Re: [ 00/27] 3.7.1-stable review

2012-12-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 02:14:06PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:07:38PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:01:13PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for

Re: [ 00/27] 3.7.1-stable review

2012-12-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
easier to automate things by just monitoring linux-stable remote for new tags. [1] linux-3.7.y is just an example here Regards, -- Mariusz Kozlowski -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordom

Re: [ 00/27] 3.7.1-stable review

2012-12-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
linux-stable remote for new tags. [1] linux-3.7.y is just an example here Regards, -- Mariusz Kozlowski -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [ 00/27] 3.7.1-stable review

2012-12-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 02:14:06PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:07:38PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:01:13PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.7.1 release. There are 27

Re: problem with starting 2.6.25-rc1 and latest git

2008-02-26 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:28:32 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:27:34 +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote: > > > Of course there is a typo in the subject :) > > > > > > 2.5.25-rc1 -> 2.6.25-rc1 > > > > > > > H

Re: problem with starting 2.6.25-rc1 and latest git

2008-02-26 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:28:32 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:27:34 +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote: Of course there is a typo in the subject :) 2.5.25-rc1 - 2.6.25-rc1 Hello, I tried 2.6.25-rc1 and latest git on my laptop (x86 32bit

Re: problem with starting 2.5.26-rc1 and latest git

2008-02-21 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hi Andi, that is not a big problem at all. If you have to enforce a specific module load order then create some dummy exports like misdn_load() and use them from the module that depends on it. That's not necessarily enough. There are races during module load when the next module is loaded

Re: problem with starting 2.5.26-rc1 and latest git

2008-02-21 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hi Andi, that is not a big problem at all. If you have to enforce a specific module load order then create some dummy exports like misdn_load() and use them from the module that depends on it. That's not necessarily enough. There are races during module load when the next module is loaded

Re: problem with starting 2.5.26-rc1 and latest git

2008-02-19 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > Of course there is a typo in the subject :) > > > > 2.5.25-rc1 -> 2.6.25-rc1 > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I tried 2.6.25-rc1 and latest git on my laptop (x86 32bit) and have a > > > problem. > > > Linux boots but with huge delay due to some issue with loading usb > > > modules.

Re: problem with starting 2.5.26-rc1 and latest git

2008-02-19 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Of course there is a typo in the subject :) 2.5.25-rc1 - 2.6.25-rc1 Hello, I tried 2.6.25-rc1 and latest git on my laptop (x86 32bit) and have a problem. Linux boots but with huge delay due to some issue with loading usb modules. Udev complains:

Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

2008-02-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9984 > > Subject : problem with starting 2.5.25-rc1 and latest git > > The kernel version seems to be a little bit bogus here :) That's a typo :/ Should read 2.6.25-rc1 instead. Mariusz -- To unsubscribe

Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

2008-02-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9984 Subject : problem with starting 2.5.25-rc1 and latest git The kernel version seems to be a little bit bogus here :) That's a typo :/ Should read 2.6.25-rc1 instead. Mariusz -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [PATCH 4/4] Voltage and current regulator framework

2008-02-15 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > Regulator framework core :- [ ... snip ... ] > +void regulator_put(struct regulator *regulator) > +{ > + struct regulator_cdev *rcdev = regulator->rcdev; > + > + if (regulator == NULL || IS_ERR(regulator)) > + return; Check after use. Regards, Mariusz --

Re: problem with starting 2.5.25-rc1 and latest git

2008-02-15 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > I tried 2.6.25-rc1 and latest git on my laptop (x86 32bit) and have a > > problem. > > Linux boots but with huge delay due to some issue with loading usb modules. > > Udev complains: > > > > 'Could not lock modprobe uhci_hcd' > > 'Could not lock modprobe yenta_socket' > >

Re: problem with starting 2.5.25-rc1 and latest git

2008-02-15 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, I tried 2.6.25-rc1 and latest git on my laptop (x86 32bit) and have a problem. Linux boots but with huge delay due to some issue with loading usb modules. Udev complains: 'Could not lock modprobe uhci_hcd' 'Could not lock modprobe yenta_socket' 'Unknown symbol usb_*'

Re: [PATCH 4/4] Voltage and current regulator framework

2008-02-15 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Regulator framework core :- [ ... snip ... ] +void regulator_put(struct regulator *regulator) +{ + struct regulator_cdev *rcdev = regulator-rcdev; + + if (regulator == NULL || IS_ERR(regulator)) + return; Check after use. Regards, Mariusz -- To

Re: [PATCH 2/6] fs/direct-io.c: Use DIV_ROUND_UP

2008-02-14 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > > Is it just me, or does > > > > > > ((user_addr + iov[seg].iov_len + PAGE_SIZE - 1)/PAGE_SIZE - > > > user_addr/PAGE_SIZE) > > > > > > not simplify to > > > > > > = ((iov[seg].iov_len + PAGE_SIZE - 1)/PAGE_SIZE + > > > user_addr/PAGE_SIZE - user_addr/PAGE_SIZE) > >

Re: [PATCH 2/6] fs/direct-io.c: Use DIV_ROUND_UP

2008-02-14 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Is it just me, or does ((user_addr + iov[seg].iov_len + PAGE_SIZE - 1)/PAGE_SIZE - user_addr/PAGE_SIZE) not simplify to = ((iov[seg].iov_len + PAGE_SIZE - 1)/PAGE_SIZE + user_addr/PAGE_SIZE - user_addr/PAGE_SIZE) =

Re: problem with starting 2.5.25-rc1 and latest git

2008-02-13 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Of course there is a typo in the subject :) 2.5.25-rc1 -> 2.6.25-rc1 > Hello, > > I tried 2.6.25-rc1 and latest git on my laptop (x86 32bit) and have a > problem. > Linux boots but with huge delay due to some issue with loading usb modules. > Udev complains: > > 'Could not lock modprobe

Re: problem with starting 2.5.25-rc1 and latest git

2008-02-13 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Of course there is a typo in the subject :) 2.5.25-rc1 - 2.6.25-rc1 Hello, I tried 2.6.25-rc1 and latest git on my laptop (x86 32bit) and have a problem. Linux boots but with huge delay due to some issue with loading usb modules. Udev complains: 'Could not lock modprobe

Re: 2.6.24-mm1: ppc32: too few arguments to function 'reserve_bootmem'

2008-02-04 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, This is from ppc32: CC arch/powerpc/mm/mem.o arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c: In function 'do_init_bootmem': arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c:256: error: too few arguments to function 'reserve_bootmem' arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c:261: error: too few arguments to function 'reserve_bootmem' Leftover

Re: 2.6.24-mm1: ppc32: too few arguments to function 'reserve_bootmem'

2008-02-04 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, This is from ppc32: CC arch/powerpc/mm/mem.o arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c: In function 'do_init_bootmem': arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c:256: error: too few arguments to function 'reserve_bootmem' arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c:261: error: too few arguments to function 'reserve_bootmem' Leftover

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: old sparc64 bug

2008-01-28 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello Takashi, > > > > I was digging through the gentoo bugzilla and found this: > > > > > > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141823 > > > > > > > > As you see this bug is present since at least 2.6.17. I can reproduce > > > > that here on my hardware with 2.6.24-rc8-mm1. All

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: old sparc64 bug

2008-01-28 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello Takashi, I was digging through the gentoo bugzilla and found this: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141823 As you see this bug is present since at least 2.6.17. I can reproduce that here on my hardware with 2.6.24-rc8-mm1. All you need to do is

Re: [PATCH] sym53c8xx: fix bad memset argument in sym_set_cam_result_error

2008-01-26 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > > On a big powerpc box I got the following oops with 2.6.24-git2: > > > > > > sym0: <1010-66> rev 0x1 at pci :d0:01.0 irq 215 > > > sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-80, LVD, parity checking > > > sym0: SCSI BUS has been reset. > > > scsi0 : sym-2.2.3 > > > target0:0:8: FAST-40 WIDE

Re: [PATCH] sym53c8xx: fix bad memset argument in sym_set_cam_result_error

2008-01-26 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > On a big powerpc box I got the following oops with 2.6.24-git2: > > sym0: <1010-66> rev 0x1 at pci :d0:01.0 irq 215 > sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-80, LVD, parity checking > sym0: SCSI BUS has been reset. > scsi0 : sym-2.2.3 > target0:0:8: FAST-40 WIDE SCSI 80.0 MB/s ST (25 ns,

Re: [PATCH] sym53c8xx: fix bad memset argument in sym_set_cam_result_error

2008-01-26 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, On a big powerpc box I got the following oops with 2.6.24-git2: sym0: 1010-66 rev 0x1 at pci :d0:01.0 irq 215 sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-80, LVD, parity checking sym0: SCSI BUS has been reset. scsi0 : sym-2.2.3 target0:0:8: FAST-40 WIDE SCSI 80.0 MB/s ST (25 ns, offset 31)

Re: [PATCH] sym53c8xx: fix bad memset argument in sym_set_cam_result_error

2008-01-26 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, On a big powerpc box I got the following oops with 2.6.24-git2: sym0: 1010-66 rev 0x1 at pci :d0:01.0 irq 215 sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-80, LVD, parity checking sym0: SCSI BUS has been reset. scsi0 : sym-2.2.3 target0:0:8: FAST-40 WIDE SCSI 80.0 MB/s ST (25 ns,

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: old sparc64 bug

2008-01-25 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > I was digging through the gentoo bugzilla and found this: > > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141823 > > > > As you see this bug is present since at least 2.6.17. I can reproduce > > that here on my hardware with 2.6.24-rc8-mm1. All you need to do is install > >

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: old sparc64 bug

2008-01-25 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, I was digging through the gentoo bugzilla and found this: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141823 As you see this bug is present since at least 2.6.17. I can reproduce that here on my hardware with 2.6.24-rc8-mm1. All you need to do is install mp3blaster on

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: old sparc64 bug

2008-01-24 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, I was digging through the gentoo bugzilla and found this: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141823 As you see this bug is present since at least 2.6.17. I can reproduce that here on my hardware with 2.6.24-rc8-mm1. All you need to do is install mp3blaster on sparc64, run: $

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: old sparc64 bug

2008-01-24 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, I was digging through the gentoo bugzilla and found this: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141823 As you see this bug is present since at least 2.6.17. I can reproduce that here on my hardware with 2.6.24-rc8-mm1. All you need to do is install mp3blaster on sparc64, run: $

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: sparc64 warning at fs/file_table.c:49 __fput+0x1a8/0x1e0()

2008-01-22 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Issuing "sysrq-s sysrq-u" sequence causes these warnings on sparc64: [ cut here ] WARNING: at fs/file_table.c:49 __fput+0x1a8/0x1e0() Modules linked in: sg sr_mod cdrom Call Trace: [004c9ac8] __fput+0x1b0/0x1e0 [004c6978] filp_close+0x60/0x80

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: sparc64 warning at fs/file_table.c:49 __fput+0x1a8/0x1e0()

2008-01-22 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Issuing sysrq-s sysrq-u sequence causes these warnings on sparc64: [ cut here ] WARNING: at fs/file_table.c:49 __fput+0x1a8/0x1e0() Modules linked in: sg sr_mod cdrom Call Trace: [004c9ac8] __fput+0x1b0/0x1e0 [004c6978] filp_close+0x60/0x80

Re: post 2.6.24-rc7 regression: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth1 to become free

2008-01-21 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth1 to become free. Usage count > > = 1 > > Known problem: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9778 Hm ... I was largely offline on weekend and did not see that. Is there any way I can subscribe 'somewhere' to get notified

Re: post 2.6.24-rc7 regression: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth1 to become free

2008-01-21 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth1 to become free. Usage count = 1 Known problem: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9778 Hm ... I was largely offline on weekend and did not see that. Is there any way I can subscribe 'somewhere' to get notified about

post 2.6.24-rc7 regression: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth1 to become free

2008-01-20 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, I found that on current Linus tree unplugging my pcmcia wifi card (Cabletron RoamAbout) causes part of the system to hang. I.e. mouse works but keyboard is frozen until reboot. Actually only sysrq works but I can not type in any terminal. Syslog shows: kernel: pccard: card

post 2.6.24-rc7 regression: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth1 to become free

2008-01-20 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, I found that on current Linus tree unplugging my pcmcia wifi card (Cabletron RoamAbout) causes part of the system to hang. I.e. mouse works but keyboard is frozen until reboot. Actually only sysrq works but I can not type in any terminal. Syslog shows: kernel: pccard: card

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: powerpc oopses

2008-01-18 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > Do we need `offset' at all? > > Looks like no. > > I wonder if there's a good argument for adding a pte_offset_val() which > would let us do: > > pteval = pte_offset_val(pmd, addr); > > and shrink the map/unmap window and overhead here and possibly > elsewhere? > > Anyway, updated

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: powerpc oopses

2008-01-18 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Do we need `offset' at all? Looks like no. I wonder if there's a good argument for adding a pte_offset_val() which would let us do: pteval = pte_offset_val(pmd, addr); and shrink the map/unmap window and overhead here and possibly elsewhere? Anyway, updated but still

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: powerpc oopses

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, The script below kills powerpc. oopses get longer and more wonderful with every next 'cated' file. /proc//task//pagemap seems to be the cause of oops. The important thing is that it oopses for random (that is not first in a row) process from /proc. So not every 'cat

Re: [-mm Patch] uml: fix a building error

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > >> > This patch fixes this building error: > >> > ... > >> > drivers/char/mem.c: In function 'read_mem': > >> > drivers/char/mem.c:136: error: implicit declaration of > >function 'unxlate_dev_mem_ptr' > >> > ... > >> > >> I see this on sparc64 as well: > >> > >> CC

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 tree, which can be > downloaded from the location: > > http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/ Compiled fine, runs fine on x86. No problems so far. Later on I'll give it a try on ppc and sparc64. Thanks, Mariusz -- To unsubscribe

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: powerpc: include/asm/nvram.h:62: error: field 'partition' has incomplete type

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, This is from powerpc (iMac G3): CC [M] sound/ppc/awacs.o In file included from sound/ppc/awacs.c:24: include/asm/nvram.h:62: error: field 'partition' has incomplete type make[1]: *** [sound/ppc/awacs.o] Error 1 make: *** [sound/ppc/awacs.o] Error 2 Regards, Mariusz #

Re: [-mm Patch] uml: fix a building error

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > This patch fixes this building error: > ... > drivers/char/mem.c: In function ‘read_mem’: > drivers/char/mem.c:136: error: implicit declaration of function > ‘unxlate_dev_mem_ptr’ > ... I see this on sparc64 as well: CC drivers/char/mem.o drivers/char/mem.c: In function

Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt2

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > > > I found this in dmesg: > > > > > > > > BUG: swapper:0 task might have lost a preemption check! > > > > Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 #3 > > > > [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d/0x3b > > > > [] show_trace+0x12/0x14 > > > > [] dump_stack+0x6a/0x70 > > > > []

Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt2

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > I found this in dmesg: > > > > BUG: swapper:0 task might have lost a preemption check! > > Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 #3 > > [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d/0x3b > > [] show_trace+0x12/0x14 > > [] dump_stack+0x6a/0x70 > > [] preempt_enable_no_resched+0x5c/0x5e > >

Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt2

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, I found this in dmesg: BUG: swapper:0 task might have lost a preemption check! Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 #3 [c010386b] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d/0x3b [c01042f3] show_trace+0x12/0x14 [c0104a2f] dump_stack+0x6a/0x70 [c0115419]

Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt2

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, I found this in dmesg: BUG: swapper:0 task might have lost a preemption check! Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 #3 [c010386b] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d/0x3b [c01042f3] show_trace+0x12/0x14 [c0104a2f] dump_stack+0x6a/0x70 [c0115419]

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: powerpc: include/asm/nvram.h:62: error: field 'partition' has incomplete type

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, This is from powerpc (iMac G3): CC [M] sound/ppc/awacs.o In file included from sound/ppc/awacs.c:24: include/asm/nvram.h:62: error: field 'partition' has incomplete type make[1]: *** [sound/ppc/awacs.o] Error 1 make: *** [sound/ppc/awacs.o] Error 2 Regards, Mariusz #

Re: [-mm Patch] uml: fix a building error

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, This patch fixes this building error: ... drivers/char/mem.c: In function ‘read_mem’: drivers/char/mem.c:136: error: implicit declaration of function ‘unxlate_dev_mem_ptr’ ... I see this on sparc64 as well: CC drivers/char/mem.o drivers/char/mem.c: In function 'read_mem':

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 tree, which can be downloaded from the location: http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/ Compiled fine, runs fine on x86. No problems so far. Later on I'll give it a try on ppc and sparc64. Thanks, Mariusz -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [-mm Patch] uml: fix a building error

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, This patch fixes this building error: ... drivers/char/mem.c: In function 'read_mem': drivers/char/mem.c:136: error: implicit declaration of function 'unxlate_dev_mem_ptr' ... I see this on sparc64 as well: CC drivers/char/mem.o drivers/char/mem.c: In

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: powerpc oopses

2008-01-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, The script below kills powerpc. oopses get longer and more wonderful with every next 'cated' file. /proc/pid/task/pid/pagemap seems to be the cause of oops. The important thing is that it oopses for random (that is not first in a row) process from /proc. So not every 'cat

Re: [PATCH] [MEMSTICK] Initial commit for Sony MemoryStick support

2008-01-15 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > Sony MemoryStick cards are used in many products manufactured by Sony. They > are available both as storage and as IO expansion cards. Currently, only > MemoryStick Pro storage cards are supported via TI FlashMedia MemoryStick > interface. I tried it here and it doesn't work. My Vaio

Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt2

2008-01-15 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
> > > We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 tree, which can be > > > downloaded from the location: > > > > > > http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/ > > > > Compiles fine but I run into another problem. On startup kernel oopses > > early and this 'oops' loops over and over again on the

Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt2

2008-01-15 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 tree, which can be downloaded from the location: http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/ Compiles fine but I run into another problem. On startup kernel oopses early and this 'oops' loops over and over again on the screen until you shut

Re: [PATCH] [MEMSTICK] Initial commit for Sony MemoryStick support

2008-01-15 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Sony MemoryStick cards are used in many products manufactured by Sony. They are available both as storage and as IO expansion cards. Currently, only MemoryStick Pro storage cards are supported via TI FlashMedia MemoryStick interface. I tried it here and it doesn't work. My Vaio

Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt2

2008-01-14 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 tree, which can be > downloaded from the location: > > http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/ Compiles fine but I run into another problem. On startup kernel oopses early and this 'oops' loops over and over again on the screen until you shut

Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt2

2008-01-14 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 tree, which can be downloaded from the location: http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/ Compiles fine but I run into another problem. On startup kernel oopses early and this 'oops' loops over and over again on the screen until you shut down

Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt1

2008-01-13 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 tree, which can be > downloaded from the location: > > http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/ CC kernel/lockdep.o kernel/lockdep.c: In function 'trace_hardirqs_on': kernel/lockdep.c:2068: error: too many arguments to function

Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt1: macro "put_cpu_var" passed 2 arguments, but takes just 1

2008-01-13 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 tree, which can be > downloaded from the location: > > http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/ CC arch/x86/mm/init_32.o In file included from include/asm-generic/tlb.h:17, from include/asm/tlb.h:9, from

Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt1: macro put_cpu_var passed 2 arguments, but takes just 1

2008-01-13 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 tree, which can be downloaded from the location: http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/ CC arch/x86/mm/init_32.o In file included from include/asm-generic/tlb.h:17, from include/asm/tlb.h:9, from

Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt1

2008-01-13 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 tree, which can be downloaded from the location: http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/ CC kernel/lockdep.o kernel/lockdep.c: In function 'trace_hardirqs_on': kernel/lockdep.c:2068: error: too many arguments to function

sparc64: ultra 60 fails to boot with 64kB pages

2008-01-09 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, I found this kconfig info on kernel page size: '8KB and 64KB work quite well, since Sparc ELF sections provide for up to 64KB alignment.' so I thought I'll give it a try. I tested 2.6.24-rc7 and it stopped right after 'Remapping the kernel ... done' At first I wanted to bisect

Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7: sparc64: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep_proc.c:267 lockdep_stats_show()

2008-01-09 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > >>> Got this when doing usual looping over /proc entries on fresh test > >>> kernel: > >> What is the usual looping, please? > > > > #!/bin/bash > > > > for i in `find /proc -type f`; do > > echo -n "cat $i > /dev/null ... "; > > ( cat $i > /dev/null & ); > >

Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7: sparc64: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep_proc.c:267 lockdep_stats_show()

2008-01-09 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Got this when doing usual looping over /proc entries on fresh test kernel: What is the usual looping, please? #!/bin/bash for i in `find /proc -type f`; do echo -n cat $i /dev/null ... ; ( cat $i /dev/null ); echo done; done OK,

Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7: sparc64: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep_proc.c:267 lockdep_stats_show()

2008-01-08 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > Got this when doing usual looping over /proc entries on fresh test > > kernel: > > What is the usual looping, please? #!/bin/bash for i in `find /proc -type f`; do echo -n "cat $i > /dev/null ... "; ( cat $i > /dev/null & ); echo "done"; done Regards,

Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7: sparc64: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep_proc.c:267 lockdep_stats_show()

2008-01-08 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Got this when doing usual looping over /proc entries on fresh test kernel: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep_proc.c:267 lockdep_stats_show() Call Trace: [00492704] lockdep_stats_show+0x6ac/0x6c0 [004eb4b4] seq_read+0x5c/0x340 [0050b2bc] proc_reg_read+0x64/0xa0

Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7: sparc64: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep_proc.c:267 lockdep_stats_show()

2008-01-08 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Got this when doing usual looping over /proc entries on fresh test kernel: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep_proc.c:267 lockdep_stats_show() Call Trace: [00492704] lockdep_stats_show+0x6ac/0x6c0 [004eb4b4] seq_read+0x5c/0x340 [0050b2bc] proc_reg_read+0x64/0xa0

Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7: sparc64: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep_proc.c:267 lockdep_stats_show()

2008-01-08 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Got this when doing usual looping over /proc entries on fresh test kernel: What is the usual looping, please? #!/bin/bash for i in `find /proc -type f`; do echo -n cat $i /dev/null ... ; ( cat $i /dev/null ); echo done; done Regards,

Re: [PATCH] drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c: inlining failed

2008-01-06 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > The fix is in Linus' tree since 17 Dec 2007, and the line numbers in > your error messages also don't make sense in the current tree. True. > Is there any problem with your local copy of the tree? Oh crap ... how could this happen? I'd say it is my git & branches PEBKAC. Regards,

Re: [PATCH] drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c: inlining failed

2008-01-06 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > >After commit 7bb67c14fd3778504fb77da30ce11582336dfced, Linus's > > >git tree gaves following compiliation error with gcc-3.4.6. > > >Following patch solves this issue for me; > > > > > > > > >[...] > > > CC [M] drivers/dma/ioat.o > > > CC [M] drivers/dma/ioat_dma.o > >

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: sparc64: undefined reference to `vmemmap_table'

2008-01-06 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, This is from allnoconfig on sparc64: LD .tmp_vmlinux1 arch/sparc64/kernel/head.o: In function `kvmap_vmemmap': (.text+0x34ec): undefined reference to `vmemmap_table' arch/sparc64/kernel/head.o: In function `kvmap_vmemmap': (.text+0x34f4): undefined reference to

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: sparc64: undefined reference to `vmemmap_table'

2008-01-06 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, This is from allnoconfig on sparc64: LD .tmp_vmlinux1 arch/sparc64/kernel/head.o: In function `kvmap_vmemmap': (.text+0x34ec): undefined reference to `vmemmap_table' arch/sparc64/kernel/head.o: In function `kvmap_vmemmap': (.text+0x34f4): undefined reference to

Re: [PATCH] drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c: inlining failed

2008-01-06 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, After commit 7bb67c14fd3778504fb77da30ce11582336dfced, Linus's git tree gaves following compiliation error with gcc-3.4.6. Following patch solves this issue for me; [...] CC [M] drivers/dma/ioat.o CC [M] drivers/dma/ioat_dma.o drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c: In function

Re: [PATCH] drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c: inlining failed

2008-01-06 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, The fix is in Linus' tree since 17 Dec 2007, and the line numbers in your error messages also don't make sense in the current tree. True. Is there any problem with your local copy of the tree? Oh crap ... how could this happen? I'd say it is my git branches PEBKAC. Regards,

sparc oops in ip_fast_csum

2008-01-04 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, This comes from the Linus latest linux-2.6 tree. Randomly happened. Can't reproduce that. More info below. Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address be286000 tsk->{mm,active_mm}->context = 0eae tsk->{mm,active_mm}->pgd = f800be0e4000

sparc oops in ip_fast_csum

2008-01-04 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, This comes from the Linus latest linux-2.6 tree. Randomly happened. Can't reproduce that. More info below. Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address be286000 tsk-{mm,active_mm}-context = 0eae tsk-{mm,active_mm}-pgd = f800be0e4000

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64

2007-12-26 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x46b04): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:sun4v_ktsb_register (between 'smp_callin' and 'smp_fill_in_sib_core_maps') WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x4756c): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:sun4v_register_mondo_queues (between 'after_lock_tlb' and

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64

2007-12-26 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x46b04): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:sun4v_ktsb_register (between 'smp_callin' and 'smp_fill_in_sib_core_maps') WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x4756c): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:sun4v_register_mondo_queues (between 'after_lock_tlb' and

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-21 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > > [ 145.128915] TSTATE: 004411009603 TPC: 005119ac TNPC: > > > 005119b0 Y: Not tainted > > > [ 145.128940] TPC: > > > > My suspicion at this point is that with certain RAM layouts, simply > > iterating over PFN's is simply not working out. > > That

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-21 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, [ 145.128915] TSTATE: 004411009603 TPC: 005119ac TNPC: 005119b0 Y: Not tainted [ 145.128940] TPC: kpagecount_read+0x94/0xe0 My suspicion at this point is that with certain RAM layouts, simply iterating over PFN's is simply not working out.

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-20 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > > Actually, you may only need these two: > > > > > > > maps4-add-proc-kpagecount-interface.patch > > > > maps4-add-proc-kpageflags-interface.patch > > > > Yes these two were enough, and exporting fs/proc/base.c's > > mem_lseek(). > > > > As hard as I try, I can't reproduce this at

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-20 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Actually, you may only need these two: maps4-add-proc-kpagecount-interface.patch maps4-add-proc-kpageflags-interface.patch Yes these two were enough, and exporting fs/proc/base.c's mem_lseek(). As hard as I try, I can't reproduce this at all. I tried both on

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > cat /proc/kpagecount on the other hand - with the change in line 710 > > - locks the box. Sysrq works, changing consoles works, but there is > > no "BUG: soft lockup ..." message. After a while the box becomes > > totaly unresponsive - even caps lock doesn't work, no responses to > >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, cat /proc/kpagecount on the other hand - with the change in line 710 - locks the box. Sysrq works, changing consoles works, but there is no BUG: soft lockup ... message. After a while the box becomes totaly unresponsive - even caps lock doesn't work, no responses to ping. Well

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Witam, > > > > cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. > > > > I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch > > > > between consoles. > > > > > > > > cat process hangs in read(3, ... > > > > > > cat /proc/kpagecount produces similar symptoms. box

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
> > > cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. > > > I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch > > > between consoles. > > > > > > cat process hangs in read(3, ... > > > > cat /proc/kpagecount produces similar symptoms. box is locked - sysrq-w >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
> cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. > I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch > between consoles. > > cat process hangs in read(3, ... cat /proc/kpagecount produces similar symptoms. box is locked - sysrq-w sshd trace: __down

Re: [PACKET]: Fix /proc/net/packet crash due to bogus private pointer

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > Surprise surprise. The namespace seq patch missed two spots in > AF_PACKET. > > [PACKET]: Fix /proc/net/packet crash due to bogus private pointer > > The seq_open_net patch changed the meaning of seq->private. > Unfortunately it missed two spots in AF_PACKET, which still > used the

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello > Will reply soon with correct data. Ok here it goes: cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch between consoles. cat process hangs in read(3, ... sysrq-w shows: syslogd D 0069240c

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
> cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. > I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch > between consoles. > > cat process hangs in read(3, ... > > sysrq-w shows: > > syslogd D 0069240c 0 2470 1 > Call Trace: >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch between consoles. cat process hangs in read(3, ... sysrq-w shows: syslogd D 0069240c 0 2470 1 Call Trace: [00692224]

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch between consoles. cat process hangs in read(3, ... sysrq-w shows: syslogd D 0069240c 0 2470 1 Call Trace: [00692224]

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch between consoles. cat process hangs in read(3, ... sysrq-w shows: syslogd D 0069240c 0 2470 1 Call Trace: [00692224]

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello Will reply soon with correct data. Ok here it goes: cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch between consoles. cat process hangs in read(3, ... sysrq-w shows: syslogd D 0069240c

Re: [PACKET]: Fix /proc/net/packet crash due to bogus private pointer

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Surprise surprise. The namespace seq patch missed two spots in AF_PACKET. [PACKET]: Fix /proc/net/packet crash due to bogus private pointer The seq_open_net patch changed the meaning of seq-private. Unfortunately it missed two spots in AF_PACKET, which still used the old way of

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch between consoles. cat process hangs in read(3, ... cat /proc/kpagecount produces similar symptoms. box is locked - sysrq-w sshd trace: __down

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch between consoles. cat process hangs in read(3, ... cat /proc/kpagecount produces similar symptoms. box is locked - sysrq-w sshd trace:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >