Theodore Tso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:37:57AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
BTW, You may be better off using "uuidgen -t" to generate the UUID in
the smolt RPM, since that will use 12 bits of randomness from
/dev/random, plus the MAC, address and timestamp. So even if there is
zero
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:37:57AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
BTW, You may be better off using uuidgen -t to generate the UUID in
the smolt RPM, since that will use 12 bits of randomness from
/dev/random, plus the MAC, address and timestamp. So even if there is
zero
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 04:23:12PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 03:18:27PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Matt Mackall wrote:
which would have been in v2.6.22-rc4 through the normal CVE process.
The only
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 04:23:12PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 03:18:27PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Matt Mackall wrote:
which would have been in v2.6.22-rc4 through the normal CVE process.
The only
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 03:18:27PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Matt Mackall wrote:
which would have been in v2.6.22-rc4 through the normal CVE process.
The only other bits in there are wall time and utsname, so systems
with no CMOS clock would behave repeatably. Can
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 02:48:12PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
Here's the top 5:
266 28caf2c3-9766-4fe1-9e4c-d6b0ba8a0132
336 810e7126-1c69-4aff-b8b1-9db0fa8aa15a
402 c8dbb9d3-a9bd-4ba6-b92e-4a294ba5a95f
884 06e84493-e024-44b1-9b32
of duplicates for certain values:
>From Mike McGrath (added to Cc)
Here's the top 5:
266 28caf2c3-9766-4fe1-9e4c-d6b0ba8a0132
336 810e7126-1c69-4aff-b8b1-9db0fa8aa15a
402 c8dbb9d3-a9bd-4ba6-b92e-4a294ba5a95f
884 06e84493-e024-44b1-9b32-32d78af04039
931 e2b67e1d-e325-4740-b
Alan Cox wrote:
Here's the top 5:
266 28caf2c3-9766-4fe1-9e4c-d6b0ba8a0132
336 810e7126-1c69-4aff-b8b1-9db0fa8aa15a
402 c8dbb9d3-a9bd-4ba6-b92e-4a294ba5a95f
884 06e84493-e024-44b1-9b32-32d78af04039
931 e2b67e1d-e325-4740-b938-795addb45280
The left number is times this month
Alan Cox wrote:
Here's the top 5:
266 28caf2c3-9766-4fe1-9e4c-d6b0ba8a0132
336 810e7126-1c69-4aff-b8b1-9db0fa8aa15a
402 c8dbb9d3-a9bd-4ba6-b92e-4a294ba5a95f
884 06e84493-e024-44b1-9b32-32d78af04039
931 e2b67e1d-e325-4740-b938-795addb45280
The left number is times this month
of duplicates for certain values:
From Mike McGrath (added to Cc)
Here's the top 5:
266 28caf2c3-9766-4fe1-9e4c-d6b0ba8a0132
336 810e7126-1c69-4aff-b8b1-9db0fa8aa15a
402 c8dbb9d3-a9bd-4ba6-b92e-4a294ba5a95f
884 06e84493-e024-44b1-9b32-32d78af04039
931 e2b67e1d-e325-4740-b938
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 02:48:12PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
Here's the top 5:
266 28caf2c3-9766-4fe1-9e4c-d6b0ba8a0132
336 810e7126-1c69-4aff-b8b1-9db0fa8aa15a
402 c8dbb9d3-a9bd-4ba6-b92e-4a294ba5a95f
884 06e84493-e024-44b1-9b32
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 03:18:27PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Matt Mackall wrote:
which would have been in v2.6.22-rc4 through the normal CVE process.
The only other bits in there are wall time and utsname, so systems
with no CMOS clock would behave repeatably. Can
12 matches
Mail list logo
