here for a few weeks.
cheers
-mark
--
Mark Frazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Configure.help needs updating for the new config option.
# This option makes the old IP_ROUTE_TOS boolean a choice
# option allowing either the old RFC1349 behaviour or the
# RFC2474 behaviour.
diff -urN linux
here for a few weeks.
cheers
-mark
--
Mark Frazer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Configure.help needs updating for the new config option.
# This option makes the old IP_ROUTE_TOS boolean a choice
# option allowing either the old RFC1349 behaviour or the
# RFC2474 behaviour.
diff -urN linux-2.4.5
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01/06/01 10:32]:
> > No way! If I implement a HA application which depends on link status, I
> > want the info to be accurate, I don't want to know that 30 seconds ago I
> > had good link.
> >
> > IMHO, rate limiting is the only solution.
>
> Please re-read your
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01/06/01 10:32]:
No way! If I implement a HA application which depends on link status, I
want the info to be accurate, I don't want to know that 30 seconds ago I
had good link.
IMHO, rate limiting is the only solution.
Please re-read your comment. Then
Khachaturov, Vassilii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01/05/31 15:00]:
> Don't forget to bug RH package maintainer on that. Whatever
bugzilla submitted
> I use source-built cscope v.15.1, and -k works for me here,
works for me too!
> WHY?! Isn't it better to put $(shell cat cscope.files) on the list
Pete Wyckoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01/05/31 13:56]:
>
> You seem not to have read my response to your earlier mail proprosing
> such a thing (for tags only, not cscope):
>
> http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/2001week21/1869.html
I did. I didn't want to sign up to maintain the
Khachaturov, Vassilii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01/05/31 12:12]:
> Great stuff. May I suggest adding -k to the cscope cmdline:
>
> > + cscope -b -I include
>
> should become
> + cscope -b -k -I include
The cscope on my RH7.0 box didn't take -k!
[root@mjftest linux-2.4.5]# ls -l cscope.files
Khachaturov, Vassilii [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01/05/31 12:12]:
Great stuff. May I suggest adding -k to the cscope cmdline:
+ cscope -b -I include
should become
+ cscope -b -k -I include
The cscope on my RH7.0 box didn't take -k!
[root@mjftest linux-2.4.5]# ls -l cscope.files
Pete Wyckoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01/05/31 13:56]:
You seem not to have read my response to your earlier mail proprosing
such a thing (for tags only, not cscope):
http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/2001week21/1869.html
I did. I didn't want to sign up to maintain the
Khachaturov, Vassilii [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01/05/31 15:00]:
Don't forget to bug RH package maintainer on that. Whatever
bugzilla submitted
I use source-built cscope v.15.1, and -k works for me here,
works for me too!
WHY?! Isn't it better to put $(shell cat cscope.files) on the list of
I
The following patch generates saner Ctags and will build cscope
output. It's against 2.4.5
--- Makefile.oldMon May 28 22:44:01 2001
+++ MakefileWed May 30 17:50:01 2001
@@ -334,11 +334,32 @@
# Exuberant ctags works better with -I
tags: dummy
- CTAGSF=`ctags --version |
The following patch generates saner Ctags and will build cscope
output. It's against 2.4.5
--- Makefile.oldMon May 28 22:44:01 2001
+++ MakefileWed May 30 17:50:01 2001
@@ -334,11 +334,32 @@
# Exuberant ctags works better with -I
tags: dummy
- CTAGSF=`ctags --version |
Anyone have any good tips on getting tags to generate nicely?
I'm having some problems with some tags for macros and such being
declared in several places since ctags doesn't honour any CPP #if'ing.
I've currently got my Makefile doing this, which seems to give me some
sanity as the
Oops, that was wrong. The proper patch is:
--- Documentation/kernel-docs.txt.old Mon May 28 12:06:43 2001
+++ Documentation/kernel-docs.txt Mon May 28 12:37:26 2001
@@ -333,7 +333,8 @@
* Title: "The Kernel Hacking HOWTO"
Author: Various Talented People, and Rusty.
Oops, that was wrong. The proper patch is:
--- Documentation/kernel-docs.txt.old Mon May 28 12:06:43 2001
+++ Documentation/kernel-docs.txt Mon May 28 12:37:26 2001
@@ -333,7 +333,8 @@
* Title: The Kernel Hacking HOWTO
Author: Various Talented People, and Rusty.
-
Anyone have any good tips on getting tags to generate nicely?
I'm having some problems with some tags for macros and such being
declared in several places since ctags doesn't honour any CPP #if'ing.
I've currently got my Makefile doing this, which seems to give me some
sanity as the
Greg Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01/05/25 08:51]:
> Have you experienced any issues like this?
> Have you successfuly built a kernel that booted on these machines?
I'm also a user of the machine Scott mentioned. We're booting it off
of a smaller scsi disk, not the 76G disks.
The disks are
Greg Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01/05/25 08:51]:
Have you experienced any issues like this?
Have you successfuly built a kernel that booted on these machines?
I'm also a user of the machine Scott mentioned. We're booting it off
of a smaller scsi disk, not the 76G disks.
The disks are
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01/05/15 16:28]:
>
> The "eth0..N" naming is done RIGHT!
Nothing to do with the kernel but, one should then argue that the
current stuff in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is broken for hotplug as
placing a new network adapter into your bus will renumber your
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01/05/15 16:28]:
The eth0..N naming is done RIGHT!
Nothing to do with the kernel but, one should then argue that the
current stuff in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is broken for hotplug as
placing a new network adapter into your bus will renumber your
20 matches
Mail list logo
