From: Manoj Iyer
On Intel Panther Point chipset USB 3.0 devices show up as
high-speed devices on powerup, but after an s3 cycle they are
correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup switch the port
to xHCI so that USB 3.0 devices are correctly recognized.
This is a second attempt at fixing
will send out a new seperate
patch with the fix.
Thanks
Manoj
Thanks,
Andiry
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Andiry Xu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, wrote:
From: Manoj Iyer
USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an
s3 cycle they are correctly recognized
will send out a new seperate
patch with the fix.
Thanks
Manoj
Thanks,
Andiry
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Andiry Xu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, manoj.i...@canonical.com wrote:
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
On Intel Panther Point chipset USB 3.0 devices show up as
high-speed devices on powerup, but after an s3 cycle they are
correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup switch the port
to xHCI so that USB 3.0 devices are correctly recognized
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
On Intel Panther Point chipset USB 3.0 devices show up as
high-speed devices on powerup, but after an s3 cycle they are
correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup switch the port
to xHCI so that USB 3.0 devices are correctly recognized.
BugLink: http
as
well.
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Andiry Xu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, wrote:
From: Manoj Iyer
USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an
s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup
unconditionally switch the port to xHCI like we do when
as
well.
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Andiry Xu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, manoj.i...@canonical.com wrote:
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an
s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup
From: Manoj Iyer
USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an
s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup
unconditionally switch the port to xHCI like we do when we resume
from suspend.
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000424
Signed-off
From: Manoj Iyer
USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an
s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup
unconditionally switch the port to xHCI like we do when we resume
from suspend.
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000424
Test results
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an
s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup
unconditionally switch the port to xHCI like we do when we resume
from suspend.
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an
s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup
unconditionally switch the port to xHCI like we do when we resume
from suspend.
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
From: Manoj Iyer
In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain
the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this
causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop
as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set to Lenovo.
Test on V490u
From: Manoj Iyer
In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain
the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this
causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop
as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set to Lenovo.
Signed-off
From: Manoj Iyer
In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain
the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this
causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop
as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set to Lenovo.
Signed-off
From: Manoj Iyer
Please consider this patch to thinkapd_acpi, it loads the module
on V-series systems that do not report with "Lenovo" or "ThinkPad"
prefix to DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION query, but only returns model name.
==
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
Please consider this patch to thinkapd_acpi, it loads the module
on V-series systems that do not report with Lenovo or ThinkPad
prefix to DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION query, but only returns model name
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain
the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this
causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop
as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain
the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this
causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop
as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain
the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this
causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop
as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set
Oops! This is embarrassing! my logic is flawed. Please ignore this patch,
I will resend it
NACK
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, manoj.i...@canonical.com wrote:
From: Manoj Iyer
In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain
the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model
From: Manoj Iyer
In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain
the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this
causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop
as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set to Lenovo.
Signed-off
From: Manoj Iyer
In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain
the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this
causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop
as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set to Lenovo.
BIOS
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain
the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this
causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop
as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain
the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this
causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop
as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set
Oops! This is embarrassing! my logic is flawed. Please ignore this patch,
I will resend it
NACK
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, manoj.i...@canonical.com wrote:
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain
the string Lenovo or Thinkpad
From: Manoj Iyer
Patch adds support for BCM20702A0 device id (0a5c:21f4).
usb-devices after patch was applied:
T: Bus=03 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=12 MxCh= 0
D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
P: Vendor=0a5c ProdID=21f4 Rev=01.12
S: Manufacturer=Broadcom
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com
Patch adds support for BCM20702A0 device id (0a5c:21f4).
usb-devices after patch was applied:
T: Bus=03 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=12 MxCh= 0
D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
P: Vendor=0a5c ProdID=21f4 Rev=01.12
S
Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
I: If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none)
I: If#= 3 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=fe(app. ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
Hi Manoj,
* Manoj Iyer [2012-04-11 13:39:23 -0500]:
usb-devices:
T: Bus=01 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=03 Cnt=02 Dev#= 4
Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
I: If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none)
I: If#= 3 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=fe(app. ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
Hi Manoj,
* Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com [2012-04-11 13:39:23 -0500]:
usb-devices:
T: Bus=01 Lev=02 Prnt=02
on write"! ZFS (Sun) and WAFL (NetApp) does this. Don't know
about WAFL, but ZFS does logging too.
-Manoj
--
Manoj Joseph
http://kerneljunkie.blogspot.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
drew Morton knew what he was doing and the consequences.
But unless you care nothing about your data, you should not do it. It is
as simple as that. No, it does not give you a robust desktop!!
-Manoj
--
Manoj Joseph
http://kerneljunkie.blogspot.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
he was doing and the consequences.
But unless you care nothing about your data, you should not do it. It is
as simple as that. No, it does not give you a robust desktop!!
-Manoj
--
Manoj Joseph
http://kerneljunkie.blogspot.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux
) and WAFL (NetApp) does this. Don't know
about WAFL, but ZFS does logging too.
-Manoj
--
Manoj Joseph
http://kerneljunkie.blogspot.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
to exclude Linux.
I thought you said "incompatible with other OS products". I believe
there are other OS products it is quite compatible with. The ports of
ZFS seem to confirm this.
That it is compatible with the Linux kernel was not what I was arguing. :)
-Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from
.
Please do see:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/faq/licensing_faq/#patents
ZFS has been ported to some of those 'other OS products'. :)
My two cents...
-Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
.
Please do see:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/faq/licensing_faq/#patents
ZFS has been ported to some of those 'other OS products'. :)
My two cents...
-Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
to exclude Linux.
I thought you said incompatible with other OS products. I believe
there are other OS products it is quite compatible with. The ports of
ZFS seem to confirm this.
That it is compatible with the Linux kernel was not what I was arguing. :)
-Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 18:35 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is back-port of O_DIRECT support for ext3 from 2.6 to 2.4.31
> > kernel.
> >
> > Any suggestions/comments ?
>
> why?
>
> personally I think this is way out of scope for a
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 18:35 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is back-port of O_DIRECT support for ext3 from 2.6 to 2.4.31
kernel.
Any suggestions/comments ?
why?
personally I think this is way out of scope for a 2.4.x release in
a similar problem and resolved it ? . Any pointers in
this regard will be really *nice*.
Thanks in advance.
--
Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
a similar problem and resolved it ? . Any pointers in
this regard will be really *nice*.
Thanks in advance.
--
Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
directly as I am not on the linux-kernel mailing
list.
Thanks,
Manoj
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU0, registers:
CPU:0
EIP:0010:[]
EFLAGS: 0086
eax: ebx: cdfe4000 ecx: cdfe8db8 edx
directly as I am not on the linux-kernel mailing
list.
Thanks,
Manoj
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU0, registers:
CPU:0
EIP:0010:[c0217900]
EFLAGS: 0086
eax: ebx: cdfe4000 ecx
t->dev->ip_ptr->in_dev->ifa_list->ifa_address is o/p i/f ip address and
skb->dst->neighbour->dev->ip_ptr->in_dev->ifa_list->ifa_address is next hop IP
address
Please correct me if I
-in_dev-ifa_list-ifa_address is o/p i/f ip address and
skb-dst-neighbour-dev-ip_ptr-in_dev-ifa_list-ifa_address is next hop IP
address
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks for all the help.
Manoj
hi
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Manoj Sontakke wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > I am getting linker error "undefined reference to __divdi3".
> > This is because c = a/b; where a,b,c are of type "long long"
> > I
hi
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Manoj Sontakke wrote:
Hi
I am getting linker error "undefined reference to __divdi3".
This is because c = a/b; where a,b,c are of type "long long"
I understand this is gcc problem.
I am doi
Hi
I am getting linker error "undefined reference to __divdi3".
This is because c = a/b; where a,b,c are of type "long long"
I understand this is gcc problem.
I am doing this on a pentium with gcc -v = egcs-2.91.66
Thanks for all the help.
Manoj
-
To unsubs
Hi
I am getting linker error "undefined reference to __divdi3".
This is because c = a/b; where a,b,c are of type "long long"
I understand this is gcc problem.
I am doing this on a pentium with gcc -v = egcs-2.91.66
Thanks for all the help.
Manoj
-
To unsubs
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Mircea Ciocan wrote:
> Here is a nice packet building library:
>
> www.packetfactory.net/Projects/Libnet/
its broken.
> > Can anyone tell me a good packet/frame generator for linux?
> > thanks
> >
> > manoj
-
To unsubscr
Hi
Can anyone tell me a good packet/frame generator for linux?
thanks
manoj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please re
Hi
Can anyone tell me a good packet/frame generator for linux?
thanks
manoj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please re
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Mircea Ciocan wrote:
Here is a nice packet building library:
www.packetfactory.net/Projects/Libnet/
its broken.
Can anyone tell me a good packet/frame generator for linux?
thanks
manoj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 04:06:19PM +0530, Manoj Sontakke wrote:
> > >2.4.x kernel. have not tried 2.2
> > >I just found somethig, I believe is kernel bug.
> > >I am working with usbne
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Regards,
Manoj Sontakke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message t
lease read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Regards,
Manoj Sontakke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 04:06:19PM +0530, Manoj Sontakke wrote:
2.4.x kernel. have not tried 2.2
I just found somethig, I believe is kernel bug.
I am working with usbnet.c driver, which stores some of its
internal
the entries for delivery for all the 3 cases or only for
the third case
Thanks in advance for all the help
Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
the entries for delivery for all the 3 cases or only for
the third case
Thanks in advance for all the help
Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
Hi
Thanks for all the help.
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:00:51 +0530 (IST),
> Manoj Sontakke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a initlisation function (just like pktsched_init in
> >TC). Can anyone tell me, where in
have a initlisation function (just like pktsched_init in
TC). Can anyone tell me, where in the kernel boot sequence should I make a
call to my initialisation function.
Thanks in advance for all the help.
Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
have a initlisation function (just like pktsched_init in
TC). Can anyone tell me, where in the kernel boot sequence should I make a
call to my initialisation function.
Thanks in advance for all the help.
Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
Hi
Thanks for all the help.
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:00:51 +0530 (IST),
Manoj Sontakke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a initlisation function (just like pktsched_init in
TC). Can anyone tell me, where in the kernel boot sequence should I
Hi
Sorry, these questions do not belog here but i could not find any
better place.
1. Is quicksort on doubly linked list is implemented anywhere? I need it
for sk_buff queues.
2. Is Weighted Round Robin implemented in linux anyehere?
thanks in advence.
Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from
Hi
Sorry, these questions do not belog here but i could not find any
better place.
1. Is quicksort on doubly linked list is implemented anywhere? I need it
for sk_buff queues.
2. Is Weighted Round Robin implemented in linux anyehere?
thanks in advence.
Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from
that possible that a 'spin_unlock_irqrestore(c,d)' would also restore
> what should have been restored only with a 'spin_unlock_irqrestore(a,b)' ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Shmulik Hen
> Software Engineer
> Linux Advanced Networking Services
>
Linux Advanced Networking Services
Intel Network Communications Group
Jerusalem, Israel.
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Gamble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 1:54 AM
To: Manoj Sontakke
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: spinlock help
On
Hi
Thankx in idvance for the help.
1. when spin_lock_irqsave() function is called the subsequent code is
executed untill spin_unloc_irqrestore()is called. is this right?
2. is this sequence valid?
spin_lock_irqsave(a,b);
spin_lock_irqsave(c,d);
Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from
Hi
Thankx in idvance for the help.
1. when spin_lock_irqsave() function is called the subsequent code is
executed untill spin_unloc_irqrestore()is called. is this right?
2. is this sequence valid?
spin_lock_irqsave(a,b);
spin_lock_irqsave(c,d);
Manoj
-
To unsubscribe from
101 - 169 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
