Re: Kernel SCM saga..

2005-04-08 Thread Matt Johnston
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 09:42:04PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > > > > I'm playing with monotone right now. Superficially it looks like it > > has tons of gee-whiz neato stuff... however, it's *agonizingly* slow. > > I mean glacial. A heavily seda

Re: odd messages in dmesg (network I think)

2001-04-24 Thread Matt Johnston
I've noticed the same for 2.4.x kernels for quite a while back The first appearence in logs/kernel is for 2.4.2-ac17. Afaik I haven't noticed any resultant problems so I presume its just some over-informative debugging code?? Cheers, Matt Johnston. On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 07:32, By

Re: OOPS when switching consoles while closing X.

2001-03-15 Thread Matt Johnston
t found in System.map. Ignoring ksyms_base entry" Is this normal? I've also attached the -ac20 dmesg. The oops seems to occur most often when X has heavy disk activity, probably swapping (64 megs RAM here). Cheers, Matt Johnston On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 22:10, you wrote: > Matt

OOPS when switching consoles while closing X.

2001-03-15 Thread Matt Johnston
27;t cause a kernel OOPS should it?? I'm not sure what information would be helpful, I've included the ksymoops output for 2.4.2ac17, and my dmesg. Tell me if more is needed. Cheers, Matt Johnston. Linux version 2.4.2-ac17 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)) #

Re: 2.4.2-ac13 make modules_install error

2001-03-06 Thread Matt Johnston
Hi. I've had the same problem, it also happens in 2.4.2ac12 Cheers, Matt Johnston On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 13:04, Frank Davis wrote: > Hello, >While 'make modules_install' on 2.4.2-ac13, I receive the following > error: > > make -C kernel modules_install >

Re: random PID generation

2001-02-23 Thread Matt Johnston
OpenBSD has a working implementation, might be worth looking at??? Cheers, Matt Johnston. On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 23:34, Heusden, Folkert van wrote: > >> My code runs trough the whole task_list to see if a chosen pid is > >> already > >> > >> in use or not