On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 01:28:25AM -0600, Dax Kelson wrote:
>
> FreeSWAN has IPSec for IPv4 on Linux.
>
> USAGI is better/more conformant IPv6 (with IPSec for IPv6 in development)
> for Linux.
>
> The USAGI goal is to get themselves folded into the official kernel (and
> glibc) at some point
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:57:17AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Generally it indicates a CPU problem but I've see it caused by overclocking
> and poorly fitted heatsinks
I've been able to trigger a Machine check error on PPC when trying to boot
directly from OF with a COFF kernel. The system has
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:57:17AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Generally it indicates a CPU problem but I've see it caused by overclocking
and poorly fitted heatsinks
I've been able to trigger a Machine check error on PPC when trying to boot
directly from OF with a COFF kernel. The system has
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 11:17:29PM -0500, David Fries wrote:
> There is a lot of comfort looking at /var/log/mail.log and seeing mail
> accepted by the computer servicing the other person's account. Now
> all I have is, accepted by university, hope it gets there...
>
While I operate my own mail
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 11:17:29PM -0500, David Fries wrote:
There is a lot of comfort looking at /var/log/mail.log and seeing mail
accepted by the computer servicing the other person's account. Now
all I have is, accepted by university, hope it gets there...
While I operate my own mail
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 12:30:58PM -0800, Bryan Rittmeyer wrote:
> > Hello linux-kernel,
> >
> > Is there any way to conduct TCP sessions (IE have a userland process
> > connect out, or accept connections) using non-local IPs? By "non-local"
> > I just mean IPs that
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 12:30:58PM -0800, Bryan Rittmeyer wrote:
Hello linux-kernel,
Is there any way to conduct TCP sessions (IE have a userland process
connect out, or accept connections) using non-local IPs? By "non-local"
I just mean IPs that aren't
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
>
> Attempts to run linux-2.4.3-pre2 on chaos.analogic.com results
...
> I -- S T R O N G L Y -- suggest that nobody use this kernel with
> a BusLogic SCSI controller until this problem is fixed.
>
> This is being sent from another machine, not on the list
Shane Wegner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Whenever I write a substantial amount of data (200mb) to
> disk, I get these messages. The disks lock for about 10
> seconds and then come back for about 10 seconds again.
> This continues until the data is successfully written.
>
> ide_dmaproc: chipset
Shane Wegner wrote:
Hi,
Whenever I write a substantial amount of data (200mb) to
disk, I get these messages. The disks lock for about 10
seconds and then come back for about 10 seconds again.
This continues until the data is successfully written.
ide_dmaproc: chipset supported
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
Attempts to run linux-2.4.3-pre2 on chaos.analogic.com results
...
I -- S T R O N G L Y -- suggest that nobody use this kernel with
a BusLogic SCSI controller until this problem is fixed.
This is being sent from another machine, not on the list (actually
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
> > I have two dsl links, each with one ip, and a single gateway is assigned the ip
> > for each.
> >
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote:
I have two dsl links, each with one ip, and a single gateway is assigned the ip
for each.
____
| ADSL | | SDSL |
|__| |__|
\ /
\/
___||
| gateway
Gabi Davar wrote:
>
> Hello I have two questions regarding Linux 2.0.x
>
> 1. Did anybody tried running Linux 2.0.x on the Intel i840 chipset based
> boards?
>
> 2. Does anybody knows of a 2.0.x driver for Intel's 82543GC Gigabit Ethernet
> MAC (aka e1000) ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Best
Catalin BOIE wrote:
> i got in syslog the message: "ide0: Speed warnings UDMA 3/4/5 is not
> functional"!
>
> What is the problem?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
Wasn't dma disabled on all VIA ide chipsets because of sporadic corruption?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Catalin BOIE wrote:
i got in syslog the message: "ide0: Speed warnings UDMA 3/4/5 is not
functional"!
What is the problem?
Thanks in advance!
Wasn't dma disabled on all VIA ide chipsets because of sporadic corruption?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Gabi Davar wrote:
Hello I have two questions regarding Linux 2.0.x
1. Did anybody tried running Linux 2.0.x on the Intel i840 chipset based
boards?
2. Does anybody knows of a 2.0.x driver for Intel's 82543GC Gigabit Ethernet
MAC (aka e1000) ?
Thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Does this help for ppc?
The help talks about BIOS which I know is only on x86.
Does this code include anything that helps a non x86 comp?
Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Does this help for ppc?
The help talks about BIOS which I know is only on x86.
Does this code include anything that helps a non x86 comp?
Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
19 matches
Mail list logo
