardware problem.
Below is fragment from logs file. Unfortunately I don't know
how to use ksymoops with 2.6.X kernels :/
System is Fedora Core 2, 2 x Pentium 3.00GHz, 1 GB RAM, 0,5 G
In article <87771.991317458@tiny> you wrote:
>> portraits:~# dmesg
>> vs-13042: reiserfs_read_inode2: [2299 593873 0x0 SD] not found
>> vs-13048: reiserfs_iget: bad_inode. Stat data of (2299 593873) not found
>> vs-13042: reiserfs_read_inode2: [2299 593807 0x0 SD] not found
>> vs-13048: reiser
Hello
What it's means?
portraits:~# dmesg
vs-13042: reiserfs_read_inode2: [2299 593873 0x0 SD] not found
vs-13048: reiserfs_iget: bad_inode. Stat data of (2299 593873) not found
vs-13042: reiserfs_read_inode2: [2299 593807 0x0 SD] not found
vs-13048: reiserfs_iget: bad_inode. Stat data of (2299
Hello
There is two "Oops" from user's space (pine,epic) programs. On 2.2.x
kernels, on this machine, it had never happened.
(2.4.5 #1 SMP Pentium III (Coppermine), 800MHz, RH 7.1, gcc 2.96)
ksymoops 2.4.0 on i686 2.4.5. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Okay, so Jeff Garzik already knows about this - I told him last week -
> but seeing as how the code has made it to a Linus pre-release without
> a fix I thought I'd better post the breakage description to l-k!
Try drivers from http://sourceforge.net/pr
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> This is only with kernel 2.4.4; 2.4.2, 2.4.3 and NetBSD boxes are not
> affected. It is independent of platform; I've reproduced it at will on a
> lowly p75, an athlon, a p3-800 and on a powerbook/PPC.
I have just reproduced that on 2.4.5pre-1. It was
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Kernel 2.4.4-pre6, 2.2.2-10, 0.74-22 - RedHat 7.1
Little update to my last mail: glibc 2.2.2-10, PAM 0.74-22 - RedHat 7.1.
--
*[ Łukasz Trąbiński ]*
SysAdmin @wsisiz.edu.pl
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I'm having a problem with "su -" on ac11/ac12. ac5 doesn't show the
> problem.
> The problem is easy to reproduce - go to a console, log in as root, do an
> "su -" (this will succeed) and then another "su -". The second "su -"
> should hang - ps shows it
Hello
I'm using 2.4.2 and 2.4.3, sometimes after cron jobs like slocate process
or checking md5sum on my file system(heavy load disk), i gets errors from
the kernel:
EXT2-fs error (device sd(8,3)): ext2_free_blocks: bit already cleared for
block
80275
EXT2-fs error (device sd(8,3)): ext2_free_bl
In article <007101c09ce4$39dc7680$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Linux-2.4.2 does not have IPv6 support ???
[root@lt /root]# ping6 3ffe:8010:19::2:2
PING 3ffe:8010:19::2:2(3ffe:8010:19::2:2) from ::1 : 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 3ffe:8010:19::2:2: icmp_seq=0 hops=64 time=84 usec
64 bytes from 3
Hello
In linux/drivers/scsi/hosts.c we have line:
#include "aic7xxx.h" and during compilation we gets a error:
hosts.c:139: aic7xxx.h: No such file or directory
hosts.c:500: `AIC7XXX' undeclared here (not in a function)
hosts.c:500: initializer element for `builtin_scsi_hosts[0]' is not
constant
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 07:02:52PM -0800, Kostas Nikoloudakis wrote:
>> The machine is running under heavy CPU + memory + network load.
>> It seems that the card has problems finding the required resources.
>> Is there a way to "guarantee" that the car
Hello
Today my important machine has dicsonneted from network with message
like this:
Jan 13 12:24:25 portraits kernel: eth0: can't fill rx buffer (force 0)!
Jan 13 12:24:25 portraits kernel: eth0: can't fill rx buffer (force 1)!
Jan 13 12:24:26 portraits kernel: eth0: can't fill rx buffer (forc
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> When I initiate connection from Solaris machine everything goes OK.
> TCP/SYN,ACK segments are OK.
> Can anyone help me?
> Does:
> bash# echo "0" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
Or maybe it?
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_no_pmtu_disc
--
*[ Ł
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Tim Waugh wrote:
> > -#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_OXSEMI_16PCI954PP0x9513
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_OXSEMI_16PCI954 0x9513
>
> Alan, do not apply, this will break the parport code.
>
> If the OXSEMI_16PCI954 is _missing_, it probably ought to be _added_,
> but it does not
Hello
I'm tring to use serial driver 5.05 with kernel in version
2.2.18. There is a little problem with vendor definition in kernel source.
In serial dirver from Theodore Ts'o we have:
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_SPECIALIX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_OXSEMI_16PCI954,
PCI_VENDOR_ID_SPECIALI
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I can (re)confirm that. I work several hours on console without any
> problem ... then I start X session and after several minutes system
> hangs.
I can confirm that, too.
Todaye, crashed two difference machines
One: AMD-K6 3D, 300 MHz, RH 7.0 + update
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Lukasz Trabinski wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Then I can only conclude your system is broken in some way since it works
> for everyone else
Very strange, on K6-II and Pentium III/II with the same version o
As Attchmnt i sending a full session
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> You can't build a kernel with that compiler. You _must_ use gcc
> 2.91.66 or another compiler that can compile the kernel. Red Hat
> ships gcc 2.91.66 packaged as "kgcc" for kernel builds as do
> other major vendors.
Huh, no way, I
Hello
There is probably not a kernel bug, but bug in gcc, but... :)
[root@beer linux]# make bzImage
[snip]
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686-DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c sele
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Francois romieu wrote:
> > NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
> > eth0: Transmit timeout using MII device, Tx status 0003.
> > eth0: Restarting the EPIC chip, Rx 4568454/4568454 Tx 6262613/6262623.
> > eth0: epic_restart() done, cmd status 000a, ctl 0512 interrupt 2400
In article <20001128042134.A1041@twoey> you wrote:
> Using 2.4-test10 I got a series of timeout errors on my tulip network
> card (Linksys LNE version 4, 00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Bridgecom,
> Inc: Unknown device 0985 (rev 11)). Networking then completely stopped
> working. Restarting the inte
29 matches
Mail list logo
