On 2021-04-05 21:34, Xie He wrote:
Hi Martin,
Could you ack? Thanks!
Acked-by: Martin Schiller
Just for the record: I'm certainly not always the fastest,
but I don't work holidays or weekends. So you also need to have some
patience.
On 2021-03-31 20:41, Xie He wrote:
Hi Martin,
Could you ack this patch again? The only change from the RFC version
(that you previously acked) is the addition of the "__GFP_NOMEMALLOC"
flag in "dev_alloc_skb". This is because I want to prevent pfmemalloc
skbs (which can't be handled by
On 2021-03-14 02:59, Xie He wrote:
Hi Martin,
Could you ack? Thanks!
Acked-by: Martin Schiller
tatic int lapbeth_open(struct net_device *dev)
return -ENODEV;
}
- netif_start_queue(dev);
return 0;
}
@@ -300,8 +299,6 @@ static int lapbeth_close(struct net_device *dev)
{
int err;
- netif_stop_queue(dev);
-
if ((err = lapb_unregister(dev)) != LAPB_OK)
pr_err("lapb_unregister error: %d\n", err);
Seems reasonable to me.
Acked-by: Martin Schiller
he patch also documents this requirement in the
"x25-iface" documentation.
I've tested the hdlc_x25 driver.
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Martin Schiller
On 2021-03-03 00:30, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 02 Mar 2021 08:04:20 +0100 Martin Schiller wrote:
On 2021-03-01 09:56, Xie He wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 10:56 PM Martin Schiller wrote:
>> I mean the change from only one hdlc interface to both hdlc and
>> hdlc_x25
On 2021-03-01 09:56, Xie He wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 10:56 PM Martin Schiller wrote:
>> Also, I have a hard time assessing if such a wrap is really
>> enforceable.
>
> Sorry. I don't understand what you mean. What "wrap" are you referring
> to?
I mea
On 2021-02-27 00:03, Xie He wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 6:21 AM Martin Schiller wrote:
I have now had a look at it. It works as expected.
I just wonder if it would not be more appropriate to call
the lapb_register() already in x25_hdlc_open(), so that the layer2
(lapb) can already "
On 2021-02-22 09:56, Xie He wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 11:14 PM Martin Schiller wrote:
I'm not really happy with this change because it breaks compatibility.
We then suddenly have 2 interfaces; the X.25 routings are to be set
via
the "new" hdlc_x25 interfaces instead o
break backward compatibility. Users with old
scripts will find them no longer working.
However, it's hard for me to find a better way to solve the problem
described in the commit message.
So I sent this as an RFC to see what people think about this. (Martin
Schiller seems to be OK with this.)
W
it.
Cc: Martin Schiller
Signed-off-by: Xie He
---
Change from RFC v1:
Properly initialize state(hdlc)->x25_dev and state(hdlc)->x25_dev_lock.
---
drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c | 158 ++---
1 file changed, 129 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a
rable")
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: Martin Schiller
Signed-off-by: Xie He
---
drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c b/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c
index bb164805804e.
On 2021-02-01 12:38, Xie He wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 1:18 AM Martin Schiller wrote:
I have thought about this issue again.
I also have to say that I have never noticed any problems in this area
before.
So again for (my) understanding:
When a hardware driver calls netif_stop_queue
On 2021-02-01 11:49, Xie He wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 2:05 AM Martin Schiller wrote:
What kind of packages do you mean are corrupted?
ETH_P_X25 or ETH_P_HDLC?
I mean ETH_P_X25. I was using "lapbether.c" to test so there was no
ETH_P_HDLC.
I have also sent a patch here i
ied before removing the pseudo header (as I did in my
patch)?
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: Martin Schiller
Signed-off-by: Xie He
---
net/lapb/lapb_out.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/lapb/lapb_out.c b/net/lapb/lapb_out.c
On 2021-01-31 04:16, Xie He wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:16 AM Jakub Kicinski
wrote:
Sounds like too much afford for a sub-optimal workaround.
The qdisc semantics are borken in the proposed scheme (double
counting packets) - both in term of statistics and if user decides
to add a
On 2021-01-28 23:06, Xie He wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:47 AM Jakub Kicinski
wrote:
Noob question - could you point at or provide a quick guide to
layering
here? I take there is only one netdev, and something maintains an
internal queue which is not stopped when HW driver stops the
On 2021-01-27 21:29, Xie He wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:14 AM David Laight
wrote:
If I read this correctly it adds a (potentially big) queue between the
LAPB code that adds the sequence numbers to the frames and the
hardware
that actually sends them.
Yes. The actual number of
On 2021-01-24 05:45, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:07:05 +0100 Martin Schiller wrote:
On 2021-01-21 01:21, Xie He wrote:
> In the lapb module, the timers may run concurrently with other code in
> this module, and there is currently no locking to prevent the code from
&g
;, "lapb_start_t2timer".
3. Let lapb_unregister wait for other API functions and running timers
to stop.
4. The lapb_device_event function calls lapb_disconnect_request. In
order to avoid trying to hold the lock twice, add a new function named
"__lapb_disconnect_request" wh
disconnect_request" which assumes the lock is held, and make
it called by lapb_disconnect_request and lapb_device_event.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: Martin Schiller
Signed-off-by: Xie He
Can you please add a Changelog. What was changed in v4?
---
include/n
should move the
actual functionality from lapb_disconnect_request() to a
__lapb_disconnect_request(), and in lapb_disconnect_request() call this
function including locking around it and also in lapb_device_event
(without locking).
Calling lapb_start_t1timer() on a "NETDEV_GOING_DOWN" event doe
he pointer. This patch fixes this
problem.
Fixes: a4989fa91110 ("net/lapb: support netdev events")
Cc: Martin Schiller
Signed-off-by: Xie He
---
net/lapb/lapb_iface.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/lapb/lapb_iface.c b/net/lapb/lapb_iface.c
index 213ea7abc9ab.
On 2020-12-24 10:49, Xie He wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 9:01 AM Xie He wrote:
I don't think this patch is suitable for stable branches. This patch
is
part of a patch series that changes the lapb module from "establishing
the
L2 connection only when needed by L3", to "establishing the L2
driver do this, too.
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Martin Schiller
Cc: Martin Schiller
Signed-off-by: Xie He
---
drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c b/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c
index b6
On 2020-12-09 21:16, Xie He wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 2:31 AM Martin Schiller wrote:
>> 1. When the x25 module gets loaded, layer 2 may already be running and
>> connected. In this case, although we are in X25_LINK_STATE_0, we still
>> need to handle the Restart Reques
On 2020-12-09 23:11, Xie He wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:47 AM Xie He wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:41 AM Martin Schiller wrote:
>
> Right.
> By the way: A "Restart Collision" is in practice a very common event to
> establish the Layer 3.
Oh, I see. Thanks!
On 2020-12-09 10:52, Martin Schiller wrote:
On 2020-12-09 09:16, Xie He wrote:
1. When the x25 module gets loaded, layer 2 may already be running and
connected. In this case, although we are in X25_LINK_STATE_0, we still
need to handle the Restart Request received, rather than ignore it.
Hmm
are in State 2. So we don't need to check x25_t20timer_pending again.
Yeah, you're right, we can actually leave that out.
Acked-by: Martin Schiller
On 2020-12-09 10:17, Xie He wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:01 AM Xie He wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:36 PM Martin Schiller
wrote:
>
> switch (nb->state) {
> case X25_LINK_STATE_0:
> - nb->state = X25_LINK_STATE_2;
> -
Remove obsolete function x25_kill_by_device(). It's not used any more.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/af_x25.c | 16
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
index 313a6222ded9..1432a05805ab 100644
--- a/net/x25/af_x25.c
1. DTE interface changes immediately to LAPB_STATE_1 and start sending
SABM(E).
2. DCE interface sends N2-times DM and changes to LAPB_STATE_1
afterwards if there is no response in the meantime.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/lapb/lapb_timer.c | 11 +--
1 file changed, 9
We have to take the actual link state into account to handle
restart requests/confirms well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/x25_link.c | 41 +
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/x25/x25_link.c b/net/x25
, as these will
be handled in layer 2 (LAPB) and layer3 (X.25) will be informed by
layer2 when layer2 link is established and layer3 link should be
initiated.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/af_x25.c| 22 --
net/x25/x25_link.c | 6 +++---
net/x25
and stop all timers.
In case of Carrier Detection, we start timer t1 on a DCE interface,
and on a DTE interface we change to state LAPB_STATE_1 and start
sending SABM(E).
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/lapb/lapb_iface.c | 82 ++-
1 file
handling
this may need fixes/cleanup and will be resubmitted later.
Changes to v1:
o fix 'subject_prefix' and 'checkpatch' warnings
---
Martin Schiller (5):
net/x25: handle additional netdev events
net/lapb: support netdev events
net/lapb: fix t1 timer handling for LAPB_STATE_0
net/x25: fix
On 2020-11-26 01:08, Xie He wrote:
Hi Martin,
Since we are going to assume lapb->state would remain in LAPB_STATE_0
when
the carrier is down (as understood by me. Right?), could we add a check
in
lapb_connect_request to reject the upper layer's "connect" instruction
when
the carrier is
On 2020-11-25 22:49, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:39:35 +0100 Martin Schiller wrote:
This patch allows layer2 (LAPB) to react to netdev events itself and
avoids the detour via layer3 (X.25).
1. Establish layer2 on NETDEV_UP events, if the carrier is already up.
2. Call
On 2020-11-24 12:43, David Laight wrote:
From: Martin Schiller
Sent: 24 November 2020 09:36
1. DTE interface changes immediately to LAPB_STATE_1 and start sending
SABM(E).
2. DCE interface sends N2-times DM and changes to LAPB_STATE_1
afterwards if there is no response in the meantime
We have to take the actual link state into account to handle
restart requests/confirms well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/x25_link.c | 41 +
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/x25/x25_link.c b/net/x25
Remove obsolete function x25_kill_by_device(). It's not used any more.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/af_x25.c | 16
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
index 313a6222ded9..1432a05805ab 100644
--- a/net/x25/af_x25.c
and stop all timers.
In case of Carrier Detection, we start timer t1 on a DCE interface,
and on a DTE interface we change to state LAPB_STATE_1 and start
sending SABM(E).
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/lapb/lapb_iface.c | 94 +++
1 file
1. DTE interface changes immediately to LAPB_STATE_1 and start sending
SABM(E).
2. DCE interface sends N2-times DM and changes to LAPB_STATE_1
afterwards if there is no response in the meantime.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/lapb/lapb_timer.c | 11 +--
1 file changed, 9
, as these will
be handled in layer 2 (LAPB) and layer3 (X.25) will be informed by
layer2 when layer2 link is established and layer3 link should be
initiated.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/af_x25.c| 22 --
net/x25/x25_link.c | 6 +++---
net/x25
.
Changes to v1:
o fix 'subject_prefix' and 'checkpatch' warnings
---
Martin Schiller (5):
net/x25: handle additional netdev events
net/lapb: support netdev events
net/lapb: fix t1 timer handling for LAPB_STATE_0
net/x25: fix restart request/confirm handling
net/x25: remove x25_kill_by_device
Remove obsolete function x25_kill_by_device(). It's not used any more.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/af_x25.c | 16
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
index 313a6222ded9..1432a05805ab 100644
--- a/net/x25/af_x25.c
1. DTE interface changes immediately to LAPB_STATE_1 and start sending
SABM(E).
2. DCE interface sends N2-times DM and changes to LAPB_STATE_1
afterwards if there is no response in the meantime.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/lapb/lapb_timer.c | 11 +--
1 file changed, 9
We have to take the actual link state into account to handle
restart requests/confirms well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/x25_link.c | 41 +
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/x25/x25_link.c b/net/x25
and stop all timers.
In case of Carrier Detection, we start timer t1 on a DCE interface,
and on a DTE interface we change to state LAPB_STATE_1 and start
sending SABM(E).
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/lapb/lapb_iface.c | 94 +++
1 file
, as these will
be handled in layer 2 (LAPB) and layer3 (X.25) will be informed by
layer2 when layer2 link is established and layer3 link should be
initiated.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/af_x25.c| 22 --
net/x25/x25_link.c | 6 +++---
net/x25
---
Martin Schiller (5):
net/x25: handle additional netdev events
net/lapb: support netdev events
net/lapb: fix t1 timer handling for LAPB_STATE_0
net/x25: fix restart request/confirm handling
net/x25: remove x25_kill_by_device()
net/lapb/lapb_iface.c | 94
On 2020-11-23 23:09, Xie He wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:36 AM Jakub Kicinski
wrote:
> > From this point of view it will be the best to handle the NETDEV_UP in
> > the lapb event handler and establish the link analog to the
> > NETDEV_CHANGE event if the carrier is UP.
>
> Thanks! This
On 2020-11-23 11:08, Xie He wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 1:36 AM Xie He wrote:
Some drivers don't support carrier status and will never change it.
Their carrier status will always be UP. There will not be a
NETDEV_CHANGE event.
Well, one could argue that we would have to repair these
On 2020-11-23 09:31, Xie He wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 10:55 PM Martin Schiller wrote:
No, they aren't independent. The carrier can only be up if the device
/
interface is UP. And as far as I can see a NETDEV_CHANGE event will
also
only be generated on interfaces that are UP.
So you
On 2020-11-21 00:50, Xie He wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 3:11 PM Xie He wrote:
Should we also handle the NETDEV_UP event here? In previous versions
of this patch series you seemed to want to establish the L2 connection
on device-up. But in this patch, you didn't handle NETDEV_UP.
Maybe on
On 2020-11-20 19:28, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:39:19 +0100 Martin Schiller wrote:
Call netdev notifiers before and after changing the device type.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
This is a fix, right? Can you give an example of something that goes
wrong without this patch
Remove obsolete function x25_kill_by_device(). It's not used any more.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/af_x25.c | 16
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
index 313a6222ded9..1432a05805ab 100644
--- a/net/x25/af_x25.c
We have to take the actual link state into account to handle
restart requests/confirms well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/x25_link.c | 41 +
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/x25/x25_link.c b/net/x25
sending SABM(E).
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/lapb/lapb_iface.c | 72 +++
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/lapb/lapb_iface.c b/net/lapb/lapb_iface.c
index 3c03f6512c5f..52d59984fbe6 100644
--- a/net/lapb/lapb_iface.c
+++ b/net
1. DTE interface changes immediately to LAPB_STATE_1 and start sending
SABM(E).
2. DCE interface sends N2-times DM and changes to LAPB_STATE_1
afterwards if there is no response in the meantime.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/lapb/lapb_timer.c | 11 +--
1 file changed, 9
, as these will
be handled in layer 2 (LAPB) and layer3 (X.25) will be informed by
layer2 when layer2 link is established and layer3 link should be
initiated.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/af_x25.c| 22 --
net/x25/x25_link.c | 6 +++---
net/x25
carrier loss correctly in lapb
o drop patch for x25_neighbour param handling
this may need fixes/cleanup and will be resubmitted later.
Changes to v1:
o fix 'subject_prefix' and 'checkpatch' warnings
---
Martin Schiller (5):
net/x25: handle additional netdev events
net/lapb: support netdev events
On 2020-11-18 15:47, Xie He wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 5:59 AM Martin Schiller wrote:
---
Changes to v2:
o restructure complete patch-set
o keep netdev event handling in layer3 (X.25)
But... Won't it be better to handle L2 connections in L2 code?
For example, if we are running X.25
We have to take the actual link state into account to handle
restart requests/confirms well.
Also, the T20 timer needs to be stopped, if the link is terminated.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/x25_link.c | 45 +
1 file changed, 37
Remove unnecessary function x25_kill_by_device().
Replace the call to x25_kill_by_device() by x25_kill_by_neigh().
Therefore, also remove the call to x25_clear_forward_by_dev() in
x25_route_device_down(), as this is already called by
x25_kill_by_neigh().
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net
fix t1 timer handling for DCE in LAPB_STATE_0:
o DTE interface changes immediately to LAPB_STATE_1 and start sending
SABM(E).
o DCE interface sends N2-times DM and changes to LAPB_STATE_1
afterwards if there is no response in the meantime.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/lapb
In case of carrier loss, clear all queues, enter state LABB_STATE_0 and
stop all timers.
By setting rc = LAPB_NOTCONNECTED, the upper layer is informed about the
disconnect.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/lapb/lapb_iface.c | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git
For a DTE interface we should change to state LAPB_STATE_1 and start
sending SABM(E). But for DCE interfaces, we simply should start the
timer t1.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/lapb/lapb_iface.c | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/lapb
in an upcomming commit, where x25 params of an neighbour
will get configurable through ioctls.
Additionally the NETDEV_CHANGE event makes it possible to handle carrier
loss and detection.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
include/net/x25.h | 2 ++
net/x25/af_x25.c | 44
and will be resubmitted later.
Changes to v1:
o fix 'subject_prefix' and 'checkpatch' warnings
---
Martin Schiller (6):
net/x25: handle additional netdev events
net/lapb: fix lapb_connect_request() for DCE
net/lapb: handle carrier loss correctly
net/lapb: fix t1 timer handling for DCE
net/x25: fix restart
On 2020-11-18 14:46, Xie He wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 5:03 AM Xie He wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:49 AM Martin Schiller
wrote:
>
> I also have a patch here that implements an "on demand" link feature,
> which we used for ISDN dialing connections.
> As
On 2020-11-17 19:28, Xie He wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:26 AM Martin Schiller wrote:
On 2020-11-17 12:32, Xie He wrote:
>
> I think for a DCE, it doesn't need to initiate the L2
> connection on device-up. It just needs to wait for a connection to
> come. But L3 seems
On 2020-11-17 20:50, Xie He wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:00 AM Martin Schiller wrote:
Remove unnecessary function x25_kill_by_device.
-/*
- * Kill all bound sockets on a dropped device.
- */
-static void x25_kill_by_device(struct net_device *dev)
-{
- struct sock *s
Call netdev notifiers before and after changing the device type.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
Changes to v4:
* Fix copy'n'paste error
Changes to v3:
* Handle return value of call_netdevice_notifiers()
Changes to v2:
* Use subject_prefix 'net-next' to fix 'fixes_present' issue
Changes
Call netdev notifiers before and after changing the device type.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
Changes to v3:
* Handle return value of call_netdevice_notifiers()
Changes to v2:
* Use subject_prefix 'net-next' to fix 'fixes_present' issue
Changes to v1:
* Fix 'subject_prefix
On 2020-11-18 01:32, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:41:21 +0100 Martin Schiller wrote:
Call netdev notifiers before and after changing the device type.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
Change from v2:
use subject_prefix 'net-next' to fix 'fixes_present' issue
Change from v1
On 2020-11-17 12:32, Xie He wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 1:53 AM Martin Schiller wrote:
On 2020-11-16 21:16, Xie He wrote:
> Do you mean we will now automatically establish LAPB connections
> without upper layers instructing us to do so?
Yes, as soon as the physical link is estab
On 2020-11-17 12:41, Xie He wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:00 AM Martin Schiller wrote:
This makes it possible to handle carrier lost and detection.
In case of carrier lost, we shutdown layer 3 and flush all sessions.
@@ -275,6 +275,19 @@ static int x25_device_event(struct notifier_block
On 2020-11-16 21:16, Xie He wrote:
Do you mean we will now automatically establish LAPB connections
without upper layers instructing us to do so?
Yes, as soon as the physical link is established, the L2 and also the
L3 layer (restart handshake) is established.
In this context I also noticed
This makes it possible to handle carrier loss and detection.
In case of Carrier Loss, layer 2 is terminated
In case of Carrier Detection, we start timer t1 on a DCE interface,
and on a DTE interface we change to state LAPB_STATE_1 and start
sending SABM(E).
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
fix t1 timer handling in LAPB_STATE_0:
o DTE interface changes immediately to LAPB_STATE_1 and start sending
SABM(E).
o DCE interface sends N2-times DM and changes to LAPB_STATE_1
afterwards if there is no response in the meantime.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
Change from v1:
fix
handling to select the next lc (DCE=from bottom / DTE=from
top)
o DTE/DCE handling to set correct clear/reset/restart cause
o take default facilities from neighbour settings
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
Change from v1:
o fix 'subject_prefix' and 'checkpatch' warnings
o fix
Remove unnecessary function x25_kill_by_device.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
Change from v1:
fix 'subject_prefix' warning
---
net/x25/af_x25.c | 22 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
index
This makes it possible to handle carrier lost and detection.
In case of carrier lost, we shutdown layer 3 and flush all sessions.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
Change from v1:
fix 'subject_prefix' and 'checkpatch' warnings
---
net/x25/af_x25.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 13
Martin Schiller (6):
net/x25: handle additional netdev events
net/x25: make neighbour params configurable
net/x25: replace x25_kill_by_device with x25_kill_by_neigh
net/x25: support NETDEV_CHANGE notifier
net/lapb: support netdev events
net/lapb: fix t1 timer handling
include/net/x25
in the next commit, where x25 params of an neighbour will
get configurable through ioctls.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
Change from v1:
fix 'subject_prefix' and 'checkpatch' warnings
---
include/net/x25.h | 2 ++
net/x25/af_x25.c | 26 ++
net/x25/x25_link.c
Call netdev notifiers before and after changing the device type.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
Change from v2:
use subject_prefix 'net-next' to fix 'fixes_present' issue
Change from v1:
fix 'subject_prefix' and 'checkpatch' warnings
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 4
1 file changed, 4
Call netdev notifiers before and after changing the device type.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
Change from v1:
fix 'subject_prefix' and 'checkpatch' warnings
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index
On 2020-11-16 09:45, Xie He wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the series. To get the series applied faster, could you
address the warnings and failures shown on this page?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?submitter=174539
Thanks!
To let the netdev robot know which tree this
On 2020-11-14 12:10, Xie He wrote:
Martin Schiller is an active developer and reviewer for the X.25 code.
His company is providing products based on the Linux X.25 stack.
So he is a good candidate for maintainers of the X.25 code.
The original maintainer of the X.25 network layer (Andrew Hendry
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index be69d272052f..8253c5b03105 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -3124,9 +3124,11 @@ static long __tun_chr_ioctl(struct file
fix t1 timer handling in LAPB_STATE_0:
o DTE interface changes immediately to LAPB_STATE_1 and start sending
SABM(E).
o DCE interface sends N2-times DM and changes to LAPB_STATE_1
afterwards if there is no response in the meantime.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/lapb
will
get configurable through ioctls.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
include/net/x25.h | 2 ++
net/x25/af_x25.c | 19 +
net/x25/x25_link.c | 51 --
3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/x25.h b
This makes it possible to handle carrier loss and detection.
In case of Carrier Loss, layer 2 is terminated
In case of Carrier Detection, we start timer t1 on a DCE interface,
and on a DTE interface we change to state LAPB_STATE_1 and start
sending SABM(E).
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
Remove unnecessary function x25_kill_by_device.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/af_x25.c | 22 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
index 439ae65ab7a8..d98d1145500e 100644
--- a/net/x25/af_x25.c
This makes it possible to handle carrier lost and detection.
In case of carrier lost, we shutdown layer 3 and flush all sessions.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
net/x25/af_x25.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
index
handling to select the next lc (DCE=from bottom / DTE=from
top)
o DTE/DCE handling to set correct clear/reset/restart cause
o take default facilities from neighbour settings
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller
---
include/net/x25.h| 7 ++-
include/uapi/linux/x25.h | 54
it seems to work again.
- Martin
On 11/12/2020 10:27 AM, Xie He wrote:
Hi Linux maintainers,
The linux-x25 mail list doesn't seem to be working. We sent a lot of
emails to linux-x25 but Martin Schiller as a subscriber hasn't
received a single email from the mail list.
Looking at the mail list
On 2020-11-11 22:36, Xie He wrote:
Hi Martin Schiller, would you like to be a maintainer for the X.25
stack?
As we know the linux-x25 mail list has stopped working for a long time.
Adding you as a maintainer may make you be Cc'd for new patches so that
you can review them.
About 1 year ago I
disconnect")
Cc: Martin Schiller
Signed-off-by: Xie He
---
net/x25/af_x25.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
index 0bbb283f23c9..8e59f9ecbeab 100644
--- a/net/x25/af_x25.c
+++ b/net/x25/af_x25.c
@@ -826,1
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
