On 3 February 2018 at 05:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 10:35:19PM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:58:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.1 release.
>> > There
On 3 February 2018 at 05:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 10:35:19PM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:58:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.1 release.
>> > There are 55 patches in this
On 31 December 2017 at 10:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>>
>> I re-tested ldt_gdt_64 again locally and in testing LAB. The test
>> failed again so I think this is a regression. I did the bisection
>> which resulted in
>>
>> 2c8e9099aecec2baaac8d34c7b823493f2d0eeed is
On 31 December 2017 at 10:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>>
>> I re-tested ldt_gdt_64 again locally and in testing LAB. The test
>> failed again so I think this is a regression. I did the bisection
>> which resulted in
>>
>> 2c8e9099aecec2baaac8d34c7b823493f2d0eeed is the first bad commit
>>
On 29 December 2017 at 10:35, Milosz Wasilewski
<milosz.wasilew...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 29 December 2017 at 09:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:29:04AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>> On 27 December
On 29 December 2017 at 10:35, Milosz Wasilewski
wrote:
> On 29 December 2017 at 09:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:29:04AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>> On 27 December 2017 at 22:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>> wrote:
>>> &
On 29 December 2017 at 09:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:29:04AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On 27 December 2017 at 22:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for
On 29 December 2017 at 09:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:29:04AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On 27 December 2017 at 22:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.10 release.
>> > There are 74 patches in this
On 8 December 2017 at 13:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:05:58AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On 7 December 2017 at 18:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the
On 8 December 2017 at 13:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:05:58AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On 7 December 2017 at 18:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.68 release.
>> > There are 109 patches in this
On 15 November 2017 at 08:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:31:18PM -0600, Tom Gall wrote:
>>
>>
>> > On Nov 13, 2017, at 6:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > This is the start of the stable review
On 15 November 2017 at 08:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:31:18PM -0600, Tom Gall wrote:
>>
>>
>> > On Nov 13, 2017, at 6:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.98 release.
>> > There are 56 patches in
On 11 October 2017 at 23:14, Tom Gall wrote:
>>> * libhugetlbfs - 76 pass - 1 skip
>>> * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - 1 pass
>>> * ltp-commands-tests - 27 pass - 13 skip - 5 known failures (ksh not in
>>> test img)
>>> * ltp-containers-tests - 63 pass - 18 fail (these are being
On 11 October 2017 at 23:14, Tom Gall wrote:
>>> * libhugetlbfs - 76 pass - 1 skip
>>> * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - 1 pass
>>> * ltp-commands-tests - 27 pass - 13 skip - 5 known failures (ksh not in
>>> test img)
>>> * ltp-containers-tests - 63 pass - 18 fail (these are being looked at looks
>>>
14 matches
Mail list logo