Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches v2

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc1 with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Adrian Bunk6

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

On 25/07/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ Andi, this might be interesting for you make allmodconfig make [...] WARNING: Absolute relocations present Offset Info Type Sym.Value

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

Andrew Morton pisze: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ > nokturn vs. reiserfs 1:0 [ 1228.964379] = [ 1228.971271] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 1228.976674] 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 #1 [

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

Andrew Morton pisze: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ nokturn vs. reiserfs 1:0 [ 1228.964379] = [ 1228.971271] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 1228.976674] 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 #1 [

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

On 25/07/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ Andi, this might be interesting for you make allmodconfig make [...] WARNING: Absolute relocations present Offset Info Type Sym.Value

Re: 2.6.23-rc1 sky2 boot crash in sky2_mac_intr

Hi Florian, On 24/07/07, Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 09:50:08AM +0100, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The problem is related to power management. The PHY has a number of PCI configuration > registers for power control, and the function of these changes based

Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches

On 24/07/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:47:44AM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Unclassified > > Subject : kobject link failure > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/19/495 > Last known good : ? This is caused by a patc

Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches

On 24/07/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:47:44AM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Unclassified Subject : kobject link failure References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/19/495 Last known good : ? This is caused by a patch that happened after 2.6.22

Re: 2.6.23-rc1 sky2 boot crash in sky2_mac_intr

Hi Florian, On 24/07/07, Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 09:50:08AM +0100, Stephen Hemminger wrote: The problem is related to power management. The PHY has a number of PCI configuration registers for power control, and the function of these changes based on

2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc1 with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Andi Kleen 4

[1/2] 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc1. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Andi Kleen 4 Linus Torvalds

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc1. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Andi Kleen 4 Linus Torvalds

[1/2] 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc1. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Andi Kleen 4 Linus Torvalds

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc1. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Andi Kleen 4 Linus Torvalds

2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc1 with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Andi Kleen 4

Re: sound is interrupting with new kernels

Hi, On 22/07/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi to all! I have a problem with recent 2.6.22 kernel with cfs-19 patch. While I'm watching the video using mplayer or listening to the music using audacious the sound is interrupting rather often. During I'm watching the video I

Re: Pata support for IDE Controller 82801G ICH7 in Linux 2.6.22

ERR- FastB2B- > Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium > >TAbort- SERR- Latency: 0 > Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 20 > Region 0: I/O ports at 01f0 [size=8] > Region 1: I/O ports at 03f4 [size=1] > Region 2: I/

Re: Pata support for IDE Controller 82801G ICH7 in Linux 2.6.22

ports at 0170 [size=8] Region 3: I/O ports at 0374 [size=1] Region 4: I/O ports at ffa0 [size=16] Hi again, Michal Piotrowski (thanks Michal :)) took me a private notice that I should send output of lspci -n instead of lspci -vvv, so here it is (part of, I hope that's enough): 00

Re: sound is interrupting with new kernels

Hi, On 22/07/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi to all! I have a problem with recent 2.6.22 kernel with cfs-19 patch. While I'm watching the video using mplayer or listening to the music using audacious the sound is interrupting rather often. During I'm watching the video I

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

Andrew Morton pisze: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:11:16 +0200 "Michal Piotrowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Yet another one: >> http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22/4.jpg >> it looks very wei

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

On 21/07/07, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 21 July 2007 18:00:52 Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi Andi, > > On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Satyam

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

On 21/07/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 21/07/07, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 21 July 2007 18:00:52 Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Hi Andi, > > > > On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

On 21/07/07, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 21 July 2007 18:00:52 Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi Andi, > > On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Satyam

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

Hi Andi, On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Satyam Sharma pisze: > > [...] > > Gargh! My system obviously cannot boot without libata. Guess it's > > time to go through git log and s

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Satyam Sharma pisze: > > [...] > > Gargh! My system obviously cannot boot without libata. Guess it's > > time to go through git log and see how to f

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, this worked: > His .config has CONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY=y > which replaces unlikely() / likely() with do_check_likely() and forces > gcc to clobber %eax with the condition itself, which in our case was > (ret < 0) == TRUE, and thus, the "1"

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

Satyam Sharma pisze: > On 7/21/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hopefully this bug should be 100% reproducible at boot time anyway. >> Don't care much for XFS and unionfs, but hoping deselecting ATA from >> the config doesn't change the variables much in this equation. ] > > >

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

Satyam Sharma pisze: On 7/21/07, Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hopefully this bug should be 100% reproducible at boot time anyway. Don't care much for XFS and unionfs, but hoping deselecting ATA from the config doesn't change the variables much in this equation. ] Gargh! My

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, this worked: His .config has CONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY=y which replaces unlikely() / likely() with do_check_likely() and forces gcc to clobber %eax with the condition itself, which in our case was (ret 0) == TRUE, and thus, the 1 value we

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Satyam Sharma pisze: [...] Gargh! My system obviously cannot boot without libata. Guess it's time to go through git log and see how to fix that build breakage myself ... Michal

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

Hi Andi, On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Satyam Sharma pisze: [...] Gargh! My system obviously cannot boot without libata. Guess it's time to go through git log and see how to fix that build breakage myself

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

On 21/07/07, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 21 July 2007 18:00:52 Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi Andi, On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Satyam Sharma pisze: [...] Gargh! My system obviously

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

On 21/07/07, Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 21/07/07, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 21 July 2007 18:00:52 Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi Andi, On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

On 21/07/07, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 21 July 2007 18:00:52 Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi Andi, On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Satyam Sharma pisze: [...] Gargh! My system obviously

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

Andrew Morton pisze: On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:11:16 +0200 Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yet another one: http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22/4.jpg it looks very weird ;) Why Linux 2/6/22-git14 #14 SMP... banner is displayed

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

0 Jul 2007 15:50:47 -0700 > > > Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 06:32:21PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > > > > This looks like a sysfs bug

Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86

On 21/07/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >We are pleased to announce a project we've been working on for some > >time: the unified x86 architecture tree, or "arch/x86" - and we'd > >like t

Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86

Hi, On 21/07/07, Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We are pleased to announce a project we've been working on for some time: the unified x86 architecture tree, or "arch/x86" - and we'd like to solicit feedback about it. What is this about? [..] As usual, comments and suggestions are

[broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

Hi Greg, This looks like a sysfs bug http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22/3.jpg l *kernel_param_sysfs_setup+0x75 0xc13c0894 is in kernel_param_sysfs_setup (kernel/params.c:570). 565 mk->mod = THIS_MODULE; 566

[broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] unionfs build error

Hi, I get this error on the latest -mm snapshot ERROR: "security_inode_permission" [fs/unionfs/unionfs.ko] undefined! ERROR: "security_file_ioctl" [fs/unionfs/unionfs.ko] undefined! make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 make: *** [modules] Error 2 CONFIG_UNION_FS=m CONFIG_UNION_FS_XATTR=y Regards,

[broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] fs/revoked_inode.c warnings

Hi Nick, Your patch fs-introduce-write_begin-write_end-and-perform_write-aops-revoke.patch introduces new warnings fs/revoked_inode.c:381: warning: 'revoked_write_begin' defined but not used fs/revoked_inode.c:388: warning: 'revoked_write_end' defined but not used Regards, Michal -- LOG

[broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] XFS build error

Hi David, I get this build error on the latest -mm snapshot fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c:483: error: unknown field 'populate' specified in initializer fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c:483: error: 'filemap_populate' undeclared here (not in a function) fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c:483: warning: excess

Re: [PATCH broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c remove unused label

Michal Piotrowski pisze: > Hi, > > Mismerge fallout > > fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c: In function 'ecryptfs_get_lower_page': > fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c:585: warning: label 'retry' defined but not used > Sorry, wrong patch format, no Signed-off-by Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.sta

[PATCH broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c remove unused label

Hi, Mismerge fallout fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c: In function 'ecryptfs_get_lower_page': fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c:585: warning: label 'retry' defined but not used Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ --- fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c2 2007-07-20 16:39:13.0 +0200 +++ fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c

[PATCH broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c remove unused label

Hi, Mismerge fallout fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c: In function 'ecryptfs_get_lower_page': fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c:585: warning: label 'retry' defined but not used Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ --- fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c2 2007-07-20 16:39:13.0 +0200 +++ fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c

Re: [PATCH broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c remove unused label

Michal Piotrowski pisze: Hi, Mismerge fallout fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c: In function 'ecryptfs_get_lower_page': fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c:585: warning: label 'retry' defined but not used Sorry, wrong patch format, no Signed-off-by Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ Signed

[broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] XFS build error

Hi David, I get this build error on the latest -mm snapshot fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c:483: error: unknown field 'populate' specified in initializer fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c:483: error: 'filemap_populate' undeclared here (not in a function) fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c:483: warning: excess

[broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] fs/revoked_inode.c warnings

Hi Nick, Your patch fs-introduce-write_begin-write_end-and-perform_write-aops-revoke.patch introduces new warnings fs/revoked_inode.c:381: warning: 'revoked_write_begin' defined but not used fs/revoked_inode.c:388: warning: 'revoked_write_end' defined but not used Regards, Michal -- LOG

[broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

Hi Greg, This looks like a sysfs bug http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22/3.jpg l *kernel_param_sysfs_setup+0x75 0xc13c0894 is in kernel_param_sysfs_setup (kernel/params.c:570). 565 mk-mod = THIS_MODULE; 566

[broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] unionfs build error

Hi, I get this error on the latest -mm snapshot ERROR: security_inode_permission [fs/unionfs/unionfs.ko] undefined! ERROR: security_file_ioctl [fs/unionfs/unionfs.ko] undefined! make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 make: *** [modules] Error 2 CONFIG_UNION_FS=m CONFIG_UNION_FS_XATTR=y Regards,

Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86

Hi, On 21/07/07, Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are pleased to announce a project we've been working on for some time: the unified x86 architecture tree, or arch/x86 - and we'd like to solicit feedback about it. What is this about? [..] As usual, comments and suggestions are

Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86

On 21/07/07, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are pleased to announce a project we've been working on for some time: the unified x86 architecture tree, or arch/x86 - and we'd like to solicit feedback about it. What is this about

Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 06:32:21PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi Greg, This looks like a sysfs bug http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/ broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22/3.jpg l *kernel_param_sysfs_setup+0x75

Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-git: known regressions

On 19/07/07, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 19 July 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > IDE > > Subject : compile error if CONFIG_BLOCK not enabled related to linux/ide.h include > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/18/11

Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-git: known regressions

On 19/07/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Subject : ext4 build warnings > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/18/420 > Last known good : ? > Submitter : Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Caused-By : ? > Handled-By : Mingming Cao <[EMAIL

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-git: known regressions

On 19/07/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Unclassified > > Subject : a52b1752c07 broke !SMP: error: implicit declaration of function `WARN_ON' > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/17/600 > Last known good : ?

Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-git: known regressions

On 19/07/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:34:55PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > SYSFS > > Subject : sysfs root link count broken in 2.6.22-git5 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/15/62 > Last known good : ? >

Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-git: known regressions

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-git. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Adrian Bunk3 Andi Kleen

2.6.22-git: known regressions with patches

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-git with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Adrian Bunk3

[1/2] 2.6.22-git: known regressions

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-git. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Adrian Bunk3 Andi Kleen

[1/2] 2.6.22-git: known regressions

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-git. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Adrian Bunk3 Andi Kleen

Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-git: known regressions

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-git. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Adrian Bunk3 Andi Kleen

2.6.22-git: known regressions with patches

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-git with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Adrian Bunk3

Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-git: known regressions

On 19/07/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:34:55PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: SYSFS Subject : sysfs root link count broken in 2.6.22-git5 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/15/62 Last known good : ? Submitter : Jean Delvare [EMAIL

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-git: known regressions

On 19/07/07, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michal Piotrowski wrote: Unclassified Subject : a52b1752c07 broke !SMP: error: implicit declaration of function `WARN_ON' References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/17/600 Last known good : ? Submitter : Uwe Kleine-König

Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-git: known regressions

On 19/07/07, Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subject : ext4 build warnings References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/18/420 Last known good : ? Submitter : Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : ? Handled-By : Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status

Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-git: known regressions

On 19/07/07, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 19 July 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: IDE Subject : compile error if CONFIG_BLOCK not enabled related to linux/ide.h include References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/18/11 Last known good

Re: [PATCH 0/2] SELinux Netlabel updates

Linus Torvalds pisze: > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, James Morris wrote: >> These are updated Netlabel/SELinux changes from Paul, reworked so that >> they don't break userspace. Michal says they work for him. Please apply >> for 2.6.23. > > They don't work AT ALL for me: > >

Re: regression: disk error loop (panic?) ide_do_rw_disk-bad:

Hi, On 17/07/07, Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, last git changes to git give me the following error (repead very quickly): sector 14657019, nr/cmr 0/0 bio f7b59280, biotail f7b59280, buffer 000, date 000, len 36 ide_do_rw_disk-bad command: dev hda: type 2, flags

Re: regression: disk error loop (panic?) ide_do_rw_disk-bad:

Hi, On 17/07/07, Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, last git changes to git give me the following error (repead very quickly): sector 14657019, nr/cmr 0/0 bio f7b59280, biotail f7b59280, buffer 000, date 000, len 36 ide_do_rw_disk-bad command: dev hda: type 2, flags

Re: [PATCH 0/2] SELinux Netlabel updates

Linus Torvalds pisze: On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, James Morris wrote: These are updated Netlabel/SELinux changes from Paul, reworked so that they don't break userspace. Michal says they work for him. Please apply for 2.6.23. They don't work AT ALL for me:

Re: Linux Kernel Development

Hi Paolo, On 16/07/07, Paolo Ciarrocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I'm the author of the document "Introduction to Linux Kernel Development Process" hosted at http://linux.tar.bz/articles/2.6-development_process. Part of the document has been included in Documentation/HOWTO I was

The art of breaking userspace (was Re: [GIT] SELinux changes for 2.6.23 (updated))

Paul Moore pisze: [..] > On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >> My system is too secure, I can not login :) >> >> Do you have CONFIG_NETLABEL=y ? >> >> If so, please try disabling it. > > Disabling NetLabel should solve the problem.

Re: Re-2: Oops in kernel 2.6.22 rc3

ld it make sense to try out the finalized (or current, respectively) version of the current kernel? It always make sense. Bye Stefan ==Originalnachricht====== Von: "Michal Piotrowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Datum: 2007-07-08 13:27:04 An: "WebLab Help" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: Re-2: Oops in kernel 2.6.22 rc3

to try out the finalized (or current, respectively) version of the current kernel? It always make sense. Bye Stefan ==Originalnachricht== Von: Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Datum: 2007-07-08 13:27:04 An: WebLab Help [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Oops in kernel 2.6.22 rc3 Hi, On 08

The art of breaking userspace (was Re: [GIT] SELinux changes for 2.6.23 (updated))

Paul Moore pisze: [..] On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: My system is too secure, I can not login :) Do you have CONFIG_NETLABEL=y ? If so, please try disabling it. Disabling NetLabel should solve the problem. Disabling NetLabel solves the problem. The recommended solution

Re: [GIT] SELinux changes for 2.6.23 (updated)

Hi, On 12/07/07, James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is an updated set of 2.6.23 SELinux changes, rebased & tested against current git. The vmsplice patch has been dropped from this and will be resubmitted via Jens. Also added an ack from Chris Wright for the mmap null dereference

2.6.22-git2 WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2416 check_flags()

Hi, Is this a known issue? [ 3006.777586] WARNING: at /home/devel/linux-git/kernel/lockdep.c:2416 check_flags() [ 3006.785256] [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 [ 3006.790508] [] show_trace+0x12/0x14 [ 3006.795125] [] dump_stack+0x16/0x18 [ 3006.799636] [] check_flags+0xb6/0x1a3 [

2.6.22-git2 WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2416 check_flags()

Hi, Is this a known issue? [ 3006.777586] WARNING: at /home/devel/linux-git/kernel/lockdep.c:2416 check_flags() [ 3006.785256] [c0405125] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 [ 3006.790508] [c0405df6] show_trace+0x12/0x14 [ 3006.795125] [c0405e82] dump_stack+0x16/0x18 [ 3006.799636] [c044306c]

Re: [GIT] SELinux changes for 2.6.23 (updated)

Hi, On 12/07/07, James Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an updated set of 2.6.23 SELinux changes, rebased tested against current git. The vmsplice patch has been dropped from this and will be resubmitted via Jens. Also added an ack from Chris Wright for the mmap null dereference hooks

Re: Linux 2.6.22 released

Hi all, I'm looking for a volunteer who is willing to maintain the list of known regressions in 2.6.22 http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions_2622 Anyone interested? Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: Linux 2.6.22 released

Hi all, I'm looking for a volunteer who is willing to maintain the list of known regressions in 2.6.22 http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions_2622 Anyone interested? Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: panics with 16port Promise Supertrack EX Controller

Hi Flavio, On 09/07/07, Flavio Curti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello I have a problem with a server running 2.6.22rc4. Jul 8 00:19:13 dorade.cyberlink.ch EFLAGS: 00210046 (2.6.22-rc7-dorade #1) Is this a regression? The machine panics after some days of running fine, the machine inst

Re: [2.6.22-rc7] khubd NULL deref oops...

Hi Daniel, On 08/07/07, Daniel J Blueman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When plugging in a USB 2 mass-storage device which I've been seeing problems with, I caught a khubd oops [1]. Kernel is 2.6.22-rc7 Is this a regression? on ia32 built with Ubuntu's 2.6.22 .config. Please send this config.

Re: KVM-AMD OOPS

Hi, Sasa Ostrouska pisze: > Hi people, > > I have kernel 2.6.21.5 and when trying to insert the kvm-amd module I > get this oops: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# modprobe kvm-amd > int3: [1] PREEMPT SMP > CPU 1 > Modules linked in: kvm_amd snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss > snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq

Re: Oops in kernel 2.6.22 rc3

Hi, On 08/07/07, WebLab Help <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I hope you can help me with the following problem. One of my systems got some bigger problems, it stops and/or reboots every few days. Today I was able to make a screenshot of the kernel oops, it's attached to this email. Because

Re: Oops in kernel 2.6.22 rc3

Hi, On 08/07/07, WebLab Help [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I hope you can help me with the following problem. One of my systems got some bigger problems, it stops and/or reboots every few days. Today I was able to make a screenshot of the kernel oops, it's attached to this email. Because I

Re: KVM-AMD OOPS

Hi, Sasa Ostrouska pisze: Hi people, I have kernel 2.6.21.5 and when trying to insert the kvm-amd module I get this oops: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# modprobe kvm-amd int3: [1] PREEMPT SMP CPU 1 Modules linked in: kvm_amd snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq

Re: [2.6.22-rc7] khubd NULL deref oops...

Hi Daniel, On 08/07/07, Daniel J Blueman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When plugging in a USB 2 mass-storage device which I've been seeing problems with, I caught a khubd oops [1]. Kernel is 2.6.22-rc7 Is this a regression? on ia32 built with Ubuntu's 2.6.22 .config. Please send this config.

Re: panics with 16port Promise Supertrack EX Controller

Hi Flavio, On 09/07/07, Flavio Curti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello I have a problem with a server running 2.6.22rc4. Jul 8 00:19:13 dorade.cyberlink.ch EFLAGS: 00210046 (2.6.22-rc7-dorade #1) Is this a regression? The machine panics after some days of running fine, the machine inst

Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches v2

On 07/07/07, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 18:06 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > FBDEV > > Subject : SLUB kmalloc-32768: Poison check [EMAIL PROTECTED] > slab 0xc04de400 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/4/

2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches v2

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc7 with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Hugh Dickins 2

2.6.22-rc7: known regressions v2

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc7. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Hugh Dickins 2 Andi Kleen

Re: 2.6.22-rc6 bad page error

Hi Bob, On 05/07/07, Bob Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This happened on an Alpha computer (433au) running 2.6.22-rc6. Can you reproduce this bug on 2.6.22-rc7-git6? The error was triggered when I started up a NX KDE session, which I've done successfully on all occasions prior to this

Re: 2.6.22-rc6 bad page error

Hi Bob, On 05/07/07, Bob Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This happened on an Alpha computer (433au) running 2.6.22-rc6. Can you reproduce this bug on 2.6.22-rc7-git6? The error was triggered when I started up a NX KDE session, which I've done successfully on all occasions prior to this one.

2.6.22-rc7: known regressions v2

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc7. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Hugh Dickins 2 Andi Kleen

2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches v2

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc7 with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Hugh Dickins 2

Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches v2

On 07/07/07, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 18:06 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: FBDEV Subject : SLUB kmalloc-32768: Poison check [EMAIL PROTECTED] slab 0xc04de400 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/4/305 Last known good : ? Submitter

Re: New systems: eu.kernel.org

Hi Peter, On 04/07/07, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, Thanks to HP, ISC and Umeå Universitet, kernel.org now has official servers in Europe. Specifically, we have www1.eu.kernel.org hosted at ISC Amsterdam, and www2.eu.kernel.org at UMU (Umeå, Sweden.) They are

2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches

Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc7 with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Hugh Dickins 2

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >