Re: Maximum mountpoints + chrooted login

2001-06-27 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
From: "Alexander Viro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [snip] > > I didn't go for proper solution in 2.4.0-test*). However, instead of > crufting up kinda-sorta namespaces one could use the real thing. Relevant > cleanups of superblock handling will go in in 2.5.very_early and the > rest of patch

Maximum mountpoints + chrooted login

2001-06-27 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
I was thinking of doing a chrooted login for some ssh accounts. The plan is this: put stuff in /home/u_dev /home/u_etc /home/u_bin Then at login time mount them to /home/user/dev /home/user/etc /home/user/bin as readonly chroot to /home/user ... And then unmount them at logout time. Does

Maximum mountpoints + chrooted login

2001-06-27 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
I was thinking of doing a chrooted login for some ssh accounts. The plan is this: put stuff in /home/u_dev /home/u_etc /home/u_bin Then at login time mount them to /home/user/dev /home/user/etc /home/user/bin as readonly chroot to /home/user ... And then unmount them at logout time. Does

Re: Maximum mountpoints + chrooted login

2001-06-27 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
From: Alexander Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED] [snip] I didn't go for proper solution in 2.4.0-test*). However, instead of crufting up kinda-sorta namespaces one could use the real thing. Relevant cleanups of superblock handling will go in in 2.5.very_early and the rest of patch (namespace proper)

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
From: "Andrea Arcangeli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:41:23PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:49:24AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > caused me to write the posted patch to get all compilations right. > > > > The reason I needed that patch is

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
From: Andrea Arcangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:41:23PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:49:24AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: caused me to write the posted patch to get all compilations right. The reason I needed that patch is that I was

Re: 2.4.4 fork() problems (maybe)

2001-05-06 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
From: "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 02:20:50AM +0200, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote: > > From: "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 09:07:53PM +0200, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote: > > > >

Re: 2.4.4 fork() problems (maybe)

2001-05-06 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
From: Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 02:20:50AM +0200, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote: From: Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 09:07:53PM +0200, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote: When i do a su - user it just hangs. When i run strace on it i see

Re: 2.4.4 fork() problems (maybe)

2001-05-05 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
From: "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 09:07:53PM +0200, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote: > > Hello, I saw that there was something changed on how fork() works, and > > wonder if this could be the cause my problem. > > When i do a "s

2.4.4 fork() problems (maybe)

2001-05-05 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
Hello, I saw that there was something changed on how fork() works, and wonder if this could be the cause my problem. When i do a "su - " it just hangs. When i run strace on it i see that it forks and wait()s on the child. Sometimes when i strace the su command it succeeds to give me a shell,

2.4.4 fork() problems (maybe)

2001-05-05 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
Hello, I saw that there was something changed on how fork() works, and wonder if this could be the cause my problem. When i do a su - user it just hangs. When i run strace on it i see that it forks and wait()s on the child. Sometimes when i strace the su command it succeeds to give me a shell,

Re: 2.4.4 fork() problems (maybe)

2001-05-05 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
From: Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 09:07:53PM +0200, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote: Hello, I saw that there was something changed on how fork() works, and wonder if this could be the cause my problem. When i do a su - user it just hangs. When i run strace on it i see

Alpha reboot

2001-05-01 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
I saw the USB/Reboot thread. I was wondering if you on alpha could specify any such parameter that makes the kernel not go back to milo, but do a "hard" reboot instead. I have a mylex raid card that can't handle to many soft reboots, it hangs. cheers Magnus

Alpha reboot

2001-05-01 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
I saw the USB/Reboot thread. I was wondering if you on alpha could specify any such parameter that makes the kernel not go back to milo, but do a hard reboot instead. I have a mylex raid card that can't handle to many soft reboots, it hangs. cheers Magnus

Re: Alpha compile problem solved by Andrea (pte_alloc)

2001-04-27 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
From: "Andrea Arcangeli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [snip] > > Is there any other patches you recommend me to apply to my kernel? > > specifically for the alpha (but of course ok for x86 kernels too) in > order against pre7: > >

Re: Alpha compile problem solved by Andrea (pte_alloc)

2001-04-27 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
From: Andrea Arcangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [snip] Is there any other patches you recommend me to apply to my kernel? specifically for the alpha (but of course ok for x86 kernels too) in order against pre7: ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.4pre

Alpha compile problem solved by Andrea (pte_alloc)

2001-04-26 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
Hello yesterday i installed redhat6.2 on our little alpha server over here. It's an Ruffian EV56 system, and a hand upgraded redhat to be able to cope with 2.4. I got an compile error that told me that pte_alloc was declared wrong in some files.. Then in the back of my mind i figured that Andrea

Alpha compile problem solved by Andrea (pte_alloc)

2001-04-26 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
Hello yesterday i installed redhat6.2 on our little alpha server over here. It's an Ruffian EV56 system, and a hand upgraded redhat to be able to cope with 2.4. I got an compile error that told me that pte_alloc was declared wrong in some files.. Then in the back of my mind i figured that Andrea