Re: set_rtc_mmss: can't update from 0 to 59

2000-12-18 Thread Matthew Dharm
how do we fix this? Put #if 0 ... #endif around the printk. Andries -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver Oh BAY-bee. -- Dust Puppy to Greg User Friendly, 12/13/1997 PGP signature

Re: set_rtc_mmss: can't update from 0 to 59

2000-12-17 Thread Matthew Dharm
ng that gets me... that's why I usually calculate things the UNIX way -- seconds since an epoch. > Of course, messing with the cmos clock at all was a rather bad idea, > but that is a different discussion. True enough... but, the question is, how do we fix this? Make the logic more buff

set_rtc_mmss: can't update from 0 to 59

2000-12-17 Thread Matthew Dharm
, this should work if my RTC is less than 15 minutes off... which I can guarantee it is. Accoring to hwclock, it's less than a second off. So, what's causing this message? Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver Okay

Re: set_rtc_mmss: can't update from 0 to 59

2000-12-17 Thread Matthew Dharm
n epoch. Of course, messing with the cmos clock at all was a rather bad idea, but that is a different discussion. True enough... but, the question is, how do we fix this? Make the logic more buff? Or change the algorithm to use something like minutes since the epoch? Mat

Anyone having trouble compiling test13-pre1?

2000-12-14 Thread Matthew Dharm
-pre1 is still compiling (and installing modules, etc) as 2.4.0-test12. -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver Pitr! That's brilliant! Funded by Microsoft refunds. What sweet irony

Re: Is this a compromise and how?

2000-12-14 Thread Matthew Dharm
boot time. Matt Dharm -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver C: They kicked your ass, didn't they? S: They were cheating! -- The Chief and Stef User Friendly, 11/19/1997 PGP signature

Re: Is this a compromise and how?

2000-12-14 Thread Matthew Dharm
. Matt Dharm -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver C: They kicked your ass, didn't they? S: They were cheating! -- The Chief and Stef User Friendly, 11/19/1997 PGP signature

Anyone having trouble compiling test13-pre1?

2000-12-14 Thread Matthew Dharm
-pre1 is still compiling (and installing modules, etc) as 2.4.0-test12. -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver Pitr! That's brilliant! Funded by Microsoft refunds. What sweet irony

Re: USB mass storage backport status?

2000-12-12 Thread Matthew Dharm
st: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage

Re: USB mass storage backport status?

2000-12-12 Thread Matthew Dharm
ernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver Umm, these aren't the droids you'

Re: USB-Storage drivers

2000-11-27 Thread Matthew Dharm
IG_USB_STORAGE_SDDR09 > + bool 'USB Mass Storage DPCMsupport' CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DPCM > + bool 'USB Mass Storage FreeCom support' CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_FREECOM > fi > dep_tristate ' USS720 parport driver' CONFIG_USB_USS720 $CONFIG_USB >$CONFIG_PARPORT >

Re: USB-Storage drivers

2000-11-27 Thread Matthew Dharm
rage FreeCom support' CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_FREECOM fi dep_tristate ' USS720 parport driver' CONFIG_USB_USS720 $CONFIG_USB $CONFIG_PARPORT dep_tristate ' DABUSB driver' CONFIG_USB_DABUSB $CONFIG_USB -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Dr

Re: scsi init problem in 2.4.0-test10?

2000-11-02 Thread Matthew Dharm
r other devices) to spin up? Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver S: Another stupid question? G: There's no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people. -- Stef and Gr

Re: scsi init problem in 2.4.0-test10?

2000-11-02 Thread Matthew Dharm
-- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver S: Another stupid question? G: There's no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people. -- Stef and Greg User Friendly, 7/15/1998 PGP

Re: GPL Question

2000-10-27 Thread Matthew Dharm
intent for me. Yeah, that's a lousy standard to use, especially in a courtroom. But that's what I really care about in the end. Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver We can customize our colonels. -- Tux User Friendly, 12/1/1998 PGP signature

Re: GPL Question

2000-10-27 Thread Matthew Dharm
t's what I really care about in the end. Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver We can customize our colonels. -- Tux User Friendly, 12/1/1998 PGP signature

Re: Is this a valid construct?

2000-10-16 Thread Matthew Dharm
e the tick count of when you do the IRQ handler and when you do > chew_on_hardware(). You'll see if I am right. > i.e., try: > > before = system_ticks_NOW > flagvar = 1; > chew_on_hardware (); > after = system_ticks_NOW > > printk (..., before, after, i

Is this a valid construct?

2000-10-16 Thread Matthew Dharm
f those places where I need the "volatile" keyword? The code I'm working on is in the kernel... but this is the stripped-down version. I can provide files/lines if people want to look at particulars. Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Main

Is this a valid construct?

2000-10-16 Thread Matthew Dharm
f those places where I need the "volatile" keyword? The code I'm working on is in the kernel... but this is the stripped-down version. I can provide files/lines if people want to look at particulars. Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Main

Re: Is this a valid construct?

2000-10-16 Thread Matthew Dharm
: before = system_ticks_NOW flagvar = 1; chew_on_hardware (); after = system_ticks_NOW printk (..., before, after, irq) interrupt_handler ( ..) { irq = system_ticks_NOW ... } Cheers, -Sudhi. -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16

2000-10-15 Thread Matthew Dharm
ady marked EXPERIMENTAL for 2.2.x -- but I don't have the disk space right now to check, and I wanted to make sure that, as the maintainer, my official opinion on the matter was voiced. -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Dri

Re: On ide-scsi recorder failure

2000-10-15 Thread Matthew Dharm
; root. > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: On ide-scsi recorder failure

2000-10-15 Thread Matthew Dharm
n '/dev/scd0'. Cannot open SCSI > driver. > > > > The fact that it says it's a cd-rom and not a CDR bothers me. Well, i'm up > for suggestions. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [E

Re: On ide-scsi recorder failure

2000-10-15 Thread Matthew Dharm
from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver Why am I talking t

Re: On ide-scsi recorder failure

2000-10-15 Thread Matthew Dharm
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver Da. Am thinkink of carbonated borscht for lonk nights

OOPS REPORT: Will someone _please_ look at this? (was Re: BUG & OOPS REPORT: /proc/scsi/ entries not properly cleaned up)

2000-10-10 Thread Matthew Dharm
this a critical item for 2.4.0, and I hope others do too. Matt On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 06:00:53PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Following up yet some more with myself... is anyone actually looking at > this stuff? I can provide even more information if desired, but I'd really > like to know that at

OOPS REPORT: Will someone _please_ look at this? (was Re: BUG OOPS REPORT: /proc/scsi/ entries not properly cleaned up)

2000-10-10 Thread Matthew Dharm
this a critical item for 2.4.0, and I hope others do too. Matt On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 06:00:53PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: Following up yet some more with myself... is anyone actually looking at this stuff? I can provide even more information if desired, but I'd really like to know that at least one

Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Matthew Dharm
sort (or ignore completely). I'd be concerned with the security implications of this feature... after all, I can edit argv[0] to change the name of my program -- a malicious application could do this to attempt to "hide" from the OOM Killer.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] RE: Updated 2.4 TODO List

2000-10-09 Thread Matthew Dharm
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 04:17:01PM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote: > . OOPS in usb-storage from the error-recovery handler. {CRITICAL} > (Matthew Dharm; [EMAIL PROTECTED]) This is fixed as of test9. Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer,

Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread Matthew Dharm
alize USB had this level of functionality. Hrm... I wonder if anyone out there is making USB Toasters That would be really nice -- have a nice snack waiting for me when I get home, etc. ;) Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mas

Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread Matthew Dharm
SB >$CONFIG_INPUT > dep_tristate ' USB HIDBP Mouse support' CONFIG_USB_MOUSE $CONFIG_USB >$CONFIG_INPUT >fi > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please

Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread Matthew Dharm
se support' CONFIG_USB_MOUSE $CONFIG_USB $CONFIG_INPUT fi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EM

Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread Matthew Dharm
of functionality. Hrm... I wonder if anyone out there is making USB Toasters That would be really nice -- have a nice snack waiting for me when I get home, etc. ;) Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver I need a computer

Re: [linux-usb-devel] RE: Updated 2.4 TODO List

2000-10-09 Thread Matthew Dharm
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 04:17:01PM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote: . OOPS in usb-storage from the error-recovery handler. {CRITICAL} (Matthew Dharm; [EMAIL PROTECTED]) This is fixed as of test9. Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB

Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Matthew Dharm
. after all, I can edit argv[0] to change the name of my program -- a malicious application could do this to attempt to "hide" from the OOM Killer. Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver I want my GPFs!!!

Re: BUG & OOPS REPORT: /proc/scsi/ entries not properly cleaned up

2000-10-02 Thread Matthew Dharm
llected on 2.4.0-test9-pre7 -- but the behavior is the same for 2.4.0-test9-pre9. Matt On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 06:32:38PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Just to follow-up to my own post, I have some more datapoints... > > The bug definatley seems to be in either the SCSI layer or the procf

Re: BUG OOPS REPORT: /proc/scsi/ entries not properly cleaned up

2000-10-02 Thread Matthew Dharm
, this was collected on 2.4.0-test9-pre7 -- but the behavior is the same for 2.4.0-test9-pre9. Matt On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 06:32:38PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: Just to follow-up to my own post, I have some more datapoints... The bug definatley seems to be in either the SCSI layer or the procfs layer

Re: BUG & OOPS REPORT: /proc/scsi/ entries not properly cleaned up

2000-10-01 Thread Matthew Dharm
:23PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > I'm using 2.4.0-test9-pre7 and have a _very_ reproducable OOPS with the > SCSI layer. Everything relevant is compiled as a module (except for the > /proc support). > > The test scenario is this: > (1) Boot the machine > (2) modprobe ide-scsi

BUG & OOPS REPORT: /proc/scsi/ entries not properly cleaned up

2000-09-29 Thread Matthew Dharm
x Code; 0013 Before first symbol 13: 66 00 00 addb %al,(%eax) Matt Dharm -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver NYET! The evil stops here! -- Pitr User Fr

BUG OOPS REPORT: /proc/scsi/ entries not properly cleaned up

2000-09-29 Thread Matthew Dharm
Code; 0013 Before first symbol 13: 66 00 00 addb %al,(%eax) Matt Dharm -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver NYET! The evil stops here! -- Pitr User

Re: Interrupt/Sleep deadlock

2000-09-28 Thread Matthew Dharm
y help. > > Later, > Ivan > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm

Re: Interrupt/Sleep deadlock

2000-09-28 Thread Matthew Dharm
he body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver C: They kicked your ass, didn't they? S: They were cheating!

Re: test9pre6 usb-storage

2000-09-24 Thread Matthew Dharm
st: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Stora

Re: test9pre6 usb-storage

2000-09-24 Thread Matthew Dharm
lease read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver Sir, for the hundreth time, we do NOT carry 600-round boxes of belt-fed suction darts! -- Salespers

Re: [BUG] That bloody /usr/local busy back again

2000-09-16 Thread Matthew Dharm
+ !o K? > w++(--) O M- V-- PS+++ PE- Y PGP>++ t--- 5-- X- R- tv-(!) b+++ DI+++ D+ G > e->++ h!(+) r+(%) y? UF++ > --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to

Re: [BUG] That bloody /usr/local busy back again

2000-09-16 Thread Matthew Dharm
UF++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer,

Re: PATCH: ide-scsi.c to allow claiming of Onstream drives

2000-09-14 Thread Matthew Dharm
't handle is a mistake. It's going to lead to user confusion and other uglyness. If st can't handle the device, it shouldn't try. Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver G: Let me guess, you started on the 'net with AOL, right

Re: PATCH: ide-scsi.c to allow claiming of Onstream drives

2000-09-14 Thread Matthew Dharm
. It's going to lead to user confusion and other uglyness. If st can't handle the device, it shouldn't try. Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver G: Let me guess, you started on the 'net with AOL, right? C: WOW

Re: PATCH: ide-scsi.c to allow claiming of Onstream drives

2000-09-13 Thread Matthew Dharm
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 03:53:13PM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Matthew Dharm wrote: > > > Attached is a patch to ide-scsi.c against 2.4.0-test8. Please consider > > applying it. > > > > This patch removes the logic which causes ide-sc

PATCH: ide-scsi.c to allow claiming of Onstream drives

2000-09-13 Thread Matthew Dharm
interface) which works with the ATAPI drive with ide-scsi patched with this patch. So there really is no reason for ide-scsi to reject this device. A future patch to make st.c reject OnStream drives it is unable to support if coming soon. Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home

PATCH: sd.c -- fix for testing WP bit

2000-09-05 Thread Matthew Dharm
ight break other devices. Linus, please apply. Matt Dharm -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver Way to go, lava boy. -- Stef to Greg User Friendly, 3/26/1998 --- drivers/scs

PATCH: sd.c -- fix for testing WP bit

2000-09-05 Thread Matthew Dharm
ight break other devices. Linus, please apply. Matt Dharm -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver Way to go, lava boy. -- Stef to Greg User Friendly, 3/26/1998 --- drivers/scs

Re: What the Heck? [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown]

2000-09-02 Thread Matthew Dharm
ge chunk of the US ISP market. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Main

Re: What the Heck? [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown]

2000-09-02 Thread Matthew Dharm
uot; in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver It was a new hope. -- Dust Puppy User Friendly, 12

Re: MTBF data for linux

2000-09-01 Thread Matthew Dharm
Whoops! Think-o. I meant I'm running 2.2.5 for over 400 days. Matt On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 01:45:25PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > I agree that the MTBF can be very misleading... > > But put it this way: My server ran 2.2.14 for over 400 days before I > rebooted it. It was do

Re: MTBF data for linux

2000-09-01 Thread Matthew Dharm
blems. > > > Jim Garlick > > > Igmar > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Matthew Dharm

<    1   2