RE: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans

1 9:36 AM > To: Matt Liotta > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans > > > >I am still stuck on 2.2 because of this issue. I would > really like to see > >this driver in 2.4.2. > > Have you tested the 2.2.18 version of the new dri

RE: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans

I am still stuck on 2.2 because of this issue. I would really like to see this driver in 2.4.2. -Matt > -Original Message- > From: Nathan Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 9:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans >

RE: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans

I am still stuck on 2.2 because of this issue. I would really like to see this driver in 2.4.2. -Matt -Original Message- From: Nathan Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 9:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans I

RE: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans

To: Matt Liotta Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans I am still stuck on 2.2 because of this issue. I would really like to see this driver in 2.4.2. Have you tested the 2.2.18 version of the new driver? The patches should work on most 2.2.X kernels, I just

RE: linux 2.2.19pre and thttpd (VM-global problem?)

I wouldn't use cheap single CPU/NIC machines in the real world. Certainly a cluster of smaller machines does better then one big machine, but that doesn't mean you should use too small of a machine. Remember that as the number of cluster nodes goes up the cluster becomes a management problem.

RE: linux 2.2.19pre and thttpd (VM-global problem?)

I wouldn't use cheap single CPU/NIC machines in the real world. Certainly a cluster of smaller machines does better then one big machine, but that doesn't mean you should use too small of a machine. Remember that as the number of cluster nodes goes up the cluster becomes a management problem.