ul 2005 01:46:52 +0300
Jar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael B Allen wrote:
> > hostap_pci: 0.3.9 - 2005-06-10 (Jouni Malinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> > ACPI: PCI interrupt :02:02.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11
> > hostap_pci: Registered netdevice
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 17:08:38 +0300 (EEST)
"Jar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > FYI:
> >
> > Please use more suitable driver for 802.11b Prism cards. This kind of
> > driver is
> > hostap_pci (for PCI cards). It can be downloaded from
> > http://hostap.epitest.fi/
> >
> > This driver really
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 17:08:38 +0300 (EEST)
Jar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI:
Please use more suitable driver for 802.11b Prism cards. This kind of
driver is
hostap_pci (for PCI cards). It can be downloaded from
http://hostap.epitest.fi/
This driver really works for Prism2/2.5/3
:52 +0300
Jar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael B Allen wrote:
hostap_pci: 0.3.9 - 2005-06-10 (Jouni Malinen [EMAIL PROTECTED])
ACPI: PCI interrupt :02:02.0[A] - GSI 11 (level, low) - IRQ 11
hostap_pci: Registered netdevice wifi0
wifi0: NIC: id=0x8013 v1.0.0
wifi0: PRI: id=0x15 v1.1.0
My wireless is a little fragile. I have a Thinkpad T30 with a MiniPCI card:
02:02.0 Network controller: Intersil Corporation Prism 2.5 Wavelan chipset (rev
01)
Subsystem: Intel Corp. Wireless 802.11b MiniPCI Adapter
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 11
My wireless is a little fragile. I have a Thinkpad T30 with a MiniPCI card:
02:02.0 Network controller: Intersil Corporation Prism 2.5 Wavelan chipset (rev
01)
Subsystem: Intel Corp. Wireless 802.11b MiniPCI Adapter
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 11
Yup!
nano kernel: parport0: PC-style at 0x378, irq 7 [SPP,PS2,EPP]
nano kernel: parport0: Printer, Hewlett-Packard HP LaserJet 6L
I setup everything as you describe below. I don't remember having to
do all this stuff before(on other machines anyway). I guess I'm used to
RH's fluffed-up stock
The parallel port is not being detected on my ABIT KT7A KT133 w/ Athlon
900 running 2.2.17 w/ Hendricks IDE patches and RH 6.2. I tried most of
the settings in the bios.
BIOS options are:
728/IRQ5
378/IRQ7
3BC/IRQ7
with the possible modes:
Normal
EPP
1.9 or 1.7
ECP
DMA 3 or 1
The parallel port is not being detected on my ABIT KT7A KT133 w/ Athlon
900 running 2.2.17 w/ Hendricks IDE patches and RH 6.2. I tried most of
the settings in the bios.
BIOS options are:
728/IRQ5
378/IRQ7
3BC/IRQ7
with the possible modes:
Normal
EPP
1.9 or 1.7
ECP
DMA 3 or 1
Does this have to do with the thing that kills off processes when memory
is low?
Feb 23 04:39:32 nano kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for xkill
Maybe xkill should be something allowed to run? The app that I ran
freaked(slrnconf) and snarfed up all my memory rapidly. If I could have
Does this have to do with the thing that kills off processes when memory
is low?
Feb 23 04:39:32 nano kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for xkill
Maybe xkill should be something allowed to run? The app that I ran
freaked(slrnconf) and snarfed up all my memory rapidly. If I could have
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 03:48:06PM -0800, Wayne Whitney wrote:
> > append="idebus=66 ide0=ata66"
>
> The idebus=66 part is incorrect. This option refers to the clock of
> the PCI bus the IDE controller is on and should rarely be changed from
> the default of 33MHz (i.e., only if you are
I've enabled the higher performance features for my ATA drive by getting
2.2.17, applying Andre Hendrick's IDE patch, adding:
append="idebus=66 ide0=ata66"
to lilo.conf. I was told that Alan's patches from here:
ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan
should be used. Is this true if I
I've enabled the higher performance features for my ATA drive by getting
2.2.17, applying Andre Hendrick's IDE patch, adding:
append="idebus=66 ide0=ata66"
to lilo.conf. I was told that Alan's patches from here:
ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan
should be used. Is this true if I
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 03:48:06PM -0800, Wayne Whitney wrote:
append="idebus=66 ide0=ata66"
The idebus=66 part is incorrect. This option refers to the clock of
the PCI bus the IDE controller is on and should rarely be changed from
the default of 33MHz (i.e., only if you are overclocking
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:33:36AM -0500, safemode wrote:
> > What's the nature of the VIA chipset problems? I want to get a new system
>
> There are no problems with 2.2.x.
I'm very glad to hear that because the AMD chips are the obvious
choice for a lot of people(all?).
> (classic), get the
Hello,
What's the nature of the VIA chipset problems? I want to get a new system
this weekend but I read on kernel traffic that VIA has problems? I
wan't to use Hendrick's ide patches on 2.2.18. What board should I
get? Help, I've searched through usenet and asked on #linux without
anything
Hello,
What's the nature of the VIA chipset problems? I want to get a new system
this weekend but I read on kernel traffic that VIA has problems? I
wan't to use Hendrick's ide patches on 2.2.18. What board should I
get? Help, I've searched through usenet and asked on #linux without
anything
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:33:36AM -0500, safemode wrote:
What's the nature of the VIA chipset problems? I want to get a new system
There are no problems with 2.2.x.
I'm very glad to hear that because the AMD chips are the obvious
choice for a lot of people(all?).
(classic), get the KA7
19 matches
Mail list logo
