On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:28 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> this warning:
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/SafeSetID.rst:110: WARNING: Title underline too
> short.
Thanks for the heads up. I think someone sent a patch
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:54 AM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:15 PM Micah Morton wrote:
> >
> > Ok so before the rebase ("reparent"), the commits were based on top of
> > some commit that was months old at this point (can't quite remember
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 10:57 AM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 5:01 PM Micah Morton wrote:
> >
> > I just rebased to v5.9 to make sure the 1-line changes that touch
> > kernel/capability.c, kernel/groups.c and kernel/sys.c still applied
> > clean
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 4:06 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> These were rebased since the merge window started, for no apparent reason.
>
> Were they in linux-next?
Yeah, they are changes that were originally targeting the v5.9 merge
window (and thus were in -next during July/August) but I didn't
The following changes since commit bbf5c979011a099af5dc76498918ed7df445635b:
Linux 5.9 (2020-10-11 14:15:50 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://github.com/micah-morton/linux.git tags/safesetid-5.10
for you to fetch changes up to 03ca0ec138927b16fab0dad7b869f42eb2849c94
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:03 AM James Morris wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Micah Morton wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 10:21 PM James Morris wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 14 Jun 2020, Micah Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patc
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:20 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:12 PM Micah Morton wrote:
> >
> > That said I'm a little fuzzy on where to draw the line for which kinds
> > of changes really should be required to have bake time in -next. If
&
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 10:21 PM James Morris wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2020, Micah Morton wrote:
>
> > This patch was sent to the security mailing list and there were no
> > objections.
>
> Standard practice for new or modified LSM hooks is that they are reviewed
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 11:39 AM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 11:04 AM Micah Morton wrote:
> >
> > I amended the author on the lone commit in this pull request. For some
> > reason I was thinking using the "From:" line in the commit body was
ff-by line from the pull request body
and included it in the commit instead of the Reviewed-by line.
Thanks,
Micah
The following changes since commit 3d77e6a8804abcc0504c904bd6e5cdf3a5cf8162:
Linux 5.7 (2020-05-31 16:49:15 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://github.com/mi
The following changes since commit 3d77e6a8804abcc0504c904bd6e5cdf3a5cf8162:
Linux 5.7 (2020-05-31 16:49:15 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://github.com/micah-morton/linux.git tags/LSM-add-setgid-hook-5.8
for you to fetch changes up
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 5:45 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:35 PM James Morris
> wrote:
> >
> > My understanding is that SafeSetID is shipping in ChromeOS -- this was
> > part of the rationale for merging it.
>
> Well, if even the developer didn't test it for two months,
The following changes since commit 609488bc979f99f805f34e9a32c1e3b71179d10b:
Linux 5.3-rc2 (2019-07-28 12:47:02 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://github.com/micah-morton/linux.git tags/safesetid-bugfix-5.4
for you to fetch changes up
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 12:27 PM Konstantin Ryabitsev
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:17:49PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> However, I suspect that getting message-ids for all your pull
> >> requests
> >> would significantly complicate your workflow.
> >
> >Yeah, that would be a
ng changes since commit 609488bc979f99f805f34e9a32c1e3b71179d10b:
Linux 5.3-rc2 (2019-07-28 12:47:02 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://github.com/micah-morton/linux.git
tags/safesetid-maintainers-correction-5.3-rc2
for you to fetch
-0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://github.com/micah-morton/linux.git tags/safesetid-maintainers-5.3-rc2
for you to fetch changes up to 7e20e910eabdf0af90fd10e712f15b413be8e135:
Add entry in MAINTAINERS file for SafeSetID LSM (2019-07-31 13:58:11 -0700
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:06 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 9:05 AM Micah Morton wrote:
> >
> > I'm maintaining the new SafeSetID LSM and was told to set up my own
> > tree for sending pull requests rather than sending my changes through
> >
.
Thanks,
Micah
---
The following changes since commit fec88ab0af9706b2201e5daf377c5031c62d11f7:
Merge tag 'for-linus-hmm' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma (2019-07-14
19:42:11 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://github.com/micah-morton/linux.git tags/safesetid
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:45 AM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:32 PM Tetsuo Handa
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2018/09/06 19:59, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Casey Schaufler
> > > wrote:
> > >> On 9/5/2018 4:08 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > >>> Thanks!
I noticed you don't have the following lines (or some of the other
related security ones) in your .config.
CONFIG_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_WRITABLE_HOOKS=y
Seems like we need a 'depends on SECURITY' line (or something like
that) in security/safesetid/Kconfig -- let me see if that fixes things
the hook from the appropriate places
in the set*gid syscalls.Tested by putting a print statement in the hook and
seeing it triggered from the various set*gid syscalls.
Signed-off-by: Micah Morton
Acked-by: Kees Cook
---
NOTE: the security_task_fix_setgid line in sys_setfsgid is over 80
characters
the hook from the appropriate places
in the set*gid syscalls.Tested by putting a print statement in the hook and
seeing it triggered from the various set*gid syscalls.
Signed-off-by: Micah Morton
Acked-by: Kees Cook
---
NOTE: the security_task_fix_setgid line in sys_setfsgid is over 80
characters
in the hook and
seeing it triggered from the various set*gid syscalls.
Signed-off-by: Micah Morton
Acked-by: Kees Cook
---
NOTE: the security_task_fix_setgid line in sys_setfsgid is over 80
characters, but I figured I'd just follow how it was done in sys_setfsuid
rather than trying to wrap the line
in the hook and
seeing it triggered from the various set*gid syscalls.
Signed-off-by: Micah Morton
Acked-by: Kees Cook
---
NOTE: the security_task_fix_setgid line in sys_setfsgid is over 80
characters, but I figured I'd just follow how it was done in sys_setfsuid
rather than trying to wrap the line
the hook from the appropriate places
in the set*gid syscalls.Tested by putting a print statement in the hook and
seeing it triggered from the various set*gid syscalls.
Signed-off-by: Micah Morton
Acked-by: Kees Cook
---
NOTE: the security_task_fix_setgid line in sys_setfsgid is over 80
characters
the hook from the appropriate places
in the set*gid syscalls.Tested by putting a print statement in the hook and
seeing it triggered from the various set*gid syscalls.
Signed-off-by: Micah Morton
Acked-by: Kees Cook
---
NOTE: the security_task_fix_setgid line in sys_setfsgid is over 80
characters
26 matches
Mail list logo
