Hi!
2.6.19-rc6-rt9 fails to compile on my Dual Core Notebook with FC6.
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CC arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from include/linux/time.h:7,
from include/linux/timex.h:57,
Hi!
2.6.19-rc6-rt9 fails to compile on my Dual Core Notebook with FC6.
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CC arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from include/linux/time.h:7,
from include/linux/timex.h:57,
Dave Jones wrote:
Was there any differnces in the devices at 00:00.0 and 00:01.0 ?
(host & pci bridges)
Only the Host bridge line c0:
With AGPGART:
00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e1 (rev a1)
Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd.: Unknown device 0300
Dave Jones wrote:
Was there any differnces in the devices at 00:00.0 and 00:01.0 ?
(host pci bridges)
Only the Host bridge line c0:
With AGPGART:
00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e1 (rev a1)
Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd.: Unknown device 0300
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
hmm I wonder.. .could you collect lspci -vxxx settings for the AGP
device (lspci -vxxx gives you lots of devices, but only one is relevant)
in both cases, maybe the difference between the two shows something
useful...
Hmmm...only the latency at the VGA card.
With AGPGART:
Terence Ripperda wrote:
> I wouldn't expect even falling back to pci dma would have this big of an
> impact on 2d performance, but perhaps there's enough bus activity for
> this to happen. Marcus, can you verify that you're actually using
> agpgart in that situation? do you possibly have our
Terence Ripperda wrote:
I wouldn't expect even falling back to pci dma would have this big of an
impact on 2d performance, but perhaps there's enough bus activity for
this to happen. Marcus, can you verify that you're actually using
agpgart in that situation? do you possibly have our
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
hmm I wonder.. .could you collect lspci -vxxx settings for the AGP
device (lspci -vxxx gives you lots of devices, but only one is relevant)
in both cases, maybe the difference between the two shows something
useful...
Hmmm...only the latency at the VGA card.
With AGPGART:
Dave Jones wrote:
> *shrug*, if the nvidia module is properly configured, it should make
no difference at all. AGPGART operation isn't a performance critical
thing, as the hardware does 99% of the work.
Yes, that was also my opinion, but after using AGPGART, hmm.
And it was on my last 32 bit FC2
Dave Jones wrote:
probably you have selected IOMMU, which is dependant on it.
Yes, thanks. Sorry my fault. I had it not deactivated, arggg.
This surprises me, especially considering the in-kernel nvidia-agp driver
was actually written by NVidia. Are there any agp error messages in
your dmesg / X
Dave Jones wrote:
probably you have selected IOMMU, which is dependant on it.
Yes, thanks. Sorry my fault. I had it not deactivated, arggg.
This surprises me, especially considering the in-kernel nvidia-agp driver
was actually written by NVidia. Are there any agp error messages in
your dmesg / X
Dave Jones wrote:
*shrug*, if the nvidia module is properly configured, it should make
no difference at all. AGPGART operation isn't a performance critical
thing, as the hardware does 99% of the work.
Yes, that was also my opinion, but after using AGPGART, hmm.
And it was on my last 32 bit FC2
Hello,
the agpgart backend is now always compiled in and selected with 2.6.11-rc3
x86_64. I can delete or disable it in the config, it is always back written.
Is this the default future behaviour? The eg Nforce3 AGP is on a normal
desktop so slow on 2D and also in 3D mode a lot slower and all
Hello,
the agpgart backend is now always compiled in and selected with 2.6.11-rc3
x86_64. I can delete or disable it in the config, it is always back written.
Is this the default future behaviour? The eg Nforce3 AGP is on a normal
desktop so slow on 2D and also in 3D mode a lot slower and all
Hello,
I can not more boot any kernel >=2.6.11-rcX also >=2.6.10-ac9 and latest
bk6. But I have here Alan Cox 2.6.10-ac8 and Cons 2.6.10-ck5 running and
booting fine without any problems.
But now all kernel versions after that failed (with the same config tried)
with:
mount: error 6 mounting
Hello,
I can not more boot any kernel =2.6.11-rcX also =2.6.10-ac9 and latest
bk6. But I have here Alan Cox 2.6.10-ac8 and Cons 2.6.10-ck5 running and
booting fine without any problems.
But now all kernel versions after that failed (with the same config tried)
with:
mount: error 6 mounting
16 matches
Mail list logo
